09.01.2013 Views

Proceedings World Bioenergy 2010

Proceedings World Bioenergy 2010

Proceedings World Bioenergy 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PROCUREMENT COSTS OF SLASH AND STUMPS IN SWEDEN<br />

– A COMPARISON BETWEEN SOUTH AND NORTH SWEDEN.<br />

Athanassiadis, Dimitris., Lundström, Anders & Nordfjell Tomas<br />

Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences<br />

S-90183 Umeå, Sweden<br />

Dimitris.Athanassiadis@srh.slu.se, Tomas.Nordfjell@srh.slu.se, Anders.Lundstrom@srh.slu.se<br />

ABSTRACT: Marginal cost curves were used to appreciate the amount of slash and stumps that could be harvested at<br />

certain costs in Sweden as a whole as well as in two regions (Upper Norrland and South Sweden). The expected region<br />

specific variations were quantified and region specific estimates on harvestable potentials of stumps and slash were made.<br />

The results in this work were based on data collected in the Swedish Forest Inventory (SFI) from 2002 to 2006<br />

Keywords: forestry residues, harvesting, resource potential<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

The demand for use of wood as raw material for heat<br />

and power generation has increased considerably at a<br />

global level. Sweden is a leading country in the use of<br />

bioenergy. According to the Swedish Energy Authority,<br />

20% of the total energy use, comes from biofuels (incl.<br />

peat) [1]. By-products from sawmills and the pulp and<br />

paper industry account for the greatest part and are used<br />

for the production of heat and power for the companies’<br />

own needs or for the provision to consumers. The<br />

introduction in 2003 of a green electricity certificate<br />

system aimed in supporting electricity production using<br />

renewable energy sources (solar energy, wind power,<br />

hydropower and bioenergy) and peat. The main objective<br />

was to increase the amount of electricity coming from<br />

renewable resources by 17 TWh by year 2016 (base level<br />

is year 2002 when 6.5 TWh of electricity from renewable<br />

resources were produced).<br />

The Swedish national forest inventory (NFI) indicates<br />

a productive economic forest cover (designated for the<br />

production of timber and non-timber forest products) of<br />

23 million ha, 56% percent of the total land area of<br />

Sweden. The total growing stock is about 3.2 billions of<br />

forest m 3 [2]. Within the near future the demand on forest<br />

woody materials is believed to get higher than the annual<br />

growth.<br />

In 2006, logging residues were extracted from 36%<br />

of the 229 000 ha of regeneration fellings in Sweden.<br />

Logging residues are today the largest assortment of<br />

forest biomass available for energy production.<br />

Depending on the level of ecological, technical and<br />

economical restrictions the potential amount of branches,<br />

tops and foliage resulting from regeneration fellings is<br />

from 3.2 to 7.4 (no restrictions) million oven dry tons<br />

(ODT) annually (for the time period <strong>2010</strong>-2019) while<br />

the potential from stumps with attached root system is 4.2<br />

to 11.7 (no restrictions) million ODT annually and for the<br />

same time period [3]. The corresponding annual figures<br />

in thinning for branches, tops and foliage and stumps<br />

with attached root system is 1,7 to 3,9 (no restrictions)<br />

and 1,7 to 5,7 (no restrictions) million ODT annually<br />

respectively. Furthermore, 0.5 million ODT, orginating<br />

from pre commercial thinning, can be added to the above<br />

mentioned potentials.<br />

Harvest and transport costs of logging residues are<br />

site specific and differ due to site characteristics (i.e. size<br />

of operational units, ecological restrictions, tree size and<br />

species, varying terrain conditions, varying forwarding<br />

distances, harvest type, transport distance to the receiving<br />

plant), regional and local differences (i.e. operation<br />

overhead costs, acquisition of harvesting rights, customer<br />

demand) and harvesting system used (i.e. type of<br />

machinery, cost and produz

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!