09.01.2013 Views

State of Technology Report for Force Main Rehabilitation, Final ...

State of Technology Report for Force Main Rehabilitation, Final ...

State of Technology Report for Force Main Rehabilitation, Final ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.1<br />

3.0 RENEWAL PRACTICES AND TECHNOLOGIES<br />

This section covers current utility practices as well as a review <strong>of</strong> existing and emerging renewal<br />

technologies <strong>for</strong> restoring structural and/or flow capacity to a distressed <strong>for</strong>ce main. As shown in<br />

Figure 3-1, the renewal <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>ce mains includes repair, rehabilitation, and replacement. The simplest <strong>for</strong>m<br />

<strong>of</strong> renewal is a spot repair, usually implemented on a reactive basis to a failure. More extensive renewal<br />

technologies are rehabilitation (using the existing fabric <strong>of</strong> the <strong>for</strong>ce main pipe) and replacement<br />

(installing an entirely new independent pipe). This new pipe can be installed <strong>of</strong>fline using a different<br />

line or online using the same line and grade <strong>of</strong> the existing pipe. Both <strong>of</strong>fline and online replacement can<br />

involve trenchless technologies.<br />

Figure 3-1. Renewal Approaches <strong>for</strong> <strong>Force</strong> <strong>Main</strong>s<br />

Current Utility Practices and Market<br />

The estimate <strong>of</strong> renewal works in <strong>for</strong>ce mains are between 250,000 and 600,000 linear feet (76,220 and<br />

182,927 meters) or 0.08% to 0.19% <strong>of</strong> the total length on an annual basis. While this is significantly<br />

less than the proportion <strong>for</strong> gravity sewers, <strong>for</strong>ce mains are in general not as old as gravity sewers, so their<br />

condition may be expected to be better in general.<br />

At this time, both repair and replacement are more widely used than rehabilitation in <strong>for</strong>ce mains. Repair<br />

can be undertaken within a short shutdown period, thus obviating the need <strong>for</strong> by-pass pumping. This is<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten a simple patching <strong>of</strong> a damaged or deteriorated area. On the other hand, replacement requires a<br />

major intervention. From the limited data available, it is estimated that replacement is the preferred<br />

approach <strong>for</strong> most utilities when faced with <strong>for</strong>ce main problems. Replacement comprises between<br />

200,000 and 500,000 linear feet (60,976 and 152,439 meters) <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>ce mains annually or some 0.1% to<br />

0.15% <strong>of</strong> the total length. There are no equivalent data on the frequency <strong>of</strong> repairs <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>ce mains.<br />

The current market <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>ce main rehabilitation is small compared to repair and replacement. No<br />

definitive data are available on the volume <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>ce main rehabilitation since neither the utilities nor the<br />

vendors report this in<strong>for</strong>mation. The best estimate is that between 50,000 and 100,000 linear feet (15,244<br />

and 30,488 meters) <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>ce mains in the US are rehabilitated annually. This represents some 0.02% to<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!