Untitled

6. FURTHER GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS (FROM GROUP DISCUSSION):
6.1 Function of the IPP Test Site
Some participants suggested that a CD-ROM be made available for practice of the
IPP. The facilitator explained that without the database/server, this exercise would not be
practical. The test site (http://193.43.36.96) would be available for practice over the next 3
weeks (until the end of May 2005) for the benefit of the participants. The facilitator
encouraged the entry of data into the production site (https://www.ippc.int) when the
participants feel confident enough after sufficient practice on the test site. At the end of
May, all data on the test site will be deleted, but data on the production site will be retained.
Any other data put into the test site would not be transferred to the actual site after 1 week.
In addition, participants found the test site practical useful, and requested a guide in the
handouts.
6.2 Workshop Practical
Some participants found the pace of the workshop too fast, and suggested a longer
period for the practical sessions.
6.3 Editorial Guidelines
Some participants requested clarification on the type of documents suitable for the
IPP. The facilitator should suggest topics or editorial guidelines. The facilitator clarified
that these would be provided for future exercises.
6.4 Workforce for Data Entry
The facilitator does not recommend more than 2 editors for the purpose of data entry,
although some countries have as many as 5 editors.
6.5 Editor Authority Over Webpages
The facilitator explained that editors will not be given the option to delete articles
already put up, to avoid the possibility of manipulation of information. All deletions have to
be done through the IPP Webmaster (ipp@ippc.int).
6.6 Difficulty to Upload Large Files
The facilitator explained that presently, the limit to a single file size was set to 5 Mb.
Editors would need to resize their files to meet this requirement.
7. CONCLUSION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Generally, the workshop was carried out in accordance to the scheduled program, and the
overall objectives were met. Participants generally benefitted from the training, and were
ready to contribute to the IPP upon return to the home countries.
The workshop also noted the above strengths, weaknesses and recommendations put
forward by the participants. These will be discussed with the authorties at the Headquarters
where decisions will be made for future improvement.
10