09.01.2013 Views

Proceedings World Bioenergy 2010

Proceedings World Bioenergy 2010

Proceedings World Bioenergy 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MaIN spONsOR:<br />

WORLD<br />

BIOENERGY<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

pROCEEDINGs<br />

Edited by:<br />

The Swedish <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association


© Swedish <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association and Authors <strong>2010</strong><br />

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including<br />

photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the<br />

copyright holder and the publisher.<br />

ISBN 978-91-977624-1-0<br />

Cover photo: Ugur Evirgen, iStockphoto


ORGaNIsED BY:<br />

The swedish <strong>Bioenergy</strong> association, svebio<br />

Torsgatan 12, SE-111 23 Stockholm, Sweden<br />

Tel +46 8 441 70 80, Fax +46 8 441 70 89<br />

E-mail worldbioenergy@svebio.se<br />

www.svebio.se<br />

Coordinator: Gustav Melin, Svebio, Sweden<br />

Elmia aB<br />

Box 6066, SE-550 06 Jönköping, Sweden<br />

Tel +46 36 15 20 00, Fax +46 36 16 46 92<br />

E-mail worldbioenergy@elmia.se<br />

www.elmia.se<br />

Coordinator: Jakob Hirsmark, Elmia, Sweden<br />

pROCEEDINGs puBLIshED BY:<br />

The swedish <strong>Bioenergy</strong> association, svebio<br />

Torsgatan 12, SE-111 23 Stockholm, Sweden<br />

Tel +46 8 441 70 80, Fax +46 8 441 70 89<br />

E-mail worldbioenergy@svebio.se<br />

www.svebio.se<br />

paTRON Of WORLD BIOENERGY:<br />

His Majesty King Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden<br />

CONfERENCE ChaIRpERsON:<br />

Prof. Tomas Kåberger, Director General of the Swedish Energy Agency<br />

Patron of<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

His Majesty King Carl XVI<br />

Gustaf of Sweden<br />

Chair person of<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Tomas Kåberger, Director<br />

General, Swedish Energy<br />

Agency<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Photo: Eva-Marie Rundquist<br />

Photo: Johan Wingborg<br />

3


WORLD BIOENERGY <strong>2010</strong><br />

Dear Colleague,<br />

Renewable energy is growing rapidly worldwide. Fossil fuels are creating not only climate<br />

change damages but also local disasters when oil is spread, for example in the Mexican Gulf.<br />

The purpose of the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Conference and Exhibition is to inform, show and discuss<br />

how bioenergy solutions in a profitable way can replace fossil fuels and dangerous nuclear.<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> is the international forum that facilitates the transfer of bioenergy technology,<br />

know-how and experience with the unique concept of combining excellent presentations with<br />

a large exhibition and numerous study visits showing bioenergy in practice. The conference is<br />

unique as it aims to connect scientific advances with practical implementations of bioenergy<br />

innovations and successful market advances. This proceedings gives you an in depth look at<br />

some of the scientific advances that were presented at the conference.<br />

These proceedings are the collection of papers from speeches and posters presented at the<br />

conference. If you do not find the speech you look for in this paper you can find it on the <strong>World</strong><br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> website www.worldbioenergy.com. This paper is based on a voluntary supply from<br />

speakers, poster exhibition and tendered abstracts. We wish you interesting reading and welcome<br />

back to Jönköping in 29-31 May 2012.<br />

Gustav Melin,<br />

President Svebio,<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Conference Manager<br />

Project managers Gustav Melin, Svebio and Jakob Hirsmark, Elmia.<br />

4 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Photo: Anders Haaker


a<br />

B<br />

C<br />

CONTENTs<br />

OpENING sEssION 7<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> outrivals oil in Sweden,<br />

showing that growth in a green economy is possible 8<br />

Gustav Melin<br />

COMBINED hEaT aND pOWER (Chp),<br />

COMBusTION, hEaTING aND CO-fIRING 11<br />

Slagging and fouling risk of Mediterranean biomasses for<br />

combustion 12<br />

Daniel J. Vega-Nieva, Raquel Dopazo, Luis Ortiz<br />

Improved flexibility and economy by using small fluidised<br />

bed boilers in district heating 17<br />

Alpo Sund, Matti Lilja<br />

fOREsT REsIDuEs – sLash, sTuMps,<br />

sMaLL TREE haRVEsT 20<br />

Procurement costs of slash and stumps in Sweden –<br />

a comparison between south and north Sweden 21<br />

Athanassiadis, Dimitris., Lundström, Anders, Nordfjell Tomas<br />

Harvesting for energy or pulpwood in early thinnings? 25<br />

Dan Bergström, Fulvio Di Fulvio<br />

CO 2 -EQ emissions of forest chip production in Finland 2020 29<br />

Arto Kariniemi, Kalle Kärha<br />

Large-scale forest biomass supply with long-distance<br />

transport methods 34<br />

Ranta, T., Korpinen, O.-J., Jäppinen, E., Karttunen, K.<br />

Biomass functions for young Scots pine-dominated forest 43<br />

K. Ahnlund Ulvcrona, U. Nilsson, T. Lundmark<br />

Estimating potentials of solid wood-based fuels in Finland 2020 47<br />

Kalle Kärhä, Juha Elo, Perttu Lahtinen, Tapio Räsänen, Heikki Pajuoja<br />

pOLICY –<br />

hOW TO MaKE IT aLL happEN 51<br />

Climate change in Brazil: Public policies,<br />

political agenda and media 52<br />

Magda Adelaide Lombardo, Ruimar Costa Freitas<br />

Barriers of implementing renewable energy and energy<br />

efficiency in northern periphery 56<br />

Renvall, J., Puhakka-Tarvainen, H., Kuittinen, V., Okkonen, L., Rice, L., Pappinen, A.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

5


D<br />

E<br />

f<br />

6 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> in Ukraine: State of the art and prospects<br />

for the development 59<br />

Georgiy Geletukha, Tetiana Zheliezna<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> at climate negotiations:<br />

Visions, challenges and opportunities 62<br />

McCormick, K.<br />

Supply chains of forest chip production in Finland 65<br />

Kalle Kärhä<br />

The economic, political and social issues, hindering<br />

the adoption of bioenergy in pakistan: A case study 69<br />

Umair Usman<br />

BIOfuELs fOR TRaNspORT –<br />

BIOGas, BIOEThaNOL aND BIODIEsEL 78<br />

Biogas upgrading by temperature swing adsorption 79<br />

Tamara Mayer, Michael Url, Hermann Hofbauer<br />

pELLETs –<br />

ThE NEW LaRGE ENERGY COMMODITY 84<br />

Emissions charecteristics of a residential<br />

pellet boiler and a stove 85<br />

Kaung Myat Win, Tomas Persson<br />

New insights in the ash melting behaviour and improvements<br />

of biomass energy pellets using flour bond 89<br />

J. van Soest, J. Renirie, S. Moelchand, M. Schouten, A. van der Meijden, J. Plijter<br />

ENERGY CROps, aGRICuLTuRaL<br />

REsIDuEs aND BY-pRODuCTs 93<br />

Use of ashes as a fertilizer in Reed Canary Grass (Phalaris<br />

Arundinacea L.) grown as an energy crop for combustion 94<br />

Eva Lindvall<br />

Intercropping of Reed Canary Grass, Phalaris Arundinacea L.,<br />

with legumes can cut costs for N-fertilization 95<br />

Cecilia Palmborg, Eva Lindvall<br />

Organisational frameworks for straw-based energy<br />

systems in Ukraine and western Eurpope 98<br />

Y. Voytenko, P. Peck<br />

ORaL CONfERENCE pROGRaMME 108


OpENING sEssION<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

7


8 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

WORLD BIOENERGY CONFERENCE <strong>2010</strong>, OPENING SESSION 25 MAY<br />

BIOENERGY OUTRIVALS OIL IN SWEDEN,<br />

SHOWING THAT GROWTH IN A GREEN ECONOMY IS POSSIBLE.<br />

Gustav Melin<br />

President<br />

Swedish <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association<br />

Torsgatan 12<br />

111 23 Stockholm<br />

Sweden<br />

ABSTRACT: From a situation when use of fossil oil covered 77 per cent of the Swedish energy mix in the 1970-ties,<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> is since 2009 the number one energy source when counting final energy use in Sweden. The last 20 years the<br />

economy (GDP) grow by 45 per cent and emissions of green house gases decreases by 12 per cent. This paper gives a<br />

background to why this development has taken place. It also claims that the same decisions and development is possible<br />

in any country and will lead to positive economical development and reduced emissions. The main instrument used is the<br />

carbon dioxide tax, a most efficient instrument to combat climat change.<br />

Keywords: <strong>Bioenergy</strong> policy, <strong>Bioenergy</strong> financing, strategy, CO 2 emission reduction, carbon dioxide tax.<br />

1. BIOENERGY SURPASS OIL IN SWEDEN<br />

In April <strong>2010</strong> the Swedish <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association<br />

calculated official Swedish energy statistics<br />

published by the Swedish Energy Agency. Svebio<br />

were able to announce that <strong>Bioenergy</strong> was the<br />

number one energy source in Swedish energy<br />

consumption. The use of bioenergy exceeded the use<br />

of fossil oil for energy. Actually the use of<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> has increased in a rate corresponding to<br />

an additional volume of 6400 cubic meters of oil<br />

every week for almost 20 years. Clearly we had<br />

foreseen that bioenergy would surpass oil any year<br />

now, nevertheless it was a bit surprising that it<br />

actually happened already in 2009.<br />

For a long time there has been no doubt about the<br />

direction, the use of renewable energy and especially<br />

bioenergy has been growing for 30 years.<br />

In the year 2009 bioenergy represented 31,7 per cent of<br />

the total energy use. Almost one third of the energy use<br />

from <strong>Bioenergy</strong> that’s a good figure.<br />

However I have been working in this sector for more than<br />

20 years. It has been a good development but it has not at<br />

all been optimal. A similar or even faster change would<br />

be possible in almost any country.<br />

2. SWEDEN ALREADY NOW CLOSE TO REACH<br />

2020 RENEWABLE TARGET<br />

Then if we take a look at the share of renewables it was<br />

already in 2009 46,3 per cent of the Swedish energy use.<br />

The red curve is the obligated level of renewables for<br />

Sweden according to the 2020-target. The blue curve is<br />

the forecasted development with the current legislation<br />

and incentives calculated by the Swedish Energy Agency.


The black curve is what actually has been registered, also<br />

figures from the Swedish Energy Agency. It is obvious<br />

that the ambitions are low compared to what is possible<br />

and that it is similar for other countries.<br />

3. REASONS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN SWEDEN<br />

I would like to briefly give a background of the reasons<br />

why this fairly good development has taken place in<br />

Sweden. I would also like to point out why I believe a<br />

similar development is possible and profitable in almost<br />

every country.<br />

Reasons for a good development I Sweden:<br />

3.1 No domestic fossil energy sources<br />

In the 1970-ties Sweden like most countries had more<br />

than 75 % of oil in the energy mix and also some<br />

additional percentage of coal. When the first oil crises hit<br />

the market in 1973, it became a wake up call for Swedish<br />

politicians. It became obvious that it was not clever to be<br />

so dependent on an imported energy source. Especially<br />

since price could change quickly, create unpredictable<br />

costs and ruin Swedish economy. Governmental research<br />

and investment money was at this time directed towards<br />

domestic energy production like nuclear power and<br />

renewables. At the same time it was obvious that oil and<br />

coal created environmental problems like spreading of<br />

heavy metals and acidification. Energy tax and sulphur<br />

fees were introduced on oil due to environmental reasons<br />

and to encourage use of domestic energy sources.<br />

3.2 No industry propagating for oil or coal<br />

One very important factor has been that there is no<br />

industry defending the fossil fuel position on the market.<br />

The Swedish industry has always focused on keeping a<br />

low electricity price, to be able to compete better on a<br />

global market. The Swedish government has had a<br />

similar view and increased energy taxes on households<br />

but kept taxes on an international level towards the<br />

industry.<br />

3.3 Efficient forest industry sector<br />

The Swedish forest industry sector consists of a leading<br />

pulp and paper industry as well as a large saw mill<br />

industry. The sector is very productive and consists also<br />

of a lot of different supply and manufacturing companies<br />

able to develop and manufacture forest harvesting<br />

equipment and equipment to collect and chip forest<br />

residues for energy. You are able to meet many of these<br />

companies at the exhibition here at <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong>.<br />

The industry continuously has invested in increased<br />

bioenergy use and production. Investments were also<br />

enhanced by the introduction of the renewable electricity<br />

certificates in 2003 which doubles the price for<br />

renewable electricity producers. As an example of the<br />

development the pulp industry Wärö owned by Södra<br />

becomes the worlds first fossil free pulp industry in the<br />

beginning of this year. Other parts of the industry invest<br />

in production of biofuels for transport, which you are<br />

able to hear from in session D2.<br />

3.4 A common view of a free market and market<br />

conditions.<br />

Finally, the most important factor has been the<br />

politicians’ ability to create a market situation that gives<br />

companies a predictable future to invest in market<br />

opportunities they believe in. The Swedish policy has<br />

mainly been decided with the polluter pays principle in<br />

mind. We have sulphur fees, NOX-fees and from 1991<br />

also carbon dioxide tax. Taxing emissions is a<br />

predictable, logical, environmentally friendly system that<br />

companies understand. Sweden as a small country has<br />

always been dependent on international trade, and<br />

therefore it has come quite natural to develop bioenergy<br />

during free market conditions. The polluter pays principle<br />

does not give any particular advantage to any type of<br />

solution. The solutions can be energy efficiency, solar,<br />

hydro, bioenergy or something else. The most profitable<br />

solutions are chosen.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

9


4. SWEDEN FIRST COUNTRY TO DECOUPLE<br />

ECONOMIC GROWTH AND GHG-EMISSIONS<br />

This slide shows blue curve: the economic growth in<br />

Sweden, red curve: emission of Green House Gases,<br />

GHG. Green curve: development of <strong>Bioenergy</strong> in<br />

Sweden.<br />

5. POSSIBILITIES FOR GOOD DEVELOPMENT IN<br />

MOST OTHER COUNTRIES<br />

.<br />

5.1 Domestic fossil fuels<br />

Domestic fossil fuels in a country make it harder for the<br />

parliament to agree on important decisions like carbon<br />

dioxide tax, deposit fees on coal ash etc. However the<br />

actual situation for development and economic growth in<br />

a country with domestic fossil fuels are not less than in a<br />

country like Sweden that lack the resource of fossil fuel.<br />

5.2 Industry propagating for oil or coal<br />

The national debate and company interest are more<br />

difficult to handle than in the Swedish situation but it is<br />

not a reason for not making the right decisions.<br />

10 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

5.3 Lots of forests and other raw material.<br />

There are always various opportunities to use energy<br />

more efficient. Combined heat and power is extremely<br />

profitable compared to wasting heat when producing<br />

power and buy the heat separately.<br />

There is a lot more forest globally than most of us<br />

believes. Professor Pekka Kauppi University of Helsinki<br />

has calculated figures from FAO reports and will share<br />

his knowledge about expanding forests in session A1<br />

“Raw material availability and market development”. In<br />

this session we will also be able to hear about wastes like<br />

old rubber trees from Liberia used in European coal<br />

power stations. There are by-products or wastes<br />

everywhere many of which profitably could be used for<br />

energy production. Olive residues, kernels and pruning,<br />

citrus pulp, palm kernels, sunflower husks, almond shells,<br />

straw, saw dust, manure, land fill gas, forest residues and<br />

million hectares of additional arable land for food, feed<br />

or energy production. <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> <strong>2010</strong> will give<br />

hundreds of opportunities to discuss possible and<br />

impossible ideas for further development and<br />

investments. Different solutions are available<br />

everywhere.<br />

5.4 A clear and simple policy<br />

Finally I would like to emphases that a clear and simple,<br />

understandable policy is a good way to have the whole<br />

society moving in the right direction. It is not sufficient to<br />

reach the 2020 target. We need good policy to solve the<br />

sustainability problems. Carbon tax is one simple and<br />

understandable measure with the benefit to strike towards<br />

use of fossil fuels getting us closer the overall goal -<br />

stopping the climate change. The Swedish <strong>Bioenergy</strong><br />

Association ask you to help us to argue for a global<br />

carbon dioxide tax and a floor price on emission trading<br />

rights making emitters pay for damages caused by carbon<br />

dioxide. Sweden has showed that polluter pays principle<br />

is an efficient and simple way to increase the use of<br />

profitable renewable energy.<br />

In some decades we are heading for 100 per cent<br />

renewables – It can be done!<br />

Svebio and Elmia wish you most welcome to Jönköping<br />

and the <strong>World</strong> of <strong>Bioenergy</strong>.


a<br />

COMBINED hEaT aND pOWER (Chp),<br />

COMBusTION, hEaTING aND CO-fIRING<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

11


12 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

SLAGGING AND FOULING RISK OF MEDITERANEAN BIOMASSES FOR COMBUSTION<br />

Daniel J. Vega-Nieva 1 , Raquel Dopazo 2 and Luis Ortiz 3 .<br />

Contact: CÁTEDRA ENCE. University of Vigo (Spain).<br />

Forestry School. A Xunqueira Campus. 36005. Pontevedra (Spain).<br />

Tel: 1-2: +34/986801948; 3: +34/986801902.<br />

Email: 1. DanielJVN@gmail.com 2. dopazo.raquel@gmail.com; 3. lortiz@uvigo.es.<br />

ABSTRACT: The interest in biomass combustion has grown exponentially in the last years, as a means for renewable<br />

heat and energy promoting local development and mitigating climate change. Various Mediterranean agricultural and<br />

forest resources such as olive stone, almond shell or pinecone chips remain large unutilized, despite their potential for<br />

being utilized in biomass combustion. New energy crops such as Cardoon, Brassica or Sorghum, are being introduced in<br />

Mediterranean countries for <strong>Bioenergy</strong> production; however, the slagging and fouling risk of many of these potential<br />

feedstocks are currently limiting their application in combustion processes given their high alkali, silica or chlorine<br />

contents. In this publication, various methods for biomass slagging and fouling hazard monitoring and prediction are<br />

presented based on recent studies with Mediterranean biomasses combustion in Spain.<br />

Keywords: slagging, fouling, biomass combustion.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION.<br />

The interest in biomass combustion has grown<br />

exponentially in the last years, as a means for renewable<br />

heat and energy promoting local development and<br />

mitigating climate change.<br />

However, various Mediterranean agricultural and<br />

forest resources such as almond shell or pinecone seed<br />

shells remain large unutilized. The slagging and fouling<br />

risk remain as important barriers that are currently<br />

limiting the use of various agricultural residues and<br />

potential agricultural energy crops feedstocks such as<br />

Cardoon, Brassica, or Sorghum [1], [2], [3].<br />

Slagging occurs in the boiler sections that are<br />

directly ex posed to flame irradiation. The mechanism<br />

of slagging formation involves stickiness, ash melting<br />

and sintering. Slagging de posits consist of an inner<br />

powdery layer followed by silicate and alkali<br />

compounds [4], [5].<br />

Fouling deposits form in the convective parts of<br />

the boiler. The mechanism of fouling is mainly due to<br />

condensation of volatile species that have been<br />

vaporised in previous boiler sections and are loosely<br />

bonded [5]<br />

In this publication, various methods for biomass slagging<br />

and fouling hazard monitoring and prediction are<br />

presented based on recent studies with Mediterranean<br />

biomasses combustion in Spain.<br />

2. ASH MELTING BEHAVIOUR: SLAGGING AND<br />

FOULING INDICES AND FUSION<br />

TEMPERATURES.<br />

2.1. Slagging and Fouling Indexes.<br />

Various authors have proposed a series of slagging and<br />

fouling indexes to explain the accumulation of ashes into<br />

the radiation and convection areas of biomass boilers,<br />

respectively. Although originally developed for coal,<br />

these indices seem to have potential for application on<br />

biomass combustion behaviour prediction (i.e. [6],<br />

[7]). Most widely used slagging and fouling indexes and<br />

currently proposed thresholds are synthesized below:<br />

Base to acid index [1], [6], [7], [8]:<br />

Critical value for coal: < 0.75 slagging trend<br />

Alkaki Index [9]:<br />

where HHV: Higher Heating value (MJ/Kg) at H=0%<br />

if index > 0.17 kg alkali /MJ probable fouling<br />

if index > 0.34 kg alkali /MJ fouling is certain to occur<br />

Slagging index [1], [7], [10]:<br />

where S d is % S from elementary analysis<br />

if RS < 0.6 low slagging trend<br />

if 0.6 < RS < 2 medium trend<br />

if 2.0 < RS < 2.6 high trend<br />

if RS > 2.6 very high trend


Chlorine Index: Cl content (%) of the sample dry weight.<br />

According to [1], [7]:<br />

if Cl < 0.2 low slagging trend<br />

if 0.2 < Cl < 0.3 medium trend<br />

if 0.3 < Cl < 0.5 high trend<br />

if Cl > 0.5 very high trend<br />

; whereas [11 ] gives a more conservative threshold:<br />

if Cl > 0.1 corrosion and HCl emissions<br />

2.2.Ash Fusion Temperatures.<br />

Ashes fusion is a continuous process which can be<br />

characterized by the following temperatures, according to<br />

norms ISO 540:2008 and DIN 51730:1998-04:<br />

Deformation temperature (DT). Temperature at<br />

which the first signs of rounding, due to melting, of the<br />

tip or edges of the test piece occur.<br />

Sphere temperature (ST). The temperature at which<br />

the edges of the test piece become completely round,<br />

with its height being equal to the width of the base line.<br />

Hemisphere temperature (HT). The temperature at<br />

which the test piece is approximately hemispherical, with<br />

the height being equal to half the base diameter.<br />

Flow temperature (FT). The temperature at which the<br />

test piece material has spread out so that its height is onethird<br />

of that at the hemisphere temperature.<br />

A large number of authors have proposed predictive<br />

functions of ash fusion temperatures from ash<br />

composition for coals (i.e. see [4] for a comprehensive<br />

review). Information on such predictive functions for<br />

biomass, however, remains scarce (i.e. [12], [13]).<br />

.Mineral composition in biomass differs significantly<br />

from coal, especially in the amount of potassium, calcium<br />

and chlorine, therefore, most appropriate slagging indices<br />

definition and threshold calibration, as well as ash fusion<br />

predictive functions must be different [9].<br />

Additionally, biomass disintegration laboratory tests have<br />

recently been proposed as a complementary means to<br />

characterize slagging tendency of biomass fuels, with<br />

significant potential to reproduce sintering and fouling<br />

behaviour observed in biomass boiler combustion tests<br />

[14].<br />

Results using the above mentioned methodologies for<br />

characterizing slagging and fouling tendency of various<br />

Mediterranean biomass fuels are presented.<br />

The effect of ash composition on ash behaviour as<br />

characterized by laboratory ash fusion and ash<br />

disintegration tests and boiler combustion tests, as well as<br />

the potential of biomass ash slagging indices to predict<br />

ash behaviour in terms of slagging and fouling hazard is<br />

discussed below.<br />

2. SLAGGING AND FOULING RISK OF<br />

MEDITERRANEAN BIOMASSES IN COMBUSTION<br />

Various recent studies (i.e. [01], [02], [03] and [04]) have<br />

recently analyzed the slagging and fouling tendency of<br />

several forest and agricultural residues and energy crops<br />

by means of laboratory ash characterization tests and<br />

combustion tests in Spain.<br />

The results of the ash composition of some of the main<br />

Mediterranean biomasses analyzed by these studies are<br />

synthezised in Table I below.<br />

Table I: Ash composition (wt% dry basis) at 550 ºC of<br />

various Mediterranean Biomasses from studies [01], [02],<br />

[03] and [04] in Spain.<br />

Sample SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 CaO MgO Na2O K2O P2O5 Ref.<br />

Poplar I 2.80 -- -- 33 3.70 0.14 18 -- [14]<br />

Poplar II 4.20 0.34 0.36 29 3.00 0.14 16 3.00 [15]<br />

Eucalyptus 41 -- -- 18 4.20 1.90 8.70 -- [14]<br />

Thistle I 13 -- -- 14 2.50 9.20 15 -- [14]<br />

Thistle II 20 -- -- 33 3.30 4.70 6.60 -- [14]<br />

Almond<br />

shell I<br />

Almond<br />

shell II<br />

Olive<br />

stontes<br />

4.60 -- -- 15 1.50 0.30 22 -- [14]<br />

3.50 0.49 0.27 16 2.60 0.49 31 2.40 [17]<br />

24 -- -- 4.40 1.70 0.52 27 -- [14]<br />

Brassica I 7.60 0.61 0.28 23 3.20 0.69 21 9.10 [15]<br />

Brassica II 1.30 0.16 0.60 25 2.70 1.10 27 8.40 [16]<br />

Wheat<br />

straw<br />

44 -- -- 8.10 2.40 0.22 18 -- [14]<br />

Rice straw 51 -- -- 8.9 3.5 2.8 16 -- [14]<br />

Sorghum 40 2.60 1.00 5.50 2.50 0.29 23 2.10 [16]<br />

Forest biomasses (i.e. Poplar, Eucalyptus chips) have<br />

very beneficial properties for combustion, namely a high<br />

Ca content, low silica content, and generally lower K<br />

content when compared to most agricultural feedstocks<br />

and residues, this resulting in high initial deformation<br />

and ash fusion temperatures, generally well above 1200-<br />

1400 ºC, as shown in Table II.<br />

It has to be noted, however, that woody fuels can often be<br />

contaminated during harvest operations with soil<br />

particles, resulting in a higher silica content (i.e.<br />

Eucalyptus sample in Table I), which can lower the ash<br />

fusion temperatures. This situation has been noted by<br />

various authors (i.e. [18]. More careful harvest methods<br />

need to be implemented in order to minimize soil<br />

contamination.<br />

Herbaceous fuels such as brassica, wheat and sorghum<br />

have large contents of both silica and potassium, resulting<br />

in the potential formation of K silicates (i.e. [4], [8],<br />

[19]). These compounds create deposits in the boiler,<br />

potentially causing slagging and fouling problems at<br />

temperatures above 700-800ºC, as illustrated by the<br />

sintering temperatures DT in Table II.<br />

Table II. Ash fusibility temperature of various<br />

Mediterranean feedstocks from Spain.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

13


14 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Fusibility temperatures (ºC)<br />

Sample D S H F Source<br />

Poplar I<br />

>1400 >1400 >1400 >1400 [14]<br />

Eucalyptus 1160 1170 1190 1230 [14]<br />

Thistle I 640 660 1150 1150 [14]<br />

Thistle II 1450 1450 1450 1450 [14]<br />

Almond shell I 750 770 n.d 1450 [14]<br />

Olive stones 1030 n.d 1090 1160 [14]<br />

Brassica I 730 n.d n.d 1450 [15]<br />

Brassica II 770 n.d n.d 1450 [16]<br />

Wheat straw 850 1040 1120 1320 [14]<br />

Rice straw 860 980 1100 1220 [14]<br />

Sorghum 830 1000 1080 1350 [16]<br />

D, deformation; S, sphere; H, hemisphere; F, fluid;<br />

n.d, not detected.<br />

Table III. Laboratory Sintering disintegration test results<br />

for Mediterranean biomasses from Spain.<br />

Disintegration test<br />

Sample 800 °C 900 ºC 1000 °C Source<br />

Poplar I E E E [14]<br />

Eucalyptus VE VE VE [14]<br />

Thistle I VD VD VD [14]<br />

Thistle II D D D [14]<br />

Almond shell<br />

I E D VD<br />

[14]<br />

Olive stones VE E VD [14]<br />

Brassica I VD VD VD [15]<br />

Brassica II - - VD [16]<br />

Wheat straw E VD VD [14]<br />

Rice straw D VD VD [14]<br />

Sorghum - - VD [16]<br />

VE, very easy disintegration; E, easy; D, difficult;<br />

VD, very difficult disintegration.<br />

Disintegration tests seem to offer a complementary<br />

criteria for rapid biomass characterization (Tables II and<br />

III). The development of comprehensive predictive<br />

functions for biomass ash fusion temperature based on<br />

ash composition is still required for a deeper<br />

understanding of ash sintering and melting processes.<br />

Table IV. Slagging indexes and agglomeration level<br />

observed in biomass combustion tests in [14], [15].<br />

Sample<br />

Ash<br />

(%, d.b)<br />

B/A<br />

index<br />

Alkali<br />

index<br />

(kg/GJ)<br />

BedAgg Source<br />

Poplar I 3.40 19.58 0.32 NO [14]<br />

Eucalyptus 4.30 0.8 0.23 NO [14]<br />

Thistle II 13.70 2.38 0.89 Part [14]<br />

Thistle I 14.10 3.13 1.96 Total [14]<br />

Brassica I 5.80 5.87 0.68 Total [15]<br />

Almond shell I 1.00 8.43 0.11 Part [14]<br />

BedAgg, bed agglomeration; NO, not agglomerated;<br />

Part, partially agglomerated; Total, totally agglomerated.<br />

The ash content can be a good indicator of the<br />

problematic nature of a biomass fuel. Herbaceous fuels<br />

typically show a higher value of ash content, this being<br />

correlated with their intrinsic K content [Jenkins et al].<br />

The Base to acid index, which has proven some<br />

predictive potential for prediction of slagging-related<br />

problems in studies such as [6] does not seem capable of<br />

reflecting the bed agglomeration tendency shown in<br />

Table IV. More refined alternative expressions may be<br />

required to account for the role of silica-based<br />

compounds on ash slagging hazard.<br />

Alkali index seems to have potential for discriminating<br />

potentially hazardous fuels in the light of results in Table<br />

IV, with lower values of the index -below the 0.34 kg<br />

alkali/MJ threshold proposed by [9]- corresponding to the<br />

samples where no agglomeration was detected in the<br />

boiler bed during the combustion test. One exception to<br />

this is the almond shell sample, where the low ash<br />

content, considered in the numerator of the alkali index,<br />

amy have masked the intrinsically hazardous nature of<br />

this fuel, with proven agglomeration effects, as proved<br />

both by a DT of 750ºC and a partial agglomeration<br />

observed in the boiler. An alternative alkali index may<br />

allow to account for fuels such as almond with a low<br />

amount of potentially problematic ashes.<br />

The higher alkali (Na+K) content present in the first<br />

sample of cardoon in Table IV (24% vs 11% in Thistle I<br />

and II, respectively), as detected by alkali indices of 1.96<br />

and 0.89, respectively, results in a higher temperature of<br />

sinterizing for the first sample, and a total vs partial<br />

agglomeration observed in the combustion test of these<br />

two biomasses in [01] study.<br />

Alkali metals react with silica contained in the residue's<br />

ash forming silicates with very low melting point<br />

(


The DOMOHEAT European project is focused on<br />

the demonstration of two innovative and sustainable<br />

medium size Centre European heating systems, for<br />

domestic and tertiary buildings, using as fuel mediumlow<br />

quality wastes from South European Regions<br />

agro/forest/wood production. Biomasses selected for this<br />

project are olive stone, pine wood chips, pine cone chips,<br />

pine cone seed shells, almond shells, hazelnut shells,<br />

eucalyptus wood chips, straw pellets, oak and pine<br />

sawdust pellets, vine shoot chips, olive pruning chips,<br />

oak chips, poplar chips, and paulownia chips.<br />

Fuel and ash characterization is being carried out for each<br />

one of the different biomasses at laboratory to determine<br />

the proximate analysis (ash, volatiles, fixed carbon),<br />

moisture content, ultimate analysis (C, H, N, S, O), Cl<br />

content, gross and net calorific value, contents of major<br />

and minor ash forming elements, particle size distribution<br />

and mass density. Laboratory evaluations of ash slagging<br />

tendency are being performed.<br />

Combustion tests in 25, 100, 150 kW experimental<br />

boilers are currently being carried out both in Vigo<br />

(Spain) and KWB Austria, in order to achieve knowledge<br />

about biomass behaviour during combustion, ash melting<br />

behaviour and relevant emissions (CO, CO , H O, CxHy,<br />

2 2<br />

NOx, O2, SO2 and HCl) are being determined. Slag<br />

deposits composition will be analyzed and ash-limiting<br />

thresholds will be explored as a means to limit the<br />

amount of silica, alkali and chlorine present in the fuels<br />

as validated by boiler combustion tests and to predict the<br />

slagging tendency of the biomasses.<br />

The tendency of slagging and ash deposition will be<br />

evaluated based on these combustion tests to select the<br />

most promising fuels for further combustion test in two<br />

demonstrative boilers at Spain (Vigo and Leon). Based<br />

on biomass characterization results and combustion test<br />

results, criteria for rejecting/accepting biomasses will be<br />

developed.<br />

On a second stage, based on established ash slagging<br />

risk thresholds calibrated with combustion test results,<br />

biomass mixtures will be performed as a strategy to<br />

diminish the sintering and slagging tendency of initially<br />

rejected biomasses in 10 new combustion tests of<br />

biomass mixtures.<br />

More information of the project can be found at<br />

http://www.escansa.com/domoheat/<br />

REFERENCES.<br />

[1] Fernandez J. Los cultivos energéticos en España y las<br />

tendencias de su desarrollo. [Energy Crops in Spain and<br />

the trends for their development]. In: I International<br />

Congress Bioenergia. Valladolid, Spain, 18-20 October<br />

2006.<br />

[2] Vega-Niena, D. J., Dopazo, R., Ortiz. L. Reviewing the<br />

potential of Forest <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Plantations: Woody Energy<br />

crop plantations management and breeding for increasing<br />

biomass productivity. In: <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 2008.<br />

Jönköping, Suecia 27-29 Mayo 2008<br />

[3] Dopazo, R. D. J. Vega, Ortiz, L. A Review of<br />

Herbaceous Energy Crops for <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Production in<br />

Europe. In: 17 th European Biomass Conference &<br />

Exhibition, Hamburgo (29 Junio-3 Julio 2009).<br />

[4] Bryers, R. W. Fireside slagging, fouling, and hightemperature<br />

corrosion of heat-transfer surface due to<br />

impurities in steam-raising fuels. Prog. Energy Combust.<br />

Sci. 22 (1996) 29-120<br />

[5] Tortosa-Masiá, A.A., Ahnert F., Spliethoff H., Loux J.C.,<br />

Hein K.R.G. Slagging and fouling in biomass cocombustion.<br />

Thermal science 9 (2005) 3, 85-98.<br />

[6] Salour, D. Jenkins, B. M. Vafaei, T M., Kayhanian M.<br />

Control of in-bed agglomeration by fuel blending in a<br />

pilot scale straw and wood fueled AFBC. Biomass and<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 117-133, 1993<br />

[7] Pronobis M. Evaluation of the influence of biomass cocombustion<br />

on boiler furnace slagging by means of<br />

fusibility correlations. Biomass and <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 28 (2005)<br />

375-383<br />

[8] Jenkins B.M., Baxter L.L., Miles T.R. Jr., Miles T.R.<br />

Combustion properties of biomass. Fuel Processing<br />

Technology 54 (1998) 17-46.<br />

[9] Miles T.R., Miles T.R. Jr., Baxter L.L., Bryers R.W.,<br />

Jenkins B.M., Oden L.L. Boiler deposits from firing<br />

biomass fuels. Biomass and <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 10 (1996) 125-<br />

138.<br />

[10] Vamvuka D., Zografos D. Predicting the behaviour of<br />

ash from agricultural wastes during combustion. Fuel 83<br />

(2004) 2051-2057.<br />

[11] Obernberger, I., Brunner, T., Bärnthaler G. Chemical<br />

properties of solid biofuels-significance and impact.<br />

Biomass and <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 30 (2006) 973–982<br />

[12] Friedl A., Padouvas E., Rotter H., Varmuza K.<br />

Prediction of heating value of biomass fuel and ash<br />

melting behaviour using elemental compositions of fuel<br />

and ash. In: 9th International Conference on<br />

Chemometrics in Analytical Chemistry, September 2004.<br />

Lisbon, Portugal.<br />

[13] Seggiani, M. Empirical correlations of the ash fusion<br />

temperatures and temperature of critical viscosity for coal<br />

and biomass ashes. Fuel 78 (1999) 1121–1125<br />

[14] Fernandez Llorente, M.J. Carrasco Garcia. J.E.<br />

Comparing methods for predicting the sintering of<br />

biomass ash in combustión. Fuel 84 (2005) 1893–1900<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

15


[15] Fernández Llorente M.J., Murillo J.M., Escalada R.,<br />

Carrasco J.E. Ash behaviour of lignocellulosic biomass in<br />

bubbling fluidised bed combustion. Fuel 85 (2006) 1157-<br />

1165.<br />

[16] Fernández Llorente M. J., Borjabad E., Barro R., Losada<br />

J., Bados R., Ramos R., Carrasco J. E. 2007. Estudio<br />

sobre sinterización de las cenizas de biomasas en la<br />

combustión. CIEMAT.<br />

[17] Fernández Llorente M.J., Escalada R., Murillo J.M.,<br />

Carrasco J.E. Combustion in bubbling fluidised bed with<br />

bed material of limestone to reduce the biomass ash<br />

agglomeration and sintering. Fuel 85 (2006) 2081-2092.<br />

[18] Zevenhoven-Onderwater, M., Blomquist, J.-P.,<br />

Skrifvars, B.-J., Backman, R., Hupa, M. The prediction<br />

of ehaviour of ashes from five different solid fuels in<br />

fluidised bed combustion. Fuel 79 (2000) 1353–1361<br />

[19] Werther J., Saenger M., Hartge E.-U., Ogada T., Siagi Z.<br />

Combustion of agricultural residues. Progress in Energy<br />

and Combustion Science 26 (2000) 1–27.<br />

[20] Arvelakis, S., Vourliotis, P., Kakaras, E., Koukios, E. G.<br />

Effect of leaching on the ash behavior of wheat straw and<br />

olive residue during fluidized bed combustion. Biomass<br />

and <strong>Bioenergy</strong> (2001) 20(6) 459-470<br />

16 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong>


IMPROVED FLEXIBILITY AND ECONOMY BY USING SMALL FLUIDISED BED BOILERS IN DISTRICT<br />

HEATING<br />

Alpo Sund 1 , Matti Lilja 2<br />

1 Nurmijärven Sähkö Oy, Kauppanummentie 1, 01900 Nurmijärvi, Finland<br />

2 Renewa Oy, Teknobulevardi 3, 01530 Vantaa, Finland<br />

matti.lilja@renewa.fi<br />

ABSTRACT: The Finnish heating company Nurmijärven Sähkö generates annually over 80 GWh heat with wood based<br />

fuels. To ensure optimal flexibility and minimal emissions, company has chosen fluidised bed combustion for two of its<br />

below 12 MW heating plants. These plants have shown a capability to operate at very low partial loads during low<br />

demand seasons, thus reducing the need to use oil fired reserve boilers. Exploiting of lower cost fuels, like slash from<br />

local forests, has been possible due to the flexible combustion process. Emissions have been successfully kept clearly<br />

below set limits, also at partial load operation or when using variable quality of fuels.<br />

Keywords: fluidised bed, heat generation, district heating, operating experience<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Nurmijärven Sähkö Oy is a municipality owned<br />

energy service company in Southernmost Finland. It<br />

provides 9500 inhabitants with 90 GWh heat<br />

annually. About 95 % of the heat is generated with<br />

wood based fuels in company’s three plants. This<br />

equals to 120 000 cubic meters of wood.<br />

To ensure economical heat for its customers,<br />

Nurmijärven Sähkö needs heat generation with is<br />

flexible to meet fluctuating heat demands, as well as<br />

digest versatile fuel and take the advantage of lower<br />

priced slash or waste wood batches from near-­‐by<br />

sources.<br />

In order to be able to maximise the operational<br />

flexibility, the company has chosen bubbling fluidised<br />

bed (BFB) combustion for two of its heating plant. The<br />

8 MWth and 11 MWth units have been operated since<br />

2002 and 2007. The units are normally unmanned<br />

and controlled remotely.<br />

2 COMBUSTION TECHNOLOGY<br />

Heating plants in the localities Nurmijärvi and<br />

Rajamäki have a capacity of 8 MW th and 11 MW th,<br />

respectively. Their combustion system is based on<br />

bubbling fluidised bed technology, where the fuel is<br />

introduced in the furnace where a 4 ton sand bed and the<br />

primary combustion air form a homogenous mixture with<br />

about 800 o C of temperature.<br />

The furnace and fluidized bed with the boiler form an<br />

integrated structure which is completely enclosed in a<br />

water cooled structure. There are refractories on the side<br />

walls in order to achieve correct combustion temperature<br />

and to prevent erosion. The boiler has a fully welded<br />

hermetic structure of membrane walls. The furnace is in<br />

the shape of rectangle. The structure is self-supporting<br />

and propped up from below which allows thermal<br />

expansion upwards.<br />

Because only few kilos of fuels are in the furnace at<br />

each moment, the gasification and combustion is fast.<br />

The heat capacity of the sand is so big that any amount of<br />

fuel humidity is easily evaporated and doesn’t harm the<br />

combustion itself.<br />

Fluidized bed temperature is controlled by<br />

combustion air distribution to primary, secondary and<br />

tertiary air. The well controlled furnace temperature is<br />

important for minimising of the temperature-derived<br />

NOx creation. With dry fuels, when the fluidized bed<br />

temperature might otherwise become too high, circulating<br />

gas is used in the fluidising air system.<br />

Figure 1. Hot water boiler with a Renewa bubbling<br />

fluidised bed<br />

Fluidised bed combustion is better known for utility<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

17


oilers of 100 MWth or larger. The Renewa BFB<br />

technology, used in the Nurmijärven Sähkö’s plants, is<br />

based on same principle as any bubbling bed. However,<br />

since the first application in 1985, the design has been<br />

optimised for small and medium sized boilers and thus<br />

can be implemented cost-efficiently. There are more than<br />

30 applications of steam and hot water BFB boilers in the<br />

capacity range of 3 – 30 MWth.<br />

3 OPERATION EXPERIENCE<br />

The two Nurmijärven Sähkö’s boilers have been in<br />

commercial operation for 8 and 3 years. The utility<br />

operates also another biomass fired boiler with<br />

reciprocating grate so observations between different<br />

combustion technologies have been made. The most<br />

visible advantage of the BFB boilers is their fast response<br />

to load change needs. The output can be decreased or<br />

increased by 12 % units within 10 minutes. This is a<br />

clear advantage in district heating plants where the daily<br />

demand curve has major variations. One just has to<br />

secure evenly chipped fuel.<br />

Flexibility to utilise different fuels has practical<br />

benefits e.g. in cold winter days when high calorific fuels<br />

can be used to achieve outputs even above nominal point,<br />

and thus postpone the start of expensive peaking plants.<br />

The same benefit there is during the summer when very<br />

low output level can be achieved with high calorific<br />

biomass. This saves costs of operating fossil fuelled<br />

plants and thus buying emission credits can be avoided.<br />

Figure 2. Rajamäki heating plant with 11 MWth<br />

fluidised bed boiler<br />

Nurmijärven Sähkö has successfully used fuels like<br />

forest slash, fresh and dry, from final forest felling, nontrimmed<br />

and trimmed small forest slash, saw dust, bark,<br />

grain sorting residues and even oat kernels with 10 %<br />

mixture. The non-trimmed forest slash, including green<br />

particles with chlorophyll, has not caused any problems<br />

in occasional use, even at operation on 100 % load, if the<br />

humidity has been inside the guaranteed window (± 12 %<br />

range around nominal point). No findings of chlorine<br />

caused corrosion have been detected. Very long time<br />

operation on full load with only such fuel has not for the<br />

time being been performed, however.<br />

During typical operation period, the main advantage<br />

of BFB flexibility comes from optimising fuel economy.<br />

18 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Cheaper low quality fuel lots can be exploited which<br />

reflects also as a better bargaining power when buying<br />

fuel. Nurmijärven Sähkö’s policy is to use only<br />

renewable biomass based fuels, but many Finnish BFB<br />

operators actively optimise their fuels costs by allowing<br />

biomass and peat suppliers to offer their best prices.<br />

Fluidised beds, however, have more stringent<br />

requirement than grates on the impurities coming with<br />

the fuel. Therefore magnetic separators and disc screens<br />

are highly recommended to screen out coarse particles<br />

and metal pieces before they enter the furnace. If such<br />

material, however, get inside the combustion chamber,<br />

they can be removed through the bottom funnels which<br />

are normally used for bed sand replacement. The inclined<br />

shape of the furnace bottom helps the coarse particles to<br />

roll towards the hoppers.<br />

4 FLUIDISED BED BOILER MAINTENANCE<br />

Concerning maintenance costs, a certain advantage<br />

has been recorded in a smaller need to replace<br />

components. Normally only bearings of motors and<br />

pumps need to be replaced, while fuidised bed boiler<br />

internals don’t have any moving mechanical components<br />

which could be subject to any wear and tear. Only the<br />

bed temperature sensors need regular replacement.<br />

Another advantage has been the possibility to use<br />

short shut-downs for maintenance works. This is possible<br />

because after shutting down there remains no fuel in the<br />

furnace and the structures can be cooled down in 3-4<br />

hours. The service persons can then enter the boiler or<br />

make the convection section soot blowing during one<br />

operation shift. In this way the scheduled annual<br />

maintenance outages can be shortened. Typically annual<br />

service outages have taken some 120 hours.<br />

5 OPERATION COSTS<br />

The main costs of operation, except the fuel, come<br />

from power autoconsumption, bed sand make-up and ash<br />

disposal. The recorded power demand of the two plants is<br />

33 kW per produced MWth of heat. The figure includes<br />

also the energy consumed by the district heat pumps.<br />

The ash amount from the electrostatic precipitator is<br />

below 4,4 kg per MW th produced, representing thus<br />

below 1 % of the consumed fuel mass. Bottom ash<br />

volume is negligible in the BFB boilers. The small ash<br />

volumes have been most economical to bring to a landfill<br />

but the company is now actively looking for alternative<br />

uses for the ash. The nutrient contents of the ash might<br />

help to recycle it.<br />

Part of the bed material, which is normal<br />

equigranular construction quality sand, is replaced daily.<br />

The recorded sand consumption has been 3,8 kg/MWth<br />

(at the 11 MW boiler) and below 2 kg/MWth (at the 8<br />

MW boiler). This means that the sand silo, capable to<br />

receive a full truckload, needs to be filled only a couple<br />

of times a year. Presently, the rejected sand is transported<br />

to a landfill. Nurmijärven Sähkö is looking for<br />

possibilities to sell this practically very clean sand to<br />

potential users or recycle it in the process by screening.<br />

The manpower costs are quite reasonable. Both plants<br />

have an advanced control system and they can be<br />

remotely controlled from each other’s control room.<br />

Therefore only one of them, normally the Nurmijärvi


plant, is permanently manned. Rajamäki plant is visited<br />

shortly once per day, due to requirements of legislation,<br />

but all operations are performed from the control centre.<br />

During the night time and weekend the operator can<br />

control the plants with a portable PC even from his home.<br />

6 EMISSIONS OF FLUIDISED BED COMBUSTION<br />

Emissions of Rajamäki plant have been measured by<br />

an independent authority. Table 1 shows emissions on 3<br />

MW partial load, i.e. below 30% of nominal capacity.<br />

Table I: Rajamäki heating plant emissions at 3 MW<br />

partial load<br />

Rajamäki Actual load: 3 MWth<br />

heating plant<br />

Performed by: Suomen<br />

Analyysipalvelut Oy<br />

Date:<br />

14.3.2008<br />

Parameter Value unit<br />

Flue gas temperature 51,8<br />

o<br />

C<br />

CO2 in flue gas 12, 3 ±0,7 %<br />

O2 in flue gas 8, 3 ±0,4 %<br />

Dust content 20 ± 4 mg/m 3 n<br />

Dust emission 0,14 ± 0,05 kg/h<br />

Dust contents red. at 6% O2 23 ± 5 mg/m 3 n<br />

Specific emissions 9 ± 3 mg/MJ<br />

NOx 97 ppm<br />

NO2 contents red. at 6% O2 236 ± 18 mg/m 3 n<br />

SO2


B<br />

20 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

fOREsT REsIDuEs –<br />

sLash, sTuMps, sMaLL TREE haRVEsT


PROCUREMENT COSTS OF SLASH AND STUMPS IN SWEDEN<br />

– A COMPARISON BETWEEN SOUTH AND NORTH SWEDEN.<br />

Athanassiadis, Dimitris., Lundström, Anders & Nordfjell Tomas<br />

Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences<br />

S-90183 Umeå, Sweden<br />

Dimitris.Athanassiadis@srh.slu.se, Tomas.Nordfjell@srh.slu.se, Anders.Lundstrom@srh.slu.se<br />

ABSTRACT: Marginal cost curves were used to appreciate the amount of slash and stumps that could be harvested at<br />

certain costs in Sweden as a whole as well as in two regions (Upper Norrland and South Sweden). The expected region<br />

specific variations were quantified and region specific estimates on harvestable potentials of stumps and slash were made.<br />

The results in this work were based on data collected in the Swedish Forest Inventory (SFI) from 2002 to 2006<br />

Keywords: forestry residues, harvesting, resource potential<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

The demand for use of wood as raw material for heat<br />

and power generation has increased considerably at a<br />

global level. Sweden is a leading country in the use of<br />

bioenergy. According to the Swedish Energy Authority,<br />

20% of the total energy use, comes from biofuels (incl.<br />

peat) [1]. By-products from sawmills and the pulp and<br />

paper industry account for the greatest part and are used<br />

for the production of heat and power for the companies’<br />

own needs or for the provision to consumers. The<br />

introduction in 2003 of a green electricity certificate<br />

system aimed in supporting electricity production using<br />

renewable energy sources (solar energy, wind power,<br />

hydropower and bioenergy) and peat. The main objective<br />

was to increase the amount of electricity coming from<br />

renewable resources by 17 TWh by year 2016 (base level<br />

is year 2002 when 6.5 TWh of electricity from renewable<br />

resources were produced).<br />

The Swedish national forest inventory (NFI) indicates<br />

a productive economic forest cover (designated for the<br />

production of timber and non-timber forest products) of<br />

23 million ha, 56% percent of the total land area of<br />

Sweden. The total growing stock is about 3.2 billions of<br />

forest m 3 [2]. Within the near future the demand on forest<br />

woody materials is believed to get higher than the annual<br />

growth.<br />

In 2006, logging residues were extracted from 36%<br />

of the 229 000 ha of regeneration fellings in Sweden.<br />

Logging residues are today the largest assortment of<br />

forest biomass available for energy production.<br />

Depending on the level of ecological, technical and<br />

economical restrictions the potential amount of branches,<br />

tops and foliage resulting from regeneration fellings is<br />

from 3.2 to 7.4 (no restrictions) million oven dry tons<br />

(ODT) annually (for the time period <strong>2010</strong>-2019) while<br />

the potential from stumps with attached root system is 4.2<br />

to 11.7 (no restrictions) million ODT annually and for the<br />

same time period [3]. The corresponding annual figures<br />

in thinning for branches, tops and foliage and stumps<br />

with attached root system is 1,7 to 3,9 (no restrictions)<br />

and 1,7 to 5,7 (no restrictions) million ODT annually<br />

respectively. Furthermore, 0.5 million ODT, orginating<br />

from pre commercial thinning, can be added to the above<br />

mentioned potentials.<br />

Harvest and transport costs of logging residues are<br />

site specific and differ due to site characteristics (i.e. size<br />

of operational units, ecological restrictions, tree size and<br />

species, varying terrain conditions, varying forwarding<br />

distances, harvest type, transport distance to the receiving<br />

plant), regional and local differences (i.e. operation<br />

overhead costs, acquisition of harvesting rights, customer<br />

demand) and harvesting system used (i.e. type of<br />

machinery, cost and produz


Figure 1: The studied regions<br />

2 MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

For the estimation of the potential harvestable<br />

amount of slash and stumps from regeneration fellings<br />

given a scenario according to which Swedish silvicultural<br />

practices are not going to change ten years in the future<br />

(<strong>2010</strong>-2019), NFI sample plots (more than 3000 sample<br />

plots evenly spread over the complete forest area of<br />

Sweden) were utilized. Each individual plot was used as<br />

the unit for decision for different future silviculture and<br />

felling measures and a growth prognosis for the trees of<br />

each plot was produced.<br />

In order to decide from which stands slash and<br />

stumps will be extracted and the quantity that should<br />

remain in the forest the following restrictions were taken<br />

under consideration.<br />

• no extraction was counted with for productive<br />

forest areas that are situated in areas of nature<br />

protection.<br />

• wet areas as well as peat soils with low bearing<br />

capacity as well as all areas that are located 25<br />

meters from a lake, sea, waterline or any other<br />

ownership category than forest were not<br />

considered for extraction<br />

• 40% of the logging residues were left at the<br />

felling site<br />

• no hardwood stumps were extracted<br />

• areas that have an uneven ground structure<br />

and/or a slope of more than 19.6 0 according to<br />

the Swedish terrain classification scheme were<br />

not considered for extraction.<br />

• regeneration felling areas of a size of less than<br />

1 ha were not included<br />

The costs for harvesting the residues, transforming it<br />

to chips and bringing it to the end user were also<br />

calculated. For slash the machine systems that were used<br />

were the following<br />

Slash system 1: Slash forwarder, roadside<br />

chipper, container truck.<br />

Slash system 2: Slash forwarder, slash<br />

truck, industry chipper<br />

Concerning stump harvesting, stumps were<br />

forwarded to the roadside, transported by truck to the<br />

industry and crushed there. Productivity and machine<br />

22 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

cost data employed in this study were obtained from<br />

practical experience and scientific studies (Table I). All<br />

calculations were made with the FLIS tool [5].<br />

Table I: Compilation of machine costs (SEK/ODT) for<br />

the slash and stump machine systems<br />

Slash Stumps<br />

System 1 System 2<br />

Stump lifter - - 187<br />

Forwarder<br />

180 m (420 m)* 163(208) 163(208) 163(208)<br />

Chipper 166 119 119<br />

Truck<br />

50 km (100 km) 108(191) 124(197) 218(364)<br />

* Average forwarding distance(one-way), ** Average<br />

transport distance<br />

The moisture, dry matter and heat content for both<br />

slash and stumps was assumed to be 50%, 0.82 MWh/m 3<br />

loose raw chips and 0.17 ODT/m 3 loose raw chips,<br />

respectively. Compensation to the land owner was set to<br />

172 SEK/ODT (2.5 SEK/m 3 loose raw chips) while<br />

administration costs were set to 73.5 SEK/ODT (13<br />

SEK/m 3 loose raw chips). Cost for machine allocations<br />

between production sites (2500 SEK/machine and<br />

allocation) was related to the amount of the harvestable<br />

amount (ODT) available in the production sites [6].<br />

3 RESULTS<br />

3.1 Potentials<br />

In Table II an estimation of the harvestable potential<br />

of slash and stumps in the different regions of Sweden is<br />

given. A majority of the potential (55%) is located in the<br />

south half of the country (Central and South Sweden).<br />

Table I: Annual regional harvestable potential of stumps<br />

and slash in Sweden<br />

Slash Stumps Total<br />

Million ODT/year<br />

Upper Norrland 0.63 0.90 1.53<br />

Central Norrland 0.78 1.08 1.86<br />

Central Sweden 0.78 1.06 1.84<br />

South Sweden 0.98 1.20 2.18<br />

Whole Sweden 3.17 4.24 7.41<br />

3.2 Marginal costs of slash and stump procurement for<br />

the whole of Sweden<br />

The potential annually harvestable amount of slash<br />

and stumps is ca. 3.2 and 4.2 million ODT, respectively.<br />

Slash can be harvested at a lower cost than stumps which<br />

leads to that the marginal curve for slash starts at a lower<br />

level than the curve for stumps. When the curves<br />

approach the maximum harvestable potential they bend<br />

strongly upwards. That is due to the fact that a part of the<br />

logging residues is located in small production sites, far<br />

away from the industry making transport costs very high.


Figure 2: Marginal cost curves for the harvesting of slash<br />

and stumps from regeneration fellings in Sweden,<br />

cumulative values (SEK/ODT as a function of million<br />

ODT/year).<br />

3.3 Regional marginal costs for slash with system 1<br />

The amount of slash that could be harvested up to a<br />

certain cost (SEK/ODT) varies for the different regions<br />

that have been studied. Marginal costs were lowest in<br />

South Sweden. The costs rose rapidly with increasing<br />

distance to the industry. In South Sweden 90% of the<br />

harvestable potential could be harvested for a cost up to<br />

800 SEK/ODT (Figure 2). For the north of Sweden two<br />

different pictures were given. To harvest 90% of the<br />

harvestable potential it would cost up to 950 SEK/ODT in<br />

the coastal area of Upper Norrland and ca. 1100 SEK/ODT<br />

in Upper Norrland Lappland (Figure 3).<br />

Figure 3: Marginal cost curves for the harvesting of slash<br />

from regeneration fellings in Upper Norrland and South<br />

Sweden, cumulative values (SEK/ODT as a function of<br />

million ODT/year).<br />

3.4 Regional marginal costs for stumps<br />

As expected marginal cost curves for stump<br />

harvesting start a higher cost level. In South Sweden to<br />

harvest 50% of the harvestable potential would cost up to<br />

ca. 900 SEK/ODT while at the coastal area of Upper<br />

Norrland and at Upper Norrland Lappland the cost would<br />

be 1100 and 1300 SEK/ODT respectively (Figure 4).<br />

Figure 4: Marginal cost curves for the harvesting of<br />

stumps from regeneration fellings in Upper Norrland and<br />

South of Sweden, cumulative values (SEK/ODT as a<br />

function of million ODT/year).<br />

Chipping slash in the industry proved to be more<br />

economical than chipping it at the roadside and<br />

transporting it to the industry. In the Lappland area of<br />

Upper Norrland the decrease in SEK/ODT was 5.5%<br />

while in the coastal area of Upper Norrland and in South<br />

Sweden the decrease was 4.5% and 3.5% respectively<br />

(Figure 5)<br />

Figure 5. Marginal cost curves for the harvesting of slash<br />

from regeneration fellings in Upper Norrland and South<br />

Sweden with a) a slash supply system based on chipping<br />

at roadside (uppermost line in each region) and b) a<br />

system based on chipping in the industry (lower line on<br />

each region). Cumulative values (SEK/ODT as a function<br />

of million ODT/year).<br />

4 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> systems are characterized by negative<br />

economies of scale; as demand increases, the average<br />

transport distance increases. This it is especially<br />

pronounced where CHP plants are located close to the<br />

coast (raw material supply area half circle). Localization<br />

of CHP plants is mainly near bigger cities with an<br />

existing district heating distribution network and a great<br />

demand for heat. In this way a lot of electricity can be<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

23


produced within the electricity certificate system.<br />

However, forest biomass production is spread out over<br />

large geographical areas.<br />

The production of economically competitive energy<br />

(electric power or heat) from primary forest fuels, is<br />

strongly dependent on the availability of low-cost raw<br />

material. Forest biomass production takes place over<br />

extended geographical areas and collection and transport<br />

to the receiving facility is costly.<br />

Some measures that could be taken in order to make<br />

the whole supply chain more effective are:<br />

� Increased use of terminals located near the raw<br />

material source<br />

� Increased use of train transport from terminals<br />

to the plant<br />

� Use of supply systems suitable for the different<br />

sites<br />

� Increment of the mass on the trucks (e.g. precrushing<br />

of stumps)<br />

� Establishment of bioenergy combines (e.g.<br />

heat, electricity, pellets)<br />

The annual potential of forest energy is not fully utilized.<br />

For the future, it is important to consider the regional<br />

potential when new CHP plants are established.<br />

5 REFERENCES<br />

[1] Swedish Energy Agency 2009. Energy in Sweden.<br />

Swedish Energy Agency. ET 2009:30. ISSN 1403-1892.<br />

[2] Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences 2009.<br />

Forestry Statistics 2009. Department of forest resource<br />

management. ISSN 0280-0543. (In Swedish)<br />

[3] Swedish Forest Agency 2008. Skogliga<br />

konsekvensanalyser 2008. SKA-VB 08. Rapport 25.<br />

http://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/episerver4/dokument/sks/a<br />

ktuellt/press/2008/rapport%20SKA.pdf (In Swedish)<br />

[4] Berg, S. 1992. Terrain Classification System for<br />

forestry work. Forestry Research Institute of Sweden,<br />

Uppsala, Sweden. ISBN 91-7614-078-4.<br />

[5] v Hofsten, H., Lundström, H., Nordén, B., & Thor, M.<br />

2006. Systemanalys för uttag av skogsbränsle – ett<br />

verktyg för fortsatt utveckling. Skogforsk. Resultat nr 6.<br />

(In Swedish)<br />

[6] Athanassiadis, D., Melin, Y., Nordfjell, T &<br />

Lundström, A. (2009). Harvesting Potential and<br />

Procurement Costs of Logging Residues in Sweden. In<br />

M. Savolainen (Ed.), <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 2009: Sustainable<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> Business. 4th International <strong>Bioenergy</strong><br />

conference.<br />

24 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong>


HARVESTING FOR ENERGY OR PULPWOOD IN EARLY THINNINGS?<br />

Dan Bergström & Fulvio Di Fulvio<br />

Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agriculture Sciences<br />

SE-901 83 Umeå, Sweden<br />

Dan.Bergstrom@srh.slu.se, Fulvio.Di.Fulvio@srh.slu.se<br />

ABSTRACT: The objectives of the study were to compare the profitability between pulpwood and energy wood harvesting<br />

systems in early thinnings. The availability of merchantable volumes of pulpwood and energy wood was calculated for three<br />

different types of first thinning stands of pine, spruce and birch, i.e. nine different stands. The energy wood and pulpwood<br />

prices were based on year 2009 market prices for Sweden and a system analysis was carried out including costs for<br />

harvesting and forwarding to roadside. The tree volume of removal ranged from 15 to 84 dm 3 and was in average 38 dm 3 . In<br />

average the biomass to pulpwood ratio of the gross income in the pine, spruce and birch stands was 2.1, 2.9 and 2.3,<br />

respectively. The net income for the pulpwood system was negative (generating costs) in all stands. The net income for the<br />

energy wood system was profitable in 67% of the stands; 133 €×ha -1 in pine stands, ranging from 37 to 145 €×ha -1 in spruce<br />

stands, and 19 to 76 €×ha -1 in birch stands. If the market price for energy wood increases with 30% (compared to the current<br />

level) harvesting for energy wood in early thinnings could generate a considerable income for the forest owner.<br />

Keywords: bioenergy, forestry, thinnings, young forests, harvesting, wood chips.<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

In Sweden there are large areas of young forests that<br />

have not being subjected to a pre-commercial thinning<br />

(PCT) and thus are dense and rich of biomass. However,<br />

performing a late PCT in such stands is expensive and the<br />

only alternative is to perform an early thinning. In early<br />

thinnings about 20-30% of the cut trees are too small<br />

sized for pulpwood and are left unutilized at the felling<br />

site. However, in the energy wood system full trees are<br />

merchantable and there are no restrictions of tree size and<br />

therefore all tree biomass are commercial available.<br />

Energy wood thinning can be a profitable alternative<br />

compared to pulpwood thinning [1]; the biomass removal<br />

can be 15-50% higher and the harvesting costs from<br />

stump to road side can be reduced by 20-40% [2].<br />

In early thinning operations for pulpwood multi-stem<br />

processing heads are used which render higher efficiency<br />

compared to using single-tree processing heads. In the<br />

multiple-tree handling of whole trees in thinning for<br />

energy wood accumulating felling heads (AFH) are used<br />

which can be mounted on single-grip harvesters or<br />

specially designed feller-bunchers [3] [4]. These multitree<br />

handling system shown to increase productivity by as<br />

much as 35-40 % when compared to single-tree handling<br />

[5]. In energy wood harvesting the felling and bunching<br />

operation still remains the largest cost component in the<br />

system (forwarding and comminution included) [4] [6].<br />

In 2009 the wood fuel (chips) costs for the thermal<br />

industry in Sweden was in average 167 SEK×MWh -1 (~<br />

317 SEK×(m 3 solid) -1 and the pulpwood price at road<br />

side was in average 310 SEK×(m 3 solid under-bark) -1 [7].<br />

The most profitable alternative depends on the relation<br />

between merchantable volumes, biomass prizes and the<br />

costs of respectively harvesting systems and supply<br />

chains.<br />

The objectives of the study were to compare the<br />

profitability between pulpwood and energy wood<br />

harvesting systems in early thinnings, from stump to road<br />

side.<br />

2 MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

The availability of merchantable volumes of<br />

pulpwood and energy wood thinning in different types of<br />

first thinning stands was estimated using pine, spruce and<br />

birch type stands from Bredberg (1972). In the analysis<br />

three stands per species aged from 22 to 42 years (age<br />

classes: “young”, “middle” and “old”) were used. In each<br />

of the stands the volume availability per treatment were<br />

calculated at a 30% level of intensity of removal of the<br />

basal area. Only trees with a dbh ≥ 5cm were used in<br />

calculations and trees where thinned from below<br />

according to a pre-suggested thinning “priority” [8]. The<br />

minimum pulpwood stem diameter under-bark was set to<br />

5 cm and the merchantable logs length range between 3.0<br />

and 5.5 m. The oven-dry weight of stem, branches and<br />

needles biomass was calculated using Marklund’s (1987)<br />

[9] functions and was then converted into solid volume<br />

by using stem basic densities and values for crown<br />

biomass by Hakkila (1978) [10].<br />

Stumpage prices were based on year 2009 market<br />

prices for Sweden: the roadside price of pulpwood overbark<br />

was 278 SEK×m -3 (340 SEK×m -3 u. b.) and the<br />

energy wood price at roadside (tree parts) of 200<br />

SEK×m - ³biomass -1 . Prices and costs were translated into<br />

Euro (€), assuming an exchange rate of 1€=10SEK.<br />

A system analysis was carried out including costs for<br />

biomass harvesting and forwarding to roadside. The<br />

harvesting productivity (productive work time; PW [11])<br />

was set to 5.4 m 3 pulpwood×PW-hour -1 in pulpwood<br />

treatment and 11.0 m 3 biomass×PW-hour -1 in energy<br />

wood treatment, according to Kärhä et al. (2004) [12] and<br />

Kärhä et al. (2006) [13] functions. The productivity of<br />

pulpwood forwarding was based on Nurminen et al.<br />

(2006) [14] study giving an average value of 13.8<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

25


m³×PW-hour -1 . The productivity of energy wood<br />

forwarding was assumed 15% lower than pulpwood<br />

forwarding, as suggested by Heikkilä et al. (2005) [15],<br />

who noticed productivity in forwarding whole trees 10-<br />

20% lower than forwarding delimbed wood. The<br />

productivity calculations were made for a forwarding<br />

distance of 200 m and a haulage load size of 8 m 3 solid.<br />

The PW were converted to main work time (MW) [11]<br />

using the coefficient 1.3 for the harvester and 1.2 for<br />

forwarding. The operating costs of the harvester were set<br />

to 80 €×MW-hour -1 and for the forwarder to 70 €×MW -1 -<br />

hour -1 . The transferring costs per machine were set to 200<br />

€ and the thinning stand areal was set to 3 ha.<br />

3 RESULTS<br />

The stem volume of harvested trees ranged between<br />

15 to 84 dm 3 with an average of 38 dm 3 . In average, the<br />

ratio of the harvested biomass to the pulpwood volume<br />

ranged from 1.5 to 2.0 in the “old” stands. The<br />

corresponding ratio in the “middle” age stands ranged<br />

from 2.4 to 2.9 and in the “young” stands it ranged from<br />

4.8 to 7.2. The highest volume ratio was found in the<br />

spruce stands since spruce have a relative higher share of<br />

branches compared to pine and birch. In average the<br />

biomass to pulpwood ratio of the gross income in the<br />

pine, spruce and birch stands was 2.1, 2.9 and 2.3,<br />

respectively (Table I-III).<br />

In pine stands (Table I) the gross income for<br />

pulpwood compared to energy wood was 7% lower in the<br />

“old”, 71% lower in the “young” and 45% lower in the<br />

“middle”.<br />

Table I: Characteristics of pine dominated stands and<br />

harvesting results at a 30% intensity of removal of the<br />

basal area<br />

Initial stand Old Middle Young<br />

Stem volume (dm 3 ) 121 53 35<br />

Basal area (m 2 ×ha -1 ) 31.3 20.2 18.4<br />

Total stem volume (m 3 ×ha -1 ) 229 121 97<br />

Removal<br />

Stem volume (dm 3 ) 79 27 18<br />

Pulpwood volume (m 3 o. b.×ha -1 ) 52 15 7<br />

Biomass volume (m 3 ×ha -1 ) 78 38 33<br />

Volume ratio, biomass/pulpwood 1.5 2.5 4.8<br />

Pulpwood gross income (€×ha -1 ) 1443 420 192<br />

Biomass gross income (€×ha -1 ) 1554 764 658<br />

In spruce stands (Table II) the gross income for<br />

pulpwood was 32% lower in the “old”, 81% lower in the<br />

“young” and 52% lower in the “middle” compared to<br />

energy wood.<br />

Table II: Characteristics of spruce dominated stands and<br />

harvesting results at a 30% intensity of removal of the<br />

basal area<br />

26 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Initial stand Old Middle Young<br />

Stem volume (dm 3 ) 160 58 31<br />

Basal area (m 2 ×ha -1 ) 27.6 20.7 21.5<br />

Total stem volume (m 3 ×ha -1 ) 240 130 100<br />

Removal<br />

Stem volume (dm 3 ) 84 31 15<br />

Pulpwood volume (m 3 o. b.×ha -1 ) 40 19 7<br />

Biomass volume (m 3 ×ha -1 ) 81 54 50<br />

Volume ratio, biomass/pulpwood 2.0 2.9 7.2<br />

Pulpwood gross income (€×ha -1 ) 1101 523 192<br />

Biomass gross income (€×ha -1 ) 1620 1082 994<br />

In birch stands (Table III) the gross income for<br />

pulpwood compared to energy wood was 12% lower in<br />

the “old”, 74% lower in the “young” and 43% lower in<br />

the “middle”.<br />

Table III: Characteristics of birch dominated stands and<br />

harvesting results at a 30% intensity of removal of the<br />

basal area<br />

Initial stand Old Middle Young<br />

Stem volume (dm 3 ) 99 45 33<br />

Basal area (m 2 ×ha -1 ) 29.9 25.1 21.8<br />

Total stem volume (m 3 ×ha -1 ) 172 120 117<br />

Removal<br />

Stem volume (dm 3 ) 52 23 15<br />

Pulpwood volume (m3 o. b.×ha -1 ) 37 18 6<br />

Biomass volume (m 3 ×ha -1 ) 58 43 30<br />

Volume ratio, biomass/pulpwood 1.6 2.4 5.0<br />

Pulpwood gross income (€×ha -1 ) 1025 496 155<br />

Biomass gross income (€×ha -1 ) 1170 865 601<br />

In average the harvesting cost per m 3 (forwarding<br />

included) of the energy wood system was 37 - 40% lower<br />

compared to the pulpwood system. The net income for<br />

the pulpwood system was negative (generating costs) in<br />

all stands. The net income for the energy wood system<br />

was profitable in 67% of the stands; 133 €×ha -1 in pine<br />

stands, ranging from 37 to 145 €×ha -1 in spruce stands,<br />

and 19 to 76 €×ha -1 in birch stands.<br />

4 DISCUSSION<br />

Under current market price conditions the energy<br />

wood system gives in average about 2.4 times higher<br />

gross income than pulpwood in the studied stands. The<br />

systems would give the same gross income if the biomass<br />

to pulpwood ratio equals about 1.4. In the studied stands<br />

this situation would be possible only in the “old” stands<br />

at a harvesting intensity of at least 40% of the basal area.<br />

In present study the current price ratio of energy<br />

wood to pulpwood was 0.7, but market prices fluctuate<br />

and this ratio changes over time. If the energy wood price<br />

would increase with 30%, from 20 to 26 €×m -3 , the price<br />

ratio would increase to 0.9. At this situation, the<br />

differences in net income (€×ha -1 ) between pulpwood and<br />

energy wood, would increase considerable (Fig. I-II-III):<br />

the energy wood harvesting would becomes profitable in<br />

all considered conditions giving a net income ranging<br />

from 120 to 533 €×ha -1 in pine stands, 306 to 556 €×ha -1<br />

in spruce stands, and 139 to 390 €×ha -1 in birch stands.


Figure 1: The net income as function of biomass to<br />

pulpwood volume ratio at different energy wood prices in<br />

the pine stands.<br />

Figure 2: The net income as function of biomass to<br />

pulpwood volume ratio at different energy wood prices in<br />

the spruce stands.<br />

Figure 3: The net income as function of biomass to<br />

pulpwood volume ratio at different energy wood prices in<br />

the birch stands.<br />

The analyses of which the results are based on are<br />

somewhat simplified, e.g. the same operative coefficients<br />

were used for both systems which in practice probably<br />

differ between usage of different technology. For<br />

example, accumulating felling heads have less<br />

sophisticated components and functions and would<br />

probably have less time reduction due to work delays<br />

compared to accumulating processing heads. Further, the<br />

forwarding work in the energy wood system (full trees)<br />

was based on data for pulpwood forwarding. In practice<br />

the differences in productivity could probably differ<br />

somewhat more, especially at longer forwarding<br />

distances, since the payloads at energy wood forwarding<br />

are lower than pulpwood loads. However, we believe the<br />

data and assumptions used in the analyses are adequate<br />

and gives a reasonable comparison of the two systems.<br />

5 CONCLUSIONS<br />

The available volumes of biomass for energy in early<br />

thinning are considerately higher compared to pulpwood<br />

volumes. With current market prices the gross income of<br />

the energy wood is higher even in stands containing trees<br />

with a relative high proportion of pulpwood. The net<br />

income becomes higher in the energy wood system<br />

compared to pulpwood when using conventional<br />

machinery. If the market prices for energy wood<br />

increases with 30% (compared to the current level)<br />

harvesting for energy wood in early thinnings could<br />

generate a considerable income for the forest owner.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This study was financed by the Forest Power project<br />

which is a part of the Botnia-Atlantica program.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] Sirén M., Heikkila J. & Sauvula T. 2006.<br />

Combined production of industrial and energy<br />

wood in Scots pine stands. Forestry Studies.<br />

Metsanduslikud Uurimused. 45: 150-163.<br />

[2] Hakkila P. 2003. Developing technology for<br />

large-scale production of forest chips. Wood<br />

Energy Technology Programme 1999–2003, Tekes-<br />

Technology programme report 5/2003 54p.<br />

[3] Johansson, J. & Gullberg, T. 2002. Multiple<br />

tree handling in the selective felling and bunching<br />

of small trees in dense stands. International Journal<br />

of Forest Engineering 13(2): 25–34.<br />

[4] Kärhä, K., Jouhiaho, A., Mutikainen, A. &<br />

Mattila, S. 2005. Mechanized energy wood<br />

harvesting from early thinnings. International<br />

Journal of Forest Engineering 16(1): 15–26.<br />

[5] Jylhä P. & Laitila J. 2007. Energy wood and<br />

pulpwood harvesting from young stands using a<br />

prototype whole-tree bundler. Silva Fennica 41 (4):<br />

763-779.<br />

[6] Laitila, J. 2008. Harvesting technology and the<br />

cost of fuel chips from early thinnings. Silva<br />

Fennica 42(2): 267–283.<br />

[7] Anon. 2009. Swedish statistical yearbook of<br />

forestry. Swedish Forest Agency. ISSN 0491-7847.<br />

ISBN 978-91-99462-87-9.<br />

[8] Bredberg, C.-J. 1972. Type stands for the first<br />

thinning. Research Notes 55. Department of<br />

operational efficiency. Royal College of Forestry.<br />

Stockholm. 42 p.<br />

[9] Marklund L.G. 1987. Biomassafunktioner för<br />

tall, gran och björk i Sverige. Biomass functions for<br />

pine, spruce and birch in Sweden. Sveriges<br />

lantbruksuniversitet, Institutionen för<br />

skogstaxering, Rapport 45, 79p (in Swedish with<br />

English Summary).<br />

[10] Hakkila, P. 1978. Pienpuun korjuu<br />

polttoaineeksi. Harvesting small-sized trees for<br />

fuel. Folia Forestalia 342. 38 p. (In Finnish with<br />

English abstract).<br />

[11] Anon. 1995. IUFRO WP 3.04.02. Forest work<br />

study nomenclature. Test editionvalid 1995-2000.<br />

Department of Operational Efficiency, Sedish<br />

University of Agriculture Sciences, Garpenberg. 16<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

27


pp. ISBN 91-576-5055-1.<br />

[12] Kärhä K., Rönkkö E. & Gumse S.-I. 2004.<br />

Productivity and Cutting Costs of Thinning<br />

Harvesters. International Journal of Forest<br />

Engineering 15(2): 43–56.<br />

[13] Kärhä K., Keskinen S., Liikkanen R. &<br />

Lindroos J. 2006. Kokopuun korjuu nuorista<br />

metsistä (Harvesting small-sized whole trees from<br />

young stands). Metsätehon raportti 193 79 p. (In<br />

Finnish).<br />

[14] Nurminen T., Korpunen H. & Uusitalo J. 2006.<br />

Time consumption analysis of cut-to-lenght<br />

harvesting system. Silva Fennica 40 (2): 335-363.<br />

[15] Heikkilä J., Laitila J., Tanttu V., Lindblad J.,<br />

Sirén M. & Asikainen A. 2006. Harvesting<br />

alternatives and cost factors of delimbed energy<br />

wood. Forestry Studies 45: 49-56<br />

28 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong>


CO 2-EQ EMISSIONS OF FOREST CHIP PRODUCTION IN FINLAND IN 2020<br />

Arto Kariniemi & Kalle Kärhä<br />

Metsäteho Oy<br />

P.O. Box 101, FI-00171 Helsinki, Finland<br />

arto.kariniemi@metsateho.fi, kalle.karha@metsateho.fi<br />

ABSTRACT: The research carried out by Metsäteho Oy calculated what would be the total fuel consumption and CO 2-eq<br />

emissions of forest chip production if the use of forest chips is 24 TWh in 2020 in Finland in accordance with the target<br />

set of Long-term Climate and Energy Strategy. CO 2-eq emissions were determined with Metsäteho Oy’s updated<br />

Emissions Calculation Model. If the production and consumption of forest chips in Finland are 24 TWh in 2020, then the<br />

total CO 2-eq emissions would be around 230 000 tonnes. The volume of diesel consumption was 73 million litres and<br />

petrol 1.7 million litres. Electric rail transportation and chipping at the mill site consumed 17 GWh of electricity. The<br />

supply chain with the lowest CO 2-eq emissions was logging residues comminuted at plant. Conversely, the highest CO 2eq<br />

emissions came from stump wood when operating with terminal comminuting. Less than 3% of the energy content<br />

was consumed during the forest chip production. Energy input/output ratio in the total volume was 0.026 MWh/MWh<br />

which varied from 0.019 to 0.038 between the supply systems researched. Hence, forest chip production gave a net of<br />

some 97% of the energy content delivered at the plant.<br />

Keywords: CO 2-eq emissions, Forest biomass, Finland.<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

The use of forest chips in Finland has increased<br />

rapidly in the 21 st century: In the year 2000, the total use<br />

of forest chips for energy generation was 1.8 TWh (0.9<br />

mill. m 3 ), while in 2009 it was 12.2 TWh (6.1 mill. m 3 )<br />

[1]. Of this amount, 10.8 TWh was used in heating and<br />

power plants, and 1.4 TWh in small-sized dwellings, i.e.<br />

private houses, farms, and recreational dwellings, in 2009<br />

[1].<br />

Of the forest chips used in heating and power plants<br />

(10.8 TWh), the majority (36%) was produced from<br />

logging residues in final cuttings in 2009 [1]. Forest chips<br />

derived from stump and root wood totalled 15% and 20%<br />

came from large-sized (rotten) roundwood. 29% of the<br />

total amount of commercial forest chips used for energy<br />

generation came from small-diameter (d 1.3


asis for machine and truck units in the calculations of<br />

CO 2-eq emissions.<br />

In the emissions calculations, the production and<br />

consumption of forest chips was 24 TWh in 2020. It was<br />

assumed that 45% of the forest chips used in 2020 would<br />

be produced from logging residues, 20% from stump and<br />

root wood, and 35% from small-sized thinning wood<br />

harvested in young stands [cf. 1, 3, 4, 24]. The main<br />

supply chain of chips from logging residues and smalldiameter<br />

thinning wood was roadside chipping, and for<br />

stumps crushing at the plant [cf. 4, 24, 25].<br />

Road transportation was the most widely used longdistance<br />

transportation method in the calculations.<br />

Almost 60% of forest biomass (m 3 km) was transported<br />

by truck from roadside landings to the energy plant, or to<br />

some other production mill. 10% transportation volume<br />

was by train, with either electric or diesel locomotives,<br />

and 14% by barge.<br />

3 RESULTS<br />

3.1 Fuel and electricity consumption<br />

If the production and consumption of forest chips in<br />

Finland are 24 TWh in 2020, then the total CO 2-eq<br />

emissions would be around 230 000 tonnes (Fig. 1). Of<br />

this amount, the proportion of forest chip harvesting<br />

operations was 68%, long-distance transportation 19%,<br />

silviculture and forest improvement works 3%, and<br />

production of diesel and fertilizer 10%. The volume of<br />

diesel consumption was 73 million litres and petrol 1.7<br />

million litres (Fig. 2). Electric rail transportation and<br />

comminuting at the mill site consumed 17 GWh of<br />

electricity.<br />

3.2 Energy input/output ratio<br />

In the study, the supply chain with the lowest CO 2-eq<br />

emissions was logging residues comminuted at plant<br />

(Fig. 3). Conversely, the highest CO 2-eq emissions came<br />

from stump wood when operating with terminal<br />

comminuting (Fig. 3). In other words, the supply chains<br />

with the best energy input/output ratio were logging<br />

residues with comminution at roadside landing and plant,<br />

as well as logging residues bundles with comminution at<br />

terminal. Correspondingly, stump and root wood supply<br />

chain with comminution at terminal had the highest ratio.<br />

Less than 3% of the energy content was consumed<br />

during the forest chip production. Energy input/output<br />

ratio in the total volume was 0.026 MWh/MWh which<br />

varied from 0.019 to 0.038 between the supply chain<br />

alternatives studied (Figs. 4–6). Hence, forest chip<br />

production gave a net of some 97% of the energy content<br />

delivered at the plant.<br />

30 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Figure 1: Volume of CO 2-eq emissions of a study,<br />

227 000 tonnes in total, with the supply sources used.<br />

Figure 2: Volume of diesel consumption of a study, 73<br />

million litres in total, with the supply sources used.<br />

Figure 3: Relative CO 2-eq emissions of forest chip<br />

supply chains in the study. CO 2-eq emissions of 100 =<br />

Logging residues, comminution at roadside landing.


Figure 4: CO 2-eq emissions (kg/m 3 ) of logging residue<br />

chips with roadside comminution supply chain in the<br />

study.<br />

Figure 5: CO 2-eq emissions (kg/m 3 ) of small-diameter<br />

thinning wood chips with roadside comminution supply<br />

chain in the study.<br />

Figure 6: CO 2-eq emissions (kg/m 3 ) of stump and root<br />

wood chips with supply chain based on comminution at<br />

plant in the study.<br />

4 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

A lot of discussion about the energy efficiency of<br />

forestry production chains and the CO 2-eq emissions of<br />

different fuels have been presented. The importance of<br />

decreasing energy use, as well as monitoring and<br />

reducing greenhouse gases are a general subject for<br />

further development. Therefore, Metsäteho Oy undertook<br />

this study on the CO 2-eq emissions in forest chip<br />

production by alternative supply chains in Finland in<br />

2020. The study results indicated that the energy<br />

input/put ratio of forest biomass is good. With our supply<br />

mix, forest chip production gave a net of some 97% of<br />

the energy content delivered at the plant. The findings are<br />

in line with the earlier CO 2-eq emissions made in Finland<br />

[26, 27].<br />

Emissions calculations have to continue to provide<br />

information that is vital for the future development. In<br />

Finland, the comprehensive forest work studies of<br />

mechanized felling and forest haulage was carried out in<br />

the 1980’s and 90’s, and now is time for deep<br />

understanding of production of forest chip technology<br />

and energy efficiency, as well as realistic alternatives of<br />

forest chip supply chains in future.<br />

This study gives a reasoned estimation of forest<br />

biomass supply sources, supply chains and machinery, as<br />

well as CO 2-eq emissions related to the target for the year<br />

2020 (24 TWh). Calculation the CO 2-eq emissions were<br />

determined for different chip raw material flows (chips<br />

from small-sized thinning wood, logging residues, and<br />

stump and root wood), and for various supply chains<br />

(comminution at roadside landings, at terminals, and at<br />

power plants, or at some other production mills).<br />

In the calculations, it was assumed that the share of<br />

stump wood chips will be increasing, as well as the share<br />

of terminal comminuting in the production of forest chips<br />

[cf. 3, 4, 24, 25]. The productivity levels of machines and<br />

vehicles are assumed to be almost at the same level than<br />

nowadays. In the future, development of machine and<br />

equipment technology, new technical and mechanical<br />

innovations and rationalization of working methods will<br />

help to boost the operating performance of machine and<br />

vehicle units and further to decrease the CO 2-eq<br />

emissions of forest chip production. In contrast, less<br />

favorable harvesting conditions (i.e. less removals, more<br />

difficult terrain, and longer forwarding distances) and<br />

lengthening transportation distances are obstacles to<br />

lowering energy consumption and CO 2-eq emissions of<br />

machinery [cf. 4, 24, 28].<br />

Just for understanding of causation for differences<br />

between supply chains based on different machinery and<br />

logistics, there need to be mention some examples: Forest<br />

haulage and long-distance transportation of logging<br />

residues are more productive compared with the other<br />

forest chip supply sources. Lifting operation and<br />

comminution of stump wood consume a lot of energy.<br />

Cutting of small-diameter thinning wood is not effective<br />

from a fuel consumption point of view.<br />

Silviculture and forest improvement activities’<br />

emissions were included into the Model, as well as<br />

machine transfers and transport-to-work and production<br />

of diesel and fertilizer. As an example, fuel consumption<br />

of truck has calculated by Metsäteho’s sensitive fuel<br />

consumption model. Emissions were calculated by type<br />

of forest chip supply chain, combined with appropriate<br />

long-distance transportation methods.<br />

As a significant part of the study, a sensitivity<br />

analysis was performed to point out the influence of<br />

different parameters and to underline the importance of<br />

data management behind the emissions calculations.<br />

In practice, the supply chain mix depends on the<br />

availability of supply chain combinations, machinery,<br />

and machine operators. The differences of emissions are<br />

due to the productivity and fuel consumption of different<br />

kind of technology, but also because of realistic<br />

combination of supply chains and available machinery.<br />

We have to look at the whole production system, hence<br />

there is no sense to compare supply chains without<br />

realistic, comprehensive boundaries.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] Ylitalo, E. <strong>2010</strong>. Puun energiakäyttö 2009. (Use of<br />

wood for energy generation in 2009). Finnish Forest<br />

Research Institute, Forest Statistical Bulletin 16/<strong>2010</strong>.<br />

[2] Anon. 2008. Long-term Climate and Energy Strategy.<br />

Government Report to Parliament 6 November 2008.<br />

Publications of the Ministry of Employment and the<br />

Economy, Energy and climate 36/2008. Available at:<br />

http://www.tem.fi/files/21079/TEMjul_36_2008_energia<br />

_ja_ilmasto.pdf.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

31


[3] Kärhä, K., Elo, J., Lahtinen, P., Räsänen, T. &<br />

Pajuoja, H. 2009. Availability and use of wood-based<br />

fuels in Finland in 2020. Metsäteho Review 40. Available<br />

at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Katsaus_40.pdf.<br />

[4] Kärhä, K., Strandström, M., Lahtinen, P. & Elo, J.<br />

2009. Forest chip production machinery and labour<br />

demand in Finland in the year 2020. Metsäteho Review<br />

41. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Katsaus_41.pdf.<br />

[5] TYKO 2007. Available at:<br />

http://lipasto.vtt.fi/tyko/malli.htm.<br />

[6] RAILI 2007. Available at:<br />

http://www.lipasto.vtt.fi/raili/index.htm.<br />

[7] EcoData. Available at:<br />

http://www.kcl.fi/page.php?page_id=309.<br />

[8] Kärhä, K. & Kariniemi, A. 2008. Fuel consumption of<br />

the production machinery of forest chips In Finland.<br />

Metsäteho Oy, Unpublished report.<br />

[9] Rieppo, K. & Örn, J. 2003. Metsäkoneiden<br />

polttoaineen kulutuksen mittaaminen. (Measurement of<br />

the fuel consumption of forest machines). Metsäteho<br />

Report 148. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/j9ac717p0zbp1.pdf.<br />

[10] Väkevä, J., Pennanen, O. & Örn, J. 2004. Puutavaraautojen<br />

polttoaineen kulutus. (Fuel consumption of<br />

timber trucks). Metsäteho Report 166. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/52ewebln0acjs.pdf.<br />

[11] Kärhä, K., Keskinen, S., Liikkanen, R. & Lindroos,<br />

J. 2006. Kokopuun korjuu nuorista metsistä. (Whole-tree<br />

harvesting from young stands). Metsäteho Report 193.<br />

Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Raportti_193_KK_ym.p<br />

df.<br />

[12] Kärhä, K. 2008. Integration of small-diameter wood<br />

harvesting in early thinnings using the two-pile cutting<br />

method. In: <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 2008, <strong>Proceedings</strong> of<br />

Poster Session. <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 2008 Conference &<br />

Exhibition on Biomass for Energy, 27 th –29 th May 2008,<br />

Jönköping, Sweden. p. 124–128.<br />

[13] Kärhä, K. & Mutikainen, A. 2008. Integrated cutting<br />

of first-thinning wood with a Moipu 400ES. TTS<br />

Research, Forestry Bulletin 726.<br />

[14] Kärhä, K., Vartiamäki, T., Liikkanen, R., Keskinen,<br />

S. & Lindroos, J. 2004. Hakkuutähteen paalauksen ja<br />

paalien metsäkuljetuksen tuottavuus ja kustannukset.<br />

(Productivity and costs of slash bundling and bundle<br />

forwarding). Metsäteho Report 179. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/4djb1xxw0otzss5.pdf.<br />

[15] Laitila, J., Ala-Fossi, A., Vartiamäki, T., Ranta, T. &<br />

Asikainen, A. 2007. Kantojen noston ja metsäkuljetuksen<br />

tuottavuus. (Productivity of stump lifting and forest<br />

haulage). Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research<br />

Institute 46. Available at:<br />

32 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

http://www.metla.fi/julkaisut/workingpapers/2007/mwp0<br />

46.pdf.<br />

[16] Kärhä, K., Mutikainen, A. & Kortelahti, I. 2009.<br />

Väkevä-kantopilkkuri Metsätehon ja TTS tutkimuksen<br />

pikatestissä. (The Väkevä Stump Processor in the test by<br />

Metsäteho and TTS Research). Metsäteho<br />

Tuloskalvosarja 12/2009. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Tuloskalvosarja_2009_<br />

12_Vakeva-kantopilkkuri_kk.pdf.<br />

[17] Rieppo, K. 2002. Hakkuutähteen metsäkuljetuksen<br />

ajanmenekki, tuottavuus ja kustannukset. (Time<br />

consumption, productivity and costs of forwarding<br />

logging residues). Metsäteho Report 136. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/f2b1et3t.pdf.<br />

[18] Asikainen, A., Ranta, T., Laitila, J. & Hämäläinen, J.<br />

2001. Hakkuutähdehakkeen kustannustekijät ja<br />

suurimittakaavaisen hankinnan logistiikka. (Cost factors<br />

and large-scale procurement of logging residue chips).<br />

University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry, Research<br />

Notes 131.<br />

[19] Korpilahti, A. & Suurniemi, S. 2001.<br />

Käyttöpaikallahaketukseen perustuva puupolttoaineen<br />

tuotanto. (Production of woody fuel chips based on<br />

comminution at power plant). Metsäteho Report 122.<br />

Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/tff0fy8d5c7p.pdf.<br />

[20] Halonen, P. & Vesisenaho, A. 2002.<br />

Hakeautoseuranta. (Follow up study of chip trucks). VTT<br />

Prosessit, Tutkimusselostus PRO/T6046/02.<br />

[21] Ranta, T., Halonen, P., Frilander, P., Asikainen, A.,<br />

Lehikoinen, M. & Väätäinen, K. 2002. Metsähakkeen<br />

autokuljetuksen logistiikka. (Logistics of truck<br />

transportation of forest chips). VTT Prosessit,<br />

Tutkimusselostus PRO/T6042/02.<br />

[22] Ranta, T. & Rinne, S. 2006. The profitability of<br />

transporting uncomminuted raw materials in Finland.<br />

Biomass and <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 30(3): 231–237.<br />

[23] Korpilahti, A. 2004. Oksapaalien autokuljetus.<br />

(Truck transportation of slash bundles). Metsäteho Report<br />

169. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/o42lhigkekx.pdf.<br />

[24] Kärhä, K. 2007. Supply chains and machinery in the<br />

production of forest chips in Finland. In: Savolainen, M.<br />

(Ed.). Book of <strong>Proceedings</strong>. <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 2007, 3 rd<br />

International <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Conference and Exhibition, 3 rd –<br />

6 th September 2007, Jyväskylä Paviljonki, Finland.<br />

Finbio Publications 36: 367–374.<br />

[25] Kärhä, K. 2009. Metsähakkeen tuotantoketjut<br />

Suomessa vuonna 2008. (Industrial supply chains of<br />

forest chip production in Finland in 2008). Metsäteho<br />

Tuloskalvosarja 14/2009. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Tuloskalvosarja_2009_<br />

14_Metsahakkeen_tuotantoketjut_kk_2.pdf.<br />

[26] Korpilahti, A. 1998. Finnish forest energy systems<br />

and CO 2 consequences. Biomass and <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 15(4/5):<br />

293–297.


[27] Wihersaari, M. 2005. Greenhouse gas emissions<br />

from final harvest fuel chip production in Finland.<br />

Biomass and <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 28(5): 435–443.<br />

[28] Kärhä, K. 2007. Production machinery for forest<br />

chips in Finland in 2007 and in the future. Metsäteho<br />

Review 28. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Katsaus_28.pdf.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

33


34 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

LARGE-SCALE FOREST BIOMASS SUPPLY WITH LONG-DISTANCE TRANSPORT METHODS<br />

Ranta, T. Korpinen, O.-J. Jäppinen, E. & Karttunen, K.<br />

Lappeenranta University of Technology<br />

Prikaatinkatu 3 E, 50100 Mikkeli, Finland<br />

tel.: +358 40 864 4994, e-mail: tapio.ranta@lut.fi<br />

ABSTRACT: Finnish forest companies aim to produce biodiesel based on the Fischer-Tropsch process from forest<br />

residues. This study presents method to evaluate biomass availability and supply costs to the selected biorefinery site.<br />

Forest-owners’ willingness to sell, buyers’ market share, and regional competition were taken into account when biomass<br />

availability was evaluated. Supply logistics was based either on direct truck transportation deliveries from forest or on<br />

railway/waterway transportation via regional terminals. The large biomass need of a biorefinery demanded both of these<br />

supply structures, since the procurement area was larger than the traditional supply area used for CHP plants in Finland.<br />

The average supply cost was 17 €/MWh for an annual supply of 2 TWh of forest biomass. Truck transportation of chips<br />

made from logging residues covered 70% of the total volume, since direct forest chip deliveries from forest were the<br />

most competitive supply solution in terms of direct supply costs. The better supply security and lower vehicle capacity<br />

needs are issues that would favour also terminal logistics with other raw-material sources in practical operations. One<br />

finding was that the larger the biomass need, the less the variation in biomass availability and supply costs, since almost<br />

the whole country will serve as a potential supply area. Biomass import possibilities were not considered in this study.<br />

Keywords: logistics, forest residues, supply chain, biorefinery<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

In Finland, the target for renewable energy as a<br />

share of final energy consumption will be 38% by<br />

2020 [1]. In 2008, the share was 28%, but it fell to<br />

26% in 2009 because of the declining production<br />

volumes in the forest industry [2]. In particular, wood<br />

fuels will be tasked with a considerable share of the<br />

work to meet Finnish targets. Wood fuels accounted<br />

for 75% (263 PJ) of renewable energy primary use<br />

(350 PJ) in 2009 [2]. The Climate and Energy Strategy<br />

of Finland presupposes wood fuel primary use to<br />

achieve the level of 335 PJ (forest chips: 76 PJ) under<br />

the base scenario or 349 PJ (forest chips: 86 PJ) in the<br />

target scenario by 2020 [1]. The target scenario<br />

strives toward the aim of RES for Finland. The<br />

difference between the scenarios follows from the<br />

increased forest chip use, while use of forest industry<br />

volume-­‐dependent wood by-­‐products and black<br />

liquor is forecast to decline according to both<br />

scenarios. which underpins the development of forest<br />

chip use. The study by Pöyry estimated that supply by<br />

products would decline some 16% (16 PJ) between<br />

2005 and <strong>2010</strong> [3].<br />

Under the Climate and Energy Strategy, the total use<br />

of forest chips (86 PJ) involves some 12 million solid<br />

cubic metres. The latest aim stated by the Government of<br />

Finland is to increase this volume to the level of 13.5<br />

million solid cubic metres (90 PJ). Techno-economical<br />

potential will lie somewhere around 151–168 PJ [3] by<br />

2020; therefore, the target is challenging to utlilise more<br />

than half of the potential within this time frame.<br />

Uncertainties arise from the development of roundwood<br />

felling levels, energy wood subsidy schemes, pricing of<br />

emission allowances and prices of alternative fuels. In<br />

addition, Finland aims to build three biorefineries, each<br />

needing 1 million solid m 3 of forest chips a year. These<br />

targets and related incentives will be announced in a<br />

national action plan for the European Commission by the<br />

end of June. The incentives include a chipping subsidy<br />

for energy wood from first thinnings, a feed-in tariff for<br />

small-scale CHP (< 20 MW) using wood, and a dynamicsubsidy<br />

model for electricity produced from wood in cocombustion<br />

boilers. The idea is to replace peat and coal<br />

with wood and link the level of the subsidy to the price<br />

development of CO 2 allowances.<br />

The development of forest chips’ use has been rapid<br />

so far in the 21 century. From 2000 to 2009, the use of<br />

forest chips increased from 7 PJ (0.9 million solid m 3 ) to<br />

44 PJ (6.1 million solid m 3 ). The energy industry (district<br />

heat and power production) used 39 PJ and small houses<br />

5 PJ in 2009 [4]. Forest chips consisted of logging<br />

residues (36%), small-diameter energy wood (29%),<br />

stumps (15%), and roundwood (20%). The share of<br />

roundwood increased till sixfold from the last year<br />

because of import from Russia.<br />

So far, all forest chips (both uncomminuted and<br />

comminuted material) have been transported by truck,<br />

except in trials with railway and waterway vehicles in the<br />

inland lake area ]4]. It was found that waterway<br />

transportation may become an option with longer<br />

transport distances (over 150 km) if the barge logistics is<br />

managed well and barge structures modified for forest<br />

chip transportation [5]. A winter season with iced-over<br />

lake areas (3–4 months) will decrease the logistical<br />

effectiveness of the waterway system. In contrast, railway<br />

logistics offers more route options and year-round<br />

operation possibilities. Experiences of railway logistics<br />

for forest chips from Sweden have been promising [6].<br />

The terminal operations are an especially essential part of<br />

railway logistics for keeping the train capacity in use [7].<br />

It could be expected that other transport modes will<br />

claim a certain part of domestic transport markets for<br />

forest chips. Larger forest chip supply volumes calls for<br />

logistics systems including buffer terminals and transport


modes suitable for longer distances. Supply costs will<br />

increase because of more handling and storage, but at the<br />

same time it is possible to increase the availability and<br />

supply security.<br />

The larger forest chip volumes and longer transport<br />

distances will be clearly manifested with biorefineries<br />

despite their integration into paper and pulp mills.<br />

Finnish forest companies aim to produce biodiesel from<br />

domestic forest chip raw-material sources, where the<br />

biofuel production technology will use the Fischer-<br />

Tropsch process. At the moment, the production<br />

technology is being further developed and evaluated for<br />

forest chips through demonstration and pilot plants. Also<br />

tentative production sites for commercial-scale plants<br />

have been selected and biomass availability estimated. In<br />

practical terms, only existing forest integrates would be<br />

suitable sites in Finland. The advantages of process<br />

integration will increase the conversion efficiency from<br />

60% to 90% [8]. There are three groups of operators<br />

interested in investing in a biorefinery and thus three<br />

parallel projects in progress in Finland. The additional<br />

biomass need per commercial site is at least 1 million m 3<br />

– i.e., 2 TWh of biomass and hundreds of truckloads per<br />

day, depending on the use of other modes of transport.<br />

The maximum need would be double this: 4 TWh of<br />

biomass.<br />

The analysis tool reported upon in this study will be<br />

targeted at assisting availability and alternative supply<br />

chain studies for potential biorefinery sites in Finland.<br />

The biorefinery scale is commercial, with production of<br />

100,000 tonnes of biodiesel a year. The analysis will be<br />

bound to a regional operational environment of supply<br />

infrastructure, including alternative transport networks<br />

such as roads, inland waterways and railways, potential<br />

forest biomass resources and alternative supply logistics<br />

structures. Regional competition is an important part of<br />

the study, for evaluating realistic biomass availability.<br />

Logistical structures dictate how the supply chain is<br />

constructed between supply and demand site including<br />

storage phases and the form in which material is handled<br />

in the various stages. Geographical information system<br />

(GIS) use is applied for analysing biomass resources in a<br />

competitive situation among end users and alternative<br />

supply logistics structures and for examining supply<br />

costs.<br />

2 MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

2.1 Forest biomass reserves<br />

Calculations of biomass potential were based on<br />

commercial fellings reported upon at municipality level<br />

in Metinfo forest information services [9]. Volumes were<br />

obtained for 2004–08 and averaged. The biomass<br />

calculation method was reported upon in an earlier study,<br />

where techno-economical logging residue and stump<br />

volumes were converted from roundwood felling<br />

volumes [10]. The calculation method for small-diameter<br />

energy wood was based on National Forest Inventory<br />

data and also reported in the earlier study [11]. Biomass<br />

volumes at municipal level (448 units) were distributed<br />

over smaller collection points (55,292 units). These<br />

points were based on actual regeneration felling points<br />

from 2002–04. In this way, the municipal volume was<br />

spread to forestry land where fellings will occur also in<br />

the future. The volume was divided equally across points<br />

within each municipality, for more fine-grained<br />

geographical coverage. The coverage of collection points<br />

was greater in areas where regeneration felling activity<br />

has been higher, such as eastern and central Finland (see<br />

Fig. 1). With the volume assigned to these points, the<br />

regional availability and logistics calculations could be<br />

made more detailed.<br />

2.2 Competition among end users<br />

Alternative end users of forest chips were<br />

geographically pinpointed to take into account the<br />

regional competition. Only large-scale users with more<br />

than 50 GWh of annual actual or planned use (approx. 30<br />

sites) were selected (Fig. 1). In practice, these were<br />

municipal or industrial CHP plants. Also future potential<br />

user sites were taken into account, where the investment<br />

has been decided on or is under construction. No<br />

potential biorefinery sites were selected, as no<br />

construction site decision has yet been made. Small-scale<br />

heating plant sites (approx. 400) were omitted, since their<br />

effect on regional use is rather low. Large-scale users<br />

account for 75% of forest chips’ end use, and the smallscale<br />

use could have been incorporated into large-scale<br />

use [4]. The regional coverage of users was extensive<br />

except in northern Finland.<br />

Figure 1: The coverage of forest biomass collection<br />

points and large-scale (> 50 GWh/a) users of forest chips<br />

The forest chips are supplied mainly in the proximity<br />

of existing CHP plants, since the typical procurement<br />

area lies within 100 km. Because of the extensive<br />

geographical coverage and plants’ proximity to each<br />

other, the procurement areas are overlapped, especially in<br />

the southern part of Finland. End users have access to<br />

only certain of the biomass sources surrounding the<br />

plants, since the biomass supply market is oligopolistic<br />

by nature. Many organisations supply biomass to<br />

alternative end users in the same region; in this study, the<br />

maximum market share was assumed to be 50%.<br />

At first, for each CHP plant the supply areas were<br />

calculated via road network to build an isodistance area<br />

(same road distance at outer ring) that could meet the full<br />

demand. This area was called the inside supply area.<br />

From this area, 50% was allocated to the plant accounting<br />

for the maximum market share. The rest was available for<br />

other users. Secondly, the outside supply area was<br />

calculated with a distance double that used in the first<br />

stage. The supply area will be quadrupled with double the<br />

distance, and 17% of this area was allocated to the plant,<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

35


with the rest being volume free for other users (Fig. 2).<br />

From the overlapping area, the free volume (i.e.,<br />

collection sites) was allocated by a method minimising<br />

the transport distance between alternative users.<br />

Especially in areas with high forest fuel demand and<br />

several overlapping supply areas, the transport distances<br />

increased. However, the areas with the highest demand<br />

also had the highest potential in central and eastern<br />

Finland. The western part of the country was outside the<br />

scope of the study. The intensity of the competition was<br />

illustrated through the use of colors in the map<br />

presentation (see Fig. 3). Areas depicted in red had the<br />

highest competition, and 50% of the volume was<br />

allocated to CHP plants in the region. By contrast, in<br />

areas shown in brown, 17% was allocated; for those in<br />

green, all biomass volume was free and no competition<br />

existed. The greatest competition was in central and<br />

eastern Finland, where are many large-scale CHP-plants<br />

with high demand. The individual points with the highest<br />

demand were in Jyväskylä, in central Finland (1,000<br />

GWh), and in the city of Lappeenranta (800 GWh), in<br />

eastern Finland. The north-eastern part of the country had<br />

the least competition from biomass.<br />

Figure 2: Isodistance areas and biomass volume<br />

allocation rules from the areas<br />

Forest biomass availability was illustrated in a map<br />

presentation via color shading, with darker color<br />

indicating better biomass availability (Fig. 3). The map<br />

showed the biomass free after competition. Therefore,<br />

availability was best in the northern part of the country,<br />

where there was the least competition. Both the potential<br />

and the availability of small diameter energy wood are<br />

increasing in the northern part of Finland. Normally, the<br />

potential maps without competition showed the opposite<br />

situation, since the potential of spruce logging residues<br />

and stumps is concentrated in central and eastern Finland<br />

[12].<br />

36 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Figure 3: Competition from biomass. The map at the left<br />

illustrates the degree of competition (red for high<br />

competition, orange for minor competition, green for no<br />

competition) and the one on the right shows the<br />

availability after competition has been taken into account<br />

(the darker the better availability). All biomass fractions<br />

are included<br />

2.3 Factors in availability of biomass to a biorefinery<br />

Forest resources, types, and felling activity dictate the<br />

biomass potential. So far, the spruce-dominated<br />

regeneration fellings have been the main source for forest<br />

chips’ recovery. Nowadays, also pine-dominated small<br />

diameter energy wood fellings and pine stump recovery<br />

has become more common. Regional competition is a<br />

very important factor in examination of availability to a<br />

specific end-user site. The market share of roundwood<br />

fellings and forest-owners’ willingness to sell biomass for<br />

energy determine the actual free biomass availability.<br />

Logging residues and stumps’ recovery are typically<br />

integrated into roundwood fellings; therefore, access to<br />

roundwood fellings provides the possibility of harvesting<br />

also energy wood from the same felling site if forest<br />

owners are willing to sell it. Forest industry companies<br />

are potential biorefinery investors in Finland, and the<br />

domestic market share of one company is, on average,<br />

one third, although it varies a great deal by region.<br />

Forest-owners’ willingness to sell was examined in a<br />

survey done in the county of Etelä-Savo in 2009.<br />

Alternative stumpage prices were taken into<br />

consideration. The results concerning willingness<br />

indicated 80% for logging residues, 75% for smalldiameter<br />

energy wood, and 50% for stumps (Fig. 4). The<br />

main reason for declining energy wood harvesting was<br />

lack of information and fear of jeopardising the nutrient<br />

balance at the forest site.<br />

End-user site location and its proximity to biomass<br />

resources, regional geography, and transport networks<br />

and related infrastructure are site-dependent factors that<br />

dictate availability to the selected end user. The railway<br />

and waterway network will widen the procurement area<br />

beyond the normal area of less than 100 km via road<br />

network. Overall, the counties of Pohjois-Karjala,<br />

Kainuu, and Pohjois-Savo (in the north-east) and the<br />

southern part of Lapland are especially suitable for<br />

railway or waterway transport logistics.


Figure 4: End users’ market share (in this case one third)<br />

and forest-owners’ willingness to sell different energy<br />

biomass fractions<br />

2.4 Supply logistics alternatives<br />

Supply logistics decisions were based on either<br />

roadside chipping and direct truck transportation or<br />

terminal chipping and railway/waterway transportation to<br />

the end-user site. The terminal chipping option included<br />

loose material’s transportation by trucks to terminals.<br />

Only inland and lake-area domestic supply was<br />

examined. Import options were excluded from this study.<br />

The terminal sites were existing terminals, and<br />

selection for the study was based on suitability to act as a<br />

biomass supply terminal for the selected end-user site.<br />

Primarily, each location’s proximity to biomass sources<br />

and transport networks (railway/waterway) dictated the<br />

terminal sites. The secondary selection criteria were<br />

technical properties and the terminal site’s suitability in<br />

terms of storage capacity, loading capacity and length of<br />

the loading rail or quay, and chipping conditions<br />

(remoteness from residential areas). The maximum pre<br />

hauling distance for loose material was set to 80 km.<br />

Waterway terminals were on Lake Saimaa, along the<br />

deep channel (4.2 m). In total, 28 railway terminals and<br />

three waterway terminals were chosen (Fig. 5).<br />

Railway transportation was based on container<br />

logistics. Railway shipment involved 20 wagons (20 ft,<br />

48 m 3 ), for a total frame volume of 2,880 m 3 of forest<br />

chips (Fig. 6). The properties of loading places imposed a<br />

limit on the train length, less than 450 m, or a 20-wagon<br />

train. The maximum net load would in this case be 976<br />

tonnes, which yields 2,380 MWh. Each wagon took three<br />

containers, with the total, approx. 140 m 3 , being<br />

equivalent to a full 140 m 3 trailer truck. The bearing<br />

capacity of one wagon is 61 tonnes, so a fifth of the<br />

bearing capacity will remain unused. Loading was done<br />

by front loader and unloading with a forklift truck (Fig.<br />

7). Forklifts could be equipped with a weighing appliance<br />

and RFID-marking system. Biomass was chipped at the<br />

railway terminal to keep the degree of capacity utilisation<br />

of chipping facilities and trains as high as possible.<br />

Biomass was stored for the long term in uncomminuted<br />

form, to avoid material loss and any risk of self-ignition.<br />

Waterway transportation was based on barge<br />

logistics, wherein a tugboat operates with a barge .Only<br />

the Lake Saimaa area is suitable for this option, apart<br />

from in the winter season, 3–4 months for which the lake<br />

is frozen. A typical suitable barge size for the Lake<br />

Saimaa area is the Europa IIa type: hold: 2,650 m 3 , load<br />

with heaped shape: 4,000 m 3 , approx. 1,200 tonnes.<br />

Storage and chipping were done as with railway logistics.<br />

Loading and unloading were done by heavy material<br />

machines or excavators (Fig. 8). Larger loads are possible<br />

with extended sides, since there is still a lot of carrying<br />

capacity (maximum: 2,500 tonnes) left. Biomass from<br />

islands will come as deck load, but for this study those<br />

options were excluded.<br />

Figure 5: Railway and waterway terminals<br />

Figure 6: Container railway shipment (Innofreight)<br />

Figure 7: Loading and unloading of railway containers<br />

(Innofreight)<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

37


Figure 8: Waterway transportation by barge<br />

2.5 Supply costs of alternative supply chain options<br />

First supply cost without transport was calculated for<br />

each biomass fraction. Each collection point had<br />

alternative transportation options, either direct truck<br />

transportation to the end user or transportation via<br />

terminals to the end user (Fig. 9). Direct transport<br />

involved roadside chipping and truck transport of forest<br />

chips. Stump biomass was chipped not at the roadside but<br />

at terminals only, or it was transported as uncomminuted<br />

loads to the end user. Terminal options included also<br />

loose biomass truck transportation to terminals and<br />

further forest chip transportation to the end user by either<br />

railway or waterway, according to the terminal type.<br />

Figure 9: Alternative supply chain option for forest<br />

chips: waterway route (A), railway route (B), and road<br />

transport route (C) by truck<br />

Logging residues were the cheapest source of raw<br />

material, ahead of stumps and small-diameter energy<br />

wood. Small-diameter energy wood harvesting and<br />

chipping received a production subsidy. Without that,<br />

they would not be a competitive source (Fig. 10).<br />

38 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Figure: 10: Supply costs without transportation<br />

Secondly, the transportation cost was calculated for<br />

each collection site, for the end user and alternative<br />

terminals. The cheapest option was selected, either direct<br />

transport or transport via terminal. The increase in truck<br />

transportation costs was much greater than the increase<br />

for railway or waterway transport (Fig. 11). The larger<br />

individual loads – by railway 20 trucks and by water 30–<br />

40 trucks – flatten out the growth in transport costs with<br />

these options. The cost functions were based on earlier<br />

studies, with updated cost parameters applied [5, 13, 14].<br />

Figure 11: Transportation cost with alternative long<br />

distance transport options (label rank the same as the line<br />

rank in the figure)<br />

2.6 Estimation of vehicle and chipper capacity needs<br />

An important part of the supply logistics planning is<br />

estimation of how many vehicles and other machines are<br />

needed to feed enough biomass to the biorefinery in view<br />

of the supply logistics structure selected. Capacity<br />

calculation was based on the annual output of alternative<br />

vehicles and machines (Table I). Values were gathered<br />

from earlier studies [5, 6, 13, 14] and modified.


Table I: Annual capacity of vehicles and chippers<br />

Vehicle/Chipper m 3 /a<br />

Trucks<br />

-­‐ logging residues 21, 200<br />

-­‐ stumps 23, 600<br />

-­‐ energy wood 21, 200<br />

-­‐ forest chips 26, 800<br />

Train 160, 000<br />

Barge 245, 000<br />

Mobile chipper<br />

-­‐ logging residues at roadside 46, 700<br />

-­‐ stumps at terminal 80, 800<br />

-­‐ energy wood at terminal 92, 300<br />

3 RESULTS<br />

The main results of the study concerned the annual<br />

availability of forest biomass in relation to the supply<br />

cost and the logistical choices behind this solution for the<br />

selected site. This paper presents the results without<br />

specification of the exact site. Also, precise values of<br />

supply costs and biomass volumes in figure presentations<br />

were omitted because of their confidential nature for the<br />

selected site. The shape of the availability function was a<br />

logistics growth curve where the cost increase was faster<br />

at the beginning but slowed in the middle to increase<br />

again at the end (Fig. 12). The procurement area was<br />

limited to below 300 km when defined as a direct truck<br />

transport distance and less than 80 km when defined as a<br />

pre-hauling distance to supply terminals. Therefore, the<br />

maximum availability was 4.5 TWh to the selected site.<br />

In particular, the market share and forest-owners’<br />

willingness to sell limited the total biomass potential to<br />

one fourth of the original free techno-economical<br />

potential. Local competition, taken into account to<br />

determine the free techno-economical potential,<br />

decreased availability particularly in eastern Finland.<br />

The average supply costs were used in the figures,<br />

while with marginal costs the shape would have been an<br />

exponential growth curve. The average supply cost<br />

increased steadily at around 2 TWh, which was the<br />

targeted supply volume for the plant, corresponding to<br />

approx. 1 million solid m 3 . The average supply cost was<br />

17 €/MWh for a 2 TWh supply. One source of supply<br />

cost variation was the biomass source. The cheapest was<br />

logging residues (16 €/MWh), ahead of stumps (17.5<br />

€/MWh), and the most expensive was small diameter<br />

energy wood (21 €/MWh), regardless of the production<br />

subsidies (Fig. 13). Production subsidies decreased the<br />

costs of small-diameter energy wood supply by 5.2 €/<br />

MWh and made these sites one potential energy source. It<br />

was assumed that 25% of energy wood sites were<br />

subsidised. The reason for lower availability of stump<br />

biomass was stricter collection site selection rules and<br />

less willingness of forest-owners to sell them. Without<br />

subsidies, the energy wood fraction would be too<br />

expensive.<br />

Figure 12: Forest biomass supply cost as a function of<br />

total biomass availability<br />

Figure 13: Forest biomass supply cost as a function of<br />

biomass availability, divided among alternative energy<br />

biomass sources (label rank the same as the line rank in<br />

the figure)<br />

Logging residues accounted for the majority of<br />

supply volumes, approx. 70% of 2 TWh supply, and<br />

decreased slowly after this. Stumps accounted for approx.<br />

20% and subsidised energy wood roughly 10% (Fig. 14).<br />

Unsubsidised energy wood became an option until the<br />

volume surpassed 2.5 TWh and the supply cost more than<br />

20 €/MWh.<br />

Figure 14: The shares of alternative biomass sources as a<br />

function of total biomass availability (label rank the same<br />

as the line rank in the figure)<br />

Truck transport vehicles dominated the<br />

transportation, at approx. 70% for 2 TWh supply, and<br />

decreased with larger volumes, to 60% (Fig. 15). The<br />

selected site did not have any waterway option.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

39


Figure 15: The share of transport modes as a function of<br />

the total biomass availability (label rank the same as the<br />

line rank in the figure)<br />

The map illustrations showed the aerial supply<br />

solution, where direct deliveries and delivery via railways<br />

terminals take place, and on which raw-material sources<br />

these deliveries were based. Direct truck loads were<br />

delivered at a transport distance of less than 300 km, and<br />

the railway option was possible outside that area, except<br />

for small areas surrounding terminals (Fig. 16). All<br />

biomass sources were transported by truck, but for longer<br />

distances only energy wood and finally logging residues<br />

were viable option. Stumps were too costly an option for<br />

railway transportation.<br />

The vehicle needs for supply of 2 TWh biomass were<br />

estimated. In this case, the forest chip trucks and mobile<br />

chippers were needed because of the large number of<br />

direct deliveries from the roadside. The need for units of<br />

other transport modes was marginal (Table II). To<br />

increase the supply from this level will require, in<br />

particular, trucks for uncomminuted biomass and mobile<br />

chippers for logging residues and energy wood.<br />

Figure 16: Map illustrating transport mode selection (left<br />

side red for trucks and yellow for railway) and biomass<br />

raw-material options (right side, dark green for all<br />

fractions, middle green without stumps and light green<br />

only logging residues ) for 2 TWh supply<br />

40 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Table II: Vehicle needs assuming a supply of 2 TWh<br />

Vehicle Units<br />

Truck (uncomminuted biomass) 9<br />

Truck (forest chips) 22<br />

Train (20 wagons) 2<br />

Barge 0<br />

Mobile chippers (logging residues,<br />

energy wood)<br />

16<br />

Mobile crushers (stumps) 2<br />

4 DISCUSSION<br />

The results of biomass availability and supply cost<br />

studies are typically very site-dependent, because of the<br />

variation in biomass resources, geography, and transport<br />

infrastructure. In particular, end-user sites near coastal or<br />

border areas have been ranked as poorer sites in<br />

comparison to inland sites in this respect [12]. However,<br />

long-distance transport with terminal logistics will level<br />

off their difference when biomass is also transported<br />

outside the typical procurement area, in which solely<br />

truck transportation is used. Coastal sites with their own<br />

harbours also have better possibilities for import of a<br />

large variety of biomass streams from abroad via large<br />

seagoing vessels.<br />

This study shows that the biomass need of a<br />

biorefinery is so great that procurement areas must be<br />

extended beyond the normal supply area handled with<br />

trucks. Typically, truck transport is a suitable option for<br />

less than 100 km, because of a rapid increase in transport<br />

costs [13]. However, they are still the cheapest transport<br />

option for longer distances, with the cost parameters used<br />

in this study. The transport costs increase to a lesser<br />

extent with other transport modes (cf. Fig. 11), but the<br />

extra stage of pre-hauling to the terminal increases the<br />

supply costs with terminals above those of direct<br />

transport. However, terminal handling costs form a rather<br />

minor cost component, because of efficient material<br />

handling machines (cf. Fig. 10). If the biorefinery will be<br />

somewhere in eastern or central Finland, the variation in<br />

biomass availability and supply cost will be minor,<br />

because of the need for a large procurement area. The<br />

greater the biomass need, the less the variation in<br />

biomass availability and supply costs, since almost the<br />

whole country will be a potential supply area. Only sites<br />

in the north-western and northern part of the country will<br />

have a poorer supply situation, especially because of<br />

scarcity of logging residues and stumps in that area.<br />

Particularly important is a site’s location in relation to<br />

transport networks, where there should be easy access in<br />

all directions, as for a transport node or inland logistics<br />

hub.<br />

Mainly terminals outside the 300 km supply area<br />

became part of the supply solution, and supply via closer<br />

terminals was less in this study. This phenomenon was<br />

taken into account in the selection of terminal sites. The<br />

terminal network was rather dense outside the truck<br />

supply area (cf. Fig. 5). The railway network reaches all<br />

over the country well, and the best terminal sites are at<br />

branching points of the network or points along the main<br />

railway. The loading track length, at minimum 450 m for<br />

20 wagons, is one important planning parameter – and<br />

another is the capacity and characteristics of the storage<br />

area. Terminals act also as buffer storage; therefore,<br />

enough space is needed for both uncomminuted and


comminuted biomass, as is stable ground (asphalted<br />

concrete), for chipping machines and trucks. Ease of<br />

access and short distance between storage and loading<br />

track are a self-evident need. For biorefineries, buffer<br />

storage capability is particularly essential for maintaining<br />

even supply year-round. From forest sites only via direct<br />

deliveries, this would not be possible. Therefore, the<br />

result of this case study is to some extent theoretical, and<br />

more biomass should be directed via terminal supply. The<br />

results rely solely on minimising supply costs on the<br />

basis of summing costs of supply stages and transport<br />

costs. In this case, supply security issues and availability<br />

of free vehicle capacity and labour were omitted. In the<br />

terminal system, there are better possibilities to increase<br />

biomass quality, by controlling the moisture content and<br />

impurity levels. There is the possibility of sieving out<br />

impurities and selecting and mixing separate biomass lots<br />

to homogenise deliveries. Vehicle needs (trucks and<br />

mobile chippers) will be lower for a terminal system<br />

feeding in the same amount of biomass, in comparison to<br />

decentralised supply from forest sites to the biorefinery.<br />

In the study, only railway transport was used via<br />

terminals, and in this way 20 truckloads were transported<br />

in one shipment. Depending on the terminal’s location<br />

(remote or in the immediate vicinity), also truck transport<br />

from terminals would be an option, but it was not<br />

considered in this study. Waterway transport based on<br />

barges could take 30–40 truckloads at a time. The<br />

waterway option is viable only in the Lake Saimaa area,<br />

where the best terminal sites are existing harbours for<br />

roundwood or other commodities. These sites have the<br />

best facilities for handling biomass. The waterway deep<br />

water channel (4.35 m) reaches a rather large area in<br />

eastern Finland, but the maximum transport distances<br />

will be to the line between south and north. For example,<br />

the route between harbours of Lappeenranta<br />

(southernmost) and Joensuu (northernmost on the east<br />

channel route) is 312 km and Lappeenranta and<br />

Siilinjärvi (northernmost on the western channel route) is<br />

339 km. These distances are rather short for making<br />

waterways a competitive solution, since in most cases the<br />

practical distance will be much shorter in this area.<br />

Waterway transport will become part of a supply solution<br />

only if the biorefinery has its own harbour and is in the<br />

lake area. The Saimaa canal connects the lake to the sea,<br />

the Gulf of Finland, and also makes imports from abroad<br />

possible. The sea transport would be based on dry cargo<br />

vessels instead of the barges used in the lake area.<br />

A common challenge with other transport modes is<br />

the under-utilisation of capacity, both bearing capacity<br />

and utilisation rate. The latter could be addressed with<br />

better management of logistics and the first with vehicle<br />

structure development. Both railway wagon and barge<br />

capacity could be increased by enlarging the load frame.<br />

It is possible to use higher containers in railway wagons<br />

or extended sides in barges. Wagon frames could be<br />

increased approx. 20%, but to make multi-mode<br />

transportation possible, containers should be dimensioned<br />

in view of truck logistics. Also, various compacting<br />

systems could be used, such as vacuum feed for<br />

containers and pressing the load down by running over it<br />

with heavy machines for barge loads.<br />

Logistics management is more important when<br />

transport is scheduled and routed to keep the<br />

pulling/pushing unit (locomotive or tugboat) constantly<br />

running while the load units (wagons or barges) move<br />

between the terminals and the end user. Also essential is<br />

guaranteed adequate biomass volume for loading points.<br />

Otherwise, the costs of railway or waterway supply<br />

chains will increase very intensively as the utilisation rate<br />

of trains and waterborne vessels decreases. To keep other<br />

transport modes part of a realistic year-round supply<br />

solution, the utilisation of vehicle capacity should be<br />

maximised. It is not possible to build an efficient supply<br />

solution based on occasional ad-hoc transport. The major<br />

drawback of waterway transport is the downtime during<br />

the winter season, from January to April.<br />

So far, no biorefinery investment has been decided on<br />

in Finland. The first site’s location will have a major<br />

effect on the site decision for other potential sites,<br />

because of the tighter competition for biomass in the<br />

proximity of the biorefinery. Also, other biomass sources<br />

may come into play, such as pulpwood, short-rotation<br />

forestry, and agro biomass. At the moment, these are<br />

more expensive sources, but if there arises a shortage of<br />

biomass, other sources will be mobilised. Peat would be<br />

an abundant source of biomass, especially in the northern<br />

part of the country, but biofuel produced from it would<br />

not have an RES label and Finland will not be able to<br />

count it toward the commitment set for RES fuel in the<br />

traffic sector.<br />

5 REFERENCES<br />

[1] Long-term Climate and Energy Strategy. Government<br />

Report to Parliament 6 November 2008. Työ- ja<br />

elinkeinoministeriön julkaisuja, Energia ja ilmasto<br />

(36/2008).<br />

[2] Energy consumption 2008 and preliminary energy<br />

statistics 2009 (Energy 2009). Statistics Finland.<br />

[3] Pöyry Energy Oy (2009). Metsäbioenergian saatavuus<br />

energiantuotantoon eri markkinatilanteissa.<br />

Loppuraportti 30.4.2009. Energiateollisuus ry. 43 p<br />

[4] E. Ylitalo, Puun energiakäyttö 2009.<br />

Metsäntutkimuslaitos, Metsätilastotiedote (16/<strong>2010</strong>).<br />

[5] K. Karttunen, E. Jäppinen, K. Väätäinen & T. Ranta,<br />

(2008). Metsäpolttoaineiden vesitiekuljetus<br />

proomukalustolla. Waterway transportation of forest<br />

fuels by barges. (abstract). Lappeenrannan teknillinen<br />

yliopisto, Teknillinen tiedekunta, Energia- ja<br />

ympäristötekniikan osasto, Loppuraportti. EN B-177.<br />

107 p.<br />

[6] J. Enström (2008). Efficient handling of wood fuel<br />

within the railway system. In publication: K. Suadicani<br />

& B. Talbot (eds). The Nordic–Baltic Conference on<br />

Forest Operations – Copenhagen, 23–25 September<br />

2008. Forest and Landscape Working Papers<br />

(30/2008), pp. 53–55.<br />

[7] O-J. Korpinen, K. Karttunen, T. Ranta & E. Jäppinen<br />

(2008). Integration of railroads and waterways with<br />

forest fuel logistics in Finland. K. Suadicani & B.<br />

Talbot (eds). The Nordic–Baltic Conference on<br />

Forest Operations – Copenhagen, 35–25 September<br />

2008. Forest and Landscape Working Papers.<br />

(30/2008), pp. 65–67.<br />

[8] P. McKeough & E. Kurkela (2008). Process<br />

evaluations and design studies in the UCG project<br />

2004-2007. Espoo. VTT Tiedotteita - Research notes<br />

2434. 45 p.<br />

[9] Metinfo. Forest information services (2009).<br />

http://www.metla.fi/metinfo/index-en.htm.<br />

[10] J. Laitila, A. Asikainen & P. Anttila (2008).<br />

Energiapuuvarat. In publication: M. Kuusinen & H.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

41


Ilvesniemi (eds). Energiapuun korjun<br />

ympäristövaikutukset, tutkimusraportti. Tapion ja<br />

Metlan julkaisuja.<br />

[11] P. Anttila, K.T. Korhonen & A. Asikainen (2009).<br />

Forest energy potential of small trees from young<br />

stands in Finland. In: Mia Savolainen (ed.).<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> 2009. Sustainable <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Business. 4th<br />

International <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Conference from 31st of<br />

August to 4th of September 2009. Book of<br />

<strong>Proceedings</strong> Part I. FINBIOn julkaisusarja - FINBIO<br />

Publications 1(44), pp. 221–226.<br />

[12] T. Ranta (2005). Logging residues from regeneration<br />

fellings for biofuel production – a GIS-based<br />

availability analysis in Finland. Biomass and<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong>, vol. 28, pp. 171–182.<br />

[13] T. Ranta & S. Rinne (2006). The profitability of<br />

transporting uncomminuted raw materials in Finland.<br />

Biomass and <strong>Bioenergy</strong>, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 231–237.<br />

[14] R. Ryymin, P. Pohto, J. Laitila, I. Humala, M.<br />

Rajahonka, J. Kallio, J. Selosmaa, P. Anttila & T.<br />

Lehtoranta (2008). Metsäenergian hankinnan<br />

uudistaminen. Loppuraportti 12/2008.<br />

42 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong>


BIOMASS FUNCTIONS FOR YOUNG SCOTS PINE-DOMINATED FOREST<br />

K. Ahnlund Ulvcrona 1 , U. Nilsson 2 , T. Lundmark 3<br />

1<br />

Vindeln Experimental Forests, Svartberget Research Station, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, SE-922 91<br />

Vindeln, Sweden<br />

2<br />

Southern Swedish Forest Research centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, SE-230 53 Alnarp, Sweden<br />

3<br />

Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, SE-901 83 Umeå, Sweden<br />

Kristina.ulvcrona@esf.slu.se<br />

ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to develop predictive biomass functions for young stands of Scots pine-dominated<br />

forests in northern Sweden. Above ground biomass was destructively sampled, and biomass functions for all tree fractions<br />

(e.g. stem including bark, branch and foliage) were developed, based on independent variables. Functions to estimate dry<br />

weight of the whole tree were also developed. No significant regressions could be found for the dead branch fraction. DBH<br />

for sampled trees in this study was in the range of 11 - 136 mm (Pinus sylvestris), 10 - 121 mm (Picea abies L. Karst) and 9 –<br />

113 mm (Betula spp.).<br />

Keywords: bioenergy strategy, biomass characteristics, forestry residues<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Global emissions of greenhouse gases from the use of<br />

coal and oil need to be reduced. Consequently, there is a<br />

need for further development of more environmentally<br />

friendly energy sources [1]. In the future, it may be<br />

possible to use biofuel to satisfy some of the global<br />

energy demand, and therefore knowledge that supports<br />

the development of new silvicultural regimes is also<br />

required. Studies have shown that wood quality and<br />

branch characteristics tend to improve when Scots pine<br />

(Pinus sylvestris) is thinned at a greater stand height [2].<br />

To meet the increasing demand for raw material from the<br />

forest, biomass growth has to increase. A high stem<br />

density results in high biomass production [3]. Dense,<br />

young forest can thus contribute to this increasing<br />

demand for raw material. Terrestrial vegetation can also<br />

be a CO 2 sink that may mitigate greenhouse gas<br />

emissions.<br />

An increased interest in small stems as well as branches<br />

for biomass harvest has led to the need for biomass<br />

functions suitable for these stands. The aim of this study<br />

was to find biomass functions based on easily measured<br />

variables (DBH and height) for the estimation of DW<br />

(dry weight) biomass.<br />

2 MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

2.1 The sites<br />

Biomass was sampled at six different sites (Renfors,<br />

Degerön, Kulbäcksliden, Gagnet, Lillarmsjö and Unbyn;<br />

table 1). The sites are all young self-regenerated pinedominated<br />

mixed forest. Four of the sites (Renfors,<br />

Degerön, Kulbäcksliden and Gagnet) used for biomass<br />

sampling are part of a factorial experiment comparing<br />

thinning/no thinning combined with three different levels<br />

of fertilization. The field experiment was established in<br />

1997 and 1998 (Gagnet) after the first biomass sampling.<br />

The sizes of the experimental plots are 30 x 30 m or 45 x<br />

20 m, and each plot is surrounded by a 5 m buffer zone.<br />

Table 1. The sites for biomass sampling<br />

Site Latitude Altitude H100 (m)<br />

Renfors 64.22 190 18<br />

Degerön 64.15 175 20<br />

Kulbäcksliden 64.17 170 20<br />

Gagnet 63.25 125 24<br />

Lillarmsjö 63.97 220 21<br />

Unbyn 65.70 20 19<br />

2.2 Sample trees<br />

The trees for biomass sampling were randomly<br />

sampled from each DBH-class in the stand, but damaged<br />

trees were not chosen.<br />

In total, 387 trees were included in this destructive<br />

above-ground biomass study, of which 54 were from the<br />

pre commercial thinning (PCT)-treatment. The first<br />

samples were taken in June 1997 (Renfors, Degerön,<br />

Kulbäcksliden), June 1998 (Lillarmsjö) and August 1998<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

43


(Gagnet and Unbyn) [4]. The second samples were taken<br />

in May and the first days of June 2003, before the trees<br />

started to grow, and the end of August and September<br />

after the growing season had finished. In 2003, birches<br />

were only sampled in August and September when the<br />

leaves were developed but had not started to fall. In 2004,<br />

biomass sampling from the thinned plots was done in<br />

April.<br />

2.3 Operations in the field<br />

The sample tree was cut down at a stump height of<br />

about 2 cm. DBH was marked and measured by cross<br />

callipering, starting towards the north side of the tree. All<br />

trees were measured in the same direction. The north side<br />

of the tree was also marked to aid selection of sample<br />

branches after felling. The thickness of the bark on Pinus<br />

sylvestris and Picea abies was measured using a bark<br />

gauge at the height of 1.35 m. The total length of the tree<br />

and the length of living crown were measured with a<br />

tape-measure. The living crown was defined as the first<br />

living branch, if no more than two whorls of dead<br />

branches separated the first living branch and the next<br />

living branches.<br />

The living crown was divided into four sections or strata<br />

(25% of the crown each) (Figure 1). One branch was<br />

chosen from each stratum for dry weight determination.<br />

The sampled branch was subjectively selected to<br />

represent all the branches from that section of the crown.<br />

The first branch, from the first section of the crown, was<br />

chosen from the first quarter (0 - 90 o ) of the stem circle<br />

starting at north. The second branch was sampled from<br />

the second quarter (90 – 180 o ) in the second section of<br />

the crown, the third from the third quarter in the third<br />

section and the fourth branch was from the fourth section<br />

of the crown and the fourth quarter of the stem. All<br />

branches from each section of the living crown were<br />

weighed, and a sample of dead branches was also<br />

collected from below the living crown for determination<br />

of the DW of dead branches.<br />

Figure 1. Sample tree for biomass studies<br />

44 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

All branches were cut using pruning shears, and live and<br />

dead branches were weighed separately. Six stem discs<br />

were taken, the first from the butt end of the stem, from<br />

the height of 130 cm (= DBH) and four further discs were<br />

taken from 30%, 55%, 70% and 85% of the stem height<br />

(Figure 1). The diameter of the disc was cross-callipered<br />

over bark and all discs were cut to a 50 mm thickness.<br />

The discs and the single sample branch were weighed in<br />

the field on a laboratory balance (6 kg maximum ±<br />

0.0005 kg). The log sections and all other branches were<br />

weighed on a scale (30 kg maximum ± 0.002 kg).<br />

2.3 In the laboratory<br />

The four branches, a sample of dead branches from<br />

below the living crown, and the 6 discs were put in<br />

separate airtight bags and stored in a freezer (-20°C)<br />

within 8 hours of sampling, until the dry weight was to be<br />

determined. The bark was separated from the disc before<br />

drying and all samples were dried in a ventilated oven<br />

(85°C for 48 hours). The discs were dried to constant<br />

weight, that is to say to the point where further drying<br />

resulted in a decrease in weight of < 1%.<br />

2.4 Statistics<br />

Anderson-Darling´s test for normality was performed<br />

on the data using MINITAB 13 [5]. A logarithmic<br />

transformation was applied to the data to obtain a<br />

constant variance [6. ]The regressions in this paper are<br />

based on the following model:<br />

Yi = β 0 + β 1x i + ε I (I = 1,2,…..n)<br />

[7]. In this simple linear form, Y i is referred to as log DW<br />

(kg), β 0 the intercept and x i to ln DBH * ln H.<br />

The models were fitted using MINITAB 13 [5] software.<br />

Statistical analysis of mean residuals for the sites showed<br />

no significant difference between sites (results not<br />

presented) [5]. Biomass for all treatments, each species<br />

and component, was related to the natural logarithm of<br />

DBH (cm) multiplied by the natural logarithm of height<br />

(H) (dm). Biomass functions were created for all species<br />

(i.e. Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies and Betula spp.), and<br />

for all tree fractions (whole tree, stem, branches and<br />

foliage).<br />

For each biomass function, the correction for logarithmic<br />

error was calculated as<br />

[6].<br />

3 RESULTS<br />

3.1 Pinus sylvestris<br />

The regression explained 77% - 97% of the biomass<br />

variation (table 2 – 4). In the case of the PCT stand,<br />

biomass functions were only established for Pinus<br />

sylvestris (tables 2 – 4). For the whole tree and stem<br />

fractions, no significant differences between trees<br />

originating from the dense stand or the PCT stand could<br />

be detected. Therefore, only one biomass function was<br />

constructed for Pinus sylvestris for these fractions (table


2). In the data for branches and foliage, significant<br />

differences were found between the different stand<br />

densities, but not for the fertilizer treatment. Therefore,<br />

different biomass functions were constructed for the unthinned<br />

stand and the PCT stand (table 3 - 4). No<br />

significant regressions for the dead branch fraction were<br />

found. Therefore, the dead branch fraction is excluded<br />

from the tables. However, the biomass functions worked<br />

well for estimating dry weight (DW) for Pinus sylvestris<br />

trees with DBH 11 - 136 mm.<br />

Table 2. Biomass function for Pinus sylvestris tree and<br />

stem wood<br />

Pinus<br />

Tree P Stem P<br />

sylvestris<br />

wood<br />

Intercept -0.61492 0.000 -0.82388 0.000<br />

ln DBH * ln H 0.190018 0.000 0.19395 0.000<br />

N 199 199<br />

R 2<br />

0.97 0.99<br />

s 0.0841 0.0607<br />

Table 3. Biomass function for Pinus sylvestris branches<br />

Pinus<br />

sylvestris<br />

Branches<br />

from unthinned<br />

stand<br />

P Branches<br />

from<br />

thinned<br />

stand<br />

Intercept -1.6709 0.000 -1.4625 0.000<br />

ln DBH * ln H 0.21155 0.000 0.1900 0.000<br />

N 145 54<br />

R 2<br />

0.84 0.75<br />

s 0.2579 0.2627<br />

Table 4. Biomass function for Pinus sylvestris foliage<br />

Pinus<br />

sylvestris<br />

Foliage<br />

from unthinned<br />

stand<br />

P Foliage<br />

from<br />

thinned<br />

stand<br />

Intercept -1.33295 0.000 -1.3069 0.000<br />

ln DBH * ln H 0.16936 0.000 0.17107 0.000<br />

N 145 54<br />

R 2<br />

0.77 0.92<br />

s 0.2582 0.1203<br />

3.2 Picea abies<br />

The regression explained 83% - 92% of the biomass<br />

variation (tables 5 – 6). Only Picea abies trees from the<br />

un-thinned treatment were sampled (tables 5-6). The<br />

biomass functions worked well for estimating the dry<br />

weight (DW) of Picea abies trees of DBH 10 – 121 mm.<br />

Table 5. Biomass function for Picea abies tree and stem<br />

wood<br />

Picea abies Tree P Stem P<br />

Intercept 0.3564 0.000 -0.7912 0.000<br />

ln DBH * ln H 0.1664 0.000 0.18297 0.000<br />

N 83 83<br />

P<br />

P<br />

R 2<br />

0.92 0.97<br />

s 0.1248 0.0796<br />

Table 6. Biomass function for Picea abies branches and<br />

foliage (un-thinned stand)<br />

Picea abies Branches P Foliage P<br />

Intercept -1.0065 0.000 0.7866 0.000<br />

ln DBH * ln H 0.1569 0.000 0.1519 0.000<br />

N 83 83<br />

R 2<br />

0.83 0.83<br />

s 0.1794 0.1727<br />

3.3 Betula spp.<br />

The regression explained 91% - 99% of the biomass<br />

variation (tables 7 – 8). Only Betula spp. trees from the<br />

un-thinned treatment were sampled (tables 7 - 8).<br />

Because the first sampling was performed in early spring,<br />

it was not possible to use all of the sample trees when<br />

analyzing the foliage. Therefore, the number of sample<br />

trees for foliage is lower, compared with other fractions.<br />

The biomass functions worked well for estimating dry<br />

weight (DW) for trees of DBH 9 – 113 mm.<br />

Table 7. Biomass function for Betula spp. tree and stem<br />

wood<br />

Betula spp. Tree P Stem P<br />

Intercept -0.6512 0.000 -0.7606 0.000<br />

ln DBH * ln H 0.1948 0.000 0.1925 0.000<br />

N 106 106<br />

R 2<br />

0.99 0.99<br />

s 0.0647 0.0561<br />

Table 8. Biomass functions for Betula spp. branches and<br />

foliage (un-thinned stand).<br />

Betula spp Branches P Foliage P<br />

Intercept -1.4079 0.000 -1.83747 0.000<br />

ln DBH * ln H 0.19367 0.000 0.19964 0.000<br />

N 106 40<br />

R 2<br />

0.91 0.87<br />

s 0.1721 0.1832<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

Participation in this conference was sponsored by Forest<br />

power – a project sponsored by the Botnia-Atlantica<br />

programme; a cross-border cooperation programme<br />

intended to co-fund projects within the Botnia-Atlantica<br />

area. Thanks also to Sees-editing Ltd. For correcting the<br />

English language.<br />

4.3 REFERENCES<br />

[1]. NREL (2002). Transitions to a new energy future.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

45


Research Review, U.S. Department of Energy´s National<br />

renewable Energy Laboratory.<br />

[2]. Ulvcrona, K., Claesson, S., Sahlén, K. And<br />

Lundmark, T. 2007. The effects of timing of precommercial<br />

thinning and stand density on stem form and<br />

branch characteristics of Pinus sylvestris. Forestry 80:<br />

323-335.<br />

[3]. Satoo, T. and Madgwick, H.A.I. 1982. Forest<br />

Biomass. The Hague, Boston, London. Martinus<br />

Nijhopp/Dr W. Junk publishers.<br />

[4]. Claaesson, S., Sahlén, K. and Lundmark, T. 2001.<br />

Functions for biomass estimation of young Pinus<br />

sylvestris, Picea abies and Betula spp. From stands in<br />

northern Sweden with high stand densities. Scandinavian<br />

Journal Forestry Research 16: 138-146<br />

[5]. Anonymous 1999. Minitab statistical software<br />

release 13 for Windows.<br />

[6]. Finney, D.J. 1941. On the distribution of a variate<br />

whose logarithm is normally distributed. Journal of the<br />

Royal Statistical Society., Supp B7 7(2) pp. 155-161.<br />

46 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong>


ESTIMATING POTENTIALS OF SOLID WOOD-BASED FUELS IN FINLAND IN 2020<br />

Kalle Kärhä 1 , Juha Elo 2 , Perttu Lahtinen 2 , Tapio Räsänen 1 & Heikki Pajuoja 1<br />

1 Metsäteho Oy, P.O. Box 101, FI-00171 Helsinki, Finland<br />

kalle.karha@metsateho.fi, tapio.rasanen@metsateho.fi, heikki.pajuoja@metsateho.fi<br />

2 Pöyry Energy Oy, P.O. Box 93, FI-02151 Espoo, Finland<br />

juha.elo@poyry.com, perttu.lahtinen@poyry.com<br />

ABSTRACT: In the context of the Long-term Climate and Energy Strategy, it is estimated that the primary use of woodbased<br />

fuels in Finland will be 93 to 97 TWh by the year 2020. The overall target set for forest chips is 12 million m 3 , i.e.<br />

around 24 TWh. The objective of the research carried out by Metsäteho Oy and Pöyry Energy Oy was to produce as<br />

realistic as possible a total analysis of the possibilities of increasing the usage of wood-based fuels in Finland by 2020.<br />

The research showed that the growth objective set in the Long-term Climate and Energy Strategy can be attained through<br />

the supply and demand of wood-based fuels. However, realizing this potential would require major investments in the<br />

entire forest chip production system, because the competitiveness of wood-based fuels in energy generation is currently<br />

not at a sufficient level. Considering the huge resources required by the forest chip production system and the current low<br />

competitiveness of forest chips, it is estimated that the use of forest chips in Finland will reach the level of 20 TWh at the<br />

earliest by the year 2020.<br />

Keywords: Energy wood, Fuelwood, Forest chips, Pontentials, Finland.<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

The total energy consumption in 2008 was 389 TWh<br />

(1,400 PJ) in Finland [1]. The most important energy<br />

source in 2008 were oil products which made up around<br />

one fourth (98 TWh) of the total energy consumption in<br />

Finland [1].<br />

In 2008, wood-based fuels covered more than one<br />

fifth (82 TWh) of the total energy consumption in<br />

Finland, and hence they were the second most important<br />

source of energy after oil [1]. This makes Finland one of<br />

the leading countries in the <strong>World</strong> when it comes to<br />

utilizing wood for energy generation. In Finland, woodbased<br />

fuels are divided into industrial waste liquors –<br />

mainly black liquor produced by pulping industries – and<br />

solid wood fuels. Further, solid wood fuels are divided<br />

into 1) wood fuels consumed by heating and power plants<br />

and 2) fuelwood consumed by small-sized dwellings, i.e.<br />

private houses, farms, and recreational dwellings [2].<br />

In 2008, a half of wood-based fuel consumption (41<br />

TWh) was covered by waste liquors [2]. Solid wood fuels<br />

were consumed to the total of 41 TWh, or 20.5 million<br />

m 3 , of which the heating and power plants accounted for<br />

27 TWh, 14 million m 3 [2]. The small-sized dwellings<br />

use currently a total of 14 TWh, or 7 million m 3 of wood<br />

for heating [2].<br />

The total consumption of forest chips for energy<br />

generation in 2008 was equivalent to 9.2 TWh (4.6 mill.<br />

m 3 ) in Finland [2]. Of the forest chips used in heating and<br />

power plants (8.0 TWh) in 2008, the majority (58%) was<br />

produced from logging residues in final cuttings [2]. 14%<br />

came from stump and root wood, and 4% from largesized,<br />

rotten roundwood. 24% of the total amount of<br />

commercial forest chips used for energy generation came<br />

from the small-diameter (d 1.3


Table 1: The assumptions related roundwood supply and<br />

the production of forest industry in 2020 in Finland in the<br />

research.<br />

Industrial<br />

roundwood supply,<br />

mill. m 3<br />

- Domestic<br />

roundwood cuttings<br />

- Import of<br />

roundwood<br />

By-products of<br />

forest industry (i.e.<br />

bark, sawdust, and<br />

waste wood chips)<br />

in energy<br />

generation, TWh<br />

Waste liquors of<br />

forest industry in<br />

energy generation,<br />

TWh<br />

48 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

2007<br />

75.4<br />

57.7<br />

17.7<br />

Basic<br />

scenario<br />

59.4<br />

56.6<br />

2.8<br />

2020<br />

Maximum<br />

scenario<br />

73.7<br />

67.9<br />

5.7<br />

19.2 17.1 18.5<br />

42.5 38.1 44.2<br />

The consumption of by-products (bark, sawdust and<br />

waste wood chips) and black liquor in energy generation<br />

were estimated to decrease in the Basic scenario<br />

compared to the year 2007. In the Maximum scenario, the<br />

energy usage of by-products also lowered but the use of<br />

black liquor increased slightly (Table 1).<br />

The cuttings by Forestry Centre and further by<br />

municipality in 2020 were allocated applying the latest<br />

National Forest Inventory data by the Finnish Forest<br />

Research Institute and the Stand Data Base by Metsäteho<br />

Oy. Metsäteho Oy Stand Data Base included more than<br />

150,000 thinning and final cutting stands harvested by<br />

Metsäliitto Group, Stora Enso Wood Supply Finland,<br />

UPM Forest, and Metsähallitus in 2006 and 2007. The<br />

calculated small-diameter wood supply potentials were<br />

based on the 10 th National Forest Inventory data of the<br />

Finnish Forest Research Institute.<br />

Three different levels of potentials were determined<br />

in the study (Fig. 1). In the research, the theoretical<br />

potential was the amount of:<br />

• Logging residues and stumps, which are produced<br />

in regeneration cutting areas in the Basic and<br />

Maximum scenarios, and<br />

• Small-diameter wood (whole trees) produced<br />

when tending and cutting operations in young<br />

stands are carried out on time.<br />

The techno-ecological supply potential was the forest<br />

chip material raw base, which is harvestable when the<br />

following limitations are taken into consideration:<br />

• Recovering percentage is less than 100,<br />

• Substantial amounts of pulpwood are not burnt,<br />

• Recommendations in the Guide for Energy Wood<br />

Harvesting [5] are followed when choosing<br />

harvesting sites, and<br />

• All energy wood does not come onto the market<br />

(forest owners' willingness to supply energy<br />

wood).<br />

And techno-economical usage potential included the<br />

total supply costs and the willingness to pay of energy<br />

plants (Fig. 1).<br />

Figure 1: The principle picture of the supply potentials<br />

determined in the research.<br />

The harvesting conditions for recovering sites were<br />

created applying Metsäteho Stand Data. The total supply<br />

system costs for forest chip quantities were calculated by<br />

Metsäteho Energy Wood Procurement Calculation<br />

Models. It was assumed that in 2020 the total supply<br />

system costs are 20% higher than currently.<br />

Pöyry Energy Oy’s Boiler and Energy Plant, Pellet,<br />

and Forest Industry Data Bases gave a possible to<br />

research the usage of wood-based fuels in the study.<br />

Pöyry Energy Data Bases included almost all current<br />

plants and factories, as well as those under planning and<br />

contracting.<br />

3 RESULTS<br />

3.1 Theoretical and techno-ecological potential<br />

According to the calculations, the technical usage<br />

potential of solid wood fuels in energy plants was 53<br />

TWh in 2020 in Finland. The proportion covered by<br />

logging residues and small-sized thinning wood was<br />

estimated to be 28 TWh. Theoretical supply potential of<br />

forest chips was 105 TWh in the Basic scenario and 115<br />

TWh in the Maximum scenario of the research (Fig. 2).<br />

Correspondingly, the techno-ecological supply potential<br />

was 43 TWh in the Basic scenario and 48 TWh in the<br />

Maximum scenario in the year 2020.<br />

Figure 2: Estimate of theoretical and techno-ecological<br />

supply potential of forest chips in 2020 based on the<br />

Basic and Maximum scenarios of the research. The<br />

calculated small-diameter wood supply potentials were<br />

based on the 10 th National Forest Inventory data of the<br />

Finnish Forest Research Institute.


3.2 Techno-economical potential<br />

When modelling the usage of solid wood fuels in<br />

energy generation in the Basic scenario in 2020, the<br />

consumption of solid wood fuels was 44 TWh of which<br />

the usage of forest industry by-products lowered from the<br />

current level to 17 TWh and the consumption of forest<br />

chips increased up to 27 TWh (Fig. 3).<br />

Particularly stumps raised significantly their<br />

proportion of total forest chip volumes (Fig. 4). The most<br />

expensive forest chip quantities delivered to energy plant<br />

were more than 20 €/MWh in the study. In this case,<br />

pulpwood starts to be cheaper than that kind of very<br />

expensive forest chip volumes.<br />

In the Maximum scenario, the usage of solid wood<br />

fuels increased to 48 TWh in 2020 (Fig. 3). Especially in<br />

the Maximum scenario the delivered quantities of logging<br />

residue chips and stump wood chips increased and the<br />

quantities of small-diameter thinning wood chips<br />

delivered decreased (Fig. 4).<br />

Figure 3: Use of solid wood-based fuels in energy plants<br />

in 2007 and the estimated usage in 2020 in the Basic<br />

scenario (domestic industrial roundwood cuttings 57<br />

million m 3 ) and in the Maximum scenario (68 mill. m 3 ).<br />

In these calculations, the price for emission rights is 30<br />

€/t CO 2 and the support for chips from small-diameter<br />

thinning wood from young forests 4 €/MWh (average<br />

stem size of removal as whole trees


and high (30 €/t CO 2), and the Kemera support for chips<br />

from small-diameter thinning wood is 0 to 8 €/MWh in<br />

2020. The presuppositions for the Kemera support<br />

claimed for small-diameter wood cut in young forests<br />

are:<br />

• When the average stem size of removal as whole<br />

trees is less than 60 dm 3 in stands, the Kemera<br />

support is at three different levels in the<br />

calculations (8, 4 and 0 €/MWh).<br />

• When the average stem size of removal as whole<br />

trees is more than 60 dm 3 in stands, the Kemera<br />

support is always 0 €/MWh in the calculations.<br />

4 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

The research showed that the growth objective set in<br />

the Long-term Climate and Energy Strategy [3] can be<br />

attained through the supply and demand of wood-based<br />

fuels because for instance in the Basic scenario the<br />

techno-economical supply potential was 27 TWh of<br />

forest chips in 2020 (cf. Fig. 4). However, realizing this<br />

potential would require major investments in the entire<br />

forest chip production system, because the<br />

competitiveness of wood-based fuels in energy<br />

generation is currently not at a sufficient level.<br />

Also we have to pay attention to the fact that the<br />

forest chip production resources are very huge. Kärhä et<br />

al. [6] mapped out how much machinery and labour<br />

would be needed for large-scale forest chip production if<br />

the use of forest chips increases extensively in Finland.<br />

According to Kärhä et al. [6] calculations, if the<br />

production and consumption of forest chips are 25 to 30<br />

TWh in Finland in 2020, 1,900 to 2,200 units of<br />

machinery, i.e. machines and trucks, would be needed.<br />

This would mean total investments in production<br />

machinery of 530 to 630 million (VAT 0%). The labour<br />

demand would be 3,400 to 4,000 machine operators and<br />

drivers, and 4,200 to 5,100 labour years including<br />

indirect labour.<br />

We clarified forest chip procurement potentials in the<br />

study using only as a raw material for forest chips so<br />

called traditional raw material sources, i.e. logging<br />

residues, stumps, and small-diameter wood. On the other<br />

words, we assumed that pulpwood is primary utilized in<br />

pulping industry. Nevertheless, it can be estimated that<br />

when the total supply costs of most expensive forest chip<br />

volumes are around 18–22 €/MWh, the pulpwood will<br />

remove this kind of the most expensive forest chip<br />

quantities.<br />

Considering the huge resources required by the forest<br />

chip production system and the current low<br />

competitiveness of forest chips, it is estimated that the<br />

use of forest chips in Finland with the low price for<br />

emission rights and current incentives by the State will<br />

reach the level of 20 TWh at the earliest by the year<br />

2020. Therefore, in the practise there are no possibilities<br />

to achieve the set targets of renewable energy with woodbased<br />

fuels in Finland if the competitiveness of woodbased<br />

energy does not improve strongly.<br />

We will need certain measures for improving<br />

operation environment in the field of forest chip<br />

production. And we need measures very fast because we<br />

have time only ten years for our targets of 2020.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

50 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

[1] Preliminary Energy Statistics. 2009. SVT, Statistics<br />

Finland, Energy. Available at:<br />

http://www.stat.fi/tup/julkaisut/isbn_978-952-244-019-<br />

8.pdf.<br />

[2] Ylitalo, E. 2009. Puun energiakäyttö 2008. (Use of<br />

wood for energy generation in 2008). Finnish Forest<br />

Research Institute, Forest Statistical Bulletin 15.<br />

[3] Long-term Climate and Energy Strategy. Government<br />

Report to Parliament 6 November 2008. 2008.<br />

Publications of the Ministry of Employment and the<br />

Economy, Energy and climate 36. Available at:<br />

http://www.tem.fi/files/21079/TEMjul_36_2008_energia<br />

_ja_ilmasto.pdf.<br />

[4] Kärhä, K., Elo, J., Lahtinen, P., Räsänen, T. &<br />

Pajuoja, H. 2009. Availability and use of wood-based<br />

fuels in Finland in 2020. Metsäteho Review 40. Available<br />

at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Katsaus_40.pdf.<br />

[5] Koistinen, A. & Äijälä, O. 2006. Energiapuun korjuu.<br />

(Energy Wood Harvesting). Metsätalouden<br />

kehittämiskeskus Tapio, Hyvän metsänhoidon opassarja.<br />

[6] Kärhä, K., Strandström, M., Lahtinen, P. & Elo, J.<br />

2009. Forest chip production machinery and labour<br />

demand in Finland in the year 2020. Metsäteho Review<br />

41. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Katsaus_41.pdf.


