Figure 4-9. L<strong>in</strong>er Specimens - Bend<strong>in</strong>g (Left) and Tensile (Right) (Denver 8-<strong>in</strong>. L<strong>in</strong>er) Table 4-6. Mark<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Specimens (Denver 8-<strong>in</strong>. L<strong>in</strong>er) Location Sample ID From the crown Crown 1; Crown 2; Crown 3 From the spr<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e SL 1; SL 2; SL 3 From the <strong>in</strong>vert Invert 1; Invert 2; Invert 3 Figure 4-10. Flexural Test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Accordance with ASTM D790 Figure 4-11. Tensile Test<strong>in</strong>g Specimens Before (Left) and After the Test (Right)
Table 4-7. Results from Flexural Test<strong>in</strong>g (Denver 8-<strong>in</strong>. L<strong>in</strong>er) Location Peak load Peak bend<strong>in</strong>g stress Peak shear stress Flexural modulus on pipe (lb) (psi) (psi) (psi) Crown 1 36.63 6,316 251 331,269 Crown 2 39.24 6,329 254 310,634 Crown 3 36.95 6,718 271 347,401 Average - 6,454±228 259±11 329,768±18,429 SL 1 29.00 6,170 243 322,611 SL 2 33.62 7,309 275 359,245 SL 3 31.29 6,657 264 338,276 Average - 6,712±571 260±16 340,044±18,381 Invert 1 33.29 7,083 283 319,351 Invert 2 32.06 6,412 256 325,894 Invert 3 36.73 7,815 308 363,382 Average - 7,103±702 282±26 336,209±23,759 Overall Average - 6,756±546 267±20 335,340±18,186 Table 4-8. Results from Tensile Test<strong>in</strong>g (Denver 8-<strong>in</strong>. L<strong>in</strong>er) Area Peak Load Peak Stress Mod. E Location on <strong>Pipe</strong> (<strong>in</strong>. 2 ) (lb) (psi) (psi) Crown 1 0.1327 430.47 3,244 405,111 Crown 2 0.1344 417.85 3,109 479,861 Crown 3 0.1351 376.52 2,787 350,396 Average - 3,047±235 411,789±64,990 SL 1 0.1607 447.55 2,785 401,369 SL 2 0.1437 459.14 3,195 400,884 SL 3 0.1462 437.34 2,991 400,954 Average - 2,990±205 401,069±262 Invert 1 0.1325 407.38 3,075 389,787 Invert 2 0.1452 465.17 3,204 473,405 Invert 3 0.1493 428.88 2,873 402,825 Average - - 3,051±167 422,006±44,988 Overall average - - 3,029±179 411,621±40,548 33
- Page 1 and 2: EPA/600/R-12/004 | January 2012 | w
- Page 3 and 4: DISCLAIMER The work reported in thi
- Page 5 and 6: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report has bee
- Page 7 and 8: samples had a flexural modulus valu
- Page 9 and 10: CONTENTS DISCLAIMER ...............
- Page 11 and 12: 4.3.10.2 Upstream Sample ..........
- Page 13 and 14: 9.2.2 Recommendations for Developme
- Page 15 and 16: Figure 5-27. Raman Spectra for the
- Page 17 and 18: ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AMP Asse
- Page 19 and 20: 1.0: INTRODUCTION This report forms
- Page 21 and 22: 1.2 Organization of the Report Foll
- Page 23 and 24: Some sections of a sewer system may
- Page 25 and 26: • The depth of the pipe below the
- Page 27 and 28: Figure 2-3 highlights the main diff
- Page 29 and 30: The most commonly used resins are i
- Page 31 and 32: the glass fiber. The tube, which is
- Page 33 and 34: 3.0: DEVELOPMENT OF CIPP EVALUATION
- Page 35 and 36: • The municipality would be willi
- Page 37 and 38: • Measurements and/or physical sa
- Page 39 and 40: Table 3-3. Laboratory Evaluation an
- Page 41 and 42: 4.1 Introduction 4.0: CITY OF DENVE
- Page 43 and 44: Figure 4-1. Images of the Recovered
- Page 45 and 46: Sample ID Figure 4-4. Soil Grain Si
- Page 47 and 48: Location Table 4-5. Denver 8-in. Li
- Page 49: Profile Plot Red - Steel tube Green
- Page 53 and 54: 35 Table 4-9. Comparison of Test Da
- Page 55 and 56: 4.2.12 Buckling Test. A steel mecha
- Page 57 and 58: Figure 4-18. Pressure Gage and Pres
- Page 59 and 60: 4.2.13 Shore D Hardness. Durometer
- Page 61 and 62: Figure 4-24. Barcol Hardness Readin
- Page 63 and 64: increases and the heat of cure decr
- Page 65 and 66: In summary, CCTV inspection of thre
