09.01.2013 Views

Retrospective Evaluation of Cured-in-Place Pipe - (NEPIS)(EPA ...

Retrospective Evaluation of Cured-in-Place Pipe - (NEPIS)(EPA ...

Retrospective Evaluation of Cured-in-Place Pipe - (NEPIS)(EPA ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

As summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 4-10, the <strong>in</strong>itial thermal program (steps 1-4) was performed to remove any<br />

previous thermal history. The f<strong>in</strong>al heat scan step (step 5) <strong>of</strong> the temperature program was used for<br />

quantification as this scan conta<strong>in</strong>s a known thermal history. The calculated Tg values are summarized <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 4-12.<br />

Table 4-12. Sample Tg Determ<strong>in</strong>ation (Denver 8-<strong>in</strong>. L<strong>in</strong>er)<br />

Sample Run Tg (°C)<br />

Invert 1 122.65<br />

Invert 2 117.52<br />

Crown 1 122.31<br />

Crown 2 119.11<br />

Spr<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e 1 134.63<br />

Spr<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e 2 129.76<br />

Virg<strong>in</strong> Res<strong>in</strong> 1 123.57<br />

Virg<strong>in</strong> Res<strong>in</strong> 2 124.59<br />

The average Tg for the control samples was 124.08°C (+/- 0.72°C) and the average Tg for the field<br />

samples was 124.33°C (+/- 6.57°C) as measured by ASTM Method E1356-08 with DSC. In general, an<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the Tg is a function <strong>of</strong> cur<strong>in</strong>g and represents the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the molecular weight <strong>of</strong> the res<strong>in</strong><br />

system (Perk<strong>in</strong>s-Elmer, 2000). The Tg results suggest a similar level <strong>of</strong> cur<strong>in</strong>g between the virg<strong>in</strong> res<strong>in</strong><br />

(control sample) and the aged material samples, with the field samples exhibit<strong>in</strong>g slightly higher<br />

variability <strong>in</strong> Tg values from the spr<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e to <strong>in</strong>vert.<br />

4.2.17 CCTV Inspection <strong>of</strong> Area Sewers for Denver 8-<strong>in</strong>. Site. The City <strong>of</strong> Denver ordered<br />

CCTV scans <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> the area from which the sample was retrieved. Also, historical ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />

reports <strong>of</strong> these l<strong>in</strong>es were requested. A total <strong>of</strong> nearly 5,800 ft <strong>of</strong> sewer l<strong>in</strong>e was imaged <strong>in</strong> the period<br />

September 24-28, 2009. A prelim<strong>in</strong>ary review <strong>of</strong> the CCTV reports suggested that the l<strong>in</strong>er is <strong>in</strong> good<br />

condition overall. Several tap break-<strong>in</strong> defects were noted as well as l<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g failure at undercut<br />

connections, which could allow for root <strong>in</strong>trusion between the lateral outer wall and the l<strong>in</strong>er cover<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

<strong>in</strong>terior <strong>of</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> pipe. This could be attributed to the robotic cutters used by the <strong>in</strong>dustry 25 years ago,<br />

which were far less sophisticated and accurate than the units used today. Some <strong>of</strong> the images reveal root<br />

<strong>in</strong>trusion via tap connections, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a partial blockage <strong>of</strong> the sewer l<strong>in</strong>e, but the l<strong>in</strong>er itself appears<br />

to be <strong>in</strong>tact <strong>in</strong> these images. On the l<strong>in</strong>e stretch <strong>in</strong> the alley between Garfield Street and Jackson Street<br />

(between 3 rd and 4 th Avenues), at cha<strong>in</strong>age 212.6 ft, there is what appears to be a l<strong>in</strong>er failure <strong>in</strong> the<br />

vic<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>of</strong> a tap break <strong>in</strong>. Another l<strong>in</strong>er failure was found at the alley between Jackson Street and<br />

Garfield Street, from the first manhole north to the first manhole south to 1 st Avenue. At cha<strong>in</strong>age 20.8 ft,<br />

a bulge was found at the <strong>in</strong>vert <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>er that prevented further advancement <strong>of</strong> the CCTV equipment.<br />

A third l<strong>in</strong>er failure location was identified <strong>in</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>e runn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the alley between Jackson and Harrison<br />

Streets, as it crosses 3 rd Avenue, at cha<strong>in</strong>age 239.8 ft. This l<strong>in</strong>er failure appears to be attributed to<br />

improper restoration <strong>of</strong> a nearby lateral connection. A significant portion <strong>of</strong> the polyurethane coat<strong>in</strong>g was<br />

hydrolyzed along this l<strong>in</strong>e. A l<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g failure attributed to a connection cut shift was noted at 2 nd Avenue<br />

and Jackson Street. Similar occurrences <strong>of</strong> a l<strong>in</strong>er connection cut shift were noted on a couple <strong>of</strong> other<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es. A location where the l<strong>in</strong>er appears to be detached from the host pipe was located at cha<strong>in</strong>age 39 ft,<br />

<strong>in</strong> the alley between 3 rd Avenue and Garfield Street.<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!