C pOLICY – hOW TO MaKE IT aLL happEN<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

51


52 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

CLIMATE CHANGE IN BRAZIL: PUBLIC POLICIES, POLITICAL AGENDA AND MEDIA<br />

Magda Adelaide Lombardo; Ruimar Costa Freitas<br />

Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) / Universidade de São Paulo (USP)<br />

Av. 24A, nº 1515, Bela Vista, 14506-900 Rio Claro – SP /<br />

Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes 338. Cidade Universitária, 05508-000 São Paulo- SP<br />

ABSTRACT: The climate change and sustainable development issue, especially in the context of energy production, have<br />

been on the current national policy rhetoric, reflecting the focus of the issue on the world scenario. The Brazilian Agroenergy<br />

Plan (2006-2011), considered as an strategic action of the federal government, is an attempt to organize a propose for<br />

Research, Development, Innovation and Technology Transfer, aiming to grant sustainability, competitiveness and greater<br />

equity between the agroenergy chain agents, starting with the reality analysis and future perspectives for the world energetic<br />

matrix. In this context, this research seeks to analyze the proposals of the State of São Paulo to the laws implementations that<br />

allows the goal accomplishment of 20% reduction on the greenhouse effect emissions until 2020 (base 2005), through action<br />

to the deforestation control, creation of an adaptation fund, establishment of a sustainable transportation system, mapping the<br />

vulnerabilities of the territory and financial mechanisms to the development of a low carbon economy. From the perspective<br />

of the national media coverage agenda, that has extensively approached the climate changes theme, this research collaborates<br />

to the analysis of sustainable projects inside the Brazilian perspective and context. This research will emphasize the relation<br />

between media, political speech and public policies.<br />

Keywords: Climate Change, Brazil, São Paulo, Public Policies, Political Agenda, Media, sustainability<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

The world lives a crisis that may be unprecedented,<br />

regarding changes in the global climate. Although the<br />

causes and accountabilities had not been fully understood<br />

by the scientific community, the consequences of these<br />

changes no longer can be ignored.<br />

Until now, the main concern of the global community<br />

was development. However, in this new context,<br />

development cannot be considered without sustainability<br />

due to the impacts of inadequate anthropic intervention in<br />

the environment associated with reckless use of natural<br />

resources and concentration of the populations in urban<br />

centers. The concentration of the populations itself in<br />

relatively small amounts of land makes them more<br />

susceptible to natural catastrophes and the improper<br />

occupation and use of the soil in the urban areas and its<br />

adjacencies escalates the threats.<br />

The world energetic matrix, based on nonrenewable<br />

sources, drives the world to a new paradigm: the need to<br />

seek sustainability. It has also been driven by the concern<br />

that carbon dioxide emissions from the burn of fossil<br />

fuels affects the world climate, accelerating and<br />

intensifying natural warming and cooling cycles.<br />

The efforts worldwide to mitigation and adaptation to<br />

the new reality and foreseen future, have its main player<br />

in governments, which are looked after for an agenda that<br />

balances the need to sustainability with the quest for<br />

development. The role of governments in the market and<br />

social arena are present through many prisms<br />

(interventionist, minimum state… and so on) but we can<br />

considerer that, in the end, the main role of any State<br />

should be to orientate society and markets in all areas<br />

through incentives and/or restrictions to meet the needs<br />

and goals of communities.<br />

Nation-states, remain reluctant to assume early<br />

mitigation measures to climate change, making the<br />

international arena a complex and intricate path to the<br />

convergence of climate-friendly initiatives, but although<br />

local and regional initiatives have been proven to be more<br />

often easier to be taken, the international efforts still<br />

seeks agreements with sovereign states, denying space in<br />

the international agenda for local and regional initiatives.<br />

Seems the working logic goes with efforts that grow from<br />

the local/regional to national and global.<br />

Boykoff (2007) [1] states that research has pointed to<br />

the fact that the media content powerfully manipulate the<br />

translation between climate science, policy and public.<br />

Bennet (apud Boykoff, 2007) adds by saying that few<br />

things are as integral part of our lives as the news, so, that<br />

turned into a kind of a snapshot file of the pace, progress,<br />

problems and hopes of society. He also says that<br />

scientists tend to qualify their findings in light of the<br />

uncertainties that pervade their research. For journalists<br />

and political actors, these issues involving precaution,<br />

probability and uncertainty are all difficult to translate in<br />

a fluid, firm and unequivocal commentary, often valued<br />

in the context of communication and decision making.<br />

McBean and Hengeveld (2000) [2] argue that often<br />

the government’s response to the perceived risk of threat<br />

are often based on individual assessment and/or<br />

collective probability of exposure to danger, and the<br />

economic and social consequences of such exposure. It<br />

should be noted that, generally, these assessments are<br />

built from data supplied by the scientific community and<br />

translated by the media.<br />

Closer one is to the problem, more motivated it will<br />

be to participate in solutions and easier will be to<br />

implement actions that wouldn’t be considered in a larger<br />

scale scenario. That is why the working logic of solutions<br />

to mitigate and adapt to climate change should be<br />

considered from the local to the global and there is no<br />

way any real change is possible in the community<br />

without the enrollment of the community itself, and one


of the best (if not the best) way to inform and enlist the<br />

communities into a project, are the mass media.<br />

2 CLIMATE CHANGE IN BRAZIL: PUBLIC<br />

POLICIES, POLITICAL AGENDA AND MEDIA<br />

In the face of global climate change and its<br />

repercussions in the energy, construction, industry,<br />

agriculture, commerce and industries specialized in the<br />

carbon market, the environmental issue makes entrance<br />

to the stage, especially in the election campaign for the<br />

Presidency in <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

In discussion agenda of the parties, three key points<br />

are: sanitation, violence and ethics in politics.<br />

During the current government, according to surveys<br />

by the National Institute for Space Research - INPE,<br />

deforestation in the Amazon region was approximately<br />

80,000 km² between the years 2004 and 2008. Also, the<br />

government granted an environmental license for the<br />

transposition of the São Francisco River and large dams<br />

in the Amazon.<br />

About the media coverage about climate change, we<br />

can highlight researches conducted by ANDI (News<br />

Agency for Childhood Rights) [3] in partnership with the<br />

British Embassy and British Council in Brazil, on the last<br />

12 years as pointing to relevant aspects:<br />

• Migration of a highly internationalized<br />

coverage to a more regional context and<br />

local aspects, establishing links between a<br />

so broad phenomena and the daily life of<br />

the public that access the information<br />

offered by the news vehicles;<br />

• In a first moment, the coverage of the<br />

theme was based by the perception that the<br />

responsibility for presenting solutions for<br />

the climate change issue was at the hands<br />

of foreign governments and these solutions<br />

could be reached through partnerships and<br />

agreements between nations (as in the case<br />

of the agreements for emissions reduction)<br />

(24%); more recently (2007/2008) the<br />

research pointed that this responsibility was<br />

transferred to the national government,<br />

especially the Brazilian executive power<br />

(32,2%).<br />

• There is an increase in the mention of the<br />

adaptation need allied with mitigation, due<br />

to the acceleration and escalation of the<br />

impacts caused by the climate change;<br />

• Is clearly seen a valorization of the debate<br />

around the necessity of public policies that<br />

reduce directly the volume of greenhouse<br />

gases in the atmosphere;<br />

• However, the weather unbalances keeps<br />

been approached as an issue exclusively<br />

environmental by a significant part of the<br />

Brazilian media.<br />

Below, is a table of mitigation strategies by area of<br />

incidence presented by the media in two periods:<br />

Table I: Mitigation strategies by incidence areas<br />

(% of total news relating to climate change that mention<br />

forms of mitigation - 45.9% in 2005/2007 and 51.1% in<br />

2007/2008)<br />

Incidence Areas 2005/2007 2007/2008<br />

Forests and soil use 26,4% 25,4%<br />

Energy offers 45,0% 20,8%<br />

Industry 6,8% 10,0%<br />

Carbon Credits Sales 0,0% 9,8%<br />

Transportation 7,5% 9,2%<br />

Waste 6,4% 4,9%<br />

Agriculture 4,1% 3,0%<br />

Others 3,8% 16,9%<br />

Total 100,0% 100,0%<br />

Climate Change in Brazilian Press (page 56 - Table 32)<br />

It is worth noting that the increase in the reference to<br />

"other" options, is due to the increased attention devoted<br />

mainly to focus on different processes of public<br />

awareness towards a more conscious consumption of<br />

nonrenewable resources, besides the neutralization of<br />

carbon through the planting of trees.<br />

It is not possible to think about solutions dissociated<br />

of the contexts of public policies, economic development<br />

models and consumption and behavior patterns of the<br />

contemporary societies.<br />

3 ENVIRONMENT AND LANDSCAPE: CONFLICTS<br />

AND ADVANCES<br />

The conflicts that sometimes impose itself on the<br />

relationship between public policies, natural resources<br />

depletion and landscape changes in different Brazilian<br />

ecosystems, points out the discussion of development and<br />

sustainability, since often, the eco-capitalism is<br />

incompatible with the solution of ecological problems<br />

due to their own internal rationality of the economic<br />

system based on capital accumulation.<br />

The predictability of negative impacts of capitalist<br />

production in nature dynamics is fragile, since it does not<br />

consider the local and regional geodynamic processes<br />

character.<br />

For that, one should consider and identify a set of<br />

geo-environmental units that configure large territorial<br />

compartments in which the external geodynamic<br />

processes behave similarly and can be triggered,<br />

accelerated or even intensified by different socioeconomic<br />

activities such as internal urbanization process,<br />

agriculture, mining, energy matrix exploration, infrastructure<br />

works varying magnitude according to the way<br />

which each intervention in the environment is produced.<br />

In this sense, the concept of risk is evidenced by the<br />

vision of sustainability, where restrictions on the<br />

indiscriminate use of natural resources should be defined<br />

by their ability to support and renewal.<br />

Risk analysis, according to Egler (1996) [4] has the<br />

challenge of working within the limits of behavior<br />

predictability of complex systems and, in most cases,<br />

potentially hazardous to life.<br />

The levels of environmental risks seem to be arising<br />

from three categories: natural, technological and social<br />

risks.<br />

4 SÃO PAULO STATE AND CLIMATE CHANGE<br />

INITIATIVES<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

53


The State of São Paulo began to have concerns about<br />

climate change in 1995, when the PROCLIMA program<br />

(Climate Change Prevention Program) was created and<br />

the main contribution of this effort was the collaboration<br />

with the federal government in the preparation of the<br />

National Emissions Inventory (SMA, 2005) [5]; in 2002,<br />

was published the AGENDA 21, in which climate change<br />

figures as a great concern; in the same year the State<br />

government with other regional authorities started the<br />

Network of Regional Governments for Sustainable<br />

Development (NRG4SD), aiming to become a channel to<br />

share climate mitigation and other sustainable<br />

development experiences, and being the main<br />

representative in international negotiations; in 2002 also,<br />

was established a 5-year renewable licensing process for<br />

stationary sources of air pollutants, correcting the<br />

previous “right to pollute” situation of previous<br />

enterprises, demanding a gradual reduction of emissions<br />

in industries, either by technology update or shutting<br />

down facilities, effort expanded in 2004 with the<br />

approval of the Decree 48.523, that regulates the<br />

emissions of NO x, SO 2, PM 10, CO and nonmethane<br />

volatile organic compounds; just before the last COP, in<br />

2009, the government proposed also a 20% reduction on<br />

the greenhouse effect emissions until 2020 (base 2005),<br />

through the magnification of actions to the deforestation<br />

control, creation of an adaptation fund, establishment of a<br />

sustainable transportation system, mapping the<br />

vulnerabilities of the territory and financial mechanisms<br />

to the development of a low carbon economy.<br />

REI and CUNHA (2008: 7) [6] highlights that<br />

even though nation-states may remain reluctant<br />

to assume early climate change mitigation<br />

measures, thus making the international arena a<br />

complex and difficult path for the convergence<br />

of climate-friendly initiatives, there is enough<br />

space for alternative structures and approaches<br />

in both developing and developed countries.<br />

Due to its economic profile (32% of the national<br />

economic productivity), the energy consumption of São<br />

Paulo State is about 27% of the national mix (SMA, 2002<br />

[7]), been the industrial (39%) and transportation (26%)<br />

sectors the main consumers of energy. Although a great<br />

part of energy consumed by the industrial sector are<br />

produced from biomass (44% - been 36% from sugarcane<br />

bagasse), the major part of energy that moves de<br />

transportation sector comes from fossil fuels, mainly<br />

diesel (44%) (BEESP, 2005 [8]). The State participates<br />

with about 25% of Brazil’s total emissions.<br />

The projected Brazilian growth rate for the next years<br />

suggests a high increase on energy demand, thus, the<br />

need to reconsider the expansion model for the energetic<br />

matrix, a key issue regarding actions against climate<br />

change.<br />

5 FINAL CONSIDERATIONS<br />

Managing environmental issues in Brazil should be<br />

considered in national, regional and local scales. In the<br />

context of Brazilian territory, should be respected the<br />

geodynamics of landscapes and ecosystems in the<br />

proposal of candidates for Republic Presidency in <strong>2010</strong>,<br />

considering the destructive impact of capitalist economic<br />

production that has occurred throughout the country.<br />

The socio-environmental management should be the<br />

54 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

contribution of candidates aiming to propose realistic<br />

alternatives for sustainability.<br />

At regional level, there is need to include in<br />

governance a system for accident prevention and<br />

effective monitoring of environmental conditions in<br />

selected areas.<br />

Locally, within the municipality, it is necessary an<br />

effective participation of the community and the local<br />

authorities in dealing with socio-environmental issues.<br />

A key challenge for proper governance of the<br />

environment to be implemented by the State of São Paulo<br />

is the need to consider global and local environmental<br />

aspects of ethanol production and use as an alternative to<br />

fossil fuels. To ensure the benefits of both global<br />

mitigation and local environmental quality, it is essential<br />

that government incentives a broader discussion and<br />

participation among all sectors and stakeholders,<br />

including the community enrollment.<br />

We can say that, nowadays, the environmental issue<br />

is at the center of global and national policy and thus, it is<br />

becoming a recurrent theme on the media agenda, and so,<br />

on the presidency candidates as well and overlaps others<br />

as it puts into discussion the model of civilization<br />

predatory consumerism grounded by the reproduction of<br />

capital. This discussion should promote extensive debates<br />

throughout the country that may lead to global climate<br />

change effective combat and managing social and<br />

environmental risks in the Brazilian territory.<br />

The use of the mass media as tool to drive the change<br />

in the patterns of social consumption and relationship<br />

with the environment is an expedient yet completely<br />

underused by governments around the globe.<br />

As conclusion of this paper, we highlight the lack of<br />

synchronism between the emergency in political speeches<br />

and the chronogram for public policies enforcement<br />

under national, state and municipal levels. It is necessary<br />

the creation of a social consciousness that emphasizes the<br />

need of personal engagement in combat of environmental<br />

degradation inside the communities, through the<br />

development of action projects as: solid residues<br />

recycling, environmental education, communal garden<br />

development, reforestation, riparian vegetation, among<br />

others. There cannot be any change in the society without<br />

the mobilization of the society itself.<br />

6 BIBLIOGRAPHY<br />

[1] BOYKOFF, M. T. From Convergence to Contention:<br />

United States Mass Media Representations of<br />

Anthropogenic Climate Change Science.<br />

Transactions of the Institute of British<br />

Geographers. Vol. 32, pp. 477-489, 2007.<br />

[2] MCBEAN, G. A.; HENGEVELD, H. G.<br />

Communicating the Science of Climate Change: A<br />

Mutual Challenge for Scientists and Educators.<br />

Canadian Journal of Environmental Education.<br />

Vol. 5, pp. 9-23, 2000.<br />

[3] ANDI - Agência de Notícias dos Direitos da Infância.<br />

Mudanças Climáticas na Mídia Brazileira. ANDI,<br />

2009. <br />

[4] EGLER, Cláudio Antônio G. Risco ambiental como<br />

critério de gestão do território: uma aplicação à zona<br />

costeira brasileira. Território. LAGET, UFRJ - Vol.


1, nº 1(Jul/Dez.1996)-Rio de janeiro: Relume-<br />

Dumará, 1996.<br />

[5] SMA – Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente do<br />

Governo do Estado de São Paulo. No reason to wait:<br />

the benefits of greenhouse gas reduction in São Paulo<br />

and California. Hewlett Foundation, 2005.<br />

[6] REI, Fernando; CUNHA, Kamyla. Regional Actions<br />

and Sustainable Development Strategies Against<br />

Climate Change: São Paulo State, Brazil.<br />

INTERFACEHS - A Journal on Integrated<br />

Management of Occupational Health and the<br />

Environment, v.2, n.5, Art 3, december 2007.<br />

[7] SMA – Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente do<br />

Governo do Estado de São Paulo. Agenda 21 in São<br />

Paulo 1992-2002. São Paulo, 2002.<br />

[8] BEESP - Balanço Energético do Estado de São<br />

Paulo, 2005 – ano base 2004. São Paulo: Secretaria<br />

de Energia, 2005.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

55


BARRIERS OF IMPLEMENTING RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN NORTHERN<br />

PERIPHERY<br />

56 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Renvall, J. ( ¹, Puhakka - Tarvainen, H. ( ¹, Kuittinen, V. ( ¹, Okkonen, L. ( ¹, Rice, L. ( ², Pappinen, A. ( ¹<br />

1) North Karelia University of Applied Sciences (NKUAS), Centre for Natural Resources<br />

Väisälänkatu 4, FI-80160 Joensuu, FINLAND<br />

Tel: +358 13 260 6900 Fax: +358 13 260 6901<br />

Email: jarmo.renvall@pkamk.fi<br />

2) Action Renewables, The Innovation Centre, NI Science Park<br />

Queens Road, Belfast, BT3 9DT, NORTHERN IRELAND<br />

Tel: +44 28 9073 7868<br />

ABSTRACT: There is need to increase efforts in implementation of renewable energy solutions and energy efficiency in the<br />

rural communities across the European Union Northern Periphery (NP). EU and state policies are encouraging people,<br />

communities and companies to invest in renewable energy solutions also in rural regions. However, investments are low in<br />

some of Europe's Northern Periphery countries and local decision-makers may have reserved attitude to them due to the need<br />

for certainty of profits and feasibility. Attitude to renewable energy itself is usually positive, but the activities in decisionmaking<br />

can be inadequate. This statement is supported by the results from interviews distributed to local decision-makers in<br />

North Karelia, Finland, during the autumn 2009. Our recent findings from North Karelia, show that local decision-makers<br />

need more decent and objective information about renewable energy for supporting their decision making. Our long term tool<br />

- supported by our recent findings - will be ”Decision Makers Academy” to help local decision-makers in their everyday<br />

work. First pilots of this new tool are under progress in North Karelia in Finland.<br />

Keywords: barriers, decision-making, renewable energy solutions, policy intervention, policymaking<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

North Karelia University of Applied Sciences is a<br />

partner of the EU Northern Periphery Programme (NPP)<br />

project SMALLEST (Solutions for Microgeneration to<br />

ALLow Energy Saving Technology), which aims at<br />

addressing renewable energy development in small<br />

communities. In general, our objectives in the<br />

SMALLEST project are to monitor and analyze the<br />

barriers and bottlenecks of implementing renewable<br />

energy investments and solutions and energy efficiency<br />

in Northern Periphery. The goal for this part of the<br />

project is to help local actors to overcome these barriers,<br />

identify policy interventions and political best practices<br />

and give suggestions for policy interventions needed in<br />

the future. We are elucidating these challenges e.g. by<br />

questionnaires, interviews and conversations in events<br />

arranged during the SMALLEST project in every project<br />

region of NP area.<br />

2 DECISION-MAKING CONTEXT IN NORTHERN<br />

PERIPHERY REGION<br />

In the project we have outlined procedures<br />

concerning renewable energy decision-making in<br />

Finland, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Faroe Islands,<br />

Iceland and Sweden.<br />

In general there are four similar main bodies in<br />

decision-making context in Northern Periphery (Fig.1).<br />

We can clearly identify financing bodies, advisory<br />

organisations, interest groups and customers. Similarities<br />

are obvious whilst differences occur inside each body.<br />

Basically the funding opportunities are similar. Same<br />

kind on funding elements can be identified in each<br />

country but there are some certain specialities. A very<br />

good example can be found from Northern Ireland.<br />

Financing for renewable energy can be granted from<br />

outer Irish funds. Also lottery funding in this context is a<br />

special way of funding in Scotland and Northern Ireland.<br />

For example, in Finland lottery funding is given most for<br />

culture or sport.<br />

Figure 1: Decision-making context in Northern<br />

Periphery<br />

In Scandinavian countries one significant feature is the<br />

role of municipalities. Communities (i.e. particular


consortiums of people) do not have as extensive role as<br />

they do in Scotland and Northern Ireland. Municipalities<br />

are local administrative units and they even have a right<br />

to collect taxes. They have officials and also politically<br />

chosen council and municipal executive board.<br />

Municipalities are mainly administrative organs but they<br />

also do some financing. They can also be customers.<br />

A special feature in Finland is also the existence of<br />

regional development companies. These are independent<br />

bodies financed by various municipalities. Their target<br />

groups are both starting and existing companies in the<br />

region. They do not give any direct funding to the<br />

enterprises but they are advising them and constructing<br />

networks for them. The advisory service is mostly free<br />

for starting enterprises. Existing enterprises will be<br />

provided with valuable advisory services in return for<br />

network fees.<br />

There are various interest groups in the regions. The<br />

role of the interest group like a lobbying group appears to<br />

be very important in every country. They have a strong<br />

influence on decision making at all levels.<br />

Influencing factors outside the four main bodies can<br />

be identified as media, values, legislation, public opinion,<br />

research evidence, global situation and not least the<br />

culture.<br />

3 BARRIERS AND NEED OF SUPPORT<br />

EXPERIENCED BY ENERGY OPERATORS IN<br />

SMALL COMMUNITIES<br />

Diverse energy operators in Northern Periphery area<br />

(Finland, Sweden, Faroe Islands, Iceland, Scotland and<br />

Northern Ireland) were interviewed. The interviews took<br />

place after the operator had made a fairly big investment<br />

in renewable energy systems. Part of the questions<br />

covered experienced barriers (Table I) and some of them<br />

covered various support needs (Table II).<br />

Table I: Barriers experienced by energy operators<br />

Faroe<br />

Islands<br />

Finland<br />

Iceland<br />

Northern<br />

Ireland<br />

Scotland<br />

Sweden<br />

Level of commitment<br />

Globalized financial policy<br />

Knowledge on legal and contractual<br />

questions<br />

Attitudes of some of the authorities and<br />

advisory organisations<br />

Access to best practice examples<br />

Lack of similar cases in grant decisions<br />

Fluctuating level on subsidies<br />

Dependence on national policy (feed-in<br />

tariffs etc.)<br />

Piloting the technology<br />

No advisory organisations existing<br />

Cheaper ways to produce energy exists<br />

(geothermal, hydropower)<br />

Funding application bureaucracy<br />

Grant money payment afterwards<br />

No flexibility in financing<br />

Lack of renewable energy awareness<br />

amongst staff members<br />

Attitudinal approach, amount of ambition<br />

Access to best practice examples for, and<br />

knowledge of funding programmes in small<br />

and very small communities and villages.<br />

The remarkable barriers (Table I) in the researched<br />

cases were lack of know-how, attitudes with advisory<br />

organizations and authorities and amount of bureaucracy<br />

in all stages before and during the investments. In some<br />

cases the investors had to operate as pioneers. Last but<br />

not least, difficulties in financing were experienced as<br />

significant barriers.<br />

Table II: Need of support experienced by energy<br />

operators<br />

Faroe Islands Updated advisory services (legal and<br />

contractual questions)<br />

Finland Training in technology maintenance<br />

Centralized advisory services<br />

Holistic and objective advisory on<br />

investment and technologies<br />

Iceland Lack of development context for<br />

bioenergy<br />

Northern<br />

Ireland<br />

Holistic and objective advisory on<br />

investment and technologies<br />

Training in technologies<br />

Scotland Real life experiences of advisors<br />

(legislation, regulations)<br />

Sweden Increased proactive advisory services<br />

aimed at small and very small<br />

communities and villages.<br />

The operators would have needed the support of<br />

centralized and comprehensive advisory services (an<br />

advisory organization which understand the operational<br />

environment as a whole) (Table II). Thus operators<br />

needed more objectivity and independency from advisory<br />

organizations. There were also lack of skills and knowhow,<br />

so training needs were obvious.<br />

4 FACTORS IN DECISION-MAKING IN FINNISH<br />

MUNICIPALITIES<br />

Savikko [1] has found in her research some<br />

significant barriers and drivers in policymaking around<br />

municipalities in Finland. The research was carried out<br />

through an internet questionnaire in two stages among the<br />

municipalities of Finland.<br />

An interesting finding was the gap between strategic<br />

and operative actions in municipalities’ climate policy.<br />

This gab can form a significant barrier for decision<br />

making. It can be explained by economical situation in<br />

municipalities, old customary ways of action and the lack<br />

of time. The public discussion in media on biofuels was<br />

not a barrier.<br />

The results also indicate several drivers for municipal<br />

decision-making, such as municipal energy efficiency<br />

agreements or energy programmes. Those help<br />

municipalities in renovating their energy systems into<br />

renewables. Also the attitudes of municipal leaders and<br />

public discussion can be significant drivers.<br />

Preliminary results from a survey responded by<br />

decision-makers in North Karelia, Finland, in 2009<br />

supported the findings of Savikko’s research [1]. The<br />

decision-makers (participants of a seminar) were among<br />

other issues asked to point out the three most significant<br />

factors which would affect the decision-making in energy<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

57


issues in the municipalities. The factors selected most<br />

often were employment, use of natural resources and<br />

climate change. The received answers gave a good<br />

picture and guidelines on how to collect more detailed<br />

and specific information in the future. The main<br />

conclusions from the survey can be found in the<br />

following sections.<br />

4.1 Optimism or not at the region<br />

Decision makers were asked to describe the<br />

atmosphere for renewable energy in their<br />

working/residential areas. There has been a positive<br />

change in attitudes in last years. There is also a<br />

willingness to act but, on the other hand, there is a lack of<br />

actions. Renewable energy sources are considered as a<br />

possibility. On the other hand, “I feel that” –way of<br />

thinking can be still seen.<br />

The received information was also experienced<br />

insufficient and some of the respondents had negative<br />

experiences. Also the concepts used by decision makers<br />

have not been consistent.<br />

4.2 Drivers and barriers<br />

Decision-makers find the existing good examples,<br />

such as raw material resources (mostly from forests) and<br />

enterprises (in the region), as very effective drivers. Both<br />

knowledge and expertise can be found from the region.<br />

University of Eastern Finland, North Karelia University<br />

of Applied Sciences, Finnish Forest Research Institute<br />

and European Forest Institute are located in the region.<br />

Despite that, there is still difficulties accessing the<br />

information, for example, on substance or financing.<br />

Inefficient decision-making, such as indecision or<br />

toing and froing (waffling) does occur. On one hand,<br />

there is the lack of information in the background and, on<br />

the other hand, the lack of funding and resources.<br />

4.3 What kind of outside help would be needed?<br />

Respondents needed objective and comparative<br />

information, as well as economic and technical<br />

consultancy.<br />

5 NORTH KARELIA CLIMATE AND ENERGY<br />

PROGRAMME 2020<br />

The Regional Council of North Karelia is<br />

establishing a “Climate and energy programme 2020” for<br />

the region. Programme work proceeds according to the<br />

regional working plan. Smallest-project provides<br />

information from diverse surveys such as comparative<br />

municipal level information and the actual baseline in<br />

terms of energy use and production. Project operates<br />

according to the model described in Figure 2.<br />

Cooperation consists of the work in steering group and<br />

themed teams, diverse surveys, and organizing<br />

municipality events. So called pre-discussions precede<br />

the actual municipality tour. During the pre-discussions<br />

some of the municipalities and regional development<br />

companies are interviewed to receive more information<br />

for designing the municipal events. In addition,<br />

interviewers are trained unify and harmonize the<br />

interviews.<br />

After the municipal events there will be regional and<br />

county level seminars to disseminate the results.<br />

58 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Figure 2: Operational model between the project and the<br />

Regional Council of North Karelia<br />

6 CONCLUSIONS<br />

Decision-makers have positive attitude toward<br />

renewable energy investments, but at the same time there<br />

is a lack of actions. There is clearly need for<br />

comprehensive advisory services and training in all<br />

levels.<br />

Smallest-project is initiating the Decision Makers<br />

Academy (DMA) -concept. The Academy will gather<br />

local decision- makers for follow-up seminars. Seminars<br />

will be themed to different aspects of climate and energy.<br />

The DMA concept is being developed and tested along<br />

the “Climate and energy programme 2020”.<br />

References<br />

[1] Savikko,R. 2009. Climate Policy in Finnish<br />

Municipalities, Association of Finnish Local and<br />

Regional Authorities (AFLRA).


BIOENERGY IN UKRAINE: STATE OF THE ART AND PROSPECTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT<br />

Georgiy Geletukha, Tetiana Zheliezna<br />

Scientific Engineering Center “Biomass”<br />

PO Box 66, 03067, Kyiv, Ukraine; t./f. (+380 44) 456 94 62, geletukha@biomass.kiev.ua; www.biomass.kiev.ua<br />

ABSTRACT: Ukraine has good preconditions for the dynamic development of bioenergy sector. The main drivers for<br />

this are permanent rise in prices of traditional energy carriers, first of all natural gas, and big potential of biomass<br />

available for energy production. The economic potential is estimated at 19-23 mtoe/yr, and it depends mainly on the<br />

annual yield of agricultural crops. Existing law on biofuels and the law on green tariff supports the introduction of<br />

bioenergy technologies for heat and power production. Nevertheless existing legislation needs further improvement. One<br />

of the serious barriers for bioenergy development in Ukraine is distortion of natural gas prices for some kinds of<br />

consumers. The price for population and communal services is artificially low that renders it impossible to introduce<br />

bioenergy technologies in these sectors. Establishment of the market price of natural gas for all kinds of consumers is a<br />

necessary precondition for large-scale substitution of natural gas by biomass. National targets on energy production from<br />

biomass must be stated in an official document like Biomass Action Plan. We consider the following targets to be real:<br />

1% of the total energy consumption at the expense of biomass in <strong>2010</strong> (that is equivalent to consumption of about 1.4<br />

mtoe), 5% in 2020, and 10% in 2030.<br />

Keywords: bioenergy strategy, bioenergy policy, bioenergy regulations, boilers, legal aspects<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Ukraine is facing now such vital tasks as to reduce its<br />

dependence on the imported energy carriers, first of all<br />

natural gas, to replace fossil fuels partly by renewable<br />

energy sources, first of all biomass (BM), and to increase<br />

energy efficiency in all the sectors of the national<br />

economy. At present natural gas makes the major<br />

contribution to Ukraine’s total primary energy<br />

consumption (40%) followed by coal (28%), nuclear<br />

energy (18%) and oil products (12%). Of the whole<br />

required volume of nature gas, only about 35% is covered<br />

by own production while 65% is exported mostly from<br />

Russia. The share of renewables in the total energy<br />

consumption is 2.5% including large hydro 2% and<br />

biomass (mainly firewood and peat) 0.5%.<br />

Price of natural gas in Ukraine has been rising<br />

constantly since 2005, from 61 to 305 $/1000 m 3 in the<br />

first quarter of <strong>2010</strong> (Figure 1). The high price of natural<br />

gas is one of the strong drivers for bioenergy<br />

technologies introduction.<br />

At that biomass as fuel is comparatively cheap.<br />

Comparison of costs recalculated per energy content of<br />

the fuels shows that firewood and baled straw are about 4<br />

times as cheaper and wood pellets are 1.6 times as<br />

cheaper than natural gas intended for industrial and statefinanced<br />

organizations (Table I).<br />

2 POTENTIAL OF BIOMASS<br />

Ukraine has quite big potential of biomass available<br />

for energy production. The economic potential is<br />

estimated at 19-23 mtoe/yr, and it depends mainly on<br />

agricultural crops annual yield (Table II). Two main<br />

constituents of the potential are agricultural residues and<br />

energy crops – 10.2 mtoe and 9.6 mtoe respectively (the<br />

data of 2008 when Ukraine had the biggest crops harvest<br />

for the past 10 years). At that agricultural residues are the<br />

“real” part of the potential, and energy crops are the<br />

“virtual” one. At present there are only a few small pilot<br />

plantations of energy crops in Ukraine but fast<br />

development of this sector is expected in the near future.<br />

It is due to the fact that currently there are 4-5 mill ha of<br />

unused agricultural lands in the country of which,<br />

according to expert estimation, up to 3 mill ha can be<br />

used for energy crops production without causing<br />

competition with food and feed production.<br />

* 1st quarter of <strong>2010</strong><br />

Figure 1: Rise in price of natural gas in Ukraine<br />

Moreover Ukraine has further room to increase the<br />

biomass potential by approaching the European level of<br />

agricultural crops yield as now the yield of some crops<br />

like rapeseed, corn for grain and others in Ukraine is 2-3<br />

times as less than in Europe. Utilisation of the biomass<br />

potential can cover about 14% of Ukraine’s total primary<br />

energy consumption.<br />

Table I: Comparison of prices of natural gas and solid<br />

biofuels<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

59


Fuel type<br />

60 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Typical<br />

price,<br />

EUR/t<br />

LHV,<br />

MJ/kg<br />

Cost of<br />

fuel<br />

energy,<br />

EUR/GJ<br />

Ratio: cost<br />

of NG<br />

energy*/<br />

cost of BM<br />

energy<br />

Wood<br />

processing<br />

residues 0-0.87 11 0-0.08 >85<br />

Firewood** 17 11 1.6 4.3<br />

Wood<br />

pellets 70 17 4.1 1.6<br />

Wood<br />

briquettes 61 17 3.6 1.9<br />

Baled<br />

straw** 26 14 1.9 3.6<br />

* 6.7 EUR/GJ<br />

** delivered price<br />

Table II: Potential of biomass in Ukraine (2008)<br />

Types of<br />

Energy potential, mtoe<br />

biomass<br />

Straw of grain<br />

Theoretical Technical Economic<br />

crops 14.21 7.12 2.32<br />

Straw of rape<br />

Residues of<br />

production of<br />

2.06 1.44 1.44<br />

corn for grain<br />

Residues of<br />

sunflower<br />

6.15 4.31 3.02<br />

production<br />

Secondary<br />

agricultural<br />

4.68 3.14 3.14<br />

residues 0.79 0.64 0.44<br />

Wood biomass 1.77 1.45 1.14<br />

Biodiesel 0.97 0.97 0.48<br />

Bioethanol<br />

Biogas from<br />

2.43 2.43 0.85<br />

manure 2.17 1.62 0.25<br />

Landfill gas 0.54 0.32 0.18<br />

Sewage gas<br />

Energy crops:<br />

- poplar,<br />

miscanthus,<br />

acacia, alder,<br />

0.15 0.09 0.06<br />

willow 8.47 7.20 7.2<br />

- rape (straw) 1.36 0.95 0.95<br />

- rape (biodiesel) 0.64 0.64 0.64<br />

- corn (biogas)<br />

Peat (only<br />

1.03 0.72 0.72<br />

renewable part) 0.54 0.32 0.28<br />

TOTAL 47.95 33.36 23.11<br />

3 RECENT LEGISLATION<br />

With the view of encouraging energy production<br />

from biomass, Ukrainian Parliament passed two<br />

important laws in 2009. The first one is the Law of<br />

Ukraine “On Amendments to Some Pieces of Legislation<br />

of Ukraine with regard to encouraging production and<br />

use of biofuels” [1]. The law introduced a number of tax<br />

privileges for the participants of biofuels market. In<br />

particular, the producers of biofuels and producers of heat<br />

or combined heat and power from biofuels have been free<br />

of the relevant profit tax since 1.01.<strong>2010</strong> for a 10-year<br />

period.<br />

The second law is the Law of Ukraine “On<br />

Amendments to the Law of Ukraine “On Energy<br />

Industry” with regard to encouraging use of alternative<br />

energy sources” [2]. The law determined the green tariff<br />

for power produced from renewable energy sources. The<br />

minimum green tariff for biomass power plants is 12.39 €<br />

cents/kWh that is 2.3 times as higher than the regular<br />

retail tariff for the consumers of electricity.<br />

Comparison with other European green tariff shows<br />

that the value of Ukrainian green tariff for biomass plants<br />

is quite high. For example, it is higher than the German<br />

green tariffs in most cases except for some particular<br />

ones, for example for biogas plants and cogeneration<br />

plants ≤150 kW. It is expected that application of the<br />

green tariff will stimulate power production from<br />

biomass in Ukraine.<br />

4 CURRENT STATUS OF BIOENERGY<br />

TECHNOLOGIES<br />

Current status of introducing bioenergy technologies<br />

in Ukraine is the following. Over 20 straw fired boilers,<br />

mostly below 1 MW, are in operation in rural areas.<br />

About 500 modern wood fired boilers, mostly below 2<br />

MW, are already installed, and over 1000 old boilers,<br />

which were converted from coal and oil to biomass,<br />

operate on enterprises of forest and wood processing<br />

industry. Production of heat is feasible in Ukraine:<br />

payback period of wood and straw fired boilers is about 2<br />

years.<br />

Three big biogas plants are in operation in the<br />

country, and over 10 biogas plants are under<br />

construction/designing. Payback period of the biogas<br />

plants is 3-6.5 years taking into account the green tariff.<br />

The lower value of the payback period range is for the<br />

case when there is an income from sale of digested<br />

manure as a fertilizer and from the sale of emission<br />

reduction units.<br />

In 2009, a mini-CHP plant on the oil-extracting plant<br />

Kirovogradoliya obtained green tariff on the power to be<br />

sold to the grid. The installation operates on sunflower<br />

seed husks, and at the moment it is the only CHP plant on<br />

solid biomass in Ukraine. Further appearance of such<br />

installations is expected in the near future due to<br />

availability of the green tariff on power produced from<br />

renewables.<br />

Payback period of a typical mini-CHP plant is about<br />

5 years for zero cost of biomass and 7 years for the cost<br />

of 17 EUR/t. If a mini-CHP plant is reconstructed from a<br />

steam or hot water boiler installation the payback period<br />

is 3.6 and 5 years, respectively.<br />

Still, some types of bioenergy equipment of domestic<br />

manufacture are missing in Ukraine’s market. They are<br />

biomass boilers > 2 MW, steam biomass boilers, and<br />

reasonably priced individual boilers of 10-50 kW<br />

including boilers for pellets. The latter would help to<br />

develop internal market for biomass pellets.<br />

5 CONCEPTION FOR BIOENERGY DEVELOPMENT<br />

Under the current conditions the following<br />

conception for introduction of bioenergy equipment in


Ukraine till 2015 can be suggested (Table III). First, it is<br />

necessary to install biomass boilers since they have the<br />

shortest payback period and can directly replace natural<br />

gas for heat production. The first-priority equipment also<br />

includes wood and straw mini-CHP plants taking into<br />

account introduced green tariff on power production from<br />

renewables. Total capacity of the proposed equipment is<br />

8380 MWth + 100 MWe that gives opportunity to replace<br />

5.3 bill m 3 /yr of natural gas and decrease СО 2 emission<br />

by 9 mill t/yr. Cost of the replaced natural gas is about<br />

1201 mill EUR, and cost of biomass which is used for<br />

operation of the equipment is about 243 mill EUR. Then<br />

money saving from the replacement of natural gas by<br />

biomass is 958 mill EUR. At that total investments<br />

required for this are 736 mill EUR (see Table III) that is<br />

1.3 times as less than the obtained annual money saving.<br />

So, introduction of the bioenergy equipment can be<br />

considered an attractive investment project.<br />

Table III: Conception for the introduction of bioenergy<br />

equipment till 2015<br />

Type of equipment<br />

/ No of units<br />

Wood fired<br />

heating boilers<br />

0.5-10 MW th / 900<br />

Wood fired<br />

industrial boilers,<br />

0.1-5 MW th / 400<br />

Wood fired<br />

domestic boilers,<br />

10-50 kW th /35000<br />

Wood fired<br />

mini-CHPPs,<br />

1-10 MW e / 10<br />

Straw fired farm<br />

boilers,<br />

0.1-1 MW th /<br />

10000<br />

Straw fired heating<br />

boilers,<br />

1-10 MW th / 1000<br />

Straw fired<br />

mini-CHPPs,<br />

1-10 MW e / 10<br />

Installed<br />

capacity,<br />

MW th+<br />

MW e<br />

Replacement<br />

of<br />

NG,<br />

bill m 3 /yr<br />

Required<br />

investments,<br />

mill EUR<br />

450 0.26 21<br />

280 0.22 13<br />

1050 0.60 69<br />

100+50 0.21 137<br />

2000 1.18 151<br />

2000 1.18 113<br />

100+50 0.20 137<br />

Farm boilers for<br />

sunflower<br />

and corn stalks,<br />

0.1-1 MWth / 9000<br />

1800 1.06 136<br />

Peat boilers,<br />

0.5-1 MWth / 800<br />

TOTAL<br />

600<br />

8380+100<br />

0.34<br />

5.26<br />

28<br />

805<br />

We consider that priority lines of bioenergy<br />

development must be determined in the state program<br />

which would have status of law that is would be<br />

compulsory for implementation. Ukraine’s national<br />

targets on biomass contribution to the total primary<br />

energy consumption should be fixed in an official<br />

document like Biomass Action Plan. Such a document<br />

was already drafted within the framework of a Dutch-<br />

Ukrainian intergovernmental project “Biomass and<br />

Biofuels in Ukraine” (2008-2009). Biomass Action Plan<br />

for Ukraine identifies the main challenges of Ukraine’s<br />

biomass sector and suggests actions to solve the<br />

problems. One of the suggested actions is adopting a<br />

political declaration with a clear statement of the national<br />

targets on biomass. The following contribution of<br />

biomass/biofuels to the final energy consumption seems<br />

to be realistic: 1% (1.4 mtoe) in <strong>2010</strong>, 5% (7 mtoe) in<br />

2020, 10% (14 mtoe) in 2030.<br />

6 CONCLUSIONS<br />

Ukraine has good preconditions for the dynamic<br />

development of bioenergy sector. The main drivers for<br />

this are permanent rise in prices of traditional energy<br />

carriers and quite big potential of biomass available for<br />

energy production.<br />

Effectiveness of bioenergy development in Ukraine<br />

depends a lot on coordination of activity in this sector<br />

and right choice of priorities. In our opinion, the<br />

government should appoint a single state body fully<br />

responsible for all the issues concerning bioenergy and<br />

for the coordination of work of all the institutions related<br />

to this sector. Priority lines for the development must be<br />

stated in the state program for bioenergy development in<br />

Ukraine, and financial sources for the program<br />

implementation must be clear determined.<br />

Existing legislation also needs further improvement.<br />

The law on biofuels and the law on green tariff have<br />

some week points to be corrected. In addition we suggest<br />

to exempt biomass as a fuel from VAT and grant a state<br />

subsidy to purchasers of bioenergy equipment in the<br />

amount of 20% of the equipment cost.<br />

One of the serious barriers for bioenergy<br />

development in Ukraine is distortion of natural gas prices<br />

for some kinds of consumers. The price for population<br />

and communal services is artificially low that renders it<br />

impossible to introduce bioenergy technologies in these<br />

sectors. Establishment of the market price of natural gas<br />

for all kinds of consumers is a necessary precondition for<br />

large-scale substitution of natural gas by biomass.<br />

National targets on energy production from biomass<br />

must be stated in a official document like Biomass Action<br />

Plan. We consider the following targets to be real: 1% of<br />

the total energy consumption at the expense of biomass in<br />

<strong>2010</strong> (that is equivalent to consumption of about 1.4<br />

mtoe), 5% in 2020, and 10% in 2030.<br />

6 REFERENCES<br />

[1] Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to Some Pieces of<br />

Legislation of Ukraine with regard to encouraging<br />

production and use of biofuels” N 1391-VI from<br />

21.05.2009.<br />

[2] Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to the Law of<br />

Ukraine “On Energy Industry” with regard to<br />

encouraging use of alternative energy sources” N<br />

1220-VI from 01.04.2009.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

61


62 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

BIOENERGY AT CLIMATE NEGOTIATIONS: VISIONS, CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES<br />

McCormick, K.<br />

International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics (IIIEE) at Lund University<br />

PO Box 196, 22100 Lund, Sweden<br />

ABSTRACT: This paper provides observations and commentary on how bioenergy was presented and communicated at<br />

the 15 th Conference of the Parties (COP 15) held in Denmark in December 2009, including the main conference and side<br />

events as well as “unofficial” parallel events and activities. We can learn significantly from the experiences of COP 15 in<br />

regards to how to develop and present visions for bioenergy, the major challenges confronting the expansion of<br />

bioenergy, and the near-term opportunities for the bioenergy industry. With the 16 th Conference of the Parties (COP 16)<br />

to be held in Mexico in November <strong>2010</strong>, this paper contributes to a better understanding of how the bioenergy industry<br />

can influence policy-makers, attract media attention, and engage the general public and key stakeholders in a constructive<br />

dialogue to take full advantage of the potential of bioenergy to contribute to climate mitigation and adaptation. At COP<br />

16 we need “to make it all happen”.<br />

Keywords: bioenergy industry, public awareness, climate change, political legitimacy, stakeholder involvement<br />

1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND<br />

The 15 th Conference of the Parties (COP 15) held in<br />

Denmark in December 2009 was a dramatic global event<br />

on climate change that culminated in the Copenhagen<br />

Accord. While there are strong differences of opinion on<br />

whether or not COP 15 and the Copenhagen Accord can<br />

be considered a “step in the right direction” or an outright<br />

failure, as well as who should do what and when, nothing<br />

has changed regarding climate science. A rapid<br />

transformation of our economies and societies towards<br />

low or zero carbon systems remains a fundamental<br />

requirement for reducing the effects of global warming<br />

over the next century.<br />

COP 15 attracted thousands of delegates and<br />

representatives from industry, government, academia,<br />

and civil society from around the world – many of which<br />

attended COP 15 to actively put forward visions and<br />

strategies for the future. In this context, we can ask what<br />

profile did bioenergy have at COP 15? This paper<br />

provides observations and commentary on how bioenergy<br />

was presented and communicated at COP 15 – both the<br />

official activities and the many “unofficial” events<br />

organised around the climate negotiations. Much can be<br />

learned from these experiences and applied at the 16 th<br />

Conference of the Parties (COP 16) to be held in Mexico<br />

in November <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

This paper talks about the bioenergy industry in<br />

relation to climate negotiations. But what is the bioenergy<br />

industry? The bioenergy industry refers to a myriad of<br />

organisations and networks that are directly (and<br />

indirectly) involved in bioenergy resources, systems and<br />

technologies. Such organisations and networks cover a<br />

number of sectors, including energy, agriculture, forestry<br />

and the environment, as well as different spheres, such as<br />

government, industry and academia. The bioenergy<br />

industry does not “speak” with a unified voice. However,<br />

on the national level, the bioenergy industry is often<br />

represented by associations, such as the Swedish<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association, and on the international level, the<br />

recently established <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association<br />

