09.01.2013 Views

Retrospective Evaluation of Cured-in-Place Pipe - (NEPIS)(EPA ...

Retrospective Evaluation of Cured-in-Place Pipe - (NEPIS)(EPA ...

Retrospective Evaluation of Cured-in-Place Pipe - (NEPIS)(EPA ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

impregnated with res<strong>in</strong> and still handled easily prior to <strong>in</strong>stallation. When the l<strong>in</strong>er is <strong>in</strong>verted, this<br />

seal<strong>in</strong>g layer becomes the <strong>in</strong>ner surface <strong>of</strong> the CIPP l<strong>in</strong>er. The uncured res<strong>in</strong> can then flow <strong>in</strong>to cracks<br />

and open<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the host pipe to lock the l<strong>in</strong>er <strong>in</strong> place. For structural purposes, a small amount <strong>of</strong> excess<br />

res<strong>in</strong> ensures that sufficient res<strong>in</strong> is available to give the required l<strong>in</strong>er thickness. However, too much<br />

res<strong>in</strong> can cause problems such as block<strong>in</strong>g sewer laterals. A second advantage <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>version approach<br />

is that the l<strong>in</strong>er is not dragged, relative to the host pipe, as it is <strong>in</strong>stalled; rather, the l<strong>in</strong>er unfurls itself<br />

along the pipe, seal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>f <strong>in</strong>filtration and displac<strong>in</strong>g stand<strong>in</strong>g water <strong>in</strong> the pipe as it moves along the pipe<br />

as well as reduc<strong>in</strong>g the potential for physical damage to the l<strong>in</strong>er. In early CIPP <strong>in</strong>stallations, the coat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

layer was a sacrificial polyurethane layer expected to hydrolