09.01.2013 Views

State of Technology Report for Force Main Rehabilitation, Final ...

State of Technology Report for Force Main Rehabilitation, Final ...

State of Technology Report for Force Main Rehabilitation, Final ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The data in Table 2-1 show clearly that DI and PVC dominate up to 12 inches (300 mm) in diameter.<br />

Over 93% <strong>of</strong> all PVC is in this range. DI is even more dominant in the 14 to 20 inch (350 to 500 mm)<br />

range, followed by CI, and then asbestos cement. It remains the main material in the 21 to 36 inch (525 to<br />

900 mm) range, but PCCP is the next most used material in this range, followed by rein<strong>for</strong>ced concrete<br />

pipe (RCP), and steel. CI and plastics including polyethylene (PE) and PVC are less widespread in this<br />

size range. PCCP is by far the main material used above 36 inches (900 mm) in diameter, with steel also<br />

representing a significant proportion <strong>of</strong> pipe.<br />

2.3<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> System<br />

In contrast to the nation’s water supply and gravity sewer systems, the use <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>ce mains to convey<br />

sewage is relatively recent. As depicted in Figure 2-3, 68% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>for</strong>ce mains in use today have been in<br />

service <strong>for</strong> 25 years or less. Another 30% have been in service between 25 and 50 years and only 2%<br />

beyond 50 years. Other data sources gave similar results in terms <strong>of</strong> the age distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>ce mains.<br />

Typically no more than 2% is greater than 50 years old. This contrasts sharply with the water supply<br />

sector in which the average age <strong>of</strong> water mains in the US is now 45 years with nearly half <strong>of</strong> pipes aged<br />

more than 50 years old.<br />

2.4<br />

<strong>Force</strong> <strong>Main</strong> Location<br />

Figure 2-3. Age <strong>of</strong> <strong>Force</strong> <strong>Main</strong>s (WERF, 2009)<br />

This in<strong>for</strong>mation might be important in evaluating the accessibility to the external surface <strong>of</strong> the pipe. As<br />

shown in Figure 2-4, over 91% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>for</strong>ce main pipes are buried, so access to the exterior surface will<br />

require some <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> excavation. Less than 1% is installed above ground where access would be easier<br />

and less costly to achieve. A slightly larger percentage, approximately 1.2%, is installed sub-aqueously<br />

where access will be the most difficult.<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!