(http://www.worldbioenergy.org/). This organisation has<br />

taken a leading role in promoting bioenergy on the<br />

international “stage”.<br />

2 OBSERVATIONS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The most significant document prepared and<br />

presented at COP 15 was the position paper by the <strong>World</strong><br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association based on a commissioned report<br />

entitled “Global Potential of Sustainable Biomass for<br />

Energy” [1]. This position paper and report highlight the<br />

very large potentials for bioenergy estimated by some<br />

studies. The “danger” with these estimated potentials is<br />

they are based on a range of assumptions that are under<br />

intense debate, such as land availability. Importantly, the<br />

position paper and report discuss the major challenges for<br />

expanding bioenergy, namely direct and indirect impacts<br />

on land use, as well as the overall sustainability of<br />

bioenergy and the need for robust certification schemes<br />

[2]. It is “smart” of the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association to<br />

not only raise these issues in such documents but also<br />

show that the bioenergy industry is actively working with<br />

them.<br />

Kent Nyström of the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association<br />

argues “There is a lack of awareness of the enormous<br />

potential of bioenergy worldwide both among politicians,<br />

the media and the public” [3]. There is indeed a lack of<br />

public awareness of bioenergy technologies and<br />

potentials, as well as the benefits of sustainable bioenergy<br />

systems that can go far beyond energy supply and include<br />

significant opportunities for regional development.<br />

Raising the profile of bioenergy in the public<br />

“consciousness” is very important. However, far greater<br />

resources will have to be invested by the bioenergy<br />

industry to achieve this goal.<br />

COP 15 involved hundreds of side events and<br />

exhibits – a number of which focused directly on<br />

bioenergy, and others which were relevant to the


ioenergy industry. The Climate Consortium Denmark<br />

and the Danish Agriculture and Food Council organised a<br />

side event called “Bio-based Society: A Sustainable<br />

Future based on Agriculture, Biotechnology and<br />

Resource Management” [4]. This event tackled the issues<br />

of increasing population and climate change through<br />

presentations on the role of agriculture and biotechnology<br />

to produce food, energy and materials. The challenge of<br />

reducing fossil fuels while at the same time producing<br />

more food for the growing population was debated. This<br />

type of event appears to be important to work through<br />

these major issues.<br />

Another side event at COP 15 entitled “Renewable<br />

Energy and Climate Change Abatement” organised by<br />

IEA <strong>Bioenergy</strong> and IEA Renewable Energy Technology<br />

Development, involved a presentation by Uwe Fritsche<br />

on better use of biomass for energy [5]. This presentation<br />

discussed a range of issues, including land use change<br />

and increased production of biomass for energy purposes.<br />

But there was also a strong point on how to maximise<br />

GHG emissions reductions from bioenergy, including the<br />

option to connect bioenergy systems with Carbon<br />

Capture and Storage (CCS) to produce “negative” carbon<br />

emissions. Overall, the presentation suggested that more<br />

stringent climate change policy will drive a better use of<br />

biomass for energy. The bioenergy industry should<br />

support such strong policy and continue to work towards<br />

more sustainable bioenergy systems.<br />

A range of parallel events, seminars and activities<br />

were organised in Denmark and its close neighbour<br />

Sweden in the lead-up to COP 15. Of particular interest<br />

was the largest alternative NGO meeting, called the<br />

Peoples Climate Summit (http://klimaforum.org/). At the<br />

summit a number of themes were very relevant to<br />

bioenergy, including “Sustainable Energy Technology<br />

and Energy Systems” and “Sustainable Agriculture and<br />

Forestry” [6]. This type of NGO event is likely to grow at<br />

COP 16 and perhaps receive greater media attention. The<br />

Peoples Climate Summit concluded with the statement<br />

“systems change not climate change”, which suggests the<br />

NGO movement is looking for more “radical” shifts in<br />

our societies and economies. What role bioenergy can<br />

play in such visions and discussions deserves some<br />

attention – at the very least to avoid confrontations and<br />

“listen” to concerns about bioenergy from the NGO<br />

sector.<br />

Lund University in Sweden hosted a number of<br />

events related to COP 15. The workshop on “Governance<br />

for a Low-Carbon Society” organised by Atomium<br />

Culture (http://atomiumculture.org/) focused on how the<br />

emerging low-carbon society can be governed [7]. There<br />

are a number of points from this workshop relevant for<br />

bioenergy. First, Atomium Culture actively works with<br />

universities, businesses, governments and newspapers.<br />

The inclusion of newspapers highlights the important role<br />

of the media and communication in establishing a lowcarbon<br />

society. Second, bioenergy was a major topic of<br />

discussion in relation to meeting sustainability goals.<br />

Again, we see the importance of institutions, policies and<br />

schemes that can ensure sustainable bioenergy systems.<br />

Third, CCS was on the agenda, and the link to bioenergy<br />

systems was also discussed and highlighted. This point<br />

about the synergy between CCS, bioenergy and<br />

producing “negative” carbon emissions should be more<br />

actively communicated by the bioenergy industry to the<br />

media and key stakeholders.<br />

COP 15 started with worldwide attention (and<br />

enthusiasm) about defining a strong global agreement but<br />

this did not eventuate. Joelle Brink for Biofuels Digest<br />

(http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/) perhaps best<br />

summarised the reactions from the bioenergy industry at<br />

COP 15 by saying that the first week of negotiations was<br />

promising with the UN assurance that bioenergy would<br />

be a priority in renewable energy plans. However, in the<br />

second week the UN negotiations stalled and resulted in a<br />

small group of nations (USA, China, India, South Africa<br />

and Brazil) developing the Copenhagen Accord with<br />

many other countries dissenting – “leaving the real work<br />

for Mexico in November <strong>2010</strong>” [8]. It seems fair to argue<br />

that COP 16 will be under even greater “pressure” to<br />

move the climate negotiations forwards.<br />

3 CONCLUSION AND REFLECTIONS<br />

This paper perhaps asks far more questions that it<br />

answers? However, the main point is to raise discussions<br />

on how to improve the profile of bioenergy at major<br />

climate negotiations, especially the up-coming COP 16 to<br />

be held in Mexico in November <strong>2010</strong>. This paper<br />

concludes with some reflections and suggestions for<br />

action. Many of these points could be debated and need<br />

to be further developed so as to make them more concrete<br />

and practical.<br />

Showing potentials is very important, but a major<br />

challenge for the bioenergy industry is to put bioenergy<br />

technologies and systems, and the overall potentials of<br />

bioenergy, into tangible contexts. In other words, it is<br />

vital to document and present functioning “real-life”<br />

bioenergy systems. This includes both case studies of<br />

specific places, and country studies that show the<br />

development of bioenergy over time.<br />

Working with all actors engaged in promoting<br />

renewable energy only strengthens the position of<br />

bioenergy. The decision of the WBA to join and support<br />

the International Renewable Energy Alliance<br />

(http://www.ren-alliance.org/) shows that there is<br />

cooperation between bioenergy and other renewable<br />

energy. There is little doubt that we will need all<br />

renewable energy to make significant reductions in GHG<br />

emissions and replace fossil fuels.<br />

Engaging with cities and regions should be a<br />

priority for the bioenergy industry at COP 16.<br />

Thousands of representatives from cities and regions<br />

attended COP 15. Cities and regions can often implement<br />

far more “radical” plans to reduce GHG emissions<br />

compared to nations, but they need help to find<br />

“solutions”. <strong>Bioenergy</strong>, in all its forms, can really<br />

contribute to cities and regions in their efforts on climate<br />

change.<br />

Learning from how the Copenhagen Accord was<br />

brokered is important to all actors working on climate<br />

change, including the bioenergy industry. The group of<br />

nations that really developed the Copenhagen Accord<br />

included China, India, the USA, South Africa and Brazil.<br />

This is a particularly interesting group of nations in<br />

respect to bioenergy, since they all have growing<br />

bioenergy sectors. Brazil, in particular, is a global leader<br />

on bioenergy.<br />

Enhancing communication activities and key<br />

collaborations in the lead-up to COP 16 is vital to<br />

successfully lifting the profile of bioenergy.<br />

Communication and stakeholder involvement are on the<br />

agenda more than ever for the fast-growing bioenergy<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

63


industry. Avoiding major confrontations on controversial<br />

issues, such as sustainability certification schemes and<br />

land use changes, requires greater efforts on engagement<br />

with diverse actors.<br />

4 REFERENCES<br />

1. Ladanai, S. & Vinterbäck, J. (2009) Global Potential of<br />

Sustainable Biomass for Energy. Uppsala: Swedish<br />

University for Agricultural Sciences.<br />

2. <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association. (2009) Global Potential<br />

of Sustainable Biomass for Energy. Position Paper<br />

3. <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association. (2009) Global Potential<br />

for <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Sufficient to meet Global Energy Demand.<br />

Press Release.<br />

4. Climate Consortium Denmark and the Danish<br />

Agriculture and Food Council. (2009) Bio-based Society:<br />

A Sustainable Future based on Agriculture,<br />

Biotechnology and Resource Management. Workshop.<br />

5. Fritsche, U. (2009) Better Use of Biomass for Energy.<br />

Presentation.<br />

6. Klimaforum (2009) The Themes of Klimaforum at<br />

COP15.<br />

URL: http://www.klimaforum.org/<br />

7. Atomium Culture. (2009) Governance for a Low-<br />

Carbon Society.<br />

URL: http://atomiumculture.org/<br />

8. Brink, J. (2009) <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Industry Reacts at COP15.<br />

URL: http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/<br />

5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This paper is part of a research effort entitled “The<br />

emerging bio-economy: Investigating the role of<br />

communication and stakeholder involvement” which is<br />

funded for <strong>2010</strong>-2013 by the Swedish Research Council<br />

for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial<br />

Planning. Visit the interactive bio-economy blog<br />

(http://bio-literacy.blogspot.com/) to follow the progress<br />

and developments of this work, make comments, and ask<br />

questions.<br />

64 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong>


SUPPLY CHAINS OF FOREST CHIP PRODUCTION IN FINLAND<br />

Kalle Kärhä<br />

Metsäteho Oy<br />

P.O. Box 101, FI-00171 Helsinki, Finland<br />

kalle.karha@metsateho.fi<br />

ABSTRACT: The Metsäteho study investigated how logging residue chips, stump wood chips, and chips from smallsized<br />

thinning wood and large-sized (rotten) roundwood used by heating and power plants were produced in Finland in<br />

2008. Almost all the major forest chip suppliers in Finland were involved in the study. The total volume of forest chips<br />

supplied in 2008 by these suppliers was 6.5 TWh. The study was implemented by conducting an e-mail questionnaire<br />

survey and telephone interviews. Research data was collected in March-May 2009. The majority of the logging residue<br />

chips and chips from small-sized thinning wood were produced using the roadside chipping supply chain in Finland in<br />

2008. The chipping at plant supply chain was also significant in the production of logging residue chips. 70% of all stump<br />

wood chips consumed were comminuted at the plant and 29% at terminals. The role of the terminal chipping supply chain<br />

was also significant in the production of chips from logging residues and small-sized wood chips. When producing chips<br />

from large-sized (rotten) roundwood, nearly a half of chips were comminuted at plants and more than 40% at terminals.<br />

Keywords: Comminution, Energy wood, Finland.<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

The use of forest chips in Finland has increased<br />

rapidly in the 21 st century: In the year 2000, the total use<br />

of forest chips for energy generation was 1.8 TWh (0.9<br />

mill. m 3 ), while in 2008 it was 9.2 TWh (4.6 mill. m 3 )<br />

[1]. Of this amount, 8.1 TWh was used in heating and<br />

power plants, and 1.1 TWh in small-sized dwellings, i.e.<br />

private houses, farms, and recreational dwellings, in 2008<br />

(Fig. 1) [1].<br />

Of the forest chips used in heating and power plants<br />

(8.1 TWh), the majority (58%) was produced from<br />

logging residues in final cuttings in 2008 (Fig. 1) [1].<br />

Forest chips derived from stump and root wood totalled<br />

14% and 4% came from large-sized (rotten) roundwood.<br />

24% of the total amount of commercial forest chips used<br />

for energy generation came from small-diameter (d 1.3200 GWh in<br />

2008) power plants in Finland [2]. However, they<br />

consume approximately 40% of forest chips used in<br />

Finland (Fig. 2) [2]. The use of forest chips is currently<br />

the greatest in Central Finland, and relatively low in<br />

Northern Finland (Fig. 3) [1].<br />

Figure 2: Use of forest chips by the class of energy<br />

content (GWh) used in heating and power plants in 2008<br />

in Finland [2]. The figures are based on the data of the<br />

Finnish Forest Research Institute: the use of forest chips<br />

7.8 TWh in total of 427 energy plants in 2008. The<br />

figures exclude the data of TTS Research’s small heating<br />

plants (0.2 TWh & 333 plants).<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

65


Figure 3: Use of forest chips by forestry centre in 2008<br />

in Finland [1].<br />

Metsäteho Oy has annually surveyed the supply<br />

chains [3] used in the production of forest chips in the<br />

21 st century in Finland [4–8]. The Metsäteho study also<br />

investigated how logging residue chips, stump wood<br />

chips, and chips from small-sized thinning wood and<br />

large-sized (rotten) roundwood used by heating and<br />

power plants were produced in Finland in 2008. The<br />

main results of the study are presented in this conference<br />

paper.<br />

2 MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

The supply chains of forest chips were investigated in<br />

the questionnaire of Supply Chains of Forest Chips in<br />

2008, which covered the production of logging residue<br />

chips, stump wood chips, chips from small-sized thinning<br />

wood, and chips from large-sized (rotten) roundwood. In<br />

the survey, the supply chains were determined as follows:<br />

• Terrain chipping: comminution at the harvesting<br />

site,<br />

• Roadside chipping (separate chipper and chip<br />

truck): comminution with a chipper or crusher at<br />

a roadside landing and road transportation of<br />

chips using a separate chip truck from the<br />

roadside to the plant,<br />

• Roadside chipping (integrated chipper–chip<br />

truck): comminution and road transportation of<br />

chips with the same unit, a so-called integrated<br />

chipper–chip truck,<br />

• Terminal chipping: forest chip raw materials<br />

(loose or bundled) to the terminal for<br />

comminution, and then transportation of the chips<br />

by truck/train/barge from the terminal to the<br />

plant, and<br />

• Chipping at plant: forest chip raw materials<br />

(loose or bundled) to the plant for comminution.<br />

Almost all the major forest chip suppliers in Finland<br />

were involved in the study. The total volume of forest<br />

chips supplied in 2008 by these (34) suppliers was 6.5<br />

TWh (Table 1). The study was implemented by<br />

conducting an email questionnaire survey and telephone<br />

interviews. Research data was collected in March-May<br />

2009.<br />

Table 1: Use of different types of forest chips at heating<br />

and power plants in 2008 in Finland [1], and the total<br />

volume supplied in 2008 by the forest chip suppliers who<br />

66 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

participated in the survey.<br />

Type of forest chips<br />

Total volume<br />

used<br />

in Finland [1]<br />

Total volume<br />

supplied<br />

by suppliers<br />

TWh<br />

Logging residue chips 4.7 3.5<br />

Stump wood chips 1.2 1.2<br />

Chips from small-sized<br />

thinning wood<br />

1.9 1.4<br />

Chips from large-sized<br />

roundwood<br />

0.4 0.5<br />

Total 8.1 6.5<br />

3 RESULTS<br />

3.1 Logging residue chips<br />

The best sites in Finland, and therefore those mainly<br />

used for recovering logging residues, are Norway spruce<br />

(Picea abies L. Karst.) dominated final cuttings. The<br />

typical logging residue removal is approximately 70–100<br />

MWh/ha. In 2008, the area where logging residues were<br />

recovered was more than 50,000 ha in Finland.<br />

Figure 4 shows that the most common place to<br />

comminute logging residues for chips is a roadside<br />

landing. In 2008, the total proportion of roadside<br />

chipping supply chains was 58%. The share of roadside<br />

chipping with a separate chipper and chip truck was 55%,<br />

and the share of roadside chipping with an integrated<br />

chipper–chip truck was 3% (Fig. 4).<br />

31% of the logging residues were comminuted at<br />

power plants in 2008 (Fig. 4). The share of chipping<br />

loose residues at the plant was 14%, and the share of<br />

chipping logging residue bundles at the plant was 17%.<br />

Currently, logging residues are bundled by around 15<br />

slash bundlers in Finnish forests [cf. 9, 10]. The<br />

proportion of terminal chipping supply chain was 11% in<br />

2008 (Fig. 4).<br />

Figure 4: Proportions of different supply chains in the<br />

production of logging residue chips during 2004–2008 in<br />

Finland.<br />

3.2 Stump wood chips<br />

Intensive development of stump and root wood<br />

harvesting began in Finland in the early 2000’s. Today<br />

stump wood is a competitive wood fuel, especially for<br />

large power plants. This is clearly evident in the stump<br />

chip supply chain figures: 70% of all stump wood chips<br />

used for energy generation in 2008 were produced at<br />

power plants (Fig. 5). In 2008, 29% of all the stump<br />

wood comminution was performed at terminals. Small


stump wood batches were also comminuted at the<br />

roadside landings by mobile crushers.<br />

In Finland, stumps for energy generation are<br />

extracted almost exclusively from spruce-dominated,<br />

final felling stands. The typical stump wood removal is<br />

150–180 MWh/ha. The period for stump lifting is limited<br />

to May–November when the ground is thawed. In 2008,<br />

stumps were removed from a total of around 7,000<br />

hectares. Heavy-duty (working weight around 20 tonnes)<br />

tracked excavators are mainly used for the lifting of<br />

stumps [9, 10]. Approximately 150 excavators are<br />

currently used for stump lifting in Finland [cf. 9, 10].<br />

Figure 5: Proportions of different supply chains in the<br />

production of stump wood chips during 2004–2008 in<br />

Finland.<br />

3.3 Chips from small-sized thinning wood<br />

Chips from small-sized thinning wood are produced<br />

in Finland from small-diameter (mainly d 1.3


increased cost pressures on the total supply chain costs of<br />

forest chips.<br />

In the future, the management of supply costs in all<br />

phases of the logistics chain will hold vital positions [12].<br />

The individual parts of the supply chains should work<br />

more efficiently (e.g. utilize the most efficient working<br />

methods, adoption of the most suitable production<br />

technology, maximization of loads in forest haulage and<br />

road transportation) and especially, increase integration<br />

between supply chains (e.g. minimization of waiting and<br />

terminal times). Moreover, quality management of chips<br />

(i.e. moisture content in the case of logging residues, and<br />

impurities with stumps) has to be increased to a suitable<br />

level than it is presently.<br />

Kärhä [12] estimated that chipping will move from<br />

roadside locations closer to the heating and power plants,<br />

partly to terminals, and partly directly to the plants. This<br />

will undoubtedly prove to be the case as, in approximate<br />

terms, the closer to the plant chipping is performed, the<br />

more cost-efficient it is. Differences will, nevertheless,<br />

remain between forest chip suppliers regarding the<br />

volumes of forest chips produced in terminals and at the<br />

plant. As the volumes of road transportation of<br />

uncomminuted raw materials for forest chips will greatly<br />

increase in the future, more efficient long-distance<br />

transportation solutions are required. The status of the<br />

terminals will also become more important.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] Ylitalo, E. 2009. Puun energiakäyttö 2008. (Use of<br />

wood for energy generation in 2008). Finnish Forest<br />

Research Institute, Forest Statistical Bulletin 15/2009.<br />

[2] Ylitalo, E. 2009. Use of forest chips by heating and<br />

power plants in Finland in 2008. Finnish Forest Research<br />

Institute, Unpublished statistics.<br />

[3] Kärhä, K. 2008. Metsähakkeen<br />

tuotantoprosessikuvaukset. (Flowcharts of supply<br />

systems for forest chip production in Finland). Metsäteho<br />

Tuloskalvosarja 3/2008. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Tuloskalvosarja_2008_<br />

03_Metsahakkeen_tuotantoprosessi_kk_3.pdf.<br />

[4] Kärhä, K. 2005. Hakkuutähteiden korjuu<br />

päätehakkuualoilta. (Harvesting of logging residues from<br />

final cutting stands). In: Kariniemi, A. (Ed.). Kehittyvä<br />

puuhuolto 2005 – Seminaari metsäammattilaisille, 16.–<br />

17.2.2005, Paviljonki, Jyväskylä. Seminaarijulkaisu. p.<br />

68–75.<br />

[5] Kärhä, K. 2005. Tienvarsihaketuksella yleisimmin<br />

metsähaketta. (Forest chips most commonly with<br />

roadside chipping). BioEnergia Magazine 2/2005: 4–5.<br />

[6] Kärhä, K. 2006. Metsähakkeen tuotantoketjut<br />

Suomessa vuonna 2005. (Industrial supply chains of<br />

forest chips in Finland in 2005). Metsäteho<br />

Tuloskalvosarja 6/2006. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Tuloskalvosarja_357_m<br />

etsahakkeen_tuotantoketjut_2005.pdf.<br />

[7] Kärhä, K. 2007. Metsähakkeen tuotantoketjut 2006 ja<br />

metsähakkeen tuotannon visiot. (Industrial supply chains<br />

of forest chips in 2006 and the visions of forest chip<br />

68 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

production). Metsäteho Tuloskalvosarja 5/2007.<br />

Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Tuloskalvosarja_2007_<br />

05_Metsahakkeet_kk.pdf.<br />

[8] Kärhä, K. 2008. Metsähakkeen tuotantoketjut<br />

Suomessa vuonna 2007. (Industrial supply chains of<br />

forest chips in Finland in 2007). Metsäteho<br />

Tuloskalvosarja 4/2008. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Tuloskalvosarja_2008_<br />

04_Metsähakkeen_tuotantoketjut_kk_1.pdf.<br />

[9] Kärhä, K. 2007. Machinery for forest chip production<br />

in Finland in 2007. Metsäteho Tuloskalvosarja 14/2007.<br />

Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Tuloskalvosarja_2007_<br />

14_forest_chips_machinery_kk_1.pdf.<br />

[10] Kärhä, K. 2007. Production machinery for forest<br />

chips in Finland in 2007 and in the future. Metsäteho<br />

Review 28. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Katsaus_28.pdf.<br />

[11] Kärhä, K. 2006. Whole-tree harvesting in young<br />

stands in Finland. Forestry Studies 45: 118–134.<br />

[12] Kärhä, K. 2007. Supply Chains and Machinery in<br />

the Production of Forest Chips in Finland. In: Savolainen,<br />

M. (Ed.). Book of <strong>Proceedings</strong>. <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 2007, 3 rd<br />

International <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Conference and Exhibition, 3 rd –<br />

6 th September 2007, Jyväskylä Paviljonki, Finland.<br />

Finbio Publications 36: 367–374.<br />

[13] Anon. 1999. Finland’s National Forest Programme<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Publications<br />

2/1999.<br />

[14] Anon. 2003. Uusiutuvan energian edistämisohjelma<br />

2003–2006. Työryhmän ehdotus. (A programme to<br />

promote renewable energy 2003–2006. Proposal of<br />

working group). Ministry of Trade and Industry, Working<br />

group and committee papers 5/2003. Available at:<br />

http://julkaisurekisteri.ktm.fi/ktm_jur/ktmjur.nsf/all/4B1<br />

BDE137F9B5121C2256CE5002B3AC1/$file/tyto5eos.p<br />

df.<br />

[15] Anon. 2008. Long-term Climate and Energy<br />

Strategy. Government Report to Parliament 6 November<br />

2008. Publications of the Ministry of Employment and<br />

the Economy, Energy and climate 36/2008. Available at:<br />

http://www.tem.fi/files/21079/TEMjul_36_2008_energia<br />

_ja_ilmasto.pdf.


INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARATION OF PAPERS<br />

THE ECONOMIC, POLITICAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES, HINDERING THE ADOPTION OF BIOENERGY IN<br />

PAKISTAN: A CASE STUDY<br />

Umair Usman<br />

UCH<br />

Moonoo Chowk, Raiwind/Defence Road E. Lahore, Pakistan<br />

Umair@uch.com.pk, Tel: 92-42-5321636, Fax: 92-42-5321638<br />

ABSTRACT: The paper will inform the audience about the energy crisis that has crippled Pakistan’s economic growth<br />

since the last 4 years, and the role that <strong>Bioenergy</strong> can play in resolving the issue. In order to help ease Pakistan in its<br />

effort to curb this crisis and to get useful insights into the role that <strong>Bioenergy</strong> can play in solving Pakistan’s problems,<br />

business ventures were attempted. The results were not encouraging and shed light onto the financial and technical<br />

hindrances involved in creating and running bioenergy businesses in Pakistan. These issues themselves linked to the more<br />

general Social, Economic and Political barriers for the adoption of <strong>Bioenergy</strong>. The paper concludes by providing<br />

suggestions and recommendations, as to what the government, private sector as well as the international community can<br />

do in order to overcome the crisis.<br />

Keywords: Bio energy Policy, Biogas, Bio-ethanol, Third <strong>World</strong>, Pakistan<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Energy is considered to be the life line of any<br />

economy. It is significant determinant of socioeconomic<br />

development and is therefore one of the most important<br />

strategic commodities [26]. Traditional growth theories<br />

focus on the labour, capital and technology as major<br />

factors of production and ignore the importance of energy<br />

in the economic growth process [16].<br />

In the era of globalization, even though dependence<br />

of economies on energy and its demand is rapidly<br />

increasing, the supply of it remains uncertain. Therefore<br />

energy shortage will be one of the biggest problems<br />

facing mankind in the next century [16].<br />

One such country which is already facing an energy<br />

crisis is Pakistan. Energy plays an important role as<br />

compared to other variables included in the production<br />

and consumption function for Pakistan, as it is in an early<br />

stage of development [10]. Already Pakistan’s economy<br />

has been under constant stress due to is energy crisis [7],<br />

leading to a sharp decrease in its economic growth rate.<br />

In order to study the role that <strong>Bioenergy</strong> can play in<br />

overcoming the energy crisis, two business ventures were<br />

attempted i.e. selling Biogas plants and Bio-ethanol.<br />

Biomass seemed like a logical alternative energy solution<br />

due to the country’s large agricultural base. However<br />

both businesses failed at different stages of development<br />

due to several micro and macro factors. Reflecting on<br />

these failures, new business models are discussed that can<br />

help create a formal Biomass industry.<br />

However before details of the ventures are looked<br />

into, it is imperative that Pakistan’s energy profile is<br />

studied first, in order to better understand its needs.<br />

.<br />

2 PAKISTAN’S ENERGY PROFILE<br />

2.1 Country profile<br />

Pakistan is a middle income economy, with an<br />

estimated population of around 170 million, among the<br />

highest in the world. It is the founding member of<br />

SAARC, G-8 and the OIC. Not only is it a major military<br />

and nuclear power, but South Asia’s second largest<br />

economy and a front line state on the war in terror.<br />

It has sustained excellent growth record in the past<br />

decade thanks to liberalization, and an opening up of the<br />

economy. Due to economic growth that took place in in<br />

the first half of the 2000s, the GDP of Pakistan doubled<br />

between 1999 and 2007. The growth in GDP was even<br />

higher than the population growth and therefore GDP per<br />

capita increased by almost sixty percent between 2000<br />

and 2008. Recognizing Pakistan’s economic growth,<br />

Goldman Sachs now considers Pakistan to be among the<br />

‘Next Eleven Countries’ i.e. nations that are likely to<br />

become sizable economic powers and have greater<br />

impact on global business in the new century [34]. As<br />

Pakistan’s agriculture, industry, trade and services sectors<br />

have been growing rapidly, the government has remained<br />

negligent to the surge in energy demand, leading to a<br />

massive shortfall in energy, which is only expected to<br />

widen [26].<br />

One of the key strategic objectives of the Musharraf<br />

era was to turn Pakistan into an energy corridor,<br />

connecting Central Asia (China and the oil producing<br />

countries) to the rest of the world (14; 13; 26). However<br />

Pakistan itself is now facing a major energy crisis. To<br />

look into this crisis in detail, it is imperative to look at<br />

Pakistan’s energy profile in order to better understand the<br />

supply and demand of different sources.<br />

2.2 Energy Profile:<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

69


The primary energy supply in Pakistan is<br />

concentrated to only a few sources. The average share of<br />

Oil and Gas between 1997-2007 was 44.36% and 32.58%<br />

respectively i.e. 77% of the total supply (relatively,<br />

Hydroelectricity and coal accounted for 18% and other<br />

sources accounted for 5%). The share now stands at 31%<br />

for oil (82% is imported) and 48% for gas i.e. the total<br />

share has grown to 79%, where the share of oil decreased<br />

to 31 percent (relatively hydroelectricity and coal account<br />

for 20% and 1 percent from nuclear and imported energy)<br />

[16; 24].<br />

Looking at total consumption of each source, the<br />

average percentage share of oil in energy consumption<br />

was 40.9% during 1998 to 2007, followed by gas 34.6%,<br />

electricity 15.7%, coal 7.5% and LPG 1.3% [16]. Noting<br />

consumption of energy by sector, the industrial sector<br />

consumed 37.3% of the energy, followed by transport<br />

sector with a share of 32.2% and domestic sector with a<br />

share of 22.2%. The agriculture sector, government and<br />

the commercial sector respectively consumed only 2.6%,<br />

2.5% and 3.3%.<br />

During the 1980s, about 86% of the energy demand<br />

was met by domestic sources and remaining 14% gap<br />

was filled by the imports [7]. At present Pakistan meets<br />

75% of its energy needs by domestic resources including<br />

gas, oil and hydroelectricity production [24]. Only 25%<br />

energy needs were managed through imports. Oil and<br />

Gas have taken major share in the energy mix and are<br />

likely to maintain their dominance [16].<br />

It can be seen that from the above that Pakistan’s<br />

energy supply is dependent largely on Oil and Gas and<br />

electricity, and the share of imported energy is increasing<br />

over time. It can be noted therefore that shortages or<br />

difficulties in imports can have disastrous effects on<br />

industry and transport, and therefore cripple the industry.<br />

2.2 Energy crisis:<br />

During the mid 200s, the average economic growth<br />

rate of 7.6% in the 2000s. It was believed that assuming<br />

the growth of 6-7 percent which Pakistan had during the<br />

mid 2000s, energy demand will growth at 8% or rougly<br />

double within a decade [24]. However insufficient<br />

generation and exploration, limited planning and<br />

negligence of successive regimes, and inefficient use and<br />

wastage of energy resources [31], has created an acute<br />

energy crisis in Pakistan since 2006. [24; 26; 7].<br />

[16]<br />

Table I: Energy Supply and Demand Gap (MTOE:<br />

Millions of Tons Oil equivalent)<br />

On the other hand according to Pakistan’s Energy<br />

Security Plan for 2005-2030 [16], the total primary<br />

energy consumption in Pakistan is expected to increase<br />

seven times to 360 MTOE and over eight-fold increase in<br />

the requirement of power by 2030 (Table I).<br />

As none of these problems were dealt with, Pakisan’s<br />

GDP growth rate plummeted to just 2.3% in 2008-2009<br />

growth, and 4.1% 2009-<strong>2010</strong>. Due to energy shortages, th<br />

large scale manufaturing sector declined by 7.7% last<br />

70 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

year, while overall manufacturing declined by 3.3% [7].<br />

It must be noted that as GDP growth declines, the<br />

estimations of the widening gap already discussed might<br />

not materialize, but severe shortages will probabaly<br />

remain. In paticular Pakistan is likely to face a major<br />

shortage of natural gas, electricity and oil, the three major<br />

sources, in the next three to four year that could choke<br />

the economic growth. The biggest shortfall is expected in<br />

the natural gas supplies [16].<br />

The demand-supply gap has therefore increased and<br />

is likely to increase in the future, exerting strong pressure<br />

on the energy resources in the Country [16; 33].<br />

2.2.1 Gas<br />

Natural gas has emerged as the most important fuel<br />

in the recent past and the trends indicate its dominant<br />

share in the future energy mix as well [26].<br />

Demand for natural gas in Pakistan increased by<br />

roughly 10 percent annually from 2000-01 to 2007-08,<br />

reaching around 3,200 cubic feet per day (MMCFD)<br />

against the total production of 3,774 MMCFD while by<br />

2008-2009, the demand for natural gas exceeded the<br />

available supply, with production of 4,528 MMCFD gas<br />

against demand for 4,731 MMCFD, indicating a shortfall<br />

of 203 MMCFD [30]. Hagler Bailly, a global<br />

management consulting firm warned in a 2006 study that<br />

Pakistan is going to witness gas shortage starting in 2007,<br />

and defecit will grow until it will cripple the economy by<br />

2025, when shortage will be 11,092 MMCFD (Million<br />

standard cubic feet per day) against total 13,259 MMCFD<br />

production i.e. demand will be 24351 [8]. This winter<br />

alone, the country dealt with a shortfall of 700 MMCFD<br />

of gas due to increasing use of heaters and geysers [17].<br />

There are also about 2718 Compressed Natural Gas<br />

(CNG) stations in the country and approximately 1.9<br />

million vehicles are using CNG. Pakistan has seen an<br />

investment of Rs 70 billion has been made, creating some<br />

100,000 job [24]. With roughly 29,167 vehincles are<br />

converted run on CNG every month, Pakistan has now<br />

become the third largest CNG consumer in the world<br />

after Argentina and Brazil, and the biggest in Asia [20;<br />

28], However due to a shortage of Natural Gas, CNG<br />

stations are required to go on ‘forced holidays’ where two<br />

days in a week they are not allowed to sell gas. Gas<br />

powered generators for domestic use, have therefore been<br />

banned as well [37].<br />

Industry too has been made to cut their gas usage for<br />

3 days every week, otherwise their gas supply will be cut.<br />

In winters, gas supplies to industry are cut for upto 2-3<br />

weeks, when demand is highest. During the same period,<br />

many residential areas, even within major urban centers<br />

do not have access to gas for weeks at a time [34].<br />

2.2.2 Oil<br />

Oil is the second biggest source of primary energy for<br />

Pakistan, and imports 82% of all its needs [24]. The issue<br />

with oil has to do more with trade deficits than depletion<br />

of resources. Between 2008-2009 (July-March)<br />

Petroleum products and crude oil made up 28.5% of<br />

Pakistan’s imports, totaling to about 7.4 billion and by<br />

2009-<strong>2010</strong>, the share in imports has increased to 29.2%<br />

or $7.3 billion [19].<br />

The situation reached its worst point in 2008. The<br />

2007-2008 Pakistan Oil bill was an all time high of $11<br />

billion, due to record world oil prices, and the<br />

depreciation in the rupee’s value. This put huge stress on<br />

the trade and current account deficit, and therefore


Pakistan’s reserves. Pakistani bureaucracy rushed to<br />

reach an agreement with the Saudi government to provide<br />

$5.9 billion of Oil on deferred payments i.e. 6 month<br />

supply [26]. Prior to this, oil prices in Pakistan reached<br />

unbearable levels and first signs of severe shortage had<br />

begun to appear as the government did not have the<br />

reserves to buy oil [30]. This incident exposed a major<br />

flaw in Pakistan’s energy security.<br />

2.2.3 Electricity<br />

Electricity is another important source of energy in<br />

Pakistan. The average share of electricity as a percentage<br />

of the total energy consumed was was about 18% during<br />

1998-2007. Electricity consumption grew in all economic<br />

sectors during the last five years. Currently Pakistan is<br />

facing severe electricity crisis as the shortfall has varies<br />

between 3000 to 4000 MW [24].<br />

The current energy crisis stems from the decline in<br />

hydro sources of energy and over reliance on the<br />

expansive source of electricity. On top there are 30%<br />

transmission losses due to poor quality<br />

infrastructure and large scale power theft [25]. Another<br />

issues is what has come to be known as circular debt.<br />

IPPs or Independent Power Producers make up 45.23%<br />

of Pakistan’s electricity supply. These IPPs sell<br />

electricity to the government, however many of them<br />

have faced delay in payments, and many remain unpaid.<br />

Therefore many IPPs has stopped operations as they<br />

could no longer finance themselves [3].<br />

The issue is also related to the problem of oil as oilbased<br />

thermal plants accounts supply 68% of generating<br />

capacity, far more than the 30% share of hydroelectric<br />

plants [7]. Rising oil prices and the depreciation of the<br />

rupee has led to huge generation costs, while several IPPs<br />

saw their costs rising and were forced to close down as<br />

payments were not made [5]. As a result, manufacturing<br />

costs and inflation are rising and, Pakistani exports are<br />

becoming expensive, further pushing pressure on the<br />

deficit ridden balance of payments [24]. All of this has<br />

negatively impacted economic growth. Overall the<br />

energy sector of Pakistan is poorly managed, service<br />

quality is low, theft of power and gas is rampant and until<br />

recently, most utilities are still receiving subsidies<br />

making them even more inefficient [32].<br />

Therefore, it can see that Pakistan’s energy mix relies<br />

heavily on Oil, Gas and electricity, all of which are<br />

creating uncertainty for Pakistan’s energy needs. Even<br />

though average consumption of oil is falling, its unstable<br />

price creates havoc for Pakistan. Gas reserves too have<br />

depleted and soon Pakistan will start importing gas from<br />

Iran to fulfill its needs. Coming to electricity, generation<br />

is not keeping up with demand and there is a dire need to<br />

fill the gap as it has already has a significant negative<br />

impact on industry. To get Pakistan out of this crisis and<br />

prepare for the future there is an urgent need to expand<br />

and upgrade the domestic resource base, by exploring<br />

new sources, exploiting existing ones, improving<br />

efficiency, undertaking conservation efforts and diversity<br />

the energy mix through alternative energy [16; 7]. One of<br />

such alternative energy solution is Biomass, which seems<br />

very promising for Pakistan.<br />

3 POTENTIAL FOR BIOMASS:<br />

There are several alternative energy solutions being<br />

implemented throughout the world. Efforts range from<br />

capturing wind power though wind turbines, Solar energy<br />

using PV cells and even capturing kinetic energy of tidal<br />

waves in the oceans to produce what is known as Tidal<br />

Power. Biomass is one such solution which shows<br />

promise and potential within Pakistan. However to look<br />

at the significance and potential of Biomass as an<br />

alternate energy of fuel it is important to get insights into<br />

exactly what it really is.<br />

3.1 What is Biomass?<br />

Biomass essentially is organic matter i.e. plants, that<br />

can be used as renewable energy. The energy comes from<br />

stored sun light through photosynthesis, known as Bio<br />

energy. Unlike Fossil fuels, which have been created<br />

through millions of years of heat and pressure, Biomass<br />

comes from fresh sources that can be grown again with<br />

relative ease [22]. Most Biomass fuels recycle agriculture<br />

byproducts. This can be from, cow dung [biogas] and<br />

agricultural residues [bio diesel or ethanol] or non<br />

agriculture byproducts such as fuel wood from forests,<br />

while traditional biomass, relies on such things as directly<br />

incineration firewood or cow dung, have serious<br />

implications for health and emissions [34]; however they<br />

are still prevalent in developing countries, where 2.4-2.5<br />

billion people still rely on it (mainly for cooking), a<br />

number that is set to increase to 2.7 billion by the year<br />

2030. Already in the South Asia region 70-80%<br />

individuals rely in some way to traditional Biomass. In<br />

Pakistan 19% of Biomass energy is sourced from, cow<br />

dung, 22% from crop residue and 60% from fuel wood<br />

[10].<br />

As the source of Biomass is basically agriculture (and<br />

forestry), there is immense potential for Biomass within<br />

Pakistan, which is largely an agricultural economy.<br />

3.2 Bio energy Potential of Pakistan<br />

Agriculture accounts for for 21% of the GDP and<br />

employees 45% of the total workforce and is hence the<br />

largest employer [11; 7]. 62% of the population already<br />

lives in the rural areas, where agriculture is the main<br />

source of income.<br />

Of the Total area of 79.61 million hectares of the<br />

country, 27% is cultivated while only 8% is forest [12].<br />

The ratio of cultivated land to population is 0.16 ha per<br />

person. Of the cropped area, Food grains are grown on<br />

56%, cash crops on 17%, pulses on 7%, oilseeds on 3%,<br />

fruits on 2%, vegetables and condiments on 1% each, and<br />

other crops, including fodder, on 13%. Most of the 17.2<br />

million hectares of cultivated area is irrigated and 70% of<br />

the water is supplied by canals, thanks to the Indus Basin,<br />

the largest continuous irrigation system in the world,<br />

provides most of the canal irrigation. 30% of water<br />

comes from wells. Traditionally monsoons in July and<br />

August and conventional winter rains ,in January and<br />

February have been a source of irrigation as well.<br />

It must be noted that Maize and Sugar Cane, are both<br />

large sources of Bio-ethanol, and are among the top 5<br />

major crops of the country [7]. Looking at livestock,<br />

while the contribution of the crop sector declined from 65<br />

percent of the total agricultural activity in 1990-91 to just<br />

43.9 percent in 2009-<strong>2010</strong>, the share of livestock has<br />

risen from 30 percent to 53.2 percent over this period, or<br />

11.4% of the total GDP, therefore becoming the biggest<br />

contributor to agriculture [7; 8]. This is derived from an<br />

estimated livestock population of 30.8 millon Buffaloes,<br />

34.3 million cattle, 59.9 million goats , sheep 27.8 and<br />

610 milion chickens [7], averaging close to 2-5 cattle per<br />

household [23]. The estates for making biogas from these<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

71


sources varies between 57488 million m³ [4] to around<br />

858,000 million m³ per day [11], cattle size estimates,<br />

and the amount of biogas that can be produced,<br />

However, even though it looks as if Pakistan is all set<br />

to embrace Biomass, it must be remembed that Pakistan<br />

is currently under severe ‘Water Stress’, and is likely to<br />

become a water scarce nation perhaps as soon as <strong>2010</strong><br />

[29]. The issue has been related to Pakistan’s<br />

mismanagement of water resources as well as what is<br />

allegedly regarded as India’s illegal construction of dams<br />

to collect water for itself, which is against the Indus<br />

Water Treaty. Water scarcity will not only have a<br />

devastation impact on crops, where already there is a<br />

‘water schedule’ in place to distribute the limited amount<br />

of water to fields at particular times only [18]. This will<br />

likely have an impact on livestock as well, as water<br />

shortage is leading to the emergence of ‘waste lands’ that<br />

have caused a shortage of fodder for livestock, situation<br />

that will only worsen in the future if nothing is done [1].<br />

In any case, noting the potential for Bio liquid fuels<br />

and Biogas, it seemed logical to attempt business<br />

ventures in these fields. However, even though there<br />

were opportunities in the field, there were may<br />

unforeseen hindrances as well.<br />

4 HINDRANCES TO BIOENERGY VENTURES<br />

Keeping the view that commercialization of Biomass<br />

solutions could create a private industry through<br />

demonstration effects of a profitable model, two<br />

businesses were planned. The intention was to get better<br />

insights into the opportunities presented by Biomass and<br />

how it can be used to resolve the energy crisis.<br />

4.1 Biogas<br />

Biogas has several advantages for communities. Apart<br />

from the health benefits of using dung in such a manner,<br />

it saves time and money, while the left over manure from<br />

the Biogas plant can be a used as an even better fertilizer<br />

than traditional dung [29].<br />

4.1.1 Commercializing Biogas Plants<br />

A simple and cheap fixed dome Biogas plant, was to<br />

be constructed for each home in a village on the outskirts<br />

of Lahore. The location was selected due to the low<br />

levels of penetration by non profit groups that establish<br />

Biogas plants for free. To try out the plan, a household<br />

with 4 Buffaloes was selected and taught how to use the<br />

plant, in terms of loading, cleaning and maintenance.<br />

Although they were skeptical in the beginning,<br />

particularly because as it was expensive, the household<br />

eventually agreed to use it on a lease of 5 years. However<br />

several factors created massive hindrances to the growth<br />

of the idea<br />

4.1.1.1 Micro level Hindrances:<br />

There was alot of suspicion, skepticism and resistance<br />

to the idea of using Biogas. Villagers, often simply did<br />

not accept the fact that burning cow dung in a traditional<br />

manner effects health, or that the waste slurry from the<br />

plant will be a better fertilizer.<br />

Another issue was the price. Although subsidies of<br />

over Rs 17,000 for a BioGas plant are available from the<br />

government, simply getting this subsidy was hectic and<br />

72 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

full of red tape [6]. The cost of the system increased<br />

further when it was realized that the household would to<br />

change their cooking utensils and stoves to work with the<br />

new supply of energy.<br />

Biogas often was not enough as there were only 4<br />

buffaloes, to support a large family of six and the<br />

buffaloes themselves were mal-nutritioned. The<br />

uncertainty of supply, was therefore an issue. The<br />

household stopped using Biogas themselves in a few<br />

months, and did not pay.<br />

This experience sheds light on to why not many<br />

private sector companies would not want to join Biogas<br />

initiatives. It is still a relatively new product and there is<br />

not much awareness among consumers about its long<br />

term financial and health benefits, making the market too<br />

uncertain and immature. However the biggest issue<br />

remains the initial price, which remains high for the<br />

average villager. This gets worse when it is learned that<br />

powerful local land owners, who are often politicians, are<br />

not willing to support such small businesses either.<br />

4.1.1.2 Macro- level hindrances<br />

Biogas, although subsidized, has not bee pushed out<br />

to the masses the way it should have been. The biggest<br />

promoter and installer of Biogas systems in Pakistan is<br />

still SNV, a Dutch initiative [29]. Even though there have<br />

been past claims by the government to promote the<br />

concept, not much has been done and villagers still use<br />

cow dung and other traditional fuels. Therefore<br />

government will and support seem to be the biggest<br />

hindrance to the growth of Biogas usage.<br />

There are also social issues, namely resistance to<br />

change, as here a large population would not only have to<br />

change the way they heat themselves or cook their food,<br />

but even change the cooking utensils they use, in order to<br />

adapt to the new system. It is therefore likely to take<br />

some time to catch on. Another problem however is that<br />

there are no formal distribution networks for those who<br />

do not have enough of their own manure, which is likely<br />

for villagers with smaller holdings. All of these would<br />

require heavy government action, and support from<br />

private for and non profit organizations, all of which<br />

have been limited until now.<br />

4.1.2 Commercializing Bio-ethanol fuel:<br />

Most cars in Pakistan are run on Petrol and therefore it<br />

was natural to go for a Bio-ethanol plant with a capacity<br />

of annual production of 1 milion gallons, with the support<br />

from American consultants. Sweet Sorghum was chosen<br />

as the feedstock for several reasons. It can give 2-3 crop<br />

rotations a year and unlike maize, or sugar cane, is not a<br />

major food source. Fuel grade ethanol was initially to be<br />

marketed directly to domestic car owners and businesses<br />

to reduce their cost of fuel who could make their own<br />

ethanol mixtures such as E-10 or E-20. However, even<br />

before the business begun there were several limitations<br />

that stopped its inception.<br />

4.1.2.1 Micro Level hindrances<br />

A major problem was the availability of Sweet<br />

Sorghum. It is usually not sown on a large, commercial<br />

scale anywhere in Pakistan, as it is not used as cattle<br />

fodder or as a food source. Due to little market value<br />

there is just not enough supply for a medium scale<br />

business of the sort. Maize and Sugar Cane could have<br />

been used, but due to the exploitative nature of food


distributors in Pakistan, and the reputation of Biofuel<br />

businesses to increase food prices, it was not attempted.<br />

Another problem was the continuous power shortages<br />

in the city of Lahore, where the plant was to be based. At<br />

the time of planning, 12-14 hours of power outages were<br />

common, while the system being employed needed to be<br />

in continuous operation, as it did not start well.<br />

Employing a generator using ethanol itself, was not found<br />

to be feasible either.<br />

This brings us to the issue of financial feasibility.<br />

Although cost savings were identified when used with<br />

petrol (an E-10 to E-20 mixture was envisioned), the<br />

margin was not large, and slight changes in petrol, power<br />

or feedstock prices could have offset any price advantage<br />

of the fuel. If a generator was to be used, it was<br />

impossible to sell the product on a ‘price’ basis, due to<br />

higher costs. Ethanol based fuels were never going to<br />

sell the fact that they were ‘eco friendly’ and ‘renewable’<br />

in a price conscious market like Pakistan in any case.<br />

Overall the system was too expensive (fixed and running<br />

costs) for it to be a viable business, unless subsidies were<br />

available, but there were none.<br />

4.2.1.2 Macro level hindrances<br />

Government support had been promised since<br />

General Musharraf was in power, however even though a<br />

policy was drafted, it was never implemented. Therefore<br />

government delay in taking action can be noted as a<br />

major hindrance to the promotion and adoption of<br />

Biomass.<br />

A major, and perhaps the biggest hindrance to the<br />

development of Bio-ethanol is the market price of crops.<br />

Sugarcane and Maize, are still the best contenders for<br />

making Biofuels as they are grown on a massive scale<br />

that can be used as feedstock. However even slight<br />

shortages in supply can cause the prices to rise<br />

exuberantly. This is due to the illegal cartels who control<br />

food distribution and supply and regularly exploit<br />

rumours of slight shortages. This could have a<br />

devastating impact on inflation and the quality of life for<br />

the common man.<br />

A major hindrance is also the issue of creating a<br />

network. No business can expand on ethanol based fuels<br />

by themselves and therefore a distribution agreements<br />

with powerful ‘Oil Marketing Companies’ (OMC) is<br />

necessary. Approaching a massive OMC is not an easy<br />

task and creating a market through direct marketing will<br />

be a slow process that can never reach the masses. This<br />

issue was was to be resolved in the government draft,<br />

which was planned years ago but is still at the<br />

preliminary stage of its implementation [6; 24]. However<br />

the energy crisis itself also feeds into the problem of<br />

large scale manufacturing (which includes producing<br />

ethanol), which has been declining since a couple of<br />

years, due to ever increasing costs of production [7].<br />

A major hindrance, to the adoption of Biogas and Bioethanol<br />

that was identified was the unwillingness or the<br />

half hearted support of the government to such efforts in<br />

terms of passing legislation, enforcing laws and<br />

providing subsidies [5]. Another problem is the fact that<br />

the political system is highly corrupt and non transparent,<br />

which means usually funds are not acounted for. Another<br />

issue is that usually, official policies change successive<br />

governments [33] and unless there is deep involvement of<br />

foreigners and the private for and nonprofit sectors, such<br />

policies are unlikely to sustain over a longer period.<br />

5 Recommendations<br />

It is apparent that there are no quick solutions to the<br />

problem of energy in Pakistan, however many<br />

possibilities exist to create a successful future.<br />

For the mass promotion and acceptance of biomass, it<br />

is imperative that the private and public sector work<br />

together. Neither the public, nor the private sector alone<br />

has the will and the resources to create a sustainable<br />

biomass industry on their own. This includes federal and<br />

local governments and agencies, businesses and industry<br />

associations, universities, supra national agencies such as<br />

Asian Development or <strong>World</strong> Bank as well as not for<br />

profit organizations.<br />

Universities could train personnel, undertake<br />

research, disseminate information and overall develop the<br />

necessary human resource, banks can help fund projects,<br />

and of course entrepreneurs could organize all these<br />

resources and networks to make it happen. The public<br />

sector on the other hand would need to promote the<br />

industry by controlling market prices and overall supply<br />

of feedstock, especially food items and manure. It would<br />

also play a major role by disseminating information<br />

among rural areas where the private sector does not have<br />

sufficient networks, and also provide help in providing<br />

funds and subsidies to these projects. Other stake holders<br />

and international agencies such as USAID and the <strong>World</strong><br />

Bank can also be involved for providing funding and<br />

expertise. However the major role will still be of the<br />

government which would have to bring all stake holders<br />

together. Red tape would have to be reduced, the transfer<br />

of funds would have to be made transparent and fair, and<br />

ensure that there is total commitment resolving the issue<br />

of energy shortage, for the long term.<br />

5.1 Possible Biogas Public-private partnership for<br />

households<br />

A possible business model for a private-public<br />

partnership could be based on Community Biogas plants,<br />

which at one point was to be attempted on a large scale<br />

by the government [20]. The federal government could<br />

help acquire and direct funds from local governments to<br />

subsidize community plants, which will help involve the<br />

whole community rather than a household and therefore<br />

reduce resistance to change and lower costs. Knowledge<br />

and expertise would be brought in by the private sector,<br />

which will also monitor progress, conduct R&D and<br />

improve the design. The private sector will also be<br />

responsible for establishing a constant supply of raw<br />

material by providing sufficient quantities of manure<br />

when not available. They can also provide after sales<br />

service for which they can charge a minimal price and<br />

also help install standardized kitchen utensils. An area<br />

could be identified by the government, which can then<br />

work on it together with private vendors, or, it can be the<br />

other way around as well. The government can identify<br />

what vendors to work with based on experience, expertise<br />

and finance. This approach is similar to the partnership<br />

between the private plastics firm ‘Sintex’ and the Indian<br />

government, which have been working together for the<br />

development of rural biogas [15].<br />

The biggest role would be played by the government<br />

however, which will have to pass laws that would make<br />

Biogas compulsory and eventually ban the use of<br />

traditional manure incineration. This will require strict<br />

policing of the new local laws. It is possible that the<br />

government’s Gas distribution company, the Sui<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

