09.01.2013 Views

State of Technology Report for Force Main Rehabilitation, Final ...

State of Technology Report for Force Main Rehabilitation, Final ...

State of Technology Report for Force Main Rehabilitation, Final ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

It was reported at the EPA-sponsored International Forum on <strong>Rehabilitation</strong> in Edison, NJ in September<br />

2008 that a new hydrostatic buckling model, with imperfections quantified, is being prepared <strong>for</strong> ASTM<br />

F1216. ASTM F1216 is described below.<br />

5.4.1 Design <strong>of</strong> Pressure Systems. As outlined above, deteriorated pipelines are classified as<br />

either partially or fully deteriorated based on their ability to continue to resist internal pressure and<br />

external load. A partially deteriorated pressure pipe would have some evidence <strong>of</strong> pinhole leaks or<br />

leaking joints, but would be capable <strong>of</strong> withstanding the internal operating pressure and any external loads<br />

(soil, live, and hydrostatic groundwater). In this case, the renewal liner is designed to be a close-fit to the<br />

existing pipe and the hoop tensile stresses are carried by the host pipe. However, the liner is designed to<br />

support any external hydrostatic pressure (only a factor when the line is not under pressure) and to be able<br />

to span over any holes or gaps in the host pipe.<br />

A fully deteriorated pressure pipe is one with large holes or gaps (most probably caused by severe internal<br />

or external corrosion) and is unable to withstand the operating pressure <strong>of</strong> the system. A partially<br />

deteriorated pipe, which is expected to continue to corrode and deteriorate over its remaining design life,<br />

would also be considered a fully deteriorated pressure pipe in terms <strong>of</strong> the design <strong>of</strong> a renewal liner. Here<br />

the renewal liner needs to be designed to carry not only the full internal pressure, but also any external<br />

loads, including soil, live, and hydrostatic groundwater. In essence, the liner is a replacement <strong>for</strong> the<br />

existing pipe.<br />

As is clear from the introduction to this section, Appendix X1 in ASTM F1216 is the most commonly<br />

accepted design method <strong>for</strong> CIPP and de<strong>for</strong>med/re<strong>for</strong>med thermoplastic pipes. It is interesting to note<br />

that the design appendix in ASTM F1216 is not mandatory, so in theory there is no obligation to use this<br />

design method when using CIPP products.<br />

5.4.1.1 Partially Deteriorated Case. In the case <strong>of</strong> a partially deteriorated pipe, two basic equations<br />

are used in the design. The hydrostatic buckling resistance <strong>of</strong> the liner is calculated by the following<br />

<strong>for</strong>mula:<br />

where:<br />

P = groundwater load, psi<br />

K = enhancement factor <strong>of</strong> the soil and existing pipe adjacent to the new pipe (a<br />

minimum value <strong>of</strong> 7 is recommended <strong>for</strong> design)<br />

EL = long-term (time corrected) flexural modulus <strong>of</strong> elasticity <strong>for</strong> the liner, psi<br />

µ = Poisson’s ratio (0.3 assumed)<br />

DR = dimension ratio (diameter/thickness) (D/t)<br />

C = ovality reduction factor<br />

N = factor <strong>of</strong> safety (2.0 is suggested)<br />

The above equation is patterned after the classic Timoshenko elastic buckling <strong>for</strong>mula <strong>for</strong> an infinitely<br />

long cylinder subjected to uni<strong>for</strong>m external hydrostatic pressure. Modifications include the addition <strong>of</strong><br />

the “enhancement factor” K and the ovality reduction factor. The enhancement factor is based mainly on<br />

hydrostatic buckling experiments published by Aggarwal and Cooper (1984) where buckling<br />

enhancement from the existing host pipe could range from 5 to 20 times greater than the free-standing<br />

liner. The ovality factor compensates <strong>for</strong> ovoid pipes and conservatively reduces the liner’s resistance<br />

(refer to ASTM F1216 <strong>for</strong> the equation <strong>for</strong> C).<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!