09.01.2013 Views

Proceedings World Bioenergy 2010

Proceedings World Bioenergy 2010

Proceedings World Bioenergy 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 8: Waterway transportation by barge<br />

2.5 Supply costs of alternative supply chain options<br />

First supply cost without transport was calculated for<br />

each biomass fraction. Each collection point had<br />

alternative transportation options, either direct truck<br />

transportation to the end user or transportation via<br />

terminals to the end user (Fig. 9). Direct transport<br />

involved roadside chipping and truck transport of forest<br />

chips. Stump biomass was chipped not at the roadside but<br />

at terminals only, or it was transported as uncomminuted<br />

loads to the end user. Terminal options included also<br />

loose biomass truck transportation to terminals and<br />

further forest chip transportation to the end user by either<br />

railway or waterway, according to the terminal type.<br />

Figure 9: Alternative supply chain option for forest<br />

chips: waterway route (A), railway route (B), and road<br />

transport route (C) by truck<br />

Logging residues were the cheapest source of raw<br />

material, ahead of stumps and small-diameter energy<br />

wood. Small-diameter energy wood harvesting and<br />

chipping received a production subsidy. Without that,<br />

they would not be a competitive source (Fig. 10).<br />

38 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Figure: 10: Supply costs without transportation<br />

Secondly, the transportation cost was calculated for<br />

each collection site, for the end user and alternative<br />

terminals. The cheapest option was selected, either direct<br />

transport or transport via terminal. The increase in truck<br />

transportation costs was much greater than the increase<br />

for railway or waterway transport (Fig. 11). The larger<br />

individual loads – by railway 20 trucks and by water 30–<br />

40 trucks – flatten out the growth in transport costs with<br />

these options. The cost functions were based on earlier<br />

studies, with updated cost parameters applied [5, 13, 14].<br />

Figure 11: Transportation cost with alternative long<br />

distance transport options (label rank the same as the line<br />

rank in the figure)<br />

2.6 Estimation of vehicle and chipper capacity needs<br />

An important part of the supply logistics planning is<br />

estimation of how many vehicles and other machines are<br />

needed to feed enough biomass to the biorefinery in view<br />

of the supply logistics structure selected. Capacity<br />

calculation was based on the annual output of alternative<br />

vehicles and machines (Table I). Values were gathered<br />

from earlier studies [5, 6, 13, 14] and modified.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!