73


Southern or Northern Pipelines, could help spread<br />

awareness and educate villagers about the benefits of<br />

Biogas, as it is directly responsible for the distribution of<br />

natural gas.<br />

Consultants can also be hired in order to learn from<br />

expertise of the ones who have been successful at Biogas<br />

deployments. Working with non-profit organizations<br />

such as SNV, which has had immense success in Asia,<br />

will be necessary. The Indian Government, which has<br />

deployed community biogas plants on a large scale, and<br />

has had public-private partnership program in place since<br />

a couple of years, can also be asked for support [15].<br />

However a major hindrance to such a system would<br />

be the issue of availability of suitable land. Even though<br />

it might be leased from a private landholder, or provided<br />

by the government, it would definitely slow the process<br />

as land ownership can be a serious issue in the rural area.<br />

A short term disruption of availability of fertilizer in a<br />

community may also arise until slurry can be used. A<br />

long term disadvantage of such a system is that it can<br />

eventually lead to a higher market price of manure, which<br />

is widely used as fertilizer. Another problem in the long<br />

run could be animals that are acutely malnourished, as<br />

they might be fed to produce manure rather than quality<br />

meat and milk, however this might already be the case, as<br />

manure can be used as fertilizer or sold in the market.<br />

Of course such a system is for domestic use only,<br />

and Natural gas for transportation will require a different<br />

model than this, characterized by a distribution channel<br />

that connects the rural and urban areas of the country. On<br />

the other hand, gas for industry too will require a<br />

different model.<br />

5.2 Possible ethanol fuel Public-private partnership for<br />

use in transport<br />

The cost of producing ethanol fuel is still high,<br />

therefore the best way to produce it would be to take the<br />

path the government has been trying to attempt for a<br />

couple of years. Pakistan has a massive sugar refining<br />

industry that uses sugar cane to make refined sugar.<br />

Many of these are already making ethanol, and they are<br />

most likely to already have the existing scale, financial<br />

strength, and the cost base, to produce ethanol in large<br />

quantities, on their existing sugar mills [9]. The<br />

government would have to work with these Sugar Mill<br />

owners and give them incentives to start producing fuel<br />

grade ethanol from Sugar cane. One of the incentives that<br />

can be given to these Sugar Mill owners would be a fixed<br />

price of ethanol, independent of market price. On top of<br />

that, simply finding a steady buyer would be a great<br />

incentive as well, as it would help reduce overall risk and<br />

uncertainty. The role of foreign private and public sector<br />

would be to support in terms of expertise, technology<br />

transfers and of course, bringing in funds. The help of<br />

experts from Brazil and the US, which are by far leaders<br />

in terms of technology and prevalence of Bio-ethanol,<br />

will be necessary. Work has already begun on such a<br />

business model, however it is currently at the testing<br />

stage and only the government owned ‘Pakistan State<br />

Oil’ is allowed to sell it. It is currently being supplied in<br />

the south of the country.<br />

It must be remembered that this model needs to be<br />

further expanded to include all Major Oil Marketing<br />

Companies and perhaps also encourage mill owners to<br />

use multiple feed stocks, such as Maize or Sweet<br />

Sorghum as well, rather than just sugar cane, in order<br />

ease the supply pressures that will be put on sugar cane.<br />

74 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Therefore the most important part of the government<br />

would be to control the prices of Sugar Cane and Sugar<br />

Cane products, and therefore prices in the market, which<br />

would be highly open to exploitation by distributors to<br />

produce artificial shortages in such a condition. Hence<br />

apparent that the possible setbacks of this model is that if<br />

it is not implemented correctly with proper policing,<br />

sugar supplies can fall (genuinely and artificially) as<br />

resources are diverted to making ethanol, ultimately<br />

resulting in high prices (and rising imports) of Sugar (or<br />

any other crop). Ideally, a non food source should be<br />

used as feedstock; however that will require heavy<br />

investments of time and effort before a complete industry<br />

can be established, as such crops usually have little<br />

market value and therefore are short in supply to begin<br />

with.<br />

In the end, it must be remembered that the problems<br />

of an inattentive and negligent governance, corrupting<br />

and misappropriation of funds is something that is likely<br />

to continue in the current political and bureaucratic<br />

culture in Pakistan. It is a long term challenge and needs<br />

to be solved for any real progress, in any field. Already<br />

Pakistan’s current energy policy is not being<br />

implemented [5]. Also Pakistan dwells in a fragile<br />

political system that is both corrupt and uncertain.<br />

Usually, policies are not retained or sustained over longer<br />

periods and successive governments. Stakeholders such<br />

as the IMF, or Asian Development Bank, whose help<br />

would be needed in acquiring fund and expertise, could<br />

become tools of accountability. Also involvement of<br />

other stake holders such as universities, domestic and<br />

foreign private and public sector companies and nonprofit<br />

organization, could help keep accountability, and also<br />

make sure that policies transcend governments.<br />

6 CONSLUSION<br />

The energy crisis in Pakistan is deep and worsening.<br />

By 2030, energy supply and demand gap is expected to<br />

increase to over 140.9 MTOE i.e. 64% of the total supply<br />

[16]. Due to Pakistan’s large agriculture base, Biomass is<br />

one of the alternative energy solutions that can help ease<br />

this crisis. However it cannot be done by the private or<br />

public sectors alone, and would require help of all kinds<br />

from foreign governments, agencies (e.g. The <strong>World</strong><br />

Bank or USAID), technology companies, nonprofit<br />

organizations (such as SNV), universities and<br />

consultancies, in order acquire the expertise and the funds<br />

to make it all happen.<br />

It must be remembered though that there are serious<br />

long term issues that need to be overcome for any real<br />

progress. One such issues is that of water stress that<br />

Pakistan is under. Water could soon be scarce in<br />

Pakistan, which can have a significant negative impact on<br />

the economy in general and the agriculture sector,<br />

including crops and livestock, in particular (1; 28; 30).<br />

Overall, Pakistan’s culture of corruption and the<br />

inability to implement and sustain policies with changing<br />

governments is another major issue. can be overcome by<br />

involving as many stakeholders a possible, including<br />

international agencies, foreign and domestic private<br />

companies, therefore helping put pressure on successive<br />

governments to continue legislation and government<br />

initiatives.<br />

However, Bio Energy alone cannot solve Pakistan<br />

problems. With all the issues arising from Biomass, and


other sources of energy, it is imperative Pakistan utilizes<br />

its immense Hydro, Thermal and Wind power potentials<br />

as well. Each approach has its own advantages,<br />

disadvantages, according to the location, distribution,<br />

costs, maintenance and sustainability [5]. This will also<br />

help Pakistan diversify its energy mix, which relies<br />

heavily on oil, gas and electricity [24; 26]. One estimate<br />

of the potential electricity generation capability of<br />

Pakistan’s coastal areas from wind power is over 50,000<br />

MW [5]. The hydel power potential of the Indus River<br />

System itself is estimated to be around 54,000 MW<br />

while coal resources are estimated at 185 billion tons ( oil<br />

equivalent, this is higher than the reserves of Saudi<br />

Arabia and Iran, combined) [24]. Therefore it is<br />

imperative that Pakistan does not reply on a few sources<br />

of energy and rather have a very diverisified energy mix<br />

(in which <strong>Bioenergy</strong> can play a very important role).<br />

Even though the crisis Pakistan faces is severe, if the<br />

intenrational community works with the private and<br />

public sector organizations in Pakistan, in a ‘war like<br />

urgency’, not only can the problem be solved, but<br />

Pakistan will be able able to become an economy with a<br />

broad energy mix, with heavy reliance on bioenergy.<br />

Therefore becoming self sufficient to a very large extent,<br />

and in the process developing new business, technologies<br />

and generate continuous economic growth and prosperity.<br />

REFERENCES:<br />

(1) Ali, T., <strong>2010</strong> Shortage of quality Livestock<br />

fodders. [Online]. Dawn.com. Available at:<br />

http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn<br />

-content-library/dawn/in-papermagazine/economic-and-business/shortage-ofquality-livestock-fodder-150<br />

[Accessed on 28th<br />

May, <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(2) Akhtar, P., 2009. Consumers to have renewable<br />

energy on subsidised rates. [Online]. Daily<br />

Times. Available at:<br />

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page<br />

=2009\04\21\story_21-4-2009_pg5_9<br />

[Accessed on 13th March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(3) Arifeen, M., <strong>2010</strong>. Circular Debt stays un paid.<br />

[Online]. The Financial Daily. Availvlae at:<br />

http://thefinancialdaily.com/NewsDetail/92442.<br />

aspx [Accessed on 11th May <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(4) BETAPAK., <strong>2010</strong>. BioGas Plants, Equipments<br />

and Services. [Online]. Betapk.org. Available<br />

at: http://betapk.org/potential.html [Accessed<br />

on 15th May, <strong>2010</strong>]<br />

(5) Bhatti, M.W., <strong>2010</strong>. Renewable energy policy<br />

not being implemented. The News. Available<br />

at:<br />

http://www.thenews.com.pk/print1.asp?id=239<br />

573 [Accessed on 17 th May <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(6) Chaudary, S., 2008. Ethanol Manufacturers<br />

Demand Subsidies. [Online]. The Daily Times.<br />

Available at:<br />

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page<br />

=2008\02\17\story_17-2-2008_pg5_9<br />

[Accessed on 12th March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(7) ESP., <strong>2010</strong>. Economic Survey of Pakistan<br />

[Online] . Ministry of Finance. Available at:<br />

http://www.finance.gov.pk/survey_0910.html<br />

[Accessed at 3th of June, <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(8) FAS., 2009. Pakistan Agriculture Economy and<br />

Policy. [Online]. Federation of American<br />

Scientists. Available at:<br />

http://www.fas.usda.gov/country/Pakistan/Paki<br />

stan%20Agriculture%20and%20Policy%20Rep<br />

ort.pdf [Accessed at 6th June <strong>2010</strong>]<br />

(9) Haq., <strong>2010</strong>. Pakistan’s Twin energy shortages<br />

of Gas and Electricity. [Online]. Haq’s<br />

Musings. Available at:<br />

http://www.riazhaq.com/<strong>2010</strong>/01/pakistanstwin-energy-crises-of-gas-and.html.<br />

[Accessed<br />

on 19th May <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(10) IAE, 2008. <strong>World</strong> Energy Outlook: Energy and<br />

Development. [Online]. International Energy<br />

Agency. Available at:<br />

http://www.iea.org/weo/slide_library.pdf<br />

[Accessed on 13th March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(11) Illyas. S.Z., 2006. A Case Study to Bottle the<br />

Biogas in cylinders as Source of Power for<br />

Rural Industries Development in Pakistan.<br />

<strong>World</strong> Applied Sciences Journal, 1(2), 127-130.<br />

(12) ILRI <strong>2010</strong>. Pakistan. [Online]. International<br />

Livestick Research Institute. Aavilable at<br />

http://www.ilri.org/infoserv/webpub/fulldocs/w<br />

ana/Pakistan.htm [Accessed on 22nd April,<br />

<strong>2010</strong>]<br />

(13) Iqbal, A., 2006. US investors to explore energy<br />

sector. [Online]. Dawn. Available at:<br />

http://www.dawn.com/2006/08/21/top10.htm<br />

[Accessed on 23rd March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

75


(14) Jize, Q., 2006. Pakistan mulls building trade,<br />

energy corridor for China. [Online].<br />

ChinaDaily. Avaliable at:<br />

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/200<br />

6-02/22/content_522558.htm [Accessed on<br />

23rd March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(15) Kahn, J., 2008. Waste not, want not. [Online].<br />

CNN Money. Available at:<br />

http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/26/news/interna<br />

tional/kahn_biogas.fortune/index.htm?postversi<br />

on=2008022704 [Accessed on 13 th March<br />

<strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(16)<br />

(17) Khan, A., Usman, M., and Usman, A., 2009.<br />

Energy Demand in Pakistan: A disaggregate<br />

Analsysis. [Online]. Pakistan Institute of<br />

Development Economics. Available at:<br />

http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/15056/1/MPRA_paper_15056.pd<br />

f [Accessed on 29th April, <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(18) Khan, M. U. H., 2009. Gas load-shedding<br />

plan’s socio-economics. [Online]. Jang:<br />

Business and Finance Review. Available at:<br />

http://jang.com.pk/thenews/nov2009weekly/busrev-16-11-2009/p6.htm<br />

[Accessed<br />

on 9th March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(19) MEDindia., 2007. Pakistan may face Water<br />

scarcity by <strong>2010</strong>. MedIndia. Available at:<br />

http://www.medindia.net/news/Pakistan-may-<br />

Face-Water-Scarcity-by-2012-30496-2.htm.<br />

[Accessed on 29th March, <strong>2010</strong>]<br />

(20) Ministry of Commerce., <strong>2010</strong>. Trade Statistics.<br />

[Online]. Commerce.gov.pk. Available at:<br />

http://www.commerce.gov.pk/trade_statistics.p<br />

hp [Accessed on 4th June, <strong>2010</strong>]<br />

(21) Mirza, B., 2006. CNG: On the footsteps of<br />

Technology. [Online]. United Nations<br />

University. Available at:<br />

http://www.ocw.unu.edu/maastricht-economicand-social-research-and-training-centre-oninnovation-and-technology/the-socialconstruction-of-technology-indevelopment/Bilal_Mizra_Paper_Bijker_2006.<br />

pdf [Accessed on 13th May, <strong>2010</strong>]<br />

(22) Mizra, U.K., Ahmad, N., and Majeed, T., 2008.<br />

An overview of Biomass energy utilization in<br />

Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy<br />

Reviews. 12(7). 1988-1996.<br />

(23) NACD., <strong>2010</strong>. Biomass. [Online]<br />

NACDNet.org. Available at:<br />

http://www.nacdnet.org/resources/guides/biom<br />

ass/pdfs/Chapter2.pdf [Accessed on 12th<br />

March, <strong>2010</strong>]<br />

76 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

(24) PDDC., 2006. The White Revolution: White<br />

paper on Pakistan’s Dairy Sector. Pakistan<br />

Dairy Development Company. Available at:<br />

http://www.pddc.com.pk/DairyPakistan-<br />

Publication.pdf. [Accessed on 25th April,<br />

<strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(25) Planning Commission, 2009. Energy Security.<br />

[Online]. Annual Plan. Available at:<br />

http://115.186.133.3/pcportal/annualplan2009-<br />

10.htm [Accessed on 13th March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(26) RECIPES, 2006. Coutry Energy Information<br />

Pakistan. [Online]. Developing Renewables.<br />

Available at:<br />

http://www.energyrecipes.org/reports/genericD<br />

ata/Asia/061129%20RECIPES%20country%20<br />

info%20Pakistan.pdf [Accessed on 7th June,<br />

<strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(27) Reuters, 2008. Saudi agrees to defer Pakistan<br />

oil payments. [Online]. ArbianBusiness.com.<br />

Available at:<br />

http://www.arabianbusiness.com/524503-saudiagrees-to-defer-pakistan-oil-payments<br />

[Accessed on 12th March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(28) Sahir, M.H., and Qureshi, A.H., 2006. Specific<br />

concerns of Pakistan in the context of energy<br />

security issues and geopolitics of the region.<br />

Energy policy, 35(4), 2031-2037.<br />

(29) Sindhu, A.S., 2008 . Energy and Road<br />

Transport in Pakistan: Situation, Issues and<br />

Options. [Online]. South Asian Electronic<br />

Forum of Energy. Available at: http://www.saenergy.net/m/EnergyPakistan.doc<br />

[Accessed on<br />

15th May, <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(30) SNV, 2009. SNV Asia Regional Results and<br />

Strategies 2007-<strong>2010</strong>. [Online]. Sustainable<br />

Poverty Reduction. Avilable at:<br />

http://www.snvworld.org/en/regions/asia/Docu<br />

ments/SNV%20Asia%20Regional%20strategie<br />

s_and_%20results_final.pdf [Accessed on 18th<br />

March <strong>2010</strong>]<br />

(31) Telegraph,, 2008. Pakistan accuses India of<br />

‘stealing’ water. [Order]. Telegraph.co.uk.<br />

Available at:<br />

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/as<br />

ia/pakistan/5052150/Pakistan-accuses-India-ofstealing-water.html<br />

[Accessed on 9th April,<br />

<strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(32) ThaiIndian., 2008. Saudi Arabia Defers 5.9 bn<br />

dollars payment for oil sales to Pakistan.<br />

[Online]. Thaindian News. Available at:<br />

http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/southasia/saudi-arabia-defers-59-bn-dollarspayment-for-oil-sales-topakistan_10070748.html<br />

[Accessed on 10th<br />

May <strong>2010</strong>]<br />

(33) The Nation, 2009. 10pc annual increase in gas<br />

demand being witnessed. The Nation on Web.<br />

Available at:


http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-newsnewspaper-daily-english-online/Business/07-Mar-2009/10pc-annual-increase-in-gasdemand-being-witnessed<br />

[Accessed on 16th<br />

March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(34) The Nation, <strong>2010</strong>a. Coal: a way out of energy<br />

crisis. [Online]. The Nation on Web. Available<br />

at: http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-newsnewspaper-daily-englishonline/Opinions/Columns/28-Jan-<strong>2010</strong>/Coal-away-out-of-energy-crisis<br />

[Accessed on 18th<br />

March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(35) The Nation, <strong>2010</strong>b. SNGPL starts gas holiday<br />

for industrial sector in Punjab. [Online]. The<br />

Nation on Web. Available at:<br />

http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-newsnewspaper-daily-english-online/Business/14-Apr-<strong>2010</strong>/SNGPL-starts-gas-holiday-forindustrial-sector-in-Punjab<br />

[Accessed on 18th<br />

March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(36) Victor, N.M., and Victor, D.G., 2002. Macro<br />

Patterns in the Use of Traditional Biomass<br />

fuels. [Online]. Stanford/TERI workshop on<br />

“Rural Energy Transitions”. Available at:<br />

http://iisdb.stanford.edu/pubs/20186/macro_patterns.pdf<br />

. [Accessed on 15th April <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(37) Wilson, D., and Stupnytska, A., 2007. The N-<br />

11: More than an Acronym. [Online]. Global<br />

Economics Paper No: 153. Available at:<br />

http://www.chicagobooth.edu/alumni/clubs/pak<br />

istan/docs/next11dream-march%20%2707goldmansachs.pdf<br />

[Accessed on 2 nd March<br />

<strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(38) Yasin, A., <strong>2010</strong>. Exemption from gas holidays:<br />

CNG stations’ strike continues. [Online]. The<br />

Daily Times. Available at:<br />

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page<br />

=<strong>2010</strong>\01\01\story_1-1-<strong>2010</strong>_pg11_1.<br />

[Accessed on 13th March].<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

77


78 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

D BIOfuELs fOR TRaNspORT<br />

– BIOGas, BIOEThaNOL aND BIODIEsEL


BIOGAS UPGRADING BY TEMPERATURE SWING ADSORPTION<br />

Tamara Mayer, Michael Url, Hermann Hofbauer<br />

Institute of Chemical Engineering, Vienna University of Technology<br />

Getreidemarkt 9/166, 1060 Vienna, Austria<br />

Phone: +43 1 58801 15901, Fax: +43 1 58801 15999, Mail: tamara.mayer@tuwien.ac.at<br />

ABSTRACT: This paper presents a novel process for biogas upgrading by means of temperature swing adsorption.<br />

Temperature swing adsorption process experiments were carried out in a laboratory test rig focusing on the process<br />

step of desorption. Desorption experiments were performed using three different variations of regeneration. Further<br />

on, performance and efficiency of the applied desorption variations were investigated. As a result, desorption by any<br />

combination of direct and indirect heating is considered as the best and most efficient way. Referring to the<br />

adsorption step, separation performance is excellent, carbon dioxide is fully adsorbed and pure methane can be<br />

obtained.<br />

Keywords: biogas, upgrading, adsorbents<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Natural gas had a share of 24% in the gross energy<br />

consumption of the EU-27 in the year 2007. Therefore<br />

Europe’s dependence on natural gas can be considered as<br />

quite high. Due to the fossil origin of natural gas, it has<br />

two drawbacks. First, it will for sure run out at some<br />

point in the future and second, emissions deriving from<br />

natural gas are not carbon neutral but they affect the<br />

climate involving the whole issue of green house gas<br />

emissions and global warming. For these two reasons<br />

alternatives for natural gas have to be found and biogas<br />

represents one option thereby.<br />

Biogas is a renewable energy source deriving from<br />

anaerobic digestion of organic matter. If biogas should<br />

replace natural gas, it has to possess a certain quality<br />

similar to natural gas. In order to achieve this quality and<br />

to obtain gas which is suitable for replacing natural gas,<br />

biogas must be upgraded.<br />

This paper investigates a novel process for biogas<br />

upgrading based on the principle of temperature swing<br />

adsorption (TSA).<br />

2 OVERVIEW OF BIOGAS UPGRADING<br />

TECHNOLOGIES<br />

Biogas typically consists of about two thirds methane<br />

balanced by about one third carbon dioxide and<br />

impurities such as hydrogen sulphide [1]. Moreover,<br />

biogas is usually saturated with water when leaving the<br />

anaerobic digestion plant. If biogas should be injected<br />

into the natural gas grid, it needs to exhibit a certain<br />

quality similar to natural gas which consists mainly of<br />

methane. Hence, gas components such as carbon dioxide<br />

and hydrogen sulphide have to be removed from biogas<br />

in order to obtain a high amount of methane.<br />

The entire process of biogas upgrading roughly<br />

comprises separation of water and hydrogen sulphide as<br />

well as methane enrichment.<br />

2.1 Overview<br />

Among currently available biogas upgrading<br />

technologies, water scrubbing and pressure swing<br />

adsorption are clearly the two most applied ones [2] and<br />

they can therefore be classified as state of the art for<br />

biogas upgrading. Other technologies like chemical or<br />

organic physical absorption processes along with<br />

membrane based techniques are in an advanced state of<br />

development or even under demonstration. Although<br />

there are established technologies, which are already well<br />

developed and going to be continuously improved and<br />

optimized, innovative technologies find their way. These<br />

emerging biogas upgrading technologies include for<br />

instance cryogenic upgrading or in situ methane<br />

enrichment.<br />

Comprehensive reviews of biogas upgrading<br />

technologies and further related information are given<br />

elsewhere (e.g. in [3] or [4]).<br />

2.2 Comparison of biogas upgrading technologies<br />

Biogas upgrading processes can be categorized into<br />

wet and dry processes depending on whether a liquid<br />

phase is required or not. Accordingly, all kinds of<br />

absorption processes are related to wet processes whereas<br />

dry processes involve adsorption processes and<br />

membrane processes like gas permeation. Wet biogas<br />

upgrading processes are characterized by the need of a<br />

liquid such as water or organic solvents in order to<br />

perform removal of carbon dioxide along with further<br />

undesired components. Disadvantages deriving from<br />

utilization of any kind of liquid are on the one hand the<br />

need of disposal and on the other hand possible treatment<br />

of the liquid before disposal. Moreover, wet processes<br />

require drying of the upgraded gas before it leaves the<br />

plant, what represents an additional process step<br />

compared to dry processes. However, pressure swing<br />

adsorption processes use activated carbon beds as guard<br />

filter for protection of the actual adsorbent which is a<br />

carbon molecular sieve. This process configuration<br />

causes the need of disposal of saturated activated carbon.<br />

Furthermore, biogas upgrading processes can be<br />

categorized according to the need of pressurization of<br />

raw gas. Correspondingly, the processes of pressure<br />

swing adsorption, water scrubbing, organic physical<br />

scrubbing as well as gas permeation require the raw gas<br />

to be compressed in order to perform the upgrading.<br />

On the contrary, chemical scrubbing with amines and<br />

the temperature swing adsorption process presented in<br />

this paper are so called pressure less processes. Further<br />

similarities of these two processes are utilization of<br />

amines as sorbent, low methane losses during the process<br />

and high methane content in the upgraded gas (98% or<br />

even above) because of excellent selectivity of the amine<br />

for carbon dioxide. However, there are differences<br />

concerning regeneration of saturated amines. Regarding<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

79


chemical scrubbing, amines are regenerated with steam,<br />

indicating the need of high temperatures and<br />

consequently high energy demand. Regeneration within<br />

the temperature swing adsorption process requires only<br />

low temperature heat.<br />

The presented temperature swing adsorption process<br />

shows some advantages compared to the other biogas<br />

upgrading processes mentioned above. Among them are,<br />

e.g. high methane content in the enriched biogas - typical<br />

values are 98% or even above, and very low methane<br />

losses during the whole process. Moreover, low energy<br />

demand represents another advantage since for ad- and<br />

desorption processes low temperature heat is used instead<br />

of electricity or process steam. The heat is mainly<br />

achieved from combined heat and power processes which<br />

are located at a biogas plant in most cases. Considering<br />

the point of compression of upgraded biogas, it would<br />

take place after carbon dioxide removal. Hence, the mass<br />

flow of the enriched gas is noticeable lower than that of<br />

raw biogas and consequently less compression power is<br />

needed.<br />

3 TEMPERATURE SWING ADSORPTION<br />

The process of temperature swing adsorption is based<br />

on the correlation of different equilibrium loads of the<br />

adsorbent to different temperatures. At low or ambient<br />

temperatures equilibrium load of the adsorbent is high<br />

and therefore the adsorbent is able to bind high quantities<br />

of gases. On the contrary, at elevated temperature levels<br />

equilibrium load decreases, the amount of gas possible to<br />

be bound by the adsorbent decreases too and this may<br />

lead to desorption of already adsorbed gases [5].<br />

Adsorption of gases on the adsorbent is performed at<br />

ambient temperatures whereas for desorption of already<br />

adsorbed gases higher temperatures are required.<br />

During the adsorption process, the temperature in the<br />

column rises due to the exothermic characteristic of the<br />

adsorption leading to lower gas uptake of the adsorbent<br />

due to lower equilibrium load at this elevated<br />

temperature. In order to prolong adsorption time and thus<br />

enlarge the amount of gas adsorbed, one possibility is to<br />

cool the adsorbent during the adsorption phase by an<br />

integrated cooling system. This system should keep<br />

temperature at a quite low level where equilibrium load is<br />

high.<br />

At the end of the adsorption process the adsorbent is<br />

saturated with gas components. Hence, it has to be<br />

regenerated by desorbing the bound gas components. In<br />

the case of temperature swing adsorption processes,<br />

desorption is performed at elevated temperature levels.<br />

Therefore, increasing the temperature is necessary<br />

because of the endothermic characteristic of desorption<br />

and in order to achieve higher temperature levels. This<br />

could be done either by direct heating, which means that<br />

a hot purge gas passes through the column and heats the<br />

adsorbent, or by indirect heating. In the latter case a<br />

heating system is built inside or outside the column and a<br />

heating medium such as hot water warms the adsorbent<br />

indirectly. As mentioned above, elevated temperature<br />

levels are correlated to low equilibrium load causing<br />

desorption of the adsorbed gas (see figure 1). After all the<br />

desorbed gas left the column, the column needs to be<br />

cooled down to ambient temperatures in order to assure<br />

optimal adsorption conditions for the next cycle.<br />

80 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

4 ADSORBENT<br />

In the present work the adsorbent Diaion WA21J<br />

provided by Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation was used.<br />

This adsorbent consists of amine groups integrated into a<br />

polymeric matrix made of polystyrene (see Table I).<br />

Table I: Properties of Diaion WA21J [6]<br />

Matrix<br />

DVB-crosslinked<br />

copolymer of styrene<br />

Functional group Ternary amine<br />

Operating temperature 100°C max<br />

Particle size 300 – 1180 µm<br />

Apparent density approx. 643 g/l<br />

The weakly basic property due to the functional<br />

amine group enables the adsorbent to selectively and<br />

reversibly bind sour gases such as carbon dioxide or<br />

hydrogen sulphide.<br />

The adsorbents adsorption capacity for carbon<br />

dioxide was determined by means of thermo gravimetric<br />

analysis. Thermo gravimetric analysis measures changes<br />

in weight in a material under a controlled atmosphere as a<br />

function of temperature and time [7]. The analyzer,<br />

roughly outlined, consists of a high-precision balance<br />

connected to a dish filled with the sample which is, in<br />

this case, the adsorbent. The dish is placed in an oven and<br />

the atmosphere within the oven can be purged with<br />

different gases. Analysis is carried out by increasing the<br />

temperature and/or purging with gases leading to changes<br />

in weight of the sample. During the analysis, weight<br />

against temperature and time is measured.<br />

Adsorption isotherms of carbon dioxide on Diaion<br />

WA21J are shown in figure 1.<br />

Figure 1: Equilibrium adsorption isotherms of carbon<br />

dioxide on Diaion WA21J [8]<br />

The adsorbent exhibits high selectivity for carbon<br />

dioxide whereas its affinity for methane can be<br />

considered as negligible. Moreover, investigations have<br />

shown that the adsorption capacity is not reduced by<br />

simultaneous adsorption of water.<br />

5 LABORATORY TEST RIG<br />

TSA process experiments were carried out using a<br />

laboratory test rig shown in figure 2. First of all, the<br />

desired gas mixture is adjusted with the help of mass<br />

flow controllers, thereby the single gases are provided by<br />

pressurized gas bottles. Afterwards the gas mixture flows


into the adsorber (more information see table II), either<br />

straightly or indirectly making a detour through a gas<br />

heater. Within the adsorber, which is filled with the<br />

adsorbent Diaion WA21J, adsorption of the gas takes<br />

place. Not adsorbed gas leaves the adsorber and is<br />

analyzed with regard to its composition and concentration<br />

by an NDIR-analyzer (non-dispersive infrared).<br />

Inside the adsorber, a tube bundle is placed providing<br />

the possibility of water passing through. Water which is<br />

let through the tubes can either be cold or warm. In this<br />

way, the adsorbent is cooled or warmed indirectly. In<br />

case of cooling, adsorption time is prolonged due to<br />

Figure 2: Flow sheet of laboratory test rig<br />

6 EXPERIMENTAL<br />

TSA experiments focused on investigating the<br />

process step of desorption. In order to desorb a saturated<br />

adsorbent, it has to be heated up whereas for heating<br />

different ways are available. On the one hand, heating<br />

can be carried out directly, i.e. with preheated gas passing<br />

through the adsorber. On the other hand, heating can be<br />

done indirectly, i.e. by heat exchange with hot water. In<br />

the course of the experiments three ways of desorption<br />

were tested<br />

• desorption by indirect heating with hot water<br />

• desorption by indirect heating with hot water<br />

and afterwards purging (with N 2)<br />

• desorption by indirect heating with hot water<br />

and simultaneous direct heating with purge gas<br />

(N 2).<br />

All TSA process experiments followed a certain<br />

procedure. During the process step of adsorption a binary<br />

gas mixture containing methane and carbon dioxide was<br />

applied. Thereby, carbon dioxide and small amounts of<br />

methane were adsorbed while methane passed through<br />

and left the adsorber. Moreover, during the adsorption<br />

step cold water was applied in order to prolong<br />

adsorption time by dissipating heat deriving from the<br />

actual adsorption process. At the moment when carbon<br />

dioxide breakthrough occurred, application of the binary<br />

gas mixture was stopped and the process was switched<br />

from adsorption to desorption. During the process step of<br />

desorption the adsorbent was heated up in one of the<br />

ways mentioned above. The heating let to desorption of<br />

the adsorbed carbon dioxide and methane. Desorption<br />

was stopped when neither methane nor carbon dioxide<br />

were detected in the gas analyzer placed after the<br />

keeping the adsorbent at low temperatures by dissipating<br />

adsorption heat. Warm water is applied for the process<br />

step of desorption.<br />

Table II: Adsorber dimensions<br />

Height 1000 mm<br />

Inner diameter 41,4 mm<br />

Outer diameter 46 mm<br />

Material Borosilicate glass<br />

adsorber. After desorption, the adsorbent was cooled<br />

down to ambient temperatures with cold water and then a<br />

new cycle including adsorption, desorption and cooling<br />

was carried out. One entire TSA process experiment<br />

consisted of five cycles, each cycle including adsorption,<br />

desorption and cooling.<br />

In table III all test parameters are given.<br />

Table III: Test parameters<br />

Adsorption<br />

Gas mixture 65% CH 4, 35% CO 2<br />

Gas flow rate 2.2 Nl/min<br />

Water temperature approx. 10°C<br />

Desorption<br />

Water temperature 75°C<br />

Purge gas N 2<br />

Purge gas temperature 75°C<br />

Purge gas flow rate 25 Nl/min<br />

7 RESULTS<br />

Results obtained from the TSA process experiments<br />

carried out in the laboratory test rig are described in the<br />

subsections below.<br />

Figures depicted in these subsections show only the<br />

first cycle of each TSA process experiment. The<br />

temperature illustrated in these figures presents the<br />

temperature in the middle of the adsorber.<br />

7.1 Desorption by indirect heating with hot water<br />

Figure 3 shows the TSA process with desorption<br />

carried out by indirect heating with hot water.<br />

During the adsorption step the binary gas mixture fed<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

81


in the adsorber is separated, carbon dioxide is adsorbed<br />

entirely and pure methane is obtained. Adsorption lasts<br />

for about 950 sec and is ended when breakthrough of<br />

carbon dioxide occurs.<br />

Figure 3: TSA process with desorption by indirect<br />

heating with hot water<br />

Desorption is achieved by heating the adsorbent<br />

indirectly with hot water. Thereby, water is heated and is<br />

let through tube bundles placed inside the adsorber. As a<br />

consequence, heat exchange between the hot water and<br />

the cold adsorbent takes place and heats the adsorbent.<br />

During the desorption step methane is desorbed at<br />

first. Methane comes to the most part from the space<br />

between the adsorbent grains (porosity approx. 45%) as<br />

well as from the space under the adsorber, since<br />

adsorption capacity of the adsorbent with regard to<br />

methane is quite low. The peak of carbon dioxide<br />

desorption occurs after methane desorption, but after this<br />

peak the flow rate of carbon dioxide decreases steadily<br />

and in the end remains at a very low level. Desorption<br />

lasts about 2000 s what is twice as long as adsorption<br />

time.<br />

Referring to temperature, the temperature increase<br />

during the adsorption step indicates the arrival of the<br />

adsorption layer. Adsorption is an exothermic process, so<br />

heat is released and it heats the adsorbent. This<br />

phenomenon can be clearly seen with the steep rise of the<br />

temperature of 30°C. Although cold water is applied<br />

during the entire adsorption step, its coolness is not<br />

sufficient in order to carry off the released heat.<br />

Nevertheless, cold water application has an effect<br />

because after the peak the temperature decreases very fast<br />

and this allows adsorption to take place for a prolonged<br />

time period. Temperature during desorption increases<br />

steadily but it takes about 2000 s in order to get to a<br />

temperature of 70°C.<br />

Regarding the following cycles of this experiment,<br />

adsorption capacity in each of them decreased to one<br />

third of the capacity in the first cycle. The reason for this<br />

lies in the only partial desorption of carbon dioxide.<br />

Desorption by heating with hot water does not allow<br />

complete desorption of the entire adsorbed gas<br />

components; only partial desorption, correlated to the<br />

equilibrium and adsorption capacities at certain<br />

temperatures, is possible.<br />

Desorption by indirect heating with water is<br />

considered as a very inefficient way of desorption due to<br />

long desorption time as well as low desorption efficiency.<br />

7.2 Desorption by indirect heating with hot water and<br />

afterwards purging<br />

Figure 4 depicts the TSA process with desorption<br />

82 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

carried out by indirect heating with hot water and<br />

afterwards purging with nitrogen.<br />

This process is very similar to that described above<br />

with one difference occurring not until the end of the<br />

desorption step.<br />

During the adsorption step separation performance is<br />

excellent as well and also here adsorption lasts for about<br />

950 s. Within the first 2000 s of desorption, desorption is<br />

also carried out indirectly by application of hot water<br />

functioning as heat exchange medium. The characteristics<br />

of desorbed gases are similar too, with methane<br />

desorbing at first followed by carbon dioxide.<br />

Figure 4: TSA process with desorption by indirect<br />

heating with hot water and afterwards purging<br />

After 2000 s of indirect heating, no more desorption<br />

of methane or carbon dioxide takes place. As already<br />

explained above, complete desorption is not achievable<br />

by indirect heating and therefore purge gas (N 2) was<br />

applied, for about 200 s. Desorption with purge gas<br />

allows complete desorption due to changes in partial<br />

pressure and the correlated adsorption capacity at<br />

equilibrium. As a consequence, still adsorbed gas<br />

components should theoretically be desorbed. Figure 4<br />

shows clearly that application of purge gas leads to<br />

further desorption of gas components. Obviously, the<br />

desorbed gas consists for the most part of carbon dioxide<br />

but also contains small amounts of methane.<br />

Regarding temperature, during the desorption step of<br />

indirect heating with hot water, temperature increases<br />

steadily but during purging temperature decreases again,<br />

although the purge gas is preheated to 75°C. The reason<br />

for temperature decrease is the desorption process itself<br />

which is of endothermic nature. Desorption of this<br />

remarkable amount carbon dioxide and methane needs<br />

energy and this causes temperature decrease.<br />

Referring to the following cycles of this experiment,<br />

adsorption capacity in each of them decreased only by<br />

approximately 1 w% compared to the capacity in the first<br />

cycle.<br />

Desorption by indirect heating with water is<br />

considered as a rather inefficient. However, application<br />

of purge gas led to further desorption of methane and<br />

carbon dioxide, what causes extended adsorption<br />

capacities (compared to desorption only with hot water)<br />

in the following cycles and therefore improves the entire<br />

process efficiency.<br />

7.3 Desorption by indirect heating with hot water and<br />

simultaneous direct heating with purge gas<br />

Figure 5 illustrates the TSA process with desorption<br />

carried out by indirect heating with hot water and<br />

simultaneous direct heating with purge gas.


Once again, the binary gas mixture passing through<br />

the adsorber is separated during the adsorption step,<br />

carbon dioxide is adsorbed up to 100% and pure methane<br />

is obtained. Adsorption lasts for about 950 s and is ended<br />

when breakthrough of carbon dioxide occurs.<br />

Figure 5: TSA process with desorption by indirect<br />

heating with hot water and simultaneous direct heating<br />

with purge gas<br />

Desorption is carried out by heating the adsorbent<br />

indirectly with hot water and at the same time directly<br />

with preheated purge gas (N 2).<br />

During the desorption step methane and carbon<br />

dioxide are desorbed quite simultaneously. The<br />

concentrations depicted in figure 5 are rather low but this<br />

is due to the high purge gas flow rate of 25 Nl/min.<br />

Desorption lasts for about 1000 s what is in the same time<br />

range as adsorption time.<br />

Referring to temperature, during the desorption step<br />

temperature increases faster compared to desorption ways<br />

described above; it takes only about 1000 s instead of<br />

2000 s to reach a temperature of 70°C within the<br />

adsorber. The reason for this fast temperature increase is<br />

on the one hand the combined heating and on the other<br />

hand the high purge gas flow rate which enhances the<br />

heat transfer.<br />

The temperature profile shows one inflection point<br />

during the desorption step. The inflection point indicates<br />

the almost complete desorption of carbon dioxide. From<br />

that point on, supplied heat is used mainly for adsorbent<br />

heating, leading to a more steeply rise of the temperature<br />

profile.<br />

Regarding the entire experiment, adsorption capacity<br />

remained stable in each cycle.<br />

Desorption by indirect heating with hot water and at<br />

the same time direct heating with purge gas is a very<br />

effective way of desorption. This combined way of<br />

heating has two effects. First, temperature rises faster<br />

compared to only indirect heating, leading to a shorter<br />

time period of desorption. And second, desorption is very<br />

effective indicated by stable adsorption capacities in each<br />

cycle.<br />

8 CONCLUSION<br />

This paper presented a novel process for biogas<br />

upgrading by means of temperature swing adsorption<br />

(TSA). TSA process experiments were performed in a<br />

laboratory test rig. Results clearly show that biogas<br />

upgrading by TSA is feasible. Separation performance is<br />

excellent since during the adsorption step carbon dioxide<br />

is adsorbed to up to 100% and pure methane is obtained.<br />

Experiments also investigated different ways of<br />

desorption. Thereby, desorption by any combination of<br />

direct and indirect heating is considered to be the best<br />

and most efficient way of desorption, in terms of<br />

desorption time as well as of desorption efficiency. One<br />

drawback arises from purge gas application. Nitrogen as<br />

purge gas causes dilution of the desorbed gas, making the<br />

valuable desorbed gas complicated to handle for further<br />

utilization. In order to avoid dilution, alternative purge<br />

gases such as carbon dioxide or methane have to be<br />

evaluated.<br />

9 REFERENCES<br />

[1] P. Weiland, Biogas, Thieme Römpp Online (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

[2] M. Persson, O. Jönsson and A. Wellinger, Biogas<br />

Upgrading to Vehicle Fuel Standards and Grid Injection,<br />

IEA <strong>Bioenergy</strong> (2006)<br />

[3] W. Urban, K. Girod and H. Lohmann, Technologien<br />

und Kosten der Biogasaufbereitung und Einspeisung in<br />

das Erdgasnetz. Ergebnisse der Markterhebung 2007-<br />

2008, Fraunhofer UMSICHT (2009)<br />

[4] A. Petersson and A. Wellinger, Biogas upgrading<br />

technologies – developments and innovations, IEA<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> (2009)<br />

[5] W. Kast, Adsorption aus der Gasphase, VCH (1988)<br />

[6] Resindion, Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation, Product<br />

Data Sheet and Material Safety Data Sheet (2004)<br />

[7] E. Buss, Gravimetric measurement of binary gas<br />

adsorption equilibria of methane-carbon dioxide mixtures<br />

on activated carbon, Gas Sep. Purif. Vol. 9 No. 3,<br />

Elsevier (1995)<br />

[8] H. Feichtner, Experimente und numerische<br />

Berechnungen zur Entwicklung eines Festbettverfahrens<br />

zur Abtrennung von Kohlendioxid aus Biogas durch<br />

Adsorption an einem polymeren Adsorbens, PhD Thesis,<br />

Vienna University of Technology (2007)<br />

10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial<br />

support of Klima- und Energiefonds.<br />

Dieses Projekt wurde aus Mitteln des Klima- und<br />

Energiefonds gefördert und im Rahmen des Programmes<br />

“ENERGIE DER ZUKUNFT“ durchgeführt.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

83


84 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

E pELLETs –<br />

ThE NEW LaRGE ENERGY COMMODITY


EMISSIONS CHARACTERISTICS OF A RESIDENTIAL PELLET BOILER AND A STOVE<br />

Kaung Myat Win, Tomas Persson<br />

Solar Energy Research Center, Dalarna University, 781 88 Borlänge, Sweden<br />

Tel: +46 23 778704, Fax: +46 23 778701, Email: kmw@du.se<br />

ABSTRACT: Gaseous and particulate emissions from a residential pellet boiler and a stove are measured at a realistic 6day<br />

operation sequence and during steady state operation. The aim is to characterize the emissions during each phase in<br />

order to identify when the major part of the emissions occur to enable actions for emission reduction where the savings<br />

can be highest. The characterized emissions comprised carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxide (NO), total organic carbon<br />

(TOC) and particulate matter (PM 2.5). In this study, emissions were characterised by mass concentration and emissions<br />

during start-up and stop phases were also presented in accumulated mass. The influence of start-up and stop phases on<br />

the emissions, average emission factors for the boiler and stove were analysed using the measured data from a six-days<br />

test. The share of start-up and stop emissions are significant for CO and TOC contributing 95% and 89% respectively at<br />

the 20kW boiler and 82% and 879% respectively at the 12 kW stove. NO and particles emissions are shown to dominate<br />

during stationary operation.<br />

Keywords: emissions, pellet boiler, stove, combustion, start-up, stop.<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Emission characteristics at each phase of pellet boiler<br />

operations are important aspect to reduce the annual<br />

emissions from residential pellet combustion.<br />

Characterisation of the emissions during different<br />

operation strategies makes it possible to identify the<br />

phase when the major part of the emissions occur and<br />

helps to take actions for emission reduction that can<br />

achieve highest possible savings. A residential pellet<br />

boiler may start and stop several thousand times [5] and a<br />

considerable part of uncombusted are emitted during start<br />

and stop periods [1, 2, 3]. Fiedler and Persson [2] and<br />

Persson [4, 5] showed that the dominating part of the COemissions<br />

in most pellet boilers were emitted during<br />

start-up and stop phases of the burner. Several simulation<br />

studies shows the possibility to substantially reduce the<br />

annual CO-emissions by changing from ON/OFF control<br />

to modulating operation, which results in fewer start-up<br />

and longer operation periods with lower combustion<br />

power [4, 5]. Good and Nussbaumer [3] have recently<br />

reported gaseous and particles emission factors for two<br />

pellet boilers.<br />

2 MEASUREMENTS<br />

A 20 kW wood pellet boiler and a 10 kW pellet stove<br />

(extended room heater) were measured during steady<br />

state operations and a six-days test. The six-days test was<br />

developed for measuring of solar heating systems during<br />

six days that should give results representative for annual<br />

operation [5]. The steady state operations were measured<br />

applying a constant heating load to avoid combustion<br />

power modulation. In order to take the average, the<br />

steady state measurement was repeated 3 times. In the<br />

realistic six day test, the combustion devices were<br />

connected to emulated domestic hot water and space<br />

heating load and run according to a measurement<br />

sequence developed by Bales [1] for comparable<br />

measurements of solar-combi systems, which are<br />

designed to give representative conditions of a full year<br />

operation. The stove was connected to a storage tank with<br />

a volume of 750 litres and an emulated 9 m 2 flat plate<br />

solar collector.<br />

The time of start-up and stop phases were chosen<br />

according to the related emissions and combustion<br />

power. Start-up phases commences after the ignition and<br />

lasts until the emission concentrations and combustion<br />

power have reached to the same level as a stationary<br />

operation. Similarly, stop phase begins with a abrupt rises<br />

of emissions followed by a slow decrease and continues<br />

until the emissions are completed. In case of an<br />

uncomplete stop phase followed by a start-up, the stop<br />

phase is only taken to the beginning of the following<br />

start-up.<br />

2.1 Measurement set up<br />

Figure 1: Schematic of the measurement set up<br />

The measurement set up was shown in figure 1. A set<br />

of multi-port averaging pitot-tubes calibrated in<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

85


combination with pressure transducers specifically to the<br />

installed chimney is used to measure the transient flue<br />

gas flow in the chimney during start-up and stop phases.<br />

The whole set of the boiler/stove was installed on a scale<br />

and the fuel consumption was continuously monitored.<br />

However, the fuel consumption during the start-up and<br />

stop period was too small relative to the scale’s<br />

measurement resolution. Therefore, the fuel consumption<br />

during start-up and stop phases are calculated using<br />

measured flue gas flow with the combustion calculation<br />

according to Wester [6].<br />

The sample flue gas is extracted from the chimney<br />

and transported via a heated tube (180°C). Carbon<br />

dioxide (CO 2), carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen oxide<br />

(NO) are measured with an non- dispersive infra-red gas<br />

analyser, oxygen (O 2) with a paramagnetic gas analyser<br />

and total organic carbon (TOC) with a flame ionisation<br />

detector (FID). The emissions of TOC are presented in<br />

propane equivalent. The particle emissions are sampled<br />

in the dilution channel (Figure 1) with an electrical low<br />

pressure impactor (ELPI). Particulate matters are<br />

measured in number concentration and size distribution<br />

in the range of 7 nm to 10 µm and are characterized for<br />

PM 2.5.<br />

2.2 Combustion devices<br />

Both boiler and stove are modern pellet heating<br />

devices with electrical ignition and automatic pellet<br />

feeding from above. The 20 kW boiler has an integrated<br />

hot water preparation unit with water volume of 150<br />

liters. The maximum combustion power was set to 80%<br />

of the nominal power and combustion air supply and. The<br />

boiler has a cleaning routine during a stop phase in which<br />

the glowing pellet are blown with compressed air into the<br />

ash box and the stove has 1.5 cleaning routine at every<br />

1.5 hours of operation.<br />

2.3 Pellet<br />

Only a brand of soft wood pellet were used.<br />

However, two batch or order were made through all the<br />

measurements. The composition of the pellet fuel used in<br />

the measurements are listed in table I.<br />

Table I: Fuel composition of the pellet<br />

86 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Element Unit Start-up Stop<br />

Carbon wt% dry 51.20 50.74<br />

Hydrogen wt% dry 42.00 42.52<br />

Oxygen wt% dry 6.30 6.23<br />

Nitrogen wt% dry 0.20 0.10<br />

Ash wt% dry 0.30 0.41<br />

Moisture wt% dry 8.20 6.80<br />

Lower heating<br />

value<br />

3 RESULTS<br />

MJ/kg 19.14 18.99<br />

The accumulated emissions measured during start-up<br />

and stop phase of the boiler and stove are presented in<br />

table II. The duration of the start-up phase and stop phase<br />

of the boiler are 5 minutes and 24 minutes. Comparing<br />

with the boiler, the stove has higher accumulated<br />

emissions during start-up with 12 minutes duration and<br />

lower emissions during stop phase with 25 minutes.<br />

Cleaning with compressed air during stop phases of the<br />

boiler caused glowing in the ash box resulting higher<br />

emissions for stop phase.<br />

Table II: Accumulated emissions of start-up and stop<br />

phase of 20 kW boiler and 12 kW stove<br />

Boiler* Stove<br />

Start-up Stop Start-up Stop<br />

CO (g) 0.72 8.99 1.05 6.78<br />

NO (g) 0.10 0.04 0.35 0.03<br />

TOC (g) 0.15 0.43 0.12 0.01<br />

PM 2.5 (g) 0.23 0.41 0.35 0.17<br />

Energy (MJ) 2.12 1.22 6.81 1.02<br />

* Win,. et al.[7]<br />

Emission concentrations during start-up, steady state and<br />

stop phases are compared in figure 2. Steady state<br />

emissions characterised per MJ combusted fuel are in<br />

general lower than start-up and stop emissions. CO<br />

emissions during steady state operation of the stove is<br />

higher than from the boiler due to the cleaning routine at<br />

every 1.5 hours occurred during long steady state periods.<br />

Figure 2: Average emission concentrations during startup,<br />

stationary periods and during stop periods<br />

Steady state emissions are lower than from start-up<br />

and stop periods, significantly in CO and TOC. Cleaning<br />

with compressed air during stop phases of the boiler<br />

caused the accumulation of uncombusted pellet in the ash<br />

box leading to glowing in the ash box resulting in higher<br />

stop emissions. The 1.5 hourly cleaning routine of the<br />

stove was taken into the steady state. Both the boiler and<br />

the stove has near zero TOC emissions during steady state.


