09.01.2013 Views

il ' ii - Northern Research Station - USDA Forest Service

il ' ii - Northern Research Station - USDA Forest Service

il ' ii - Northern Research Station - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

. RESULTS The heuristic search using equal weighting of the 300bp<br />

data set returned 2 most parsimonious trees (369 steps;<br />

Sequence• divergence based on pairwise comparisons of C.I. (excl. uninf.) = 0.461; fig. 1). All species of<br />

the 19 Cynipini taxa (table 2) was less than 12 percent, _ Cynipini formed a monophyletic group; however, this<br />

valueS typical of within-genus comparisons in other was usually not the case when multiple species from a<br />

insects (e.g., Brown et al. 1994b). [Analysis of the 10 genus were present (e.g., with Callirhytis, Andricus and *<br />

taxa for which 660bp was ava<strong>il</strong>able was showed only a Neuroterus).<br />

Slightly higher maximum divergence (table 2).] As<br />

expected, highest divergence was found at 3rd positions DISCUSSION<br />

in codons, where substitutions are often synonymous.<br />

A+T base composition was 76 percent (table 3), a level The results of this preliminary analysis indicate that<br />

typical for mitochondrial genes in insects (e.g., Liu and wh<strong>il</strong>e the cytochrome oxidase I gene exhibits appropriate<br />

Beckenbach 1992, Brown et al. 1994b, Spicer 1995); levels of variation for use in phylogenetic inference, two<br />

base composition was particularly'A+T-biased at third aspects of sequence evolution in these genes, A+T bias<br />

positions (95 percent; table 3), as has been found for and strong constraint at the amino acid level, raise<br />

, _protein-coding mitochondrial genes in other Hy- concerns over inference methods. As 3rd codon position<br />

menoptera [e.g., Apis mellifera (Crozier and Crozier substitutions are often synonymous, they are typically the<br />

1993)]. This strong A+T bias has interesting effects on first to differentiate after lineages split. However, with<br />

frequency of substitutions at these lower levels of effectively only.2 character states at 3rd positions (A and<br />

divergence. We reconstructed the classes of substitutions T), instead of 4,reversals are likely with increasing<br />

over one of the most parsimonious trees (see below), divergence time. Thus differences at 3rd positions are<br />

excluding the relatively distant outgroups, using unlikely to be informative with highly divergent taxa.<br />

MacClade 3.05 (Maddison and Maddison 1995). Con- By weighting 3rd codon positions changes less than<br />

trary to the common discovery of a transition bias at low changes at other positions, one can favor conservative<br />

levels of sequence divergence (e.g., Brown et al. 1994b, changes without discarding information from the less<br />

• Liu and Beckenbach 1992), extreme A+T bias at third conservative 3rd positions. However, it is possible that<br />

positions resulted in A_--_Ttransversions being equal in selection at the amino acid level may constrain evolution<br />

number to all transitions combined (70 each), at 1st and 2nd positions such that differences accumulate<br />

Table 2._Percent sequence divergence among 19 cynipini taxa. Values inparentheses are<br />

. for 660 bp data set (with only 10 taxa).<br />

• .<br />

Sequence All 1st 2nd 3rd<br />

divergence positions position position position<br />

Minimum 1.9 (7.4) 0 (1.9) 0 (0.5) 5.9 (13.8)<br />

Maximum 11.3 (13.1) 5.2 (8.3) 5.1 (7.1) 32.0 (31.2)<br />

• Ip<br />

Table 3._Percent base composition in the 300 bp region of COI in Cynipidae<br />

" Base Codon position<br />

All 1st 2nd 3rd<br />

C 10.0 6.3 21.4 2.3<br />

G 14.5 23.3 17.1 2.9<br />

A 34.9 42.0 17.9 45.0<br />

T 40.6 28.5 43.6 49.8<br />

• A+T 75.5 70.5 61.5 94.8<br />

I<br />

243

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!