09.01.2013 Views

Proceedings World Bioenergy 2010

Proceedings World Bioenergy 2010

Proceedings World Bioenergy 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

distributors in Pakistan, and the reputation of Biofuel<br />

businesses to increase food prices, it was not attempted.<br />

Another problem was the continuous power shortages<br />

in the city of Lahore, where the plant was to be based. At<br />

the time of planning, 12-14 hours of power outages were<br />

common, while the system being employed needed to be<br />

in continuous operation, as it did not start well.<br />

Employing a generator using ethanol itself, was not found<br />

to be feasible either.<br />

This brings us to the issue of financial feasibility.<br />

Although cost savings were identified when used with<br />

petrol (an E-10 to E-20 mixture was envisioned), the<br />

margin was not large, and slight changes in petrol, power<br />

or feedstock prices could have offset any price advantage<br />

of the fuel. If a generator was to be used, it was<br />

impossible to sell the product on a ‘price’ basis, due to<br />

higher costs. Ethanol based fuels were never going to<br />

sell the fact that they were ‘eco friendly’ and ‘renewable’<br />

in a price conscious market like Pakistan in any case.<br />

Overall the system was too expensive (fixed and running<br />

costs) for it to be a viable business, unless subsidies were<br />

available, but there were none.<br />

4.2.1.2 Macro level hindrances<br />

Government support had been promised since<br />

General Musharraf was in power, however even though a<br />

policy was drafted, it was never implemented. Therefore<br />

government delay in taking action can be noted as a<br />

major hindrance to the promotion and adoption of<br />

Biomass.<br />

A major, and perhaps the biggest hindrance to the<br />

development of Bio-ethanol is the market price of crops.<br />

Sugarcane and Maize, are still the best contenders for<br />

making Biofuels as they are grown on a massive scale<br />

that can be used as feedstock. However even slight<br />

shortages in supply can cause the prices to rise<br />

exuberantly. This is due to the illegal cartels who control<br />

food distribution and supply and regularly exploit<br />

rumours of slight shortages. This could have a<br />

devastating impact on inflation and the quality of life for<br />

the common man.<br />

A major hindrance is also the issue of creating a<br />

network. No business can expand on ethanol based fuels<br />

by themselves and therefore a distribution agreements<br />

with powerful ‘Oil Marketing Companies’ (OMC) is<br />

necessary. Approaching a massive OMC is not an easy<br />

task and creating a market through direct marketing will<br />

be a slow process that can never reach the masses. This<br />

issue was was to be resolved in the government draft,<br />

which was planned years ago but is still at the<br />

preliminary stage of its implementation [6; 24]. However<br />

the energy crisis itself also feeds into the problem of<br />

large scale manufacturing (which includes producing<br />

ethanol), which has been declining since a couple of<br />

years, due to ever increasing costs of production [7].<br />

A major hindrance, to the adoption of Biogas and Bioethanol<br />

that was identified was the unwillingness or the<br />

half hearted support of the government to such efforts in<br />

terms of passing legislation, enforcing laws and<br />

providing subsidies [5]. Another problem is the fact that<br />

the political system is highly corrupt and non transparent,<br />

which means usually funds are not acounted for. Another<br />

issue is that usually, official policies change successive<br />

governments [33] and unless there is deep involvement of<br />

foreigners and the private for and nonprofit sectors, such<br />

policies are unlikely to sustain over a longer period.<br />

5 Recommendations<br />

It is apparent that there are no quick solutions to the<br />

problem of energy in Pakistan, however many<br />

possibilities exist to create a successful future.<br />

For the mass promotion and acceptance of biomass, it<br />

is imperative that the private and public sector work<br />

together. Neither the public, nor the private sector alone<br />

has the will and the resources to create a sustainable<br />

biomass industry on their own. This includes federal and<br />

local governments and agencies, businesses and industry<br />

associations, universities, supra national agencies such as<br />

Asian Development or <strong>World</strong> Bank as well as not for<br />

profit organizations.<br />

Universities could train personnel, undertake<br />

research, disseminate information and overall develop the<br />

necessary human resource, banks can help fund projects,<br />

and of course entrepreneurs could organize all these<br />

resources and networks to make it happen. The public<br />

sector on the other hand would need to promote the<br />

industry by controlling market prices and overall supply<br />

of feedstock, especially food items and manure. It would<br />

also play a major role by disseminating information<br />

among rural areas where the private sector does not have<br />

sufficient networks, and also provide help in providing<br />

funds and subsidies to these projects. Other stake holders<br />

and international agencies such as USAID and the <strong>World</strong><br />

Bank can also be involved for providing funding and<br />

expertise. However the major role will still be of the<br />

government which would have to bring all stake holders<br />

together. Red tape would have to be reduced, the transfer<br />

of funds would have to be made transparent and fair, and<br />

ensure that there is total commitment resolving the issue<br />

of energy shortage, for the long term.<br />

5.1 Possible Biogas Public-private partnership for<br />

households<br />

A possible business model for a private-public<br />

partnership could be based on Community Biogas plants,<br />

which at one point was to be attempted on a large scale<br />

by the government [20]. The federal government could<br />

help acquire and direct funds from local governments to<br />

subsidize community plants, which will help involve the<br />

whole community rather than a household and therefore<br />

reduce resistance to change and lower costs. Knowledge<br />

and expertise would be brought in by the private sector,<br />

which will also monitor progress, conduct R&D and<br />

improve the design. The private sector will also be<br />

responsible for establishing a constant supply of raw<br />

material by providing sufficient quantities of manure<br />

when not available. They can also provide after sales<br />

service for which they can charge a minimal price and<br />

also help install standardized kitchen utensils. An area<br />

could be identified by the government, which can then<br />

work on it together with private vendors, or, it can be the<br />

other way around as well. The government can identify<br />

what vendors to work with based on experience, expertise<br />

and finance. This approach is similar to the partnership<br />

between the private plastics firm ‘Sintex’ and the Indian<br />

government, which have been working together for the<br />

development of rural biogas [15].<br />

The biggest role would be played by the government<br />

however, which will have to pass laws that would make<br />

Biogas compulsory and eventually ban the use of<br />

traditional manure incineration. This will require strict<br />

policing of the new local laws. It is possible that the<br />

government’s Gas distribution company, the Sui<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!