Figure 3: Accumulated emissions from the boiler during<br />

first 12 hours operation in the realistic sequence.<br />

Figure 4: Accumulated emissions from the stove during<br />

first 12 hours operation in the realistic sequence.<br />

Accumulated total emissions during the six-days test<br />

are plotted together with CO emission to show operating<br />

cycles in figure 3 for the boiler and in figure 4 for the<br />

stove. The boiler had higher number of start-up and stop<br />

within the same time interval due to its higher nominal<br />

power and smaller heat storage. Sudden rises of CO and<br />

TOC emissions are shown during start-up and stop.<br />

The NO emissions emitted during the stop period was<br />

small in relation to the accumulated NO emission.<br />

Particles during start and stop periods are not as<br />

dominating as for CO and TOC although emissions peaks<br />

occur. The contribution of start-up and stop phases to<br />

total accumulated emissions are shown in figure 5. The<br />

start-up and stop phases contribute 39% of the total PM<br />

emission for the boiler and 23% of PM for the stove. The<br />

amount of start-up and stop emissions are dominating for<br />

CO and TOC emissions contributing by 95% and 89%<br />

respectively at the 20kW boiler and 82% and 89 %<br />

respectively at the 12 kW stove.<br />

Figure 5: Accumulated start-up and stop emissions<br />

during six days test<br />

Figure 6: Emission concentrations for whole six days<br />

test<br />

The calculated total emissions related to fuel<br />

consumption for the whole six days period are presented<br />

in figure 6 divided between emissions during start-up and<br />

stop periods and stationary operation. The 20 kW boiler<br />

has higher emissions contributed partly by the higher<br />

number of start-up and stop. Since the six-days should<br />

give representative condition of a full year operation of a<br />

domestic heating system, the average emissions<br />

concentration from the tests should give representative<br />

annual emissions factors for the heating devices. The<br />

average annual emissions factors for the boiler are CO<br />

(491 mg/MJ), NO (55 mg/MJ), TOC (54 mg/MJ) and<br />

PM2.5 (93 mg/MJ) and for the stove CO (159 mg/MJ),<br />

NO (54 mg/MJ), TOC (2 mg/MJ) and PM2.5 (39<br />

mg/MJ).<br />

4 CONCLUSIONS<br />

Substantial parts of CO and TOC emissions are<br />

contributed from start-up and stop while NO and particles<br />

dominate during stationary operation. Higher operating<br />

combustion power of the heating device in a domestic<br />

heating system can results higher number of start-up and<br />

stop and consequently higher annual emissions.<br />

5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

87


This work was performed within the project SWX-Energi<br />

financed by the European Union, Region Dalarna Region<br />

Gävleborg and Högskolan Dalarna.<br />

6 REFERENCES<br />

1. Bales, C., Combitest - A New Test Method for<br />

Thermal Stores Used in Solar Combisystems, in<br />

Department of Building Technology. 2004,<br />

Chalmers University of Technology: Göteborg,<br />

Sweden.<br />

2. Fiedler, F. and T. Persson, Carbon monoxide<br />

emissions of combined pellet and solar heating<br />

systems. Applied Energy, 2009. 86(2): p. 135-<br />

143.<br />

3. Good, J. and T. Nussbaumer, Emissionsfaktoren<br />

moderner pelletkessel unter typischen<br />

heizbedingungen. 2009, Hochschule Luzern –<br />

Technik & Architektur: Bern, Switzerland.<br />

4. Persson, T., Solar and Pellet Heating Systems :<br />

Reduced Electricity Usage in Single-family<br />

Houses ed. V.V.D. Müller. 2009, Saarbrücken,<br />

Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller. 153.<br />

5. Persson, T., F. Fiedler, M. Rönnelid, and C. Bales.<br />

Increasing efficiency and decreasing COemissions<br />

for a combined solar and wood pellet<br />

heating system for single-family houses. in<br />

Pellets 2006 Conference.30 May - 1 June.<br />

2006. Jönköping, Sweden.<br />

6. Wester, L., Förbrännings- och rökgasreningsteknik,<br />

in Compedium to the course: "Förbrännings<br />

och rökgasreningsteknik". 2009, Mälardalens<br />

Högskola: Västerås, Sweden.<br />

7. Win, K.M., Paavilainen, Janne, Persson, T. Emissions<br />

Characterisation of residential pellet boilers<br />

during start-up and stop periods in 3 rd<br />

International Scientific Conference on “Energy<br />

systems with IT".16-17 March. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Stockholm, Sweden.<br />

88 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong>


NEW INSIGHTS IN THE ASH MELTING BEHAVIOUR AND IMPROVEMENT OF BIOMASS ENERGY<br />

PELLETS USING FLOUR BOND<br />

J. van Soest, J. Renirie, S. Moelchand, M. Schouten, A. van der Meijden, J. Plijter<br />

Meneba B.V., www.meneba.com<br />

Brielselaan 115, 3081 AB Rotterdam, The Netherlands.<br />

Tel. +31 104238130, Fax. +31 104238299, J.vanSoest@meneba.com<br />

ABSTRACT: New insight was obtained in the effect of ash composition on the ash melting behavior. It was shown that<br />

there is a good correlation between the amount of calcium (Ca), silicon (Si) and potassium (K) contents of the ash and the<br />

ash melting temperature (Tmelt) of bio-energy products like wood, agro- and sludge pellets (n=164). Using PCA and<br />

linear regression analyses led to a good prediction of the Tmelt by using an easy to use formula:<br />

Ln [Tmelt] = 7,24 -0,33*Si-0,70*K+1,28*K*Ca (variance accounted for is 72%)<br />

The new formula gives much better predictions of ash Tmelt of wood pellets and other solid bio-energy or biofuel<br />

products than previous fits. As expected Ca plays an important positive role. K and Si sink the Tmelt. Other metals play a<br />

less dominant role, such as iron (Fe), aluminium (Al) and magnesium (Mg). The new insight was put into practice by<br />

showing that by adding FlourBond®, a pressing aid high in Ca, the Tmelt of wood pellet ash can be increased. It is<br />

envisaged that an elevated ash Tmelt reduces the risk of slagging of solid biofuels.<br />

Keywords: pellets, ash, biomass production, biomass characteristics, sintering<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Wood pellet combustion is nowadays known as a<br />

reliable and comfortable heating system. However,<br />

the pellets have to be of high quality to ensure stable<br />

and long-­‐term usage of the heaters. The pellets have<br />

to be made according to strict quality criteria as put<br />

down in the Önorm or DIN+ or ENplus [1]. It is<br />

important to control the pellet properties such as<br />

water content, hardness, abrasion, fines, ash content<br />

and heating value. In particular ash melting behaviour<br />

can create problems in ovens such as corrosion,<br />

erosion and slagging [2-­‐7].<br />

Some of the pellet properties can be improved by<br />

using pressing aids, such as starch or rye meal. Pure<br />

starches can be very expensive and rye meal, corn<br />

grits or lower quality starches can result in high ash<br />

content and melting temperature and severe slagging<br />

beside resulting in worse processing and pellet<br />

abrasion properties. Therefore, development of a, for<br />

the pellet market dedicated, cheap multifunctional<br />

pressing aid has become of great importance.<br />

New insight has been obtained in the behavior of<br />

pressing aids in the production of wood pellets. On the<br />

basis of this a novel multifunctional pressing aid was<br />

developed with a high calcium content (FlourBond®)[8].<br />

It was shown that free flowing properties were improved<br />

making the product easier to use in the pellet factory and<br />

control dosage level. The output of the pellet presses<br />

could be enhanced resulting in lower energy usage. The<br />

pellet properties were improved at lower contents than<br />

with currently used pressing aids such as most starches.<br />

The pressing aid is readily available and an excellent<br />

performing alternative for expensive starches.<br />

In this detailed study, the properties of ash from<br />

pellets produced in industrial conditions with various<br />

pressing aids were investigated. The study includes the<br />

effect of the new pressing aid with high calcium content<br />

on pellet ash properties. A broad range of pellets (n=35)<br />

were made on different industrial presses based on<br />

various wood resources (containing both soft and hard<br />

woods, see figure 1). The ash melting behavior and<br />

composition were studied and compared with data from<br />

literature on the ash composition and melting behavior of<br />

various pellets and other bio-energy products [9-20]. The<br />

total data set consisted of 164 products.<br />

Figure 1: Various pellets<br />

2 MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Various wood pellets (n=35) were made based on<br />

miscellaneous wood resources (soft, hard and mixed<br />

woods as well as fresh and waste woods). Pellets were<br />

made using various presses and pressing aids, including<br />

FlourBond. Ash (composition and melting behavior) was<br />

characterized according to the following DIN standards:<br />

v Water content DIN CEN/TS 14774-3: 2004-11<br />

v Ash content DIN CEN/TS 14775: 2004-11<br />

v Ash composition DIN 51729 part 1 & 11 (as Oxide)<br />

v Ash melting DIN CEN/TS 15370-1<br />

Other ash melting data were taken from literature [9-<br />

19]. A large data set was obtained of in total 164<br />

products. Beside wood pellets, the data set contains<br />

products consisting of woods, grasses, hay, straw, cereal<br />

based products, whole crop products, sludge, municipal<br />

and food processing waste products, and waste streams<br />

from chemical industry such as paper and textile.<br />

From the raw data the metal compositions were<br />

calculated expressed as % of the total ash and as mg/kg<br />

of the bio-energy products or wood pellet. The sintering<br />

(SST), softening (DT), hemispheric (HAT) and flowing<br />

(FT) temperatures were used to characterize the ash<br />

melting behavior.<br />

3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

89


It is seen that the total data set, existing of 164<br />

products, have a broad range of differences in ash content<br />

and composition. The lowest ash values are found for soft<br />

wood consumer pellets (0,20-0,64%). Hard, mixed and<br />

waste wood pellets have ash contents between 0,8-2,5%.<br />

Miscellaneous non-pellets woods (such as chips, logs,<br />

saw dust, flour, bark) have been studied with ash contents<br />

in the range of 0,23-5,9%. Non-wood plant based<br />

products were studied with ash contents varying between<br />

0,8-14,7%. Waste stream or sludge products had ash<br />

contents of 3,5-46%. The main elements of wood based<br />

products are calcium, silicon, potassium and magnesium.<br />

Calcium contents range from 386 mg/kg for a soft wood<br />

pellet to 12990 mg/kg for a product consisting of mixed<br />

bark. The waste stream and sludge products are much<br />

more divers in composition then the wood or plant based<br />

products, having also significant differences in Al, Fe, Na<br />

and P contents. Typically sewage sludge products have<br />

high iron contents in the range of 10-20 g/kg.<br />

The sintering melting temperatures (SST) are found<br />

in the range of 578°C for rye straw to 1585°C for kenaf.<br />

One has to take into account, while interpreting the<br />

results, that the determination of ash melting<br />

temperatures can have a standard deviation of up to 50°C.<br />

As expected, the melting T of ash of soft wood consumer<br />

pellets are higher than of the less clean industry pellets.<br />

Typically low melting ash is obtained from grasses and<br />

cereal based products (non wood based plants).<br />

Figure 2: %Ca of total ash versus ash melting<br />

temperature of all products. Logarithmic fit is shown<br />

without ash consisting of mixed ash from waste and<br />

sewage sludge ash [10].<br />

In figure 2 the ash melting T is shown as a function<br />

of %Ca of the total ash for the complete data set. It is<br />

known from literature that calcium plays an important<br />

role in the ash melting behavior. Authors [9,11,18,19]<br />

describe the increase of ash melting T by increasing the<br />

Ca content of incineration ash. However, it is clear that<br />

calcium content itself is not enough to predict ash melting<br />

temperatures of the products. In particular waste, sludge<br />

and non-wood plant based products show less correlation<br />

between T and %Ca of the ash.<br />

The ash melting temperature is correlated to all of<br />

wt% per element in the incineration ash (Ca, Mg, Fe, Si,<br />

Al, P, Na) for the complete data set studied (n=164).<br />

Clearly seen is that calcium is the most important element<br />

for affecting ash melting leading to an increase in ash<br />

melting T. Silicon and potassium are the 2nd and 3rd<br />

most important elements affecting ash melting by<br />

lowering the melting T. Fe and Al seem to have a limited<br />

effect while, within the data set studied. Na, P and Mg<br />

90 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

show hardly any significant effect. The results were<br />

confirmed with principle component analyses (PCA).<br />

Remarkable is that magnesium shows on average for this<br />

data set almost no negative influence on ash melting. In<br />

literature some authors have stressed the importance of<br />

magnesium in lowering ash melting T but others also<br />

have seen increased melting T. Of course, one has to take<br />

into account that probably also the interactions between<br />

the various elements play an important role. Mixed<br />

oxides will all have their different melting characteristics<br />

depending also on thermal-physical history of the ash.<br />

It is very likely that the total composition of the ash is<br />

of great importance for the ash melting behavior.<br />

Therefore, it is thought that the ratios of various elements<br />

are important. In figure 3 the most important example is<br />

given of ash melting T as function of a typical ratio of<br />

elements (Ca/[K+Si]).<br />

Figure 3: Ratio combined elements (mg/kg product)<br />

versus ash melting T of all products.<br />

It is seen that again, as expected, in particular<br />

calcium is having a positive influence on the effect of<br />

Mg, Si en K on the ash melting. The Ln-fit of the ratios<br />

Ca/K, Ca/Si en Ca/Mg show a reasonable correlation.<br />

The effect of calcium on sodium is less dominant. It is<br />

thought that calcium containing silicates have higher<br />

melting points than mixed Mg-K-Na silicates. The<br />

presence of Fe en Al probably gives a slight increase in<br />

the melting of mixed silicates compared to silicates,<br />

which have high Na and K content. Mg and P show no<br />

correlation with Si. Therefore, it is seen that the Ln of the<br />

ratio of the most dominant elements Ca/(K+Si) gives a<br />

good correlation with a R 2 of 0,65. The correlation with<br />

ratios without Si, K or Ca are worse or even bad. A slight<br />

improvement is found for ratios were Al or Fe are<br />

included as a positive effect and Na as a negative effect<br />

on the Tmelt. However, the improvements are small.<br />

Including Mg gives no significant improvement in the fit<br />

compared to the ratio Ca/(K+Si). The prediction using<br />

the Ln fit of the ratio Ca/(K+Si) is already good as well.<br />

Research was extended by using statistics (linear<br />

regression analyses) to gain more insight in the<br />

interactions between the elements. The main results are<br />

shown in figure 4 and 5.


Figure 4: Statistical analyses (linear regression) results.<br />

One could say that Ca, K, Si are indeed the most<br />

important elements (of the studied elements in this data<br />

set) for determining the ash melting T. Apparently, Mg<br />

plays less a role. In particular, the prediction of the ash<br />

melting T of the wood pellets is very good. Most outliers<br />

are from some non-wood plant based products such as<br />

kenaf and hemp or waste products.<br />

Figure 5: 3-D graphical representation of the model Ln<br />

Tmelt = 7,24 -0,33*Si-0,70*K+1,28*K*Ca. high T =<br />

right below (high Ca), low T = top left (high K).<br />

An extensive comparison of various literature fits<br />

(see figure 6 - more details of this study can be found in<br />

reference [20]), has been made, that have been taken<br />

from literature references [9,10,19]. It is obvious that the<br />

fits are reasonable for the limited data set used in the<br />

papers [9,10,19]. However, the fits do not give useful<br />

predictions for our more broad and larger data set. But<br />

they do not give a good, more universal applicable,<br />

prediction of the ash melting temperature. Some formulas<br />

make use of polynomial fits. This leads to large<br />

deviations of the predictions for products with large<br />

differences in ash compositions. The data set in the fit<br />

used to design the formulas was probably too small.<br />

Some formulas are already better but still there are large<br />

deviations and multiple outliers. According to most<br />

formula calcium and potassium are important as in<br />

agreement with our findings. The role of magnesium is<br />

also taken into some fits, while our findings show that<br />

magnesium plays not a dominant role. More important is<br />

the situation if silicon is left out of the equation. One<br />

formula takes into account silicon and calcium, but they<br />

do not take into account the effect of potassium. This is<br />

probably due to the fact that K is not a very dominant<br />

component in the incineration ash the authors studied.<br />

However, in lignocellulosics, such as wood pellets and<br />

plant based bio-energy products, this can be an important<br />

component of the ash. Probably a linear fit is also not the<br />

best option looking at the physical phenomenon it needs<br />

to describe.<br />

Figure 6: Comparison of formulas from literature and the<br />

new formula based on the Ca/(K+Si) ratio. Top: formula<br />

based on synthetic ash. Middle: fit based on<br />

lignocellulosics. Bottom: formulas based on waste-sludge<br />

ash.<br />

Figure 7: Influence addition FlourBond on pellet<br />

processing and properties.<br />

Pressing aids are used to obtain improved pellet<br />

processing and quality. A pressing aid can have effect on<br />

the ash melting. The effect of FlourBond , a pressing aid<br />

high in Ca, on soft wood pellets was studied, starting by<br />

comparing two properties, i.e. abrasion (%fines) and<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

91


amperage of the pellet press. Experiments (see figure 7)<br />

using 1% FlourBond in comparison with pellets made<br />

without additive, 1% corn starch or FlourBond-IP (a new<br />

product), were performed by Holzforschung Wien at<br />

controlled conditions and show the positive effects of<br />

FlourBond on pellet processing and quality.<br />

The effect of FlourBond on the ash Tmelt of<br />

consumer softwood based pellets and mixed waste wood<br />

pellets is shown in figure 8. The Ca/K ratio was taken<br />

because the Si level was constant for the pellets because<br />

the two type of woods used originated from the same<br />

resources and were processed during one production run.<br />

The amount of FlourBond was between 0-5% and 0-3%,<br />

respectively for the soft wood and mixed waste wood<br />

pellets. FlourBond has a high level of calcium compared<br />

to other pressing aids. It is shown that by adding<br />

FlourBond the Tmelt is clearly increased.<br />

Figure 8: Influence addition FlourBond on ash melting<br />

temperature.<br />

4 CONCLUSIONS<br />

The Ca/(Si+K) ratio can be used to give a good<br />

prediction of the ash melting temperatures of all kind of<br />

bio-energy products such as wood pellets. Using PCA<br />

and linear regression analyses led to an even better<br />

prediction of the Tmelt by using an easy to use formula:<br />

Ln [Tmelt] = 7,24 -0,33*Si-0,70*K+1,28*K*Ca<br />

(variance accounted for is 72%). By using FlourBond as<br />

the pressing aid, the ash melting temperature can be<br />

increased due to an increase of the Ca/(Si+K) ratio. It is<br />

envisaged that as a result the change or risk of slagging<br />

can be diminished for pellets made with more difficult<br />

woods or other biomass resources.<br />

5 REFERENCES<br />

92 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

1. Englisch, European standards, quality and<br />

certification systems in Europe, 8. Pellets Industry<br />

Forum, 2008, Conference Book, pp 102<br />

2. Arvelakis et al., Biomass and <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 20 (2001)<br />

pp. 459<br />

3. Friedl, Wopienka, Haslinger, Schlackebildung in<br />

Pelletsfeuerungen, Beitrag zum Stuttgart 7.<br />

InterPellets, 9.-10. Oktober 2007<br />

4. Paulrud, Upgraded Biofuels - Effects of Quality on<br />

Processing, Handling Characteristics, Combustion<br />

and Ash melting, Unit of Biomass Technology and<br />

Chemistry, Umeå, Doctoral thesis, Swedish Univ.<br />

Agric. Sci.<br />

5. Ottmann, Verbrennung biogener Brennstoffe in<br />

stationären Wirbelschichtfeuerungen, Vollständiger<br />

Abdruck der von der Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum<br />

Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und<br />

Umwelt der Technischen Universität München<br />

Dissertation. Technischen Universität München<br />

2007<br />

6. NEBrA – Nachhaltige Energieversorgung durch<br />

Biomasse aus regionalem Anbau, Vortrag<br />

Bloischdorf, 31.8.2007 H-B Rombrecht<br />

7. Thy et al., Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Fuel<br />

Chem. 2004, 49 (1), 89<br />

8. Meneba, Flour Bond erhốht ergiebigkeit von<br />

Holzpellets, Pellets Markt und Trends 2008, nr. 5<br />

9. Hartmann et al., 2000, Naturbelassene biogene<br />

Festbrennstoff, Bayerisches Landesanstalt f.<br />

Landtechnik (Germany)<br />

10. Kim et al., 2000, www.cheric.org<br />

11. Launhardt, 2002, Thesis Umweltrelevante Einflüsse<br />

bei der thermischen Nutzung fester Biomasse in<br />

Kleinanlagen Schadstoffemissionen, Aschequalität<br />

und Wirkungsgrad, Dept für Biogene Rohstoffe und<br />

Technologie der Landnutzung, Lehrstuhl für<br />

Landtechnik der Technischen Universität München<br />

12. Analyseergebnisse aller mốgliche Rohstoffe zur<br />

Pelletproduktion, BTU Cottbus, Lehrstuhl<br />

Kraftwerkstechnik, www.kwt.tu-cottbus.de<br />

13. Ragland, D.J. Aerts, Bioresource Technology 37<br />

(1991) pp. 61<br />

14. Lasselsberger, Österreichischer Biomassetag 2006,<br />

Lecture Monitoringprojekte Der Bundesländer NÖ<br />

& OÖ<br />

15. Huber, Frieß, 1997 München, Emissionen<br />

Bayerischer Biomassefeuerungen Ergebnisse einer<br />

Grundsatzuntersuchung<br />

16. Bakker, Elbersen, Managing ash content and -quality<br />

in herbaceous biomass: An analysis from plant to<br />

product, WUR, Institute Agrotechnology & Food<br />

Innovations-Biobased Products\<br />

17. Anon. www.vt.tuwien.ac.at/Biobib/<br />

18. Behr, Einflußfaktoren auf das<br />

Ascheschmelzverhalten bei der Verbrennung von<br />

Holzpellets, Holz-Energie-Zentrum Olsberg GmbH,<br />

Tagungsband Vorlage 7. Industrieforum Pellets<br />

2007 Stuttgart<br />

19. Lin, J. Air & Waste Managem. Assoc. 56, pp. 1743<br />

20. van Soest, et al., Increasing the ash melting<br />

temperature of wood pellets, <strong>World</strong> Sustainable<br />

Energy Days 2009, Pellet Conference Book,<br />

Wels/Upper Austria, 2009.


f ENERGY CROps, aGRICuLTuRaL REsIDuEs<br />

aND BY-pRODuCTs<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

93


USE OF ASHES AS A FERTILIZER IN REED CANARY GRASS (PHALARIS ARUNDINACEA L.) GROWN AS AN ENERGY CROP FOR<br />

94 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

COMBUSTION<br />

Eva Lindvall<br />

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of agricultural research for northern Sweden,<br />

901 83 UMEÅ, Sweden<br />

eva.lindvall@njv.slu.se<br />

ABSTRACT: Use of reed canary grass (RCG) as biofuel for combustion produces relative high amounts of ash. Deposition<br />

cost of ash negatively influences the economy of RCG production and is not very environmentally friendly. Therefore it<br />

is of importance that RCG ashes, pure or in mixtures, can be recycled to the RCG field as a part of the nutrient supply.<br />

Results from this field trail do not show any negative effects on crop or soil caused by the ash.<br />

Keywords: reed canary grass, ash, heavy metals<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Reed canary grass (RCG) has been considered as the<br />

most interesting perennial grass for energy purposes in<br />

Sweden. RCG is high yielding and the root system is very<br />

large which enables the plant to very efficiently absorb<br />

nutrients from the soil. Stands of perennial grasses can<br />

have a lifetime of more than 10 years and therefore<br />

require less cultivation and have lower requirement of<br />

pesticides (Wrobel et al, 2009, Kätterer & Andren, 1999).<br />

Some of the machinery required for grass cultivation is<br />

already available on many farms. Perennial grasses have<br />

lower nutrient requirements than annual bioenergy crops<br />

as some of the nutrients used of the shoots can be<br />

remobilized to the roots during autumn.<br />

One disadvantage when using RCG as biofuel for<br />

combustion is the relatively high ash content (Burvall &<br />

Hedman, 1994, Burvall, 1997). Deposition cost of ashes<br />

negatively influences the economy of RCG production<br />

and is not very environmentally friendly. Therefore it is<br />

of importance that RCG ashes, pure or in mixtures, can<br />

be recycled to the RCG field as a part of the nutrient<br />

supply.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

One concern when using ash and other waste products on<br />

agricultural land is the risk of enrichment of heavy metals<br />

in the circulation from soil to plant and ash. A field trial<br />

was established at SLUs field station in Umeå, Sweden in<br />

the spring 2002. Three different fertilizer treatments were<br />

applied. Treatment A was fertilized with an ash from<br />

combustion of RCG together with municipal wastes,<br />

treatment B an ash from RCG only and for treatment C<br />

was only commercial fertilizers used. The total amounts<br />

of nutrient each year applied in the trial were 100 kg ha -1<br />

N, 15 kg ha -1 P and 80 kg ha -1 K. The amount of ash in<br />

treatment A and B was calculated from the chemical<br />

analysis of the ashes to be equal to the required amount<br />

of P. The required amounts of N and K within these<br />

treatments were complemented by commercial fertilizers.<br />

The trial was harvested each spring from 2003 to 2009.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The dry matter yield showed large variation between<br />

years but no significant differences between treatments<br />

were detected. Samples of grass and soil have been<br />

analyzed for heavy metal content some of the years. No<br />

significant differences between the treatments were found<br />

in the grass. When comparing samples from 2004 and<br />

2009 the content was lower for most elements in 2009,<br />

only Zn showed a significant higher level. Soil samples<br />

were taken from 3 levels; 0-5 cm, 5-10 cm and 10-20 cm.<br />

In the uppermost level there are significant differences<br />

between treatments for Cd, Pb and Zn, with higher<br />

contents in treatment A. The differences between levels is<br />

mainly small, and compared to results from 2003 there<br />

seems to be no tendency to enrichment during this period<br />

of time.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

We can conclude that the ash we used does not seem to<br />

cause any harm to the growth of RCG, content of<br />

undesired chemical elements in grass and soil and can be<br />

used as a complement to commercial fertilizers.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This project was founded by The Swedish Energy<br />

Agency through Värmeforsk (Thermal Engineering<br />

Research Institute) and Bioenergigårdar i ett nytt<br />

landskap, a project administrated by Västerbotten County<br />

Administrative Board and financed by Kempestiftelserna<br />

among others.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Burvall J, 1997. Influence of harvest time and soil type<br />

on fuel quality in reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea<br />

L). Biomass <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 12, 149-154.<br />

Burvall J. and Hedman B, 1994. Bränslekaraktärisering<br />

av rörflen - resultat från första och andra års vallar.<br />

Röbäcksdalen meddelar 5, 1-27. (in Swedish)<br />

Kätterer T. and Andren O, 1999. Growth dynamics of<br />

reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) and its<br />

allocation of biomass and nitrogen below ground in a<br />

field receiving daily irrigation and fertilisation. Nutrient<br />

Cycling in Agroecosystems 54, 21-29.<br />

Wrobel C., Coulman B.E. and Smith D.L. 2009. The<br />

potential use of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea<br />

L.) as a biofuel crop. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica<br />

Section B-Soil and Plant Science 59, 1-18.


INTERCROPPING OF REED CANARY GRASS, PHALARIS ARUNDINACEA L., WITH LEGUMES CAN CUT<br />

COSTS FOR N-FERTILIZATION<br />

Cecilia Palmborg and Eva Lindvall<br />

Department of Agricultural Research for Northern Sweden, SLU<br />

90183 Umeå, Sweden<br />

ABSTRACT: In a field experiment close to Östersund in mid Sweden reed canary grass was intercropped with barley,<br />

Alsike clover, Trifolium hybridum L., red clover, T. pratense L., goats rue, Galega orientalis L. or a combination of red<br />

clover and goats rue. There were also three fertilization treatments: A: Recommended amounts of N, P and K. B:<br />

Recommended amounts of P and K and half amount of N. C: Sewage sludge application before sowing (establishment<br />

year) and recommended amounts of P and K and half amount of N. The biomass was lower where reed canary grass had<br />

been undersown in barley, and higher with full N-fertilization than with half N-fertilization. However there were no<br />

significant differences between legume intercrops with half N-fertilization and pure reed canary grass with full Nfertilization.<br />

Alsike clover was the most productive legume, followed by red clover. The amount of nitrogen fixed by the<br />

legumes was less with full N-fertilization (29 kg/ha as a mean) than with half N-fertilization (38 kg/ha). Intercropping<br />

with legumes could substitute half of the N in fertilization but similar experiments in other parts of Sweden has shown<br />

that there is a higher risk of weed problems.<br />

Keywords: autumn harvest, spring harvest, bioenergy crop, energy grass<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Cropping systems that will provide our future energy<br />

for society need to be sustainable in many ways. The<br />

system should use nutrients efficiently, the system should<br />

need a minimum of input of fossil fuels for machinery<br />

and transport and the system should bind at least as much<br />

carbon to the soil as is respired from the soil. Reed<br />

canary grass harvested in spring fulfills these criteria [1].<br />

However, to make the cropping profitable without heavy<br />

subsidies, costs must be cut. This paper focus on the<br />

possibilities to cut fertilization costs by intercropping<br />

between reed canary grass and legumes and by<br />

fertilization with sewage sludge.<br />

The legumes take some of their need for nitrogen<br />

from nitrogen fixation by symbiotic bacteria in their root<br />

nodules. Some of this nitrogen then can be transferred to<br />

the accompanying grass via decomposing legume litter<br />

both above and below ground. Reed canary grass as an<br />

energy crop is always grown in monoculture. There have<br />

been few experiments with intercropping with legumes.<br />

The only experiment that has studied intercropping in a<br />

system with spring harvest a Lithuanian study by<br />

Jasinskas et. al [2]. In that study there was no Nfertilization<br />

in the intercrops and this favored the legumes<br />

that increased from year to year and the third year they<br />

comprised 28-56 % of the crop. In our experiment we do<br />

not take away all fertilizers in order to favor reed canary<br />

grass and keep legumes as a minor component or the<br />

sward.<br />

2 MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

A field experiment was established in Ås close to<br />

Östersund in mid Sweden (latitude 63 o 14’ longitude<br />

14 o 34’) in july 2008. Reed canary grass was intercropped<br />

with Alsike clover, Trifolium hybridum L., red clover, T.<br />

pratense L., goats rue, Galega officinalis L. or a<br />

combination of red clover and goats rue. There are also<br />

monoculture reed canary plots established alone or<br />

undersown in barley that was harvested as a whole crop,<br />

a strategy to get an income from the crop the first year.<br />

There are also three fertilization treatments: A:<br />

Recommended amounts of N (40 kg/ha first year and 100<br />

kg/ha second year), P (20 kg/ha first year) and K (40<br />

kg/ha first year and 50 kg/ha second year). B:<br />

Recommended amounts of P and K and half amount of<br />

N. C: Sewage sludge application before sowing<br />

(establishment year) and recommended amounts of P and<br />

K and half amount of N. The experiment has a split-plot<br />

design with fertilization treatment on the main plots and<br />

species mixtures on the sub-plots (2.8 x 9 m), and it is<br />

randomized in four replicate blocks.<br />

In the end of August 2009, 50 x 50 cm plots, 50 cm<br />

from the edge of the big plots were harvested by hand<br />

cutting in autumn 2009. The biomass was sorted in each<br />

sown species and weeds and the dry weight of each<br />

fraction was determined. The sown species were milled<br />

and N% and the proportions of the stable isotope 15 N<br />

were analyzed on an ANCA-SL coupled to a Sercon 20-<br />

20 IRMS (Sercon, United Kingdom). The data were used<br />

to calculate the nitrogen fixation using both the<br />

difference method and the 15 N natural abundance method<br />

[3]. In October, larger plots (1.5 x 7.5 m) were harvested<br />

with a plot harvester. However, since this harvest was<br />

interrupted by snow, only 2/3 of the plots were harvested.<br />

The harvested material was put back on the plots and<br />

collected and weighed again in May <strong>2010</strong> to determine<br />

winter losses.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

95


Figure 1: Amount of biomass and botanical composition<br />

in August 2009 in small plots 50 x 50 cm.<br />

3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

There were significant differences in legume biomass<br />

between the species mixtures (Figure 1). Alsike clover<br />

was the most productive sown legume, followed by red<br />

clover. Goats rue was a slow starter and it formed a low<br />

but healthy undergrowth.<br />

The nitrogen fixation as determined by the difference<br />

method varied very much between plots and differences<br />

between legumes were not significant. However there<br />

was significantly less N-fixation, 28 kg N/ha, with full Nfertilization<br />

compared to half N-fertilization, 39 kg N/ha.<br />

The low nitrogen fixation rate was probably due to strong<br />

competition from the very dense reed canary grass crop.<br />

It was not possible to use the 15 N natural abundance<br />

method to determine the N-fixation since the difference<br />

in 15 N natural abundance in reed canary grass and<br />

legumes was too small.<br />

The amount of reed canary grass was higher with the<br />

higher N-fertilization level (Figure 1). However the<br />

difference was not significant. There were no significant<br />

differences between the treatment with sewage sludge<br />

and the corresponding treatment without sludge.<br />

Establishment of reed canary grass undersown in<br />

barley did not work well. The harvest was less than half<br />

of the other species mixtures. Also there were more<br />

weeds in the barley treatment. The reason is probably that<br />

the barley was harvested with a stubble height of only 7<br />

cm in early September 2008 and the reed canary grass<br />

probably was not able to grow enough rhizomes before<br />

winter to get a good spring growth 2009.<br />

Both in October 2009 and in May <strong>2010</strong>, the harvest<br />

of the larger plots showed the same pattern as the smaller<br />

plots, but due to the smaller variation there was<br />

significantly more biomass with full N-fertilization. The<br />

biomass harvest in spring was 64 % of the biomass<br />

harvest in autumn, and there were no significant<br />

differences in winter losses between treatments.<br />

Three similar experiments have also been established<br />

96 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

in other parts of Sweden. In two of these, there have been<br />

large problems with weeds: white clover in one site and<br />

couch grass in the other site. More information is given in<br />

a recent report [4].<br />

4 ECONOMICS AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

An economic calculation showed that the<br />

establishment costs (the first two growing seasons) can<br />

be lowered by intercropping with red clover (Table 1).<br />

However it is also involves more risks, related to weeds,<br />

and cannot be recommended on fallow soil with a large<br />

seed bank of weeds. Weed management with glyphosate<br />

(Roundup) the year before sowing and Basagran SG<br />

when the legumes have three full leaves, is recommended<br />

in order to decrease the total competition of weeds.<br />

Table 1: Establishment costs for reed canary grass. To<br />

calculate the cost per MWh the establishment cost were<br />

spread over 10 harvesting years with 5000 kg biomass<br />

harvest/ ha and year and 4,2 MWh/ton field dry material.<br />

RCG + red clover RCG<br />

Half fertilization Full fertilization<br />

SEK/ha SEK/ha<br />

Seeds 1105 825<br />

Fertilizer 2000 4000<br />

Herbicides 500 250<br />

Other 300 300<br />

Plowing 1000 1000<br />

Harrowing 675 675<br />

Seeding<br />

Spreading<br />

200 200<br />

of fertilizer<br />

Application<br />

825 825<br />

of herbicide 300 300<br />

Sum 6905 8375<br />

Cost/MWh 32.9 39.9


5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This project was founded by The Swedish Energy<br />

Agency through Värmeforsk (Thermal Engineering<br />

Research Institute). We thank Per-Erik Nemby and coworkers<br />

for skillful field work.<br />

6 References<br />

1. Wrobel, C., B.E. Coulman, and D.L. Smith, The<br />

potential use of reed canarygrass (Phalaris<br />

arundinacea L.) as a biofuel crop. Acta<br />

Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B-Soil and Plant<br />

Science, 2009. 59(1): p. 1-18.<br />

2. Jasinskas, A., A. Zaltauskas, and A. Kryzeuiciene,<br />

The investigation of growing and using of tall<br />

perennial grasses as energy crops. Biomass &<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong>, 2008. 32(11): p. 981-987.<br />

3. Unkovich, M., et al., 15 N Natural abundance method,<br />

in Measuring plant-associated nitrogen fixation in<br />

agricultural systems. 2008, Australian Centre for<br />

International Agricultural Research: Canberra,<br />

Australien. p. 132-162.<br />

4. Palmborg, C. and E. Lindvall, Optimering av<br />

odlingsåtgärder i rörflen för ökad lönsamhet.<br />

Fältstudier av sorter, samodling med baljväxter<br />

och korn, gödsling samt markpackning. <strong>2010</strong>,<br />

Värmeforsk: Stockholm. p. 44.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

97


98 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

ORGANISATIONAL FRAMEWORKS FOR STRAW-BASED ENERGY SYSTEMS IN UKRAINE AND<br />

WESTERN EUROPE<br />

Y. Voytenko*, P. Peck<br />

*Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, Central European University, Nádor u. 9, 1051 Budapest, Hungary,<br />

tel. + 36 1 327 3021; yuliya.voytenko@mespom.eu<br />

International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics at Lund University, Tegnérsplatsen 4, 22100 Lund, Sweden,<br />

tel. +46 46 222 0200; fax: +46 46 222 0230; philip.peck@iiiee.lu.se<br />

Ukraine (UA) has large biomass potentials, and faces broad needs for energy security enhancement, agricultural sector<br />

revitalisation and environmental improvement. Cross case study analysis is applied to nine straw-fired installations in UA<br />

within a conceptual framework developed by the authors. The analysis yields three distinct straw-based frameworks for<br />

organisation and action including ‘small scale local heat production’, ‘small scale local straw production for fuel sale to<br />

municipality’, and ‘medium scale conversion and district heating’. Ukrainian case is then compared to countries with<br />

more advanced bioenergy sectors, i.e. Sweden (SE) and Denmark (DK). Individual business entrepreneurship qualities<br />

and knowledge are found crucial on small and medium scale. Straw use on large scale requires substantial and consistent<br />

support from the National government. Barriers to the expansion of bioenergy in UA include low access to technology<br />

and funding, lack of knowledge on bioenergy funding schemes, and bioenergy in general. The outcomes of the paper are<br />

transferable to various contexts on the condition that local specificities are taken into account.<br />

Keywords: bioenergy management, developing countries, logistics, non-technical barriers to bioenergy, straw<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

This paper has its point of departure from the<br />

recognition of a number of parameters that have been<br />

found important for the transformation of local<br />

energy systems towards bioenergy. These include<br />

resources available (i.e. physical, human and<br />

organisational capital) [1], financial and technological<br />

resources [2], social capital [3], and strategies for the<br />

transformation of local energy systems [4-­‐10]. The<br />

latter component (deliberate strategies) however,<br />

infers a need for “frameworks for organisation and<br />

action” that can support such transformation. Yet<br />

limited work is available in the area.<br />

Earlier research by the authors [11,12]<br />

highlighted four promising framework types for<br />

organisation of straw-­‐based energy systems in<br />

selected Western European (WE) countries, i.e.<br />

Sweden (SE), Denmark (DK) and Spain (ES), and key<br />

factors that define and foster energy system<br />

transition. Each country has gone down its own<br />

transition path but when viewed collectively, they<br />

constitute a good ‘learning environment’ for other<br />

regions where straw-­‐based systems are anticipated to<br />

emerge. That work [12] yielded four distinct types of<br />

agro-­‐biomass based frameworks (ABFs) for<br />

organisation and action including ‘small scale local<br />

heat production’, ‘medium scale local heat provision<br />

with excess for sale’, ‘medium scale conversion and<br />

district heating (DH)’, and ‘large scale power or<br />

combined heat and power generation (CHP)’.<br />

This work focuses on Ukraine (UA), which has<br />

significant potential for all bioenergy options and crop<br />

residues in particular [13-­‐17]. <strong>Bioenergy</strong><br />

development is driven by an urgent need for energy<br />

security enhancement, reduction of dependence on<br />

fuel imports, rural diversification, job creation,<br />

bioenergy business opportunities and potential for<br />

environmental improvement [14,18]. A tangible<br />

policy support environment for bioenergy and real<br />

straw-­‐based heating systems are both emerging in UA<br />

[18,19].<br />

This work aims to compile and analyse ABFs that<br />

seek to transform energy systems to bioenergy. The<br />

objectives of the paper are the following:<br />

• to collect and describe existing practices of<br />

straw use for energy in UA;<br />

• to generate empirical conceptual ABFs that<br />

ensure commercial use of straw for energy;<br />

• to compare and contrast ABF types in UA<br />

and WE.<br />

The paper has the following structure. Section 2<br />

provides a background on bioenergy production,<br />

potentials, technology, and markets for crop residues for<br />

energy in UA as well as on support mechanisms for<br />

bioenergy development in the country. Section 3 outlines<br />

a methodological approach to the work. Results on ABFs<br />

for organisation and action in UA are presented and<br />

analysed in Section 4. Section 5 discusses straw-toenergy<br />

experiences in UA and compares them to those in<br />

WE. Section 5 concludes the paper and presents areas<br />

and implications for future research.<br />

2 BIOENERGY IN UKRAINE<br />

2.1 <strong>Bioenergy</strong> production<br />

Current energy production from biomass in UA is<br />

about 38 PJ (0.9 Mtoe) per year, which comes only in the


form of heat and constitutes 0.65% in UA’s total primary<br />

energy supply (TPES) [20]. UA utilises biomass mainly<br />

as firewood [21]. Wood pellet production is primarily<br />

export oriented [22,23]. Crop residues are burnt in<br />

converted and specifically designed boilers [20,24,25].<br />

There exist up to 25 straw-fired boilers in rural areas in<br />

UA [26]. A few farms operate small-scale individual<br />

biogas units [20]. Among larger biogas installations a few<br />

pilot projects were carried out in 2004-2009 [27,28].<br />

Today only a few large-scale plantations of energy crops<br />

(i.e. coppice crops and perennial grasses) exist in UA<br />

[23]. All of them have been introduced quite recently,<br />

and have not been harvested yet. There exist six first<br />

generation bioethanol production plants with a total<br />

capacity of 135 000 million tonnes per year [29] and<br />

eight big oil-extracting plants that produce rapeseed oil<br />

[24] in the country.<br />

2.2 Potentials for energy from biomass and straw<br />

Total technical potential of biomass and peat is<br />

estimated at 1062 PJ per year or 18.11% in the country’s<br />

TPES [14]. Annual potentials for agricultural residues<br />

and energy crops constitute the main share equalling<br />

739 PJ (or 69.5% in the country’s overall biomass<br />

potential).<br />

Straw has the highest potential among all agricultural<br />

residues - 175 PJ per year (or 16.5% of total biomass<br />

potential). Every year from 6-8 [13] to 10.2 [17] million<br />

tonnes of straw can be used for energy production in UA<br />

without putting other needs in straw under pressure. In<br />

addition, straw is also considered to be one of the easiest<br />

and the cheapest biomass options that can be developed<br />

in Ukrainian conditions [13,15,30]. For the farms with<br />

their own straw resources a straw-fired boiler payback is<br />

1-2 years while for those that purchase straw at USD 26-<br />

33 per tonne it is about 3 years [15].<br />

Current total annual fuel consumption in all boiler<br />

houses in rural areas of UA constitutes about 84 PJ,<br />

which can be fully supplied with straw resources<br />

available in the country [31]. At present the main share of<br />

straw use for energy is performed in UTEM boilers [32],<br />

the total installed capacity of which is about 8.9 MW.<br />

Annual use of straw in these boilers is about 14 100<br />

tonnes (or 0.2 PJ) [33,16].<br />

2.3 Technology for crop residue use for energy<br />

Straw combustion technology in UA is represented<br />

with a few companies that produce straw-fired boilers<br />

and their parts, heat generators and grain-drying units that<br />

use straw and/or other crop residues as a fuel.<br />

The biggest straw-fired boiler manufacturer and the<br />

only one that produces water-based straw-fired boilers<br />

with the capacity of up to 1 MW that can be used for the<br />

heating of premises is OJSC UTEM [26,32]. UTEM<br />

produces boilers under the license of Danish company<br />

Passat Energi A/S; it also provides design works,<br />

arranges heat works and service maintenance [32].<br />

Currently up to 25 UTEM boilers are installed in<br />

different regions in UA [26], which in most cases<br />

produce heat for municipal buildings in the villages (i.e.<br />

schools, kindergartens, premises of village councils,<br />

cultural centres, multi-storeyed living houses, etc.) or/and<br />

for local agricultural enterprises.<br />

Scientific Engineering Centre (SEC) Biomass carries<br />

out research and development of straw-fired heat<br />

generators [34]. OJSC Bryg is one of the few companies<br />

that produce biomass-fired heat generators and grain-<br />

drying units on biomass [35]. Currently about 20 Bryg<br />

products are installed in the country [36]. There are also a<br />

few manufacturers of heat generators and boilers that<br />

work on a mixture of solid fuels [37-40].<br />

2.4 Market potential for crop residues<br />

SEC Biomass estimated technical and commercial<br />

potential for biomass boilers and suggests that by 2015<br />

total thermal capacity of wood-, straw- and peat-fired<br />

boilers in UA can reach 9000 MW [21]. This would<br />

allow to reduce GHG emissions by 11 million tonnes per<br />

year and substitute 5.44 billion m 3 of natural gas<br />

annually. The total estimated investment cost is about<br />

USD 0.64 billion [21].<br />

In October 2009 97% of briquettes from sunflower<br />

husk and 100% straw briquettes produced in UA were<br />

sold outside the country [41]. The main markets can be<br />

found in Poland with smaller amount sold in Germany,<br />

Czech Republic, Hungary and Lithuania.<br />

2.5 Support schemes and mechanisms<br />

Ukrainian government accepted a number of<br />

documents supporting bioenergy development in the<br />

country. The State Development Programme of Biofuel<br />

Production and Consumption is the framework policy. It<br />

aims to increase the share of biofuels in the national<br />

energy balance to 5-7% [42]. Other important laws in this<br />

area include the Law of UA On Amendments to Some<br />

Laws of Ukraine on Support of Biofuel Production and<br />

Consumption, which sets a target to increase the share of<br />

biofuel use to 20% in total fuel consumption in the<br />

country by 2020 [43]; the so called Law On Green<br />

Electricity Tariff, and a set of Laws On Minimisation of<br />

Financial Crisis Impact. The latter laws set specific<br />

economic support mechanisms. <strong>Bioenergy</strong> projects in UA<br />

can also be developed as joint implementation (JI)<br />

projects under Kyoto Protocol [44].<br />

3 METHODOLOGY<br />

3.1 General approach<br />

This work presents results on straw use for energy in<br />

UA and compares them to similar experiences in SE and<br />

DK. A detailed analysis of nine initiatives (Table I) on<br />

straw for energy is applied to underpin the proposal of<br />

three types of ABFs for organisation and action in<br />

Ukrainian setting. ABFs are developed for each case, and<br />

then contrasted and compared in a cross-case analysis<br />

and a broader cross-country context.<br />

Coverage topics that have driven case study selection<br />

are given in Table II.<br />

Table I: Cases on straw use for energy in Ukraine<br />

Village (region,<br />

province)<br />

Strutynka,<br />

(Lypovetsk,<br />

Vinnytsya)<br />

Lebedyn,<br />

(Shpola,<br />

Cherkasy)<br />

Olgopil<br />

(Chechelnyk,<br />

Vinnytsya)<br />

Stavy, (Kagarlyk,<br />

Kyiv)<br />

Boiler<br />

size, kW<br />

Purpose Informants<br />

250 Heat for agro- Director of the<br />

enterprise<br />

“Rapsodiya” and a<br />

mill<br />

agro-enterprise<br />

250 Heat for agro- Leading energy<br />

enterprise<br />

“Lebedyn Seed<br />

Plant”<br />

expert<br />

300 Heat for the local 1st deputy head<br />

secondary school of local<br />

administration<br />

350 Heat for local Project<br />

secondary school coordinator<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

