09.01.2013 Views

Retrospective Evaluation of Cured-in-Place Pipe - (NEPIS)(EPA ...

Retrospective Evaluation of Cured-in-Place Pipe - (NEPIS)(EPA ...

Retrospective Evaluation of Cured-in-Place Pipe - (NEPIS)(EPA ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.3.10 Barcol Hardness<br />

4.3.10.1 Downstream Sample. Seven specimens from the exhumed downstream sample were<br />

subjected to the Barcol test (ASTM D2583). Due to the presence <strong>of</strong> dust and debris on the outer wall <strong>of</strong><br />

the exhumed CIPP slabs (Figure 4-42), a belt sander was used to achieve a smooth surface. The <strong>in</strong>ner<br />

surface <strong>of</strong> each sample was kept unaltered (Figure 4-43). A wooden base was prepared to match the<br />

thickness <strong>of</strong> the specimens, and the Barcol hardness tester (Figure 4-44) was placed on that platform to<br />

conduct the test (Figure 4-45).<br />

Figure 4-42. Orig<strong>in</strong>al Outer Surface<br />

(Denver 48-<strong>in</strong>. Downstream Sample)<br />

Figure 4-44. Barcol Hardness Tester, Tak<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

Measurement<br />

Figure 4-43. Smoothed Outer Surface (Top Row) and<br />

Inner Surface (Bottom Row)<br />

(Denver 48-<strong>in</strong>. Downstream Sample)<br />

59<br />

Figure 4-45. Barcol Hardness Test Setup<br />

For each specimen a total <strong>of</strong> 30 read<strong>in</strong>gs were taken: 15 on the outer surface and 15 on the <strong>in</strong>ner surface.<br />

Similarly to the durometer (Shore D) hardness test, it was found that the measured <strong>in</strong>ner surface hardness<br />

values were lower than those measured on the outer surface.<br />

The average calculated values and their standard deviations are shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 4-46. The weighted<br />

average <strong>of</strong> Barcol hardness for the sample <strong>in</strong>ner surface was calculated to be 16.5 and the weighted error<br />

±1.5, and for the outer surface 29.3 ±1.3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!