09.01.2013 Views

A System of Heraldry - Clan Strachan Society

A System of Heraldry - Clan Strachan Society

A System of Heraldry - Clan Strachan Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

228 OF NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL FIGURES.<br />

As for the odd numbers, one is counted the best, being situate in the centre <strong>of</strong><br />

the shield, and frequently to be seen in ancient paintings and engravings. Next<br />

to it is the number three, called <strong>of</strong> old ternio, or trias ; most frequently in arms,<br />

disposed 2 and i, towards the angles <strong>of</strong> the shield. And these figures, being all <strong>of</strong><br />

one kind, (which the ancients call identity) are said to represent but one thing<br />

multiplied to 2 and i , for beauty's sake ; as, for instance, the ancient Earls <strong>of</strong><br />

LEICESTER carried gules, a cinquefoil ermine ; and afterwards the family carried<br />

gules, three cinquefoils ermine ; as did the old Earls <strong>of</strong> ANGUS, gules, a cinquefoil<br />

or ; and the GORDONS <strong>of</strong> old, a boar's head couped or ; as did many other old families<br />

with us, whose old arms I have seen, which had but one figure, afterwards<br />

multiplied to 3, 2 and i.<br />

There is none <strong>of</strong> all the odd number that decreaseth, in every rank one, to the<br />

point <strong>of</strong> the shield, except the number three, and number fifteen : For an example<br />

<strong>of</strong> the last, I shall mention the arms <strong>of</strong> the duchy <strong>of</strong> CORNWALL in England, azure,<br />

fifteen besants or, 5, 4, 3, 2 and i.<br />

The odd numbers <strong>of</strong> things, by their situation in a shield, are capable <strong>of</strong> more<br />

armorial forms than the even numbers which Edward Bolton ; observes, in his<br />

Elements <strong>of</strong> Armories, and lays down this for a rule, that no even number <strong>of</strong><br />

things, <strong>of</strong> one kind, possessing the field only, and alone, and keeping all <strong>of</strong> them<br />

one state or way, with requisite distance, can be capable <strong>of</strong> such diversity <strong>of</strong> forms<br />

in their situation as the odd. For example, five figures can be placed in cross,<br />

and in saltier, as the five escutcheons in the arms <strong>of</strong> the Kingdom <strong>of</strong> PORTUGAL in<br />

cross, and the five stars <strong>of</strong> eight points gules, in saltier, in a field or ; for which see<br />

Plate X. fig. 1 6. It may be objected, that four figures may be placed formally in<br />

cross, as the four filbert-nuts, Plate VI. fig. 25. And there the four flower-deluces<br />

in cross, fig. 26. To which it is answered, these figures do not keep the<br />

same state and way mentioned in the above rule, not being situate one way, nor<br />

after their natural position ; which, if they were, the centre or middle <strong>of</strong> the shield<br />

will be empty, and so a deformity would appear.<br />

Figures placed in bend, bar, and pale, are always <strong>of</strong> an odd number, for four<br />

figures so disposed are hardly to be met with ; but frequently three, or five, which<br />

are armorial numbers. Plate IV. fig. 23. Argent, five fusils in fesse sable. And<br />

there, azure, three stars in fesse argent.<br />

Whether these armorial figures be odd or even, there is these three things to be<br />

observed, as the causes <strong>of</strong> armorial beauties, which are, distance, fulness, and iden-<br />

tity, which I shall show by the following examples.<br />

The number three is beautiful, being disposed 2 and i, with equal distance, but<br />

without that there will appear a deformity and want ; thus, if two stars were<br />

placed in chief, and the third in the centre <strong>of</strong> the shield, for want <strong>of</strong> spreading<br />

distance, the arms would be placed deformed, except the third appear below, towards<br />

the base.<br />

As to fulness, when there are three stars in chief, as in the arms <strong>of</strong> DALMAHOY<br />

<strong>of</strong> that Ilk, Plate IV. fig. 34. (though these arms be warrantable and good) the<br />

three stars having requisite distance in regard <strong>of</strong> themselves, yet the arms fail <strong>of</strong><br />

for the-<br />

complete beauty, being destitute <strong>of</strong> fulness in respect <strong>of</strong> the whole shield ;<br />

designed end <strong>of</strong> arms is manifestation, and the more extended and dilated the figures<br />

are in the shield, the more manifest they must be, that every angular portion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the shield may answer the eye with an object : So that if one <strong>of</strong> the stars were<br />

placed towards the base, in equal distance with the other two, the coat would be<br />

then more beautiful ; and, being azure, three stars argent, would belong to the<br />

name <strong>of</strong> MURRAY :<br />

So that beauty here cedes to necessity, by placing the stars in<br />

chief, to distinguish Dalmahoy from Murray, the last having them dispossed 2<br />

and i ; in which bearing are three causes <strong>of</strong> armorial beauties, distance, fulness,,<br />

and identity.<br />

Identity is when the figures are <strong>of</strong> one kind : If <strong>of</strong> different kinds, there appears<br />

a discord or deformity, let the figures be never so noble : Amongst<br />

many examples<br />

to be met with in this system, I shall only mention the arms <strong>of</strong> WAUCHOPE<br />

<strong>of</strong> Niddry, Plate IV. fig. 35. azure, a garb or, and in chief two mullets argent :<br />

Though the arms be good and warrantable, yet beauty faileth, because the figure:are<br />

not all <strong>of</strong> one sort.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!