09.01.2013 Views

Retrospective Evaluation of Cured-in-Place Pipe - (NEPIS)(EPA ...

Retrospective Evaluation of Cured-in-Place Pipe - (NEPIS)(EPA ...

Retrospective Evaluation of Cured-in-Place Pipe - (NEPIS)(EPA ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.2.2 Timel<strong>in</strong>e for Fieldwork<br />

Tuesday, April 13, 2010<br />

7:30 AM Contractor’s (Bale) crew began stag<strong>in</strong>g equipment and prepar<strong>in</strong>g the site for the<br />

excavation.<br />

8:00 AM Excavation began on asphalt roadway. The asphalt layer was approximately 4 <strong>in</strong>. thick<br />

with 4 <strong>in</strong>. <strong>of</strong> road base material compacted beneath. The excavation was carried out<br />

between manholes 0233S0013 and 0233S0010, from 254 ft to 264 ft west <strong>of</strong> manhole<br />

0233S0013.<br />

8:05 AM After removal <strong>of</strong> the asphalt pavement, a soil sample was taken at the sub-grade level.<br />

Sample No. 1 was collected and placed <strong>in</strong> a 1 gallon plastic bag. All samples were<br />

collected with a spade shovel and hand loaded <strong>in</strong>to sample conta<strong>in</strong>ers.<br />

8:30 AM Excavation was halted and sample No. 2 was collected from the bottom <strong>of</strong> the trench at a<br />

depth <strong>of</strong> 3 ft.<br />

9:45 AM In-service, 4 <strong>in</strong>. diameter, vitrified clay lateral was encountered. The lateral entered the<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e from the south with a 90° bend. At the connection, concrete was poured to assist<br />

<strong>in</strong> keep<strong>in</strong>g the lateral <strong>in</strong> place at the ma<strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e. No noticeable leak<strong>in</strong>g was detected <strong>in</strong> this<br />

area. There was also a second, <strong>in</strong>active lateral on the north side <strong>of</strong> the excavation.<br />

10:00 AM Excavation encountered crown <strong>of</strong> pipe. Excavation was halted and sample No. 3 was<br />

collected from 6 ft below grade and immediately above the crown <strong>of</strong> the pipe. Sample No.<br />

4 was collected from the side <strong>of</strong> the trench at elevation 5 ft below grade.<br />

10:05 AM Excavation activity entered the area surround<strong>in</strong>g and below the pipe. Formation l consisted<br />

predom<strong>in</strong>antly <strong>of</strong> native shale. Visual observation suggested good compaction around the<br />

pipel<strong>in</strong>e. The bedd<strong>in</strong>g material was undisturbed with a solid beam support and good<br />

support at the spr<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es. Normal condensation was observed around the outside <strong>of</strong> the<br />

clay host pipe. The clay host pipe was <strong>in</strong>stalled with 2 ft jo<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

10:55 AM Sample No. 5 was collected with cont<strong>in</strong>ued hand digg<strong>in</strong>g at the spr<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

pipe.<br />

11:10 AM Sample No. 6 was collected with cont<strong>in</strong>ued hand digg<strong>in</strong>g at the <strong>in</strong>vert <strong>of</strong> the pipe.<br />

Bedd<strong>in</strong>g beneath the <strong>in</strong>vert consisted ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>of</strong> native shale. Traces <strong>of</strong> excess res<strong>in</strong> from<br />

the <strong>in</strong>stallation were observed and a res<strong>in</strong> sample collected for future consideration.<br />

11:30 AM Once the l<strong>in</strong>e was 90% exposed, shims and brac<strong>in</strong>g were used to support the host pipe.<br />

The pipe was lashed to a wooden support structure and layers <strong>of</strong> the shr<strong>in</strong>k wrap material<br />

were applied. Two lift<strong>in</strong>g sl<strong>in</strong>gs were then fitted to the pipe specimen and the excavator. It<br />

should be noted that the host pipe with CIPP was not fully supported several times dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the excavation and removal process, act<strong>in</strong>g as a simple supported beam. One section <strong>of</strong><br />

lateral was damaged dur<strong>in</strong>g excavation and was removed so that the excavation around the<br />

pipe could be completed.<br />

14:00 AM One wastewater sample (Richards-8) was collected for pH and total petroleum<br />

hydrocarbons (TPH) <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g gasol<strong>in</strong>e range organics (GRO) and diesel range organics<br />

(DRO).<br />

14:05 PM Another wastewater sample (Richards-8D) was collected for pH and TPH GRO/DRO.<br />

14:15 PM The shor<strong>in</strong>g box was set and a temporary l<strong>in</strong>e was put <strong>in</strong> place for the lateral that was<br />

removed. Steel plates were placed over the excavation and cold patch around the edges.<br />

15:15 PM Measurements <strong>of</strong> the annular gap between the host pipe and l<strong>in</strong>er were taken us<strong>in</strong>g a feeler<br />

gauge at both ends <strong>of</strong> the specimen and at both ends <strong>of</strong> the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g pipe before the repair<br />

is made.<br />

15:30 PM The construction crew f<strong>in</strong>ished wrapp<strong>in</strong>g the specimen and loaded the specimen <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

bed <strong>of</strong> a truck.<br />

64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!