99


Vyshnyuvate,<br />

(Rozivka,<br />

Zaporizzhya)<br />

Polkovnyche,<br />

(Stavyshche,<br />

Kyiv)<br />

Zlatoustivka,<br />

(Volnovakha,<br />

Donetsk)<br />

Drozdy (Bila<br />

Tserkva, Kyiv)<br />

Dyagova (Mena,<br />

Chernihiv)<br />

100 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

150 or<br />

350<br />

(project)<br />

and kindergarten<br />

Heat for local<br />

secondary school<br />

and (possibly) to<br />

local municipality<br />

600 Heat for trading<br />

company and agroenterprise<br />

“ROPA<br />

Ukraine”<br />

600 DH to municipal<br />

buildings in the<br />

village<br />

980 and<br />

150<br />

DH to municipal<br />

buildings in the<br />

village; for pigbreeding<br />

facility on<br />

the farm<br />

250 Heat for a grain<br />

dryer on the farm<br />

Project<br />

coordinator<br />

Director of the<br />

agro-enterprise<br />

Director of agroenterprise<br />

Deputy director<br />

of the agro-<br />

enterprise<br />

A farmer and a<br />

boiler operator<br />

3.2 Data collection<br />

This work involved both “desktop” and field research.<br />

Field studies were carried out in June 2009 – February<br />

<strong>2010</strong>, and involved 14 in-depth interviews with key actors<br />

within an agro-biomass production chain (Table I). Six<br />

interviews were conducted face-to-face and eight - over the<br />

telephone. This study also involved site visits to two grain<br />

producing farms with straw-fired installations, straw<br />

storages, baling equipment, premises with heating needs,<br />

etc.<br />

Interviews sought to reveal the main components of a<br />

conceptual framework to this study and answer the key<br />

overarching area of query framed as follows:<br />

“How did actors collect and combine the necessary<br />

resources in a new straw based business?”<br />

Table II: Coverage topics for case studies<br />

Coverage topic Comment<br />

Installation capacity One or two examples are examined in-depth for<br />

each straw-fired boiler capacity that is available<br />

in UA at present<br />

Purpose of<br />

installation<br />

Cases examined represent different ways of<br />

energy end-use (e.g. grain drying, local heating<br />

of industrial premises, DH of municipal<br />

buildings and dwelling houses)<br />

Boiler ownership Straw-fired boilers examined are owned by<br />

various actors i.e. agricultural enterprises,<br />

companies and municipalities<br />

Boiler manufacturer Initiatives described involve installations<br />

developed<br />

producers<br />

and manufactured by various<br />

Degree of the<br />

installation success<br />

Not only successful examples are included but<br />

also those facing constraints in their<br />

establishment or operation<br />

3.3 Conceptual framework<br />

Conceptual framework was developed by the authors<br />

in previous work [11,12]. It is based on theoretical<br />

considerations from neoinstitutional theory and studies<br />

on the legitimisation of new ventures 45,4,46,47,<br />

diffusion models that describe the variables critical to the<br />

rate of adoption of new ventures 4,7-9, studies on<br />

Technological Innovation Systems (TISs) 4,5,7-9, and<br />

work explaining the behaviour of actors 48-50.<br />

Four main categories in the conceptual framework<br />

include: 1) actors and their networks, 2) natural<br />

resources, 3) “hard” (technical) components, and<br />

4) “soft” (non-technical) components. They build the<br />

core of an ‘agro-biomass framework for organisation and<br />

action’. The frameworks are grouped according to the<br />

empirical examples of straw use for energy identified in<br />

UA (Section 4-1). These in turn are classified according<br />

to a number of industrial development stages suggested<br />

by Aldrich and Fiol [45] (Table IV).<br />

4 RESULTS AND ANALYSIS<br />

4.1 Agro-biomass frameworks for organisation and<br />

action<br />

Three distinct ABF types (Table III) were found in this<br />

study including:<br />

ABF 1: Small scale local heat production<br />

ABF 2: Small scale local straw production for fuel sale<br />

to municipality<br />

ABF 3: Medium scale conversion and DH<br />

Four principal categories, which were found<br />

important to group the variables describing each ABF<br />

type, include ‘general parameters’, ‘boiler<br />

characteristics’, ‘straw supply chain’ variables, and<br />

‘economy and reasons for transformation’.<br />

Aldrich and Fiol [45] identify four stages in the<br />

industry development (levels of analysis) – organisational,<br />

intraindustrial, interindustrial, and institutional. Ukrainian<br />

ABF types are analysed along these stages (Table IV).<br />

Discussion on comparison of Ukrainian and Western<br />

European realities [11,12] is presented in the Sub-sections<br />

4.2-4.4, 5.2.<br />

In comparison to WE two framework types are absent<br />

in UA namely ‘medium scale local heat provision with<br />

excess for sale’ and ‘large scale power or CHP generation’<br />

[11,12]. Instead an additional ABF type is identified in UA<br />

– ‘small scale local straw production with fuel sale to<br />

municipality’.<br />

Organisations in case studies within this research<br />

include agricultural enterprises, village councils, village<br />

schools, funding bodies, bioenergy and renewable energy<br />

consultancies, local authorities, boiler manufacturers, etc.<br />

4.2 ABF 1: Small scale local straw production for local<br />

use for heat<br />

ABF 1 is represented with a privately owned small<br />

scale straw-fired installation (a water-based boiler or an<br />

air-based heat generator) located on a grain producing<br />

agricultural enterprise that also yields significant amounts<br />

of crop residues and has substantial heating needs.<br />

In all cases [51,52,60,64] the land is rented from<br />

private users (long-term leasing) since in UA land sale is<br />

prohibited by law. Most of the enterprises are not only<br />

involved in agricultural activities on the farm but also deal<br />

with industrial production and trading/service provision.<br />

Table III. Types of empirical agro-biomass frameworks<br />

for organisation and action in Ukraine<br />

Case study Strutynka (Sn),<br />

Lebedyn (L),<br />

Polkovnyche (P),<br />

Dyagova (Dg)<br />

Farm size 800-2000 ha<br />

16 000 ha (L)<br />

ABF 1 ABF 2 ABF 3<br />

I GENERAL PARAMETERS<br />

Olgopil (O),<br />

Stavy (St),<br />

Vyshnyuvate (V)<br />

Zlatoustivka (Z),<br />

Drozdy (D)<br />

6000 ha (O) 10 000 ha (Z)<br />

3250 ha (D)<br />

Energy type Heat Heat Heat<br />

Energy end<br />

use<br />

Heat network<br />

ownership<br />

Enterprise<br />

(premises,<br />

facilities) or farm<br />

(e.g. a grain<br />

dryer) heating<br />

Heating of a<br />

village school/<br />

kindergarten<br />

Heating of<br />

village municipal<br />

buildings on a<br />

DH grid<br />

Private Municipal Municipal


II BOILER CHARACTERISTICS<br />

Capacity, kW 250-600


authorities, village schools and kindergartens, and third<br />

parties (e.g. consultancies). Hence there are more actors<br />

involved in ABF 2 as compared to ABF 1. They are also<br />

more diverse as they include not only buyers and sellers<br />

of straw feedstock but also researchers, consultants and<br />

other motivated enthusiasts.<br />

Currently ABF 2 is represented with up to 10<br />

examples of working UTEM boilers in different regions<br />

of UA [30,26]. The need to expand energy production<br />

from straw to supply village schools and other municipal<br />

buildings with heat is often mentioned by respondents<br />

[55,16,30].<br />

In two cases within ABF 2 the initiative to install a<br />

straw-fired boiler emerged from third parties (consultants<br />

or potential consultants) [55,30]. Neither the owners of<br />

the installations (municipalities) nor the producers of<br />

straw feedstock (local agricultural companies) have<br />

become the prime movers to introduce a straw-fired<br />

system although they had demonstrated an overall<br />

support and engagement in the activities. Only in the case<br />

of Olgopil it was the municipality that catalysed the<br />

transition towards bioenergy. However, Vinnytsya<br />

province, where the boiler is located, is recognised to be<br />

an exampleous one in the sense of straw use for energy in<br />

UA [16,66,55], and has the biggest number of<br />

functioning straw-fired boilers (seven) [58]. Vinnytsya<br />

province also has a working state programme on the<br />

promotion of renewable energy sources, which is being<br />

implemented via straw-fired boiler installations [53].<br />

In all cases straw handling and delivery is managed<br />

and organized either by feedstock growers or a third party<br />

(e.g. consultancy). The intention to put this responsibility<br />

on a school director in the case of Stavy did not bring any<br />

successful results but constrained the project<br />

implementation instead [16], which demonstrated a need<br />

for the correct assignation of responsibilities between the<br />

actors in the system.<br />

The case of Vyshnyuvate, which has not been<br />

implemented yet, faced numerous institutional constraints<br />

primarily caused by the constraining behaviour of market<br />

incumbents represented with the lobby of coal industry<br />

[55]. Also the lack of transparent vertical governmental<br />

influence (from top to bottom) was noted as a barrier for<br />

the project implementation [55].<br />

The reasons for a transition to straw use were of<br />

economic nature and also of a desire to increase the<br />

energy self-sufficiency in remote areas and provide<br />

continuous heat supply to village educational institutions.<br />

Since there are not so many working installations of<br />

ABF 2 in UA, the demonstration character of the projects<br />

has contributed to the justification of the reasons for their<br />

implementation.<br />

This ABF type is identified only for Ukrainian setting<br />

and has not been encountered in WE.<br />

4.4 ABF 3: Medium scale local straw production for heat<br />

sale<br />

ABF 3 cases involve private agricultural enterprises<br />

that produce heat from their own straw resources<br />

combusted in their own boilers, and sell it to a DH network<br />

in the village. Heat is supplied to local municipal buildings<br />

and dwelling houses that are connected to the grid, which<br />

is owned by local municipality [63,61].<br />

Straw supply is completely organised by the boiler<br />

owners, and they burn only straw produced on their farms<br />

[63,61]. Mainly wheat straw is used. Ash from straw<br />

102 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

combustion is then spread on the fields of the farms as a<br />

natural fertiliser.<br />

In Drozdy the boiler was produced by Danish company<br />

Passat Energi A/S and installed with technical and<br />

financial assistance of Danish partners [63] (Fig. 1). The<br />

boiler in Zlatoustivka was manufactured by UTEM and<br />

purchased at the company’s own expense [61].<br />

Figure 1: Straw-fired boiler (980 kW), Drozdy village,<br />

Kyiv province, Ukraine<br />

This ABF type represents intraindustrial level of<br />

analysis with a slightly bigger number and types of actors<br />

involved in the system as compared to ABF 2.<br />

Stakeholders include agricultural enterprises,<br />

municipalities, village councils, local secondary schools,<br />

kindergartens, community centres, hotels, dwelling<br />

houses, consultancies, project partners and executing<br />

bodies, etc.<br />

The system has medium degree of complexity and<br />

formalisation. Written contracts exist between heat<br />

producers (agricultural enterprises) and heat users (local<br />

municipalities).<br />

The installation of a straw-fired boiler for the<br />

provision of DH in villages was done in the substitution<br />

of existing installations fired with natural gas [63] or coal<br />

[61]. An important prerequisite for the success of the<br />

projects was the existence of quite broad heat distribution<br />

networks in place, where no significant technological<br />

changes and investments were required. The best proof of<br />

that a boiler has been a successful enterprise is the<br />

installation of an additional small (150 kW) straw-fired<br />

boiler by the managers of the agricultural company in<br />

Drozdy for their own needs on the farm a few years later<br />

[63].<br />

The owners of both installations are satisfied with<br />

their operation, and the boilers can be considered a<br />

success as they brought a number of economic, social and<br />

environmental co-benefits to the villages. First of all, the<br />

dependence of the village DH system on natural gas or<br />

coal was eliminated due to the fuel substitution with<br />

locally sourced straw. This enhanced local energy<br />

security and also resulted in cost savings from fuel<br />

purchase for the municipality, which buys heat at lower<br />

tariffs from the agricultural enterprises [63,61]. Besides,<br />

the enterprises created an additional source of their<br />

incomes by valorising their agricultural waste and selling<br />

the heat from straw combustion. Second, in social area


some optimisation in local employment was achieved and<br />

a few seasonal work places were created [63,61]. Third,<br />

the installations brought climate co-benefits due to GHG<br />

emission reduction from fuel substitution [34,63].<br />

The reasons for a transition towards straw use for<br />

energy were of economic and environmental origin. Boiler<br />

managers [63,61] were interested to substitute expensive<br />

imported fuel with locally sourced biomass, and also<br />

improve environmental conditions in the village. In the<br />

case of Drozdy the installation of a straw-fired boiler also<br />

had a demonstration purpose as it was the first straw-fired<br />

boiler installed in UA [34].<br />

Comparing ABF 3 to Danish and Swedish<br />

experiences, it should be noted that “medium scale” is<br />

defined differently for Ukrainian and Western European<br />

context. In UA these are small installations up to 1 MW<br />

(Fig. 1) while in WE medium scale implies that the boiler<br />

has a capacity larger than 1 MW [11,12] and thus<br />

represents a more complicated technological system<br />

(Fig. 2) with automatic straw feed in and shredding. It is<br />

rather the nature and shape of organisational factors and<br />

forms that enables comparability and certain degree of<br />

analogy between the systems in UA and WE.<br />

The reasons for transformation in SE and DK were<br />

somewhat different from those in UA, and included<br />

political and legal support in addition to economic gains<br />

achieved with fuel substitution. In UA one of the key<br />

drivers for transformation towards bioenergy on different<br />

scales is the issue of energy security provision.<br />

Figure 2: Straw-fired boiler house (1 MW) and straw<br />

storage, Horreby, Denmark<br />

V DISCUSSION<br />

5.1 Straw-to-energy realities in Ukraine<br />

Examples of Ukrainian initiatives on energy<br />

production from straw clearly demonstrate that straw-toenergy<br />

markets and the whole sector are in their latent<br />

phase of development, and straw is not commercialised<br />

as an energy carrier in the country yet. Working strawfired<br />

installations do not exceed 1 MW. This is to certain<br />

extent linked to the fact that in UA there exist no<br />

technological production lines of straw-fired boilers or<br />

heat-generators larger than 1 MW. UTEM is the<br />

dominating straw-fired boiler manufacturer in the<br />

country.<br />

The majority of straw-fired installations in rural areas<br />

in UA do not supply hot water in addition to heat supply.<br />

This can be most likely explained by the scarcity of<br />

central water distribution networks and sewage systems<br />

in the villages. However, potentially all of the boilers<br />

could supply hot water.<br />

Neither of the functioning boilers in UA have air<br />

emission abatement equipment. According to the law,<br />

flue gas cleaning systems are not required to be installed<br />

in small combustion facilities.<br />

Almost in all cases straw bailers are owned by<br />

agricultural enterprises, who are feedstock growers and<br />

straw suppliers either to their own boilers or to the boilers<br />

owned and operated by local municipality. In two cases<br />

bailers are rented by the farmers from their neighbours,<br />

which demonstrates that there exist a practice of sharing<br />

machinery and equipment between the actors in a strawsupply<br />

chain.<br />

Farmers and agricultural enterprises that have<br />

installed straw-fired boilers in UA are quite well off.<br />

They can both allow to purchase a boiler and to own<br />

necessary machinery and equipment for straw handling.<br />

In the case of private boilers no permits were noted to<br />

be required for the boiler installation and operation. Also<br />

since these installations are privately owned, not much<br />

intrusion from the side of local authorities is observed.<br />

Written contracts are put in place when there are a few<br />

actors involved, and a need for straw-supply agreement<br />

exists.<br />

The role of actors and human factor is noted<br />

important in the transformation towards straw use for<br />

energy in UA. Many farm managers who own straw-fired<br />

installations have higher education and sometimes hold a<br />

PhD degree. Often a determining role for the success of<br />

the project can be attributed to its enthusiastic initiators<br />

and leaders (i.e. businessmen, researchers, consultants,<br />

school teachers, representatives of local municipalities,<br />

etc.).<br />

In most cases it is reported that no additional jobs<br />

directly linked to the boiler operation and maintenance<br />

were created. However, a positive co-benefit observed in<br />

all cases is that money is kept and is circulating within<br />

the local budget. In all cases in UA valorisation of wasted<br />

straw, crop residues and sometimes wood waste was<br />

achieved with the installation of straw-fired systems.<br />

All straw-fired owners and operators report to be<br />

satisfied with the work of installations and quite happy<br />

with their payback periods.<br />

A more smooth and easy transition pathway towards<br />

straw use for energy can be attributed to the existing DH<br />

networks and old tradition of biomass use for energy in<br />

rural areas in UA. On the other hand, the absence of<br />

transparent governmental influence and targeted support<br />

could be attributed to the factors hindering the success of<br />

straw-based energy systems in the country.<br />

5.2 Comparison of straw use for energy in Ukraine and<br />

Western Europe<br />

The analysis yields three different generic<br />

frameworks for organisation and action in UA, two of<br />

which (ABF 1 and ABF 3) have been encountered in<br />

Western European context while one (ABF 2) is rather<br />

specific for Ukrainian conditions. All ABFs share key<br />

components but differ in accordance with the nature of<br />

goals and energy end-use needs, ownership of the<br />

installations, number of actors involved, degrees of<br />

system complexity and formalisation.<br />

For all ABF types in UA sizes of farms are larger on<br />

average than in WE. In UA on small scale the main users<br />

are not only grain-dryers but also enterprises. Besides,<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

103


there are no grain-drying installations that use waterbased<br />

boilers in UA.<br />

Straw bales in the majority of Ukrainian cases have<br />

an average weight of 300 kg (Fig. 3) while in Swedish<br />

and Danish systems these are standardised bales of<br />

500 kg each. However, this is also linked to the boiler<br />

scale in UA, which are smaller than those functioning on<br />

Swedish and Danish farms for all ABF types. Straw<br />

annual requirements are quite the same among countries,<br />

and depend on the boiler capacity. Straw storage is<br />

different for all cases, and there is no specific trend<br />

observed depending on the size or type of the installation.<br />

Both in UA and in WE, ash from straw combustion is<br />

mainly returned to the soil.<br />

In UA unlike WE no cooperative ownership of DH<br />

networks is encountered. For analogous installations in<br />

UA and WE investment costs are lower in UA while the<br />

payback periods are relatively the same (about 2-3 years<br />

for comparable systems below 1 MW).<br />

In UA energy security issue and a desire to achieve<br />

energy self-sufficiency in remote areas were observed to<br />

be some of the key driving forces for the transition<br />

towards straw. With increasing prices for natural gas<br />

imported from Russia [14] the trend towards the<br />

increased development of renewable energy alternatives<br />

is obvious in UA. Energy security can be forecasted to<br />

have a continuous influence and be a facilitating factor<br />

for the development of renewables and bioenergy in<br />

particular. However, it is not likely to bring groundbreaking<br />

changes in the existing energy system until<br />

market distortions in the form of cross-subsidised energy<br />

tariffs are removed in Ukrainian system [14], and when<br />

private users will be paying real price for conventional<br />

energy carriers.<br />

Figure 3: Field straw storage at agricultural enterprise<br />

LLC “DiM”, Drozdy village, Kyiv province, Ukraine<br />

Swedish and Danish examples of straw use for<br />

energy revealed that medium and large scale straw-fired<br />

installations often required political support in addition to<br />

purely economic reasons for transformation with targeted<br />

incentives in place [11,12]. This is the case for the large<br />

scale CHP plants in DK, and may be one of the reasons<br />

why in SE there are still no functioning large scale strawfired<br />

installations. As for the medium scale installations<br />

for neighbour and district heating, if privately owned<br />

(which is quite a spread practice in DK), they require<br />

significant private investments (in the range of EUR 0.5-<br />

2.3 million) both for the boiler installation and the DH<br />

network construction [67-70]. It can be assumed that<br />

these investments would be 2-3 times lower in Ukrainian<br />

104 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

reality, in case there were straw-fired boilers of domestic<br />

manufacture. However, financial constraints can still be<br />

quite significant taking into account the low purchasing<br />

capacity of Ukrainian agricultural producers. In this case<br />

feasible funding schemes will be required for the<br />

expansion of straw use for energy on medium scale.<br />

All straw-fired installations in UA are only<br />

generating heat, which can be explained by their small<br />

capacity. CHP plants on straw do not exist below<br />

10 MW, which can be demonstrated with Danish<br />

experiences [71]. With existing incentives on electricity<br />

generation from renewable sources (“feed in tariff”<br />

mechanism) electricity from straw could potentially<br />

become a pathway for residual straw utilisation in UA.<br />

However, this is not likely to occur until a more targeted<br />

governmental support of the activity is put in place like it<br />

happened in the case of DK [12].<br />

From Ukrainian experiences it can be concluded that<br />

private ownership of a straw-fired installation is one of<br />

the important predetermining factors for the enterprise<br />

success. This is also noted by Ukrainian bioenergy<br />

experts 30. In UA in ABF 1 and 3, where the majority of<br />

successful cases on straw for energy can be found,<br />

private business interests of actors or agricultural<br />

companies played the key role for the transition. In the<br />

initiatives within ABF 2, where a straw-fired boiler is<br />

owned by local municipality, a wide range of problems<br />

were encountered. The problems were mainly linked to<br />

the commitment of actors, their interests and a desire to<br />

participate in a collective action. For example, the main<br />

difference between the project case in Vyshyuvate and<br />

the functioning case in Zlatoustivka was the fact that in<br />

Zlatoustivka a straw-fired boiler was owned by the<br />

agricultural enterprise and the DH provision was ensured<br />

by entrepreneurs among their business activities [61]. In<br />

the case of Vyshnyuvate the boiler was planned to be<br />

financed from the state budget and owned by local<br />

municipality, which did not show any commitment but<br />

rather opposed the idea. The opposition was mainly<br />

linked to the lobby interests of the decision-makers [55],<br />

who were interested to keep the functioning coal supply<br />

system in place.<br />

Described types of problems are likely to be<br />

encountered where local authorities and municipalities<br />

play a key role as decision-makers. However, in case the<br />

energy installations and distribution grids are privatised,<br />

the owners become the definitive stakeholders.<br />

Successful examples from WE [11,12] show that strawto-energy<br />

facilities are very rarely owned by<br />

municipalities. Hence the privatisation can become one<br />

of the pathways for a more smooth transition towards<br />

increased straw use for energy in UA.<br />

In Ukrainian conditions similar to Western European<br />

context all successful examples of transformation<br />

towards straw/bioenergy include a number of economic,<br />

environmental and social co-benefits leveraged between<br />

the actors in one way or another.<br />

5 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH<br />

5.1 Conclusions<br />

Three types of ABFs are identified in Ukrainian<br />

context:<br />

• On organisational level – ABF 1: Small scale<br />

local straw production for local use for heat;<br />

• On intraindustrial level – ABF 2: Small scale


local straw production for fuel sale to<br />

municipality and ABF 3: Medium scale local<br />

straw production for heat sale.<br />

While ABF 1 and 3 were encountered in WE, ABF 2<br />

is specific for UA.<br />

Straw-to-energy is in the latent phase of system<br />

development in UA. All existing installations are below<br />

1 MW and there are no technology production lines for<br />

larger straw-fired boiler capacities.<br />

There is no significant political support of straw-toenergy<br />

activities in UA, which is a key prerequisite for<br />

large-scale straw use and is important on medium scale.<br />

Feasible funding schemes are desired to expand the<br />

scales of straw use for energy in the country.<br />

In UA currently only heat is produced from straw.<br />

Electricity generation could become one pathway since<br />

“feed-in tariff” is already in place. However, since<br />

electricity is only produced on large scale a targeted<br />

governmental support will be needed.<br />

Energy security is a driving force that is promising to<br />

have further influence on straw sector development in<br />

UA. However, cross-subsidised tariffs for energy need to<br />

be removed.<br />

Privatisation can be one of the pathways for a more<br />

smooth transition towards straw-to-energy in UA.<br />

5.2 Future research and implications<br />

Future research needs to be carried out to deliver a<br />

more detailed analysis on the constraints to bioenergy<br />

development in UA (i.e. technological and “know how”,<br />

financial, political barriers, etc.) with a consequent<br />

construction of recommended pathways for the sector<br />

development in the country.<br />

This work is a part of a full-time PhD research<br />

funded by Central European University, Budapest,<br />

Hungary, and conducted by the leading author under the<br />

supervision of the second author.<br />

The results of this paper are expected to be of direct<br />

use for policy makers, municipal leaders, business<br />

managers, researchers and other actors seeking for the<br />

transformation of local energy systems towards<br />

bioenergy. The outcomes of the paper are transferable to<br />

various contexts on the condition that local specificities<br />

are taken into account.<br />

6 REFERENCES<br />

1. Barney, J.B. Firm resources and sustained<br />

competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17,<br />

99-120 (1991).<br />

2. Dollinger, M.J. Enterpreneurship: Strategies and<br />

Resources. (Homewood, IL, 1995).<br />

3. Greene, P.G. & Brown, T.E. Resource needs and the<br />

dynamic capitalism typology. Journal of Business<br />

Venturing 12, 161-173 (1997).<br />

4. Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S. & Sandén, B.A.<br />

‘Legitimation’ and ‘Development of Positive<br />

Externalities’: Two Key Processes in the Formation<br />

Phase of Technological Innovation Systems.<br />

Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20<br />

(5), 575-592 (2008).<br />

5. Carlsson, B. & Stankiewicz, R. On the Nature,<br />

Function and Composition of Technological<br />

Systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1 (2),<br />

93-118 (1991).<br />

6. Hektor, B. Planning Models for <strong>Bioenergy</strong>: Some<br />

General Observations and Comments. Biomass and<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> 18, 279-282 (2000).<br />

7. Hillman, K.M., Suurs, M.P., Hekkert, M.P. &<br />

Sandén, B.A. Cumulative Causation in Biofuels<br />

Development: a Critical Comparison of the<br />

Netherlands and Sweden. Technology Analysis &<br />

Strategic Management 20 (5), 593-612 (2008).<br />

8. Jacobsson, S. & Bergek, A. Transforming the Energy<br />

Sector: the Evolution of Technological Systems in<br />

Renewable Energy Technology. Industrial and<br />

Corporate Change 13 (5), 815-849 (2004).<br />

9. Jacobsson, S. & Johnson, A. Diffusion of Renewable<br />

Energy Technology: An Analytical Framework and<br />

Key Issues for Research. Energy Policy 28, 625-640<br />

(2000).<br />

10. Mårtensson, K. & Westerberg, K. How to Transform<br />

Local Energy Systems towards <strong>Bioenergy</strong>? Three<br />

Strategy Models for Transformation. Energy Policy<br />

7, (2007).<br />

11. Voytenko, Y. & Peck, P. Agro-biomass frameworks<br />

for organisation in Southern Sweden. Presented at<br />

17 th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition<br />

29 June-3 July 2009, Hamburg, Germany<br />

12. Voytenko, Y. & Peck, P. Frameworks for<br />

Organisation of Straw-based Energy Systems.<br />

Presented at <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Network of Excellence<br />

(NoE) Final Seminar, 3 November 2009, Brussels,<br />

Belgium<br />

13. Dubrovin, V. et al. Biopalyva: technologiyi, mashyny<br />

i obladnannya [Biofuels: technologies, machines<br />

and equipment]. (CTI Energetyka i elekrofikatsiya:<br />

Kyiv, Ukraine, 2004).<br />

14. Geletukha, G. & Dolinsky, A. State of the art and<br />

prospects for bioenergy development in Ukraine.<br />

Presented at 5 th International Conference on<br />

Biomass to Energy, 22 September 2009, Kyiv,<br />

Ukraine<br />

15. Grynyuk, I. Vid pryrodnogo gazu do biomasy [From<br />

Natural Gas to Biomass]. Agrosector 4, (2009).<br />

16. Oliynyk, Y., a consultant at SEC Biomass. Telephone<br />

interview, 19 January <strong>2010</strong>, Lund, Sweden<br />

17. Radchenko, S., Bashtovoy, A. & Chaplygin, S.<br />

Osobennosti vybora potentsialnykh obyektov dlya<br />

ustanovki solomoszhygayushchikh kotlov [Specific<br />

parameters defining the choice of potential objects<br />

for the installation of straw-fired boilers]. (2009).<br />

18. Voytenko, Y., Israilava, A. & Peck, P. <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Cobenefits<br />

in Ukraine and Belarus: Realities on the<br />

Ground. (2009).<br />

19. Zhelezna, T. & Geletukha, G. Analysis of Legal<br />

Frameworks on <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Development in Ukraine<br />

[Analiz zakonodavchoyi bazy rozvytku<br />

bioenergetyky v Ukrayini]. Presented at 5 th<br />

International Conference on Biomass to Energy,<br />

22 September 2009, Kyiv, Ukraine<br />

20. Geletukha, G., Zhelezna, T., Matveev, Y. & Zhovmir,<br />

M. Analysis of the present state and prospects for<br />

bioenergy development in Ukraine. Presented at 16 th<br />

European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, 2-<br />

6 June 2008, Valencia, Spain<br />

21. Dolinsky, A. Resolution. Presented at 4 th<br />

International Conference on Biomass for Energy,<br />

22-24 September 2008, Kyiv, Ukraine<br />

22. Geletukha, G., director of SEC Biomass and<br />

Department Head at the Institute of Engineering<br />

Thermophysics of National Academy of Sciences of<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

105


Ukraine. Personal interview, 19 March 2007, Kyiv,<br />

Ukraine<br />

23. Fominykh, O., a manager at LLC “Agrarna<br />

spivdruzhnist” - Green Energy. Personal interview,<br />

26 May 2009, Kyiv, Ukraine<br />

24. Listopad, V. Rol’ Ukrainy na mirovom rynke syr’ya<br />

dlya proizvodstva biodiselya [The Role of Ukraine<br />

on the <strong>World</strong> Market for Biodiesel Feedstock<br />

Production]. (2009).<br />

25. Zhelezna, T. & Morozova, O. Lushpynnya<br />

sonyashnyku dlya teplovyh potreb [Sunflower Husk<br />

for Heat]. Zelena energetyka 24-25 (2007).<br />

26. Svintsitskiy, R., UTEM sales director. Personal<br />

interview, 28 December 2009, Kyiv, Ukraine<br />

27. Kucheruk, P., Matveev, Y. & Plugatar, O.<br />

Ekonomichni aspekty rozvytku biogazovyh<br />

tehnologiy v Ukrayini [Economic Aspects of Biogas<br />

Technologies in Ukraine]. Kommunalnoe<br />

hozyaystvo 6, 30-31 (2007).<br />

28. Matveev, Y. The state of biogas technologies<br />

development in Ukraine. Presentation (2009).<br />

29. Korol, O. The Bioethanol Program. Presentation<br />

(2009).<br />

30. Oliynyk, Y., a consultant at SEC Biomass. Personal<br />

interview, 22 September 2009, Kyiv, Ukraine<br />

31. Zhovmir, M., Oliynyk, Y. & Chaplygin, S. Soloma<br />

obigriye sela [The Straw will Heat the Villages].<br />

Zelena energetyka 5, 28-29 (2007).<br />

32. UTEM Implementation of economically sound<br />

modern technologies. Issues of the day: OJSC<br />

UTEM is the only in Ukraine manufacturer of<br />

licensed straw boilers. (2009).<br />

33. Avdeev, A. UTEM Engineering Leaflet. (2008).<br />

34. SEC Biomass Scientific Engineering Centre<br />

"Biomass". Information bulletin. (2009).<br />

35. OJSC "Bryg" Zernosushilnye kompleksy na<br />

biomasse [Grain drying units on biomass].<br />

Oborudovanie dlya zernosushil'noy i<br />

zernopererabatyvayushchey promyshlennosti<br />

[Equipment for Grain Drying and Grain Processing<br />

Industry] (<strong>2010</strong>). URL: http://www.brigzerno.com.ua/pr19.htm<br />

36. Kuzmin, N., a chief engineer at OJSC “Bryg”.<br />

Telephone interview. 1 February <strong>2010</strong>, Lund,<br />

Sweden<br />

37. NVT "Technology" Oborudovanie i technologii.<br />

Ispolzovanie netraditsionnykh vidov topliva<br />

[Equipment and Technologies. The Use of<br />

Unconventional Fuels]. (2009).<br />

38. RETRA Zagalni kharaketrystyky kotliv "RETRA<br />

3M" [General Parameters of RETRA 3M Boilers].<br />

RETRA: Kotly na tverdom toplive [RETRA: Boilers<br />

on Solid Fuels] (2009).<br />

URL: http://www.retra.com.ua/page.php?2<br />

39. TM "Ukrsetka" Stalnoy otopitelnyi kotel na<br />

biotoplive (soloma, drevesina, pellety, shelukha<br />

semechki, stebli kukuruzy i podsolnechnika i t.d.)<br />

[Biofuel-fired Steel Heating Boiler (straw, wood,<br />

pellets, sunflower husk, corn and sunflower stems,<br />

etc.)]. Alternativnaya energetika: Otoplenie<br />

[Alternative energy: Heating] (2008).<br />

URL: http://www.ukrsetka.com/index.php?productI<br />

D=285<br />

40. Toropets, O., a director of heat generator production<br />

company "NVT-Technology". Personal interview.<br />

3 June 2009, Chernihiv, Ukraine<br />

41. FuelAlternative Rynok biotopliva. Ukraina: export<br />

106 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

(Biofuel market. Ukraine: Export). FuelAlternative<br />

1, 1-4 (2009).<br />

42. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine Decree #276-p On<br />

Approval of State Targeted Scientific Technical<br />

Development Programme on Biofuel Production<br />

and Consumption. (2009).<br />

URL: http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/cgibin/laws/main.cgi?nreg=276-2009-%F0<br />

43. Verkhovna Rada Ukrayiny Law of Ukraine #1391-VI<br />

On Changes to Some Laws of Ukraine on Support of<br />

Biofuel Production and Consumption. (2009).<br />

URL: http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/cgibin/laws/main.cgi?nreg=1391-17<br />

44. Geletukha, G. & Konshyn, Y. Kiotskyi protocol ta<br />

dodatkovi invetytsiyi v energozberezhennya [Kyoto<br />

Protocol and Additional Investments in Energy<br />

Saving]. EtaR 4, 28-33 (2007).<br />

45. Aldrich, H. & Fiol, C. Fools Rush In? The<br />

Institutional Context of Industry Creation. The<br />

Academy of Management Review 19 (4), 645-670<br />

(1994).<br />

46. DiMaggio, P. & Powell, W. The Iron Cage Revisited:<br />

Institutional Isomorphism and Collective<br />

Rationality in Organisational field. The New<br />

Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991).<br />

47. Mizruchi, M. & Fein, L. The Social Construction of<br />

Organisational Knowledge: A Study of the Uses of<br />

Coercive, Mimetic, and Normative Isomorphism.<br />

Administrative Science Quarterly 44, 653-689<br />

(1999).<br />

48. Alsos, G.A., Ljunggren, E. & Pettersen, L.T. Farmbased<br />

Entrepreneurs: What Triggers the Start-up of<br />

New Business Activities? Journal of Small Business<br />

and Enterprise Development 10 (4), 435-443<br />

(2003).<br />

49. Mitchell, R., Agle, B. & Wood, D. Toward a Theory<br />

of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining<br />

the Principle of Who and What Really Counts.<br />

Academy of Management Review 22 (4), 853-856<br />

(1997).<br />

50. Neville, B., Menguc, B. & Bell, S. Stakeholder<br />

Salience Reloaded: Operationalising Corporate<br />

Social Responsibility. 1883-1889, (2003).<br />

51. Antonik, I., director and co-founder of agricultural<br />

enterprise “Rapsodiya”. Telephone interview,<br />

21 January <strong>2010</strong>, Lund, Sweden<br />

52. Demydov, O., leading energy expert at OJSC<br />

“Lebedynskyi Seed Plant”. Telephone interview,<br />

4 December 2009, Lund, Sweden<br />

53. Tkachynskyi, M., first deputy head of Chechelnyk<br />

regional administration, Vinnytsya province.<br />

Telephone interview, 30 November 2009, Lund,<br />

Sweden<br />

54. Geletukha, G. & Globenko, A. Dogovir pryimannyaperedachi<br />

#8-09 [Contract оn Taking over and<br />

Transfer #9-09]. (2009).<br />

55. Belay, V., a teacher of Physics at Vyshyuvate<br />

secondary school, Rozivka region, Zaporizzhya<br />

province. Telephone interview, 27 November 2009,<br />

Lund, Sweden<br />

56. Belay, V. Teplogeneratory na solomi - teplo dlya<br />

silskyh shkil [Straw-fired boilers - heat for village<br />

schools in Ukraine]. Zelena energetyka 4, 5-6<br />

(2009).<br />

57. Belay, V. Vykorystannya solomy dlya opalyuvannya<br />

prymishchennya Vyshyuvatskoyi zagalnoosvitnyoyi<br />

shkoly [Straw Use for the Heating of Vyshnyuvate


Secondary School]. (2009).<br />

58. Belay, V. Ne hvylyuyut' zovsim nas tsiny na<br />

rosiyskyi gaz! A yak u vas? [We Don't Care about<br />

Russian Gas Prices at All! What about You?].<br />

Zelena energetyka 4, (2009).<br />

59. Belay, G. & Belay, V. Biznes-plan stvorennya v<br />

Rozivskomu rayoni Zaporizkoyi oblasti<br />

energoservisnoyi kompaniyi ESKO [Business Plan<br />

on the Establishment of Energy Service Company<br />

ESKO in Rozivka Region]. (2009).<br />

60. Orlovskyi, V., director of the trading company<br />

"ROPA Ukraine". Telephone interview, 8 February<br />

<strong>2010</strong>, Lund, Sweden<br />

61. Yerkhov, O., director of agricultural enterprise<br />

"Rossiya". Telephone interview, 22 January <strong>2010</strong>,<br />

Lund, Sweden<br />

62. Khoba, Y. Byurokraty nagreli selo [Bureaucrats Have<br />

Heated up the Village]. Donbass (2008).<br />

63. Lytvyn, O., deputy director at agricultural enterprise<br />

“DiM”. Personal interview, 17 September 2009,<br />

Drozdy, Ukraine<br />

64. Butenko, O., private farmer and owner of biomassfired<br />

heat generator. 2 June 2009, Mena, Ukraine<br />

65. Belay, G. & Belay, V. Biznes-ideya stvorennya v<br />

Rozivskomu rayoni energoservisnoyi kompaniyi<br />

(ESKO) [Business Idea: Creation of Energy Service<br />

Company (ESCO) in Rozivka region]. (2009).<br />

66. Konechenkov, A., head of Ukrainian Wind<br />

Association; former editor-in-chief of Green Energy<br />

journal. Personal interview, 14 October 2009, Lund,<br />

Sweden<br />

67. Palle, P., a farmer and an owner of neighbour heating<br />

plant in Horreby, Denmark. Telephone interview,<br />

9 December 2009, Lund, Sweden<br />

68. Palle, P., a farmer and an owner of neighbour heating<br />

plant in Horreby, Denmark. Personal interview,<br />

27 January <strong>2010</strong>, Horreby, Denmark<br />

69. Rasmusen, J., a farmer and an owner of neighbour<br />

heating plant in Stokkemarke, Denmark. Personal<br />

interview, 27 January <strong>2010</strong>, Stokkemarke, Denmark<br />

70. Sejdenfaden, O., a farmer and owner of neighbour<br />

heating plant in Hunseby, Denmark. Personal<br />

interview, 27 January <strong>2010</strong>, Hunseby, Denmark<br />

71. Sander, B. & Skøtt, T. <strong>Bioenergy</strong> for Electricity and<br />

Heat – Experiences from Biomass-fired CHP Plants<br />

in Denmark. (DONG Energy and Vattenfall: 2007).<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

107


108 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

ORaL CONfERENCE pROGRaMME 25-27 MaY<br />

Presentations from the oral sessions can be downloaded at www.worldbioenergy.com.<br />

(Only open for conference delegates.)


CONfERENCE TuEsDaY 25 MaY<br />

09.00 OpENING pLENaRY sEssION<br />

Conference chairperson: Tomas Kåberger, Director General of the Swedish Energy Agency<br />

Opening speech, Eskil Erlandsson, Swedish minister of Agriculture and Forestry<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> opportunities in developing countries, Miguel Trossero, FAO, Argentina<br />

price ceremony and presentation of the winner of <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> award, Kent Nyström, <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association<br />

speech by the winner of <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> award<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> for the world - Global Energy assessment, Thomas B Johansson, University of Lund, Sweden<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> outcompetes oil in sweden, showing that growth in a green economy is possible, Gustav Melin, Svebio, Sweden<br />

Tomas Kåberger Eskil Erlandsson Miguel Trossero Kent Nyström Thomas B Johansson<br />

Gustav Melin<br />

10.45 Coffee<br />

11.15 - 13.00 paRaLLEL CONfERENCEs<br />

Rawmaterial availability and<br />

forest residues – slash,<br />

policy – how to make it all<br />

a1 B1 C1<br />

D1<br />

market development<br />

stumps, small tree harvest<br />

happen<br />

Chair. lena Söderberg, Svebio Chair. rolf björheden, Forest research institute of Sweden Chair. Kjell Andersson, Svebio Chair. david Frykerås, Ageratec<br />

Current status and challenges<br />

in the global availiability of<br />

biomass<br />

Hubert Röder, Pöyry Management<br />

Consulting<br />

Forest biomass availability<br />

in EU<br />

Robert Prinz, Finish forest<br />

research institute<br />

Clean power from discarded<br />

rubber trees – Benefits for<br />

Europe and Africa<br />

Annika Billstein Andersson, Vattenfall<br />

Competition between power<br />

stations for biomass in<br />

Poland<br />

Magdalena Walker,<br />

National Research Institute<br />

From shrinking to expanding<br />

biomass in forests of the<br />

world<br />

Pekka Kauppi, University of Helsinki<br />

Introduction – What is the<br />

overall potential, and what<br />

technologies can we use?<br />

Rolf Björheden, The Forest Research<br />

Institute of Sweden<br />

Can slash and stumps be<br />

harvested without negative<br />

effects on the environment?<br />

Hillevi Eriksson,<br />

Swedish Forest Agency<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> from mountain<br />

forests: Analysis of the<br />

woody biomass supply chain<br />

Clara Valente,<br />

Hedmark University College<br />

Cost-efficient small-sized<br />

energy wood harvesting<br />

method for young stands<br />

Kalle Kärhä, Metsäteho<br />

Harvest for energy or<br />

pulpwood in early thinnings<br />

Dan Bergström, Swedish<br />

University of Agricultural Sciences<br />

13.00 - 15.00 Lunch in Black & White restaurant in Lobby south and Exhibition<br />

15.00 - 18.00 sTuDY VIsITs aND sIDE EVENTs<br />

EU climate and renewable<br />

energy policy opens up new<br />

markets across Europe<br />

Jean-Marc Jossart, Aebiom<br />

The Renewable Energy<br />

Directive: A first step towards a<br />

sustainable bioenergy policy, or<br />

rather, another piece of red tape?<br />

Stefan Busse,<br />

University of Goettingen<br />

Biomass sustainability criteria:<br />

Case study in sustainability<br />

auditing for power generation<br />

Adrian Mason, Inspectorate<br />

International<br />

Barriers of implementing<br />

renewable energy and energy<br />

efficiency in northern periphery<br />

Jarmo Renvall, North Karelia<br />

University of Applied Sciences<br />

The Global <strong>Bioenergy</strong><br />

Development Fund – A path<br />

forward for social justice in the<br />

mitigation of anthropogenic<br />

emission of greenhouse gases<br />

Alfred Wong, Arbokem Inc.<br />

Biofuels are evolving –<br />

new innovations<br />

Green-LPG an ideal 2nd<br />

generation vehicle fuel<br />

Christian Hulteberg,<br />

Biofuel-Solution<br />

Ammonia treatment of cellulose<br />

is a key technology on dramatic<br />

improvement of cellulase activity<br />

Masahiro Samejima,<br />

The University of Tokyo<br />

Biogas upgrading by<br />

temperature swing adsorption<br />

Tamara Mayer, Vienna University<br />

of Technology<br />

Infrastructure system of<br />

textile waste recycling in<br />

Japan<br />

Chie Yoshimura, JEPLAN.Co.<br />

Why heterogeneous catalysis<br />

will be central to renewable<br />

fuels<br />

Curtis Conner, Chalmers Technical<br />

University<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

109


CONfERENCE WEDNEsDaY 26 MaY<br />

09.00 - 10.45 paRaLLEL CONfERENCEs<br />

a2<br />

Chair. Andrew lang, SMArTimbers Chair. Christian rakos, proPellets Chair. Peter rechberger, Aebiom Chair. Tomas Kåberger, Swedish energy Agency<br />

The cost and management<br />

of moisture in the biomass<br />

to energy supply chain<br />

Ross Harding, Energy Launch<br />

Partners, USA<br />

Innovative technologies for<br />

long-distance biomass<br />

transports by rail<br />

Gerald Petschner, Innofreight<br />

Biomass pre-treatment by<br />

torrefaction – How to scale<br />

up the process<br />

Jaap Kiel, Energy Research Centre<br />

of the Netherlands<br />

Application development of<br />

bio-coke technology for<br />

Coppoloa furnace<br />

Tamio Ida, Kinki University<br />

The development of<br />

pyrolysis oil applications<br />

Dagmar Zwebe, BTG Bioliquids<br />

10.45 Coffee<br />

11.15 - 13.00 paRaLLEL CONfERENCEs<br />

a3<br />

fuel preparation, production<br />

and logistics<br />

Large scale combustion and<br />

cofiring<br />

110 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

U.S. wood pellet production<br />

and global market outlook<br />

Thomas Meth, Intrinergy Inc.<br />

Temperature controlled<br />

pelletizing – A new dimension<br />

of process control<br />

Sylvia Larsson, Swedish University<br />

of Agricultural Sciences<br />

Emerging pellets markets –<br />

Country profiles from<br />

around the globe<br />

Jan Wintzell, Pöyry Management<br />

Consulting<br />

Development of pellet<br />

production in Russia<br />

Olga Rakitova, The National<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> Union<br />

Best engineering, operating<br />

and maintenance practices for<br />

safety and health in the pellet industry<br />

Staffan Melin, Wood Pellet<br />

Association of Canada<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> – an opportunity<br />

for farmers?<br />

Christina Huhtasaari, Swedish Board<br />

of Agriculture<br />

Frameworks for organisation<br />

of straw-based energy<br />

systems in Ukraine<br />

Yuliya Voytenko, Central<br />

European University<br />

Modelling impact of climate<br />

change on willow potential<br />

productivity in Poland<br />

Jerzy Korzyra, Institute of Soil<br />

Sciences and Plant Cultivation<br />

Round bale harvest of willow<br />

plantations in Quebec<br />

Frédèric Lavoie,<br />

Agriculture and Agri-Food<br />

Intercropping of reed canary<br />

grass, with legumes can cut<br />

costs for N-fertilization<br />

Cecilia Palmborg, Swedish University of<br />

Agricultural Sciences<br />

Ethanol from wheat straw –<br />

A reality in Denmark from<br />

November 2009<br />

Rene Juul Strandgaard, Inbicon<br />

Commercial scale BTL<br />

production on the verge of<br />

becoming reality – The CHOREN<br />

Beta-Plant and future developments<br />

Jochen Vogels, Choren<br />

Small to medium scale<br />

biodiesel production<br />

Ulf Johansson, Ageratec<br />

GoBiGas – Efficient transfer<br />

of biomass to biofuels<br />

Åsa Burman, Göteborg Energi<br />

Wood-biorefineries in<br />

Northern Sweden, the<br />

Domsjö example<br />

Clas Engström,<br />

Processum Biorefinery Initiative<br />

Chair. Kent nyström, wbA Chair. Pekka Kauppi, University of Helsinki Chair. Jean-Marc Jossart, Aebiom Chair. gustav Melin, Svebio<br />

Large percentage cofiring of<br />

coal with biomass and 100 %<br />

fuel switch from coal to biomass<br />

Wlodzimierz Blasiak, Nalco Mobotec and<br />

Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden<br />

Large scale cofiring by GDF-<br />

Suez in Belgium, Poland and<br />

the Netherlands<br />

Yves Ryckmans, Laborelec<br />

Results from a 120 MW unit<br />

in northern Sweden for high<br />

steam technology<br />

Marcus Bolhar-Nordenkampf,<br />

AE&E Group<br />

District heating in the US –<br />

It can be done!<br />

Michael Burns, Ever-Green Energy<br />

Ontario’s huge biomass<br />

resource – Our steps forward<br />

to large-scale bioenergy<br />

Stephen Roberts, Ontario Ministry of<br />

Northern Development Mines and Forests<br />

pellets – the new large energy Energy crops, agricultural resi-<br />

E1 f1<br />

commodity<br />

dues and by-products<br />

D2<br />

B2<br />

forest residues – slash, stumps,<br />

small tree harvest<br />

Procurement costs of slash<br />

and stumps in Sweden<br />

Dimitris Athanassiadis, Swedish<br />

University of Agricultural Sciences<br />

10 years with slash bundles<br />

– More efficiency and flexibility<br />

to forest energy logistics<br />

Marica Kilponen, John Deere Forestry<br />

Mediterranean slash;<br />

olive oil tree, the green oil<br />

Marcos Martin, Spanish Biomass<br />

Association, AVEBIOM<br />

Effects of harvesting<br />

techniques and storage<br />

methods on fuel quality of stumps<br />

Erik Anerud, Swedish University of<br />

Agricultural Sciences<br />

The future of the<br />

Chilean native forest<br />

Hans Grosse, Chilean Forest Institute<br />

(INFOR)<br />

13.00 - 15.00 Lunch in Black & White restaurant in Lobby south and Exhibition<br />

15.00 - 18.00 sTuDY VIsITs aND sIDE EVENTs<br />

C2<br />

policy – how to make it all<br />

happen<br />

Global standards on<br />

solid biofuels<br />

Lars Sjöberg,<br />

Swedish Standards Institute<br />

Biomass Florida - Why and<br />

how Florida makes<br />

biomass work<br />

Mary Ellen Hogan, Bryant Miller Olive<br />

Mind efficiency in<br />

policy making<br />

Tomas Kåberger,<br />

Swedish Energy Agency<br />

Policy innovation system for<br />

clean energy security<br />

Benard Mouk, African Center for<br />

Technology Studies<br />

Expect more from France –<br />

Current and future bioenergy<br />

development<br />

Jean-Hugues Pierson,<br />

Invest in France Agency<br />

D3<br />

Leading global examples of<br />

biofuels<br />

how to build a market for<br />

biofuels<br />

Darkness at noon? Scenarios<br />

for bioenergy success<br />

Petri Vasara, Pöyry Management<br />

Consulting<br />

Bioethanol for sustainable<br />

transport, the BEST method<br />

for market development<br />

Jonas Ericsson, City of Stockholm<br />

How to build a biofuel<br />

market in China<br />

Zhang Nan, SF-Bio-Industrial Bio-tech<br />

Co. Ltd. & Yang Liu, Commercial Bureau<br />

of Administrative Committee<br />

Southeast Asia –<br />

The Saudi Arabia of biofuels?<br />

Per Dahlen, Portelet Asia Pte.,<br />

Singapore<br />

Brazilian sugarcane ethanol’s<br />

contribution to a more<br />

sustainable European<br />

transport mix<br />

Emmanuel Desplechin, UNICA


CONfERENCE ThuRsDaY 27 MaY<br />

09.00 paRaLLEL CONfERENCEs<br />

Improved energy efficiency, electri- pellets – the new large energy Energy crops, agricultural<br />

a4 E2<br />

f2<br />

city production and district heating<br />

commodity<br />

residues and by-products D4<br />

Chair. ross Harding, energy launch Partners Chair. niklas engström, neova Ab Chair. lennart ljungblom, bioenergy international Chair. Harry Stokes, gaia Association<br />

GHG-emissions and cost<br />

savings with district<br />

heating in Europe<br />

Peter Rechberger, Aebiom<br />

Business model ontology<br />

for heat entrepreneurship<br />

Helena Puhakka-Tarvainen, North<br />

Karelia University of Applied Science<br />

TopCycle – 55% electric<br />

efficiency from biofuel<br />

Leif R K Nilsson, Euroturbine<br />

The future of biomass - drying<br />

from classical drying to<br />

torrefaction<br />

Ulf Bojner, AB Torkapparater<br />

Advanced Bio CFB<br />

technology for large-scale<br />

power generation of biomass<br />

Timo Jäntti, Foster Wheeler Global<br />

Power<br />

Profitable small scale power<br />

generation from waste heat<br />

and steam<br />

Ingemar Olson, Opcon Energy<br />

Systems<br />

11.00 Coffee<br />

Australian plantation<br />

forestry and wood-biofuel<br />

pellets: Examining the role of<br />

management investment schemes<br />

Philip Peck, Lund University, Sweden<br />

The EN plus certificate –<br />

Striving for uniform pellet<br />

qualities in Europe<br />

Christian Rakos, ProPellets<br />

The residential market<br />

versus the export of industrial<br />

wood pellets in the mid and<br />

long term<br />

Leroy Reitsma, Pinnacle Pellets Inc.<br />

Influencing factors on<br />

the wood pellet price<br />

development on selective<br />

European markets<br />

Christiane Hennig, German<br />

Biomass Research Centre<br />

New insights in ash<br />

melting properties<br />

Jeroen van Soest, Meneba<br />

Torrefaction for biomass<br />

refinement<br />

Anders Nordin, Umeå University<br />

Showing how to create<br />

wealth from Jatropha<br />

Curcas<br />

Ohene Kwadwo Akoto,<br />

Jatropha Africa<br />

Effects of spacing in the<br />

proprieties of the wood<br />

and charcoal of eucalyptus<br />

clones from energetic forests<br />

Laércio Couto, Federal<br />

University of Viçosa (UFV)<br />

Ethanol from tropical<br />

sugar beet; an exciting<br />

new feedstock for Latin America,<br />

Asia and Africa<br />

Jan Örhvall, ANDITEC LTDA and<br />

Chematur Engineering<br />

Future vehicle fuel supply<br />

for agriculture –<br />

case study Sweden<br />

Andras Baky, JTI<br />

Biomethanation of solid<br />

biomass from agro-industries<br />

in India<br />

Dilip Ranade, Agharkar Research<br />

Institute, India<br />

Improve the productivity of<br />

agriculture and the<br />

sustainable development<br />

in Sub Saharan Africa<br />

Ralph Hanmbock Songo, ANCC<br />

Why biomass –<br />

and for what?<br />

Tone Knudsen, Bellona Europa<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> and land use<br />

change – Impacts and<br />

mitigation options<br />

Andrea Egeskog,<br />

Chalmers Technical University<br />

How to verify the<br />

sustainability of biofuels?<br />

Sébastien Haye, Roundtable on<br />

Sustainable Biofuels<br />

Verified sustainable ethanol<br />

Emmi Jozsa, SEKAB<br />

Closing debate on the<br />

sustainability of biofuels.<br />

11.30 - 13.00 fINaL pLENaRY sEssION: sYMphONY Of ThE RENEWaBLEs – a REVOLuTION<br />

Chairperson: Tomas Kåberger, Director General of the Swedish Energy Agency<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> <strong>2010</strong> will close with a panel of representatives from The International Renewable Energy<br />

Alliance (REN Alliance) discussing the future of renewable energy in a global perspective.<br />

The panel will summarise key aspects of the renewable revolution relevant to the technologies they represent and discuss<br />

collectively how the various technologies are working together and can increase collaboration to provide safe, reliable, secure<br />

and clean energy services throughout the world, highlighting examples and case studies.<br />

Panel:<br />

Jan-Olov Dahlenbäck, International Solar Energy Society<br />

Gregory Tracz, International Hydropower Association<br />

Horst Rüter, International Geothermal Association<br />

Kent Nyström, <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association<br />

Stefan Gsänger, <strong>World</strong> Wind Energy Association<br />

13.00 - 15.00 Lunch in Black & White restaurant in Lobby south and Exhibition<br />

15.00 - 18.00 sTuDY VIsITs aND sIDE EVENTs<br />

sustainability of biofuels<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

111


Welcome back to<br />

WORLD<br />

BIOENERGY<br />

2012 29-31 May<br />

29-31 May 2012<br />

JÖNKÖPING, SWEDEN<br />

WWW.WORLDBIOENERGY.COM<br />

Register<br />

your e-mail at<br />

WWW.WORLDBIOENERGY.COM<br />

Keep up to date!


TaKING YOu fROM KNOW-hOW TO shOW-hOW<br />

WWW.WORLDBIOENERGY.COM<br />

WOuLD YOu LIKE<br />

MORE INfORMaTION?<br />

Contact us and we’ll be happy to tell you more.<br />

Svebio office, conference organiser<br />

Tel: +46 8 441 70 80, Fax: +46 8 441 70 89<br />

E-mail: worldbioenergy@svebio.se<br />

Jakob Hirsmark, exhibition manager<br />

Tel: +46 36 15 22 14, Fax: +46 36 16 46 92<br />

Box 6066. SE-550 06 Jönköping, Sweden<br />

Tel +46 36-15 20 00. Fax +46 36-16 46 92<br />

Internet: www.elmia.se<br />

E-mail: jakob.hirsmark@elmia.se<br />

Torsgatan 12. SE-111 23 Stockholm, Sweden<br />

Tel +46 8-441 70 80. Fax +46 8-441 70 89<br />

Internet: www.svebio.se<br />

Cover photo: Ugur Evirgen [istockphoto].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!