09.01.2013 Views

DNV's Container (slot) Cost Calculator

DNV's Container (slot) Cost Calculator

DNV's Container (slot) Cost Calculator

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Minimale Brennstoffkosten bei<br />

<strong>Container</strong>schiffen<br />

Ein entscheidender Wettbewerbsvorteil<br />

Jost Bergmann<br />

Segment director container ships<br />

THB-Stammtisch, 21. November 2011


Übersicht<br />

� Mega-Trends in der <strong>Container</strong>schiffahrt<br />

� Gegenüberstellung Konstruktionsanforderungen<br />

� Hauptmerkmale moderner <strong>Container</strong>schiffe<br />

� Ökonomische Betrachtungen für Neubauten<br />

� Herausforderungen für bestehende Schiffe<br />

2011<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

2


Mega trends<br />

� Changed market<br />

2011<br />

- Unstable world economy<br />

- Structural oversupply, tough competition<br />

- <strong>Cost</strong> pressure<br />

- High fuel oil costs<br />

� Increasing environmental attention<br />

- Public awareness<br />

- Shipper’s requirements<br />

- New environmental rules and legislations<br />

- MARPOL Annex VI. Tier II & III<br />

- Extended ECA areas<br />

- EEDI, EEOI, ESI<br />

- Cold ironing<br />

- Market Based Measures/ Carbon tax?<br />

� Changing infra structure<br />

- Panama Canal<br />

- New terminal technology e.g. gantries, IT systems<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

3


Changed design requirements<br />

� Existing designs<br />

2011<br />

- High design speed, design draft<br />

- “off design” conditions neglected<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

4


Changed design requirements<br />

� Existing design<br />

2011<br />

- High design speed, design draft<br />

- “off design” conditions neglected<br />

- Lean<br />

- Hydrodynamics<br />

- Old Panama Canal<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

5


Changed design requirements<br />

� Existing design<br />

2011<br />

- High design speed, design draft<br />

- “off design” conditions neglected<br />

- Lean<br />

- Hydrodynamics<br />

- Old Panama Canal<br />

- Tend to have too little stability<br />

- Lot of ballast water<br />

- High powered engines<br />

- One fuel (HFO)<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

6


Key features of modern designs<br />

� Existing design<br />

2011<br />

- High design speed, design draft<br />

- “off design” conditions neglected<br />

- Lean<br />

- Hydrodynamics<br />

- Old Panama Canal<br />

- Tend to have too little stability<br />

- Lot of ballast water<br />

- High powered engines<br />

- One fuel (HFO)<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

7<br />

� Future design<br />

- Reduced top speed, variable draft<br />

- Optimized for operational profile<br />

- Shorter/ wider & bigger<br />

- Hydrodynamics<br />

- New Panama Canal dimensions<br />

- Economy of scale<br />

- Tend to have too much stability<br />

- BW mainly for trim control<br />

- Flexible & efficient engines<br />

- Multiple fuel, new fuels (LNG) or<br />

exhaust gas treatment


Slot cost as function of size/ speed/ utilization/ HFO cost...<br />

DNV’s <strong>Container</strong> (<strong>slot</strong>) <strong>Cost</strong> <strong>Calculator</strong><br />

2011<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

HFO 600 USD/ t, 21 kn/ 100% utilization<br />

Size class 10.000 14.000 18.000<br />

Slot cost, $ 371 327 312<br />

Slot cost savings, % - 12 16<br />

HFO 600 USD/ t, 21 kn/ Abt. 1.000.000 TEU p.a.<br />

Size class 10.000 14.000 18.000<br />

Utilization 100% 75% 50%<br />

Slot costs, $ 371 445 592<br />

Slot cost savings, % - -20 -60<br />

HFO price increase from 600 USD/t to 800 USD/t<br />

21 kn/ 100 % utilization<br />

Size class 10.000 14.000 18.000<br />

Slot cost, $ @ 600 $/t 371 327 312<br />

Slot cost, $ @ 800 $/t 434 382 362<br />

Slot cost increase, % 16,98 16,82 16,03<br />

8


Example: Fuel efficiency of different designs<br />

2011<br />

Fuel <strong>Cost</strong>s [US$/TEU/d]<br />

CASE: 18 kn, 650 Fuel <strong>Cost</strong>s USD/ US$/TEU/day t HFO-<br />

20kn Vessel Speed, 9t/TEU, 650US$/tHFO<br />

•13,5 Difference between worst and best design = 1,75 USD/ TEU/ d<br />

• Assuming 10 ships string, 12.000 TEU WB, 10.000 TEU EB<br />

MITSUBISHI Yard 1 w/o MALS<br />

13,0<br />

DSME Yard 2<br />

• 1,75 USD/ TEU/ d * 11.000 TEU = 19.250 USD / ship/ d at sea<br />

12,5<br />

Imabari Yard 3<br />

• Assuming 50 days at sea on 70 day R/V = 19.250 * 50 = $962.500 per R/V<br />

12,0<br />

SHI Yard 4<br />

• Assuming weekly service = 52 R/V p.a. = 962.500 * 52 HYUNDAI = Yard $50.000.000 5<br />

p.a.<br />

11,5<br />

HHIC Yard 6<br />

11,0<br />

STX Yard 7<br />

10,5<br />

10,0<br />

9,5<br />

9,0<br />

8,5<br />

8,0<br />

7,5<br />

7,0<br />

6,5<br />

6500 7000 7500 8000 8500 9000 9500 10000 10500 11000 11500 12000 12500 13000 13500<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

Number of 9t TEU


Example: 10.000 TEU, Seaspan, YZJ<br />

2011<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

10


2011<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

The Advanced Bangkok Max-Size<br />

<strong>Container</strong> Feeder – MARLIN 2000 (Blue)<br />

MAIN DIMENSIONS<br />

Length OA 172.2 m<br />

Length PP abt. 162.1 m<br />

Breadth moulded 27.5 m<br />

Depth to main deck 13.7 m<br />

Draught, design 9.0 m<br />

Draught, scantling 9.5 m<br />

Deadweight (T= 9.5 m) 21,760 t<br />

Gross tonnage 17,500<br />

11<br />

SPEED & ENDURANCE<br />

Design Speed (NCR, T= 9.0 m) 18 kts<br />

Max. Speed (MCR, T= 9.5 m) abt.20 kts<br />

HFO capacity, approx. abt. 2,300 m³<br />

Endurance (HFO) abt. 17,000 nm<br />

CLASS NOTATION<br />

DNV +1A1 <strong>Container</strong> Carrier,<br />

NAUTICUS (Newbuilding) E0, DG-P,<br />

BIS, TMON, NAUT-AW, BWM(T),<br />

CLEAN, COMF-V(2)


Competitiveness of existing ships<br />

� Existing cellular fleet (all sizes / all positions) (Alphaliner 11/2011)<br />

2011<br />

- 4,935 ships<br />

- 15.297.118 TEU<br />

� New designs may be quite a lot more efficient compared with existing designs<br />

� Charterers will focus more on fuel efficiency when chartering in ships in the future<br />

� DNV and HSVA are working on a “Fuel Efficiency Guideline”,<br />

to be published by end NOV 2011<br />

� Categories of fuel saving measures<br />

- Reducing the hull resistance<br />

- Improving the propulsion efficiency<br />

- Improving the power plant efficiency<br />

- Improving the operational efficiency<br />

� Some aspects are discussed by Dr. Hollenbach<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

12


2011<br />

Safeguarding life, property<br />

and the environment<br />

www.dnv.com<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!