- Page 67 and 68: Figure 4-28. Thickness for Denver 4
- Page 69 and 70: 4.3.6.2 Downstream Sample. Seven sp
- Page 71 and 72: Figure 4-34. Flexural Stress-Strain
- Page 73 and 74: Table 4-18. Flexural Test Results f
- Page 75 and 76: 4.3.8.2 Upstream Sample. Specimens
- Page 77 and 78: 4.3.10 Barcol Hardness 4.3.10.1 Dow
- Page 79 and 80: 4.3.11.2 Downstream Sample. The Ram
- Page 81 and 82: 5.1 Introduction 5.0: CITY OF COLUM
- Page 83 and 84: April 16, 2010 The specimen was rec
- Page 85 and 86: The resulting gradation curves are
- Page 87 and 88: Table 5-4. Soil pH at Designated Lo
- Page 89 and 90: Figure 5-8. Average Thickness at Di
- Page 91 and 92: 5.2.12 Flexural Testing. Specimens
- Page 93 and 94: Figure 5-14. Flexural Stress-Strain
- Page 95 and 96: Figure 5-16. Tensile Stress-Strain
- Page 97 and 98: 5.2.15 Buckling Test. A mechanical
- Page 99 and 100: Figure 5-24. Localized Leak on the
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure 5-26. Barcol Hardness Readin
- Page 103 and 104:
5.3.3 Visual Inspection of Liner. I
- Page 105 and 106:
Figure 5-32. Ultrasonic Testing for
- Page 107 and 108:
Table 5-13. Geometric Data for Flex
- Page 109 and 110:
Figure 5-38. Shore D Hardness of Co
- Page 111 and 112:
6.1 Introduction 6.0: REVIEW AND CO
- Page 113 and 114:
Overall, the liners appear to be ho
- Page 115 and 116:
age difference between the liners i
- Page 117 and 118:
Looking for correlations to the low
- Page 119 and 120:
A significantly lower range of Shor
- Page 121 and 122:
7.0: RECOMMENDED TEST PROTOCOL FOR
- Page 123 and 124:
combining this broadly available in
- Page 125 and 126:
Table 7-3. Overall Structure for a
- Page 127 and 128:
Table 8-2. CIPP and Other Rehabilit
- Page 129 and 130:
Table 8-5. Rehabilitation Specifica
- Page 131 and 132:
113 Table 8-9. Process Verification
- Page 133 and 134:
Göttingen Stadtentwässerung: Göt
- Page 135 and 136:
experience and quality, and do not
- Page 137 and 138:
km of pipe and 50-year-old pipes ar
- Page 139 and 140:
methods are detailed in the Guide t
- Page 141 and 142:
The business of pipeline rehabilita
- Page 143 and 144:
• Destructive testing (but will n
- Page 145 and 146:
In Denver, in CCTV inspections of n
- Page 147 and 148:
9.2 Recommendations for Future Work
- Page 149 and 150:
Falter, B. 1996. “Structural Anal
- Page 151 and 152:
Lehmann, M.A, J.P. Schroeder and C.
- Page 153 and 154:
APPENDIX A LIST OF TEST STANDARDS R
- Page 155 and 156:
The following table lists the non-A
- Page 157 and 158:
B.1 Introduction This study was con
- Page 159 and 160:
Mean thickness values for each cont
- Page 161 and 162:
APPENDIX C INTERNATIONAL STUDY INTE
- Page 163 and 164:
The original Insituform liner insta
- Page 165 and 166:
However, the figures published by O
- Page 167 and 168:
exfiltration and infiltration. Any
- Page 169 and 170:
STW uses CIPP for virtually all of
- Page 171 and 172:
method. Top hat repairs to junction
- Page 173 and 174:
All design and construction supervi
- Page 175 and 176:
Process verification test samples a
- Page 177 and 178:
consultant born out of the corporat
- Page 179 and 180:
BW continues to use CIPP, mainly in
- Page 181 and 182:
East, but has not yet had marked su
- Page 183 and 184:
D-1
- Page 185 and 186:
D-3
- Page 187 and 188:
D-5
- Page 189 and 190:
D-7
- Page 191 and 192:
D-9
- Page 193 and 194:
D-11
- Page 195 and 196:
D-13
- Page 197 and 198:
D-15
- Page 199 and 200:
D-17
- Page 201 and 202:
D-19
- Page 203 and 204:
D-21
- Page 205 and 206:
D-23
- Page 207 and 208:
D-25
- Page 209 and 210:
D-27
- Page 211 and 212:
D-29
- Page 213 and 214:
D-31
- Page 215 and 216:
D-33
- Page 217 and 218:
D-35
- Page 219 and 220:
D-37
- Page 221 and 222:
D-39
- Page 223 and 224:
D-41
- Page 225 and 226:
D-43
- Page 227 and 228:
D-45
- Page 229 and 230:
D-47
- Page 231 and 232:
D-49