Untitled

More documents

Recommendations

Info

6. FURTHER GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS (FROM GROUP DISCUSSION): 6.1 Function of the IPP Test Site Some participants suggested that a CD-ROM be made available for practice of the IPP. The facilitator explained that without the database/server, this exercise would not be practical. The test site (http://193.43.36.96) would be available for practice over the next 3 weeks (until the end of May 2005) for the benefit of the participants. The facilitator encouraged the entry of data into the production site (https://www.ippc.int) when the participants feel confident enough after sufficient practice on the test site. At the end of May, all data on the test site will be deleted, but data on the production site will be retained. Any other data put into the test site would not be transferred to the actual site after 1 week. In addition, participants found the test site practical useful, and requested a guide in the handouts. 6.2 Workshop Practical Some participants found the pace of the workshop too fast, and suggested a longer period for the practical sessions. 6.3 Editorial Guidelines Some participants requested clarification on the type of documents suitable for the IPP. The facilitator should suggest topics or editorial guidelines. The facilitator clarified that these would be provided for future exercises. 6.4 Workforce for Data Entry The facilitator does not recommend more than 2 editors for the purpose of data entry, although some countries have as many as 5 editors. 6.5 Editor Authority Over Webpages The facilitator explained that editors will not be given the option to delete articles already put up, to avoid the possibility of manipulation of information. All deletions have to be done through the IPP Webmaster (ipp@ippc.int). 6.6 Difficulty to Upload Large Files The facilitator explained that presently, the limit to a single file size was set to 5 Mb. Editors would need to resize their files to meet this requirement. 7. CONCLUSION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Generally, the workshop was carried out in accordance to the scheduled program, and the overall objectives were met. Participants generally benefitted from the training, and were ready to contribute to the IPP upon return to the home countries. The workshop also noted the above strengths, weaknesses and recommendations put forward by the participants. These will be discussed with the authorties at the Headquarters where decisions will be made for future improvement. 10
The facilitator thanked participants for their enthusiasm and persistence, and also thanked the hosts for the excellent hospitality and resources made available for the running of the workshop. The workshop report was adopted after receiving consensus of all the participants at 4.00 pm May 6, 2005. 11
Page 2 and 3: WORKSHOP REPORT Information Exchang
Page 4 and 5: 2. OPENING SESSION 2.1 Opening Rema
Page 6 and 7: global trade. With this workshop he
Page 8 and 9: 4.3 Data entry Participants were re
Page 12 and 13: Appendix 1: List of FAO staff, proj
Page 14 and 15: LAOS Mr. Khanxay Somchanda Entomolo
Page 16 and 17: Secretariat Ms. Azizah Md. Jan Assi
Page 18 and 19: Appendix 2 - Workshop Program Infor
Page 20 and 21: Appendix 3 - Workshop Presentations
Page 22 and 23: • Information exchange • Now in
Page 24: 3.4 Country Presentations 3.4.1 Cou
Page 28: 3.4.2 Country IPP Report: Japan Int
Page 31: CURRENTLY INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT
Page 34 and 35: • The country’s net sown area i
Page 36: Oilseeds Crop • To supply the edi
Page 39 and 40: 3.4.5 Country IPP Report: Nepal 1.
Page 41 and 42: • Plant Protection Bill, 2005 •
Page 43 and 44: Agri-Food & Veterinary Authority of
Page 45 and 46: 3.4.7 Country IPP Report: Sri Lanka
Page 47 and 48: •Inspection Procedures (For diffe
Page 49 and 50: 3.4.8 Country IPP Report: Thailand
Page 51 and 52: Department of Agriculture (DOA) htt
Page 53 and 54: Activities of Plant Quarantine •
Page 55 and 56: conducting Integrated Pest Surveill
Page 57 and 58: The IPP In Lao P.D.R For IPP activi
Page 59 and 60: - Have a contact point for informat
Page 61 and 62:
Department of Agronomy and Agricult
Page 63 and 64:
Figure 3: Cambodia current LAN stat
Page 65 and 66:
Figure 5. Pest Status Record Tool O
Page 67 and 68:
3.5 IPPC Contact Points and the Exc
Page 69 and 70:
3.6 The Role and Relationship of Sc
Page 71 and 72:
3.7 SPS Notification System WTO sys
Page 73 and 74:
Rating 4.1.3 Did you find the hando
Page 75 and 76:
4.4 Internal arrangements Please co
Page 77:
case (unless there is some special
show all

Untitled

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?