Untitled

Rating
4.1.3 Did you find the handouts useful? 4.0
4.1.4 Suggestions, additional comments in relation to agenda topics:
i. A glossary of the terminology used would be helpful, eg. Calendar, news, contact.
ii. Presentation of “Role of NPPO” and “Introduction to IPP” was excellent
iii. Insufficient time to read and understand the handouts, because of long journey
and jetlag
iv. Printouts of slides from power point were not clear. Suggest remove slide
background for printing purposes.
v. Agenda topics should be expanded
4.2 Practical Sessions
Rating
4.2.1 Was the duration of the practical sessions sufficient? 3.8
4.2.2
Suggest a suitable practical sessions duration:
__________ hours/days/weeks
4.2.3 Was the equipment provided sufficient? 4.5
4.2.4 Was the venue of the workshop suitable? 4.2
4.2.5 Were the facilities provided satisfactory? 4.1
After this workshop, how confident do you feel in your capacity to
4.2.6
manage the NPPO information in the IPP?
General comments on the practical sessions:
3-6
days
i. Practical sessions were good, but insufficient time was allocated.
ii. Setup of the lab was excellent
iii. Data entry period for IPP was not specified
iv. The practical manual should have examples for each step
v. A CD-ROM should be provided on using the IPP
vi. The different levels of comprehension of the participants caused some difficulty
to the instructor when trying to create a uniform pace in the workshop. Instructor
should take into consideration the different competency levels of web portal
handling ability of the participants when executing the practical sessions.
vii. Data entry errors could not be edited
viii. A facilitator should be made available to assist the participants on the use of
computers
4.2
73