09.01.2013 Views

Retrospective Evaluation of Cured-in-Place Pipe - (NEPIS)(EPA ...

Retrospective Evaluation of Cured-in-Place Pipe - (NEPIS)(EPA ...

Retrospective Evaluation of Cured-in-Place Pipe - (NEPIS)(EPA ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.2.4 Locations <strong>of</strong> Soil Samples. The trench was divided <strong>in</strong>to six regions (Figure 4-3) for soil<br />

sampl<strong>in</strong>g. Soil samples collected from each region were placed <strong>in</strong> airtight bags to avoid foreign<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ation and/or loss <strong>of</strong> moisture. The samples were numbered as shown <strong>in</strong> Table 4-1.<br />

Figure 4-3. Location <strong>of</strong><br />

Soil Sample Collection<br />

<strong>Place</strong> (Denver 8-<strong>in</strong>. Site)<br />

Table 4-1. Designation <strong>of</strong> Collected Soil Samples for<br />

Denver 8-<strong>in</strong>. Site<br />

Soil Sample Location Sample ID<br />

Sub-grade 1<br />

2 ft below sub-grade 2<br />

4 ft below sub-grade 3<br />

Just above crown 4<br />

Bedd<strong>in</strong>g along the spr<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e 5<br />

Bedd<strong>in</strong>g under the <strong>in</strong>vert 6<br />

4.2.5 Analysis <strong>of</strong> Soil Samples. Standard test methods ASTM C136 and ASTM C128 were<br />

followed to classify the soil and determ<strong>in</strong>e its particle size distribution. In addition to those tests, the pH<br />

<strong>of</strong> the soil samples was measured us<strong>in</strong>g a pH meter.<br />

4.2.5.1 Particle Size Distribution. ASTM C136, a standard test<strong>in</strong>g method used for perform<strong>in</strong>g sieve<br />

analysis on geological material, was followed for the particle size distribution analysis. Based on visual<br />

<strong>in</strong>spection, soil samples were categorized as f<strong>in</strong>e aggregates. For this analysis, 500 g <strong>of</strong> soil material was<br />

taken from each <strong>of</strong> the six soil samples and placed on a No. 4 sieve. For all samples, more than 90% <strong>of</strong><br />

the particles passed through a No. 4 (4.76 mm) sieve, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the analysis procedure for f<strong>in</strong>e<br />

aggregates should be followed. The result<strong>in</strong>g gradation curves are shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 4-4.<br />

Based on gra<strong>in</strong> size distribution, both the backfill and bedd<strong>in</strong>g soils can be considered to be sandy soils.<br />

The steep slopes <strong>of</strong> the result<strong>in</strong>g gradation curves for the samples taken from the spr<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e and <strong>in</strong>vert<br />

elevations suggest that the bedd<strong>in</strong>g material consists <strong>of</strong> uniform (poorly-graded) soil. For the other<br />

locations, the gradation <strong>of</strong> soil was determ<strong>in</strong>ed to be a fair-graded material. Review <strong>of</strong> bore logs collected<br />

as part <strong>of</strong> utility construction projects performed <strong>in</strong> nearby areas revealed that the native soil <strong>in</strong> the top 5<br />

ft consist <strong>of</strong> sandy-silt underly<strong>in</strong>g by gravelly sand (between 5 ft and 12 ft).<br />

4.2.5.2 Soil Specific Gravity and Absorption. ASTM C128 standard method was used to calculate<br />

the density, relative density, and absorption <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>e aggregates. Soil material weigh<strong>in</strong>g 500 g was taken<br />

from each <strong>of</strong> the six samples for the needed tests. The results are listed <strong>in</strong> Table 4-2.<br />

4.2.5.3 Soil Moisture Content. ASTM D2216 is a test method used to determ<strong>in</strong>e the moisture<br />

content <strong>in</strong> soils and rocks by mass. Samples weigh<strong>in</strong>g 1,000 g from each <strong>of</strong> the six locations were placed<br />

<strong>in</strong> an oven for a period <strong>of</strong> 24 hr. After 24 hr, the soil samples were weighed and returned to the oven for<br />

an additional 24 hr period. The process was repeated until the difference between two subsequent<br />

measured weights was less than 1 g. At this po<strong>in</strong>t the soil was assumed to be moisture free. Moisture<br />

content values for the six soil samples are listed <strong>in</strong> Table 4-3.<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!