Untitled

4.3 Data entry
Participants were required to enter data into the IPP using information available. On
the final day of the workshop, the facilitator examined the webpages put up by the
participants and generally commented on their content.
5. WORKSHOP DISCUSSION
5.1 Availability of Technical Assistance
The facilitator explained that although there was commitment from the FAO to
provide technical assistance, there was no fixed program as yet. Ideally, the package would
probably be sponsorship of workshops an annual basis, preferably involving the same
participants so that evaluation of progress and accountability be easily monitored. However,
this is not practical due to the lack of funds at this stage.
Should countries require national or sub-regional assistance, they should apply to
FAO or the IPPC Secretariat if not a FAO member but an IPPC contracting party, for such
assistance through the normal FAO channels.
5.2 Member Countries Not Meeting Their National Obligations
There is no penalty for member countries for not meeting their obligations under the
IPPC, but the facilitator explained that not making this information available to trading
partners would probably have a negative impact on trade. By providing this information, it
would be interpreted as a declaration of transparency, which would be highly favoured by
trading partners. Information put on the website will be useful to facilitate trade. For
example, where there is failure to report a pest occurrence, the repercussions from other
countries (trading partners) may be serious if discovered later.
5.3 National surveillance system
Some countries suggested that FAO provide technical assistance to develop their
national surveillance system to allow the provision of the appropriate information through
the IPP, thus allowing countries to meet their obligations.
5.4 Discussion on Country Reports
Summary of the Country Reports in Appendix 3.
India clarified that only official information will be put into the IPP, and there was no
intention to put in any other information.
Singapore requested for clarification on the requirement for the reporting of endemic
pests. The facilitator explained that there was an obligation to report any pest that is a threat
to trading partners, and there was no limit to the amount of pest reporting. In addition a
country may also report pest status, for example, the progress report on an eradication
program. Before posting on the web, the information is approved by the IPPC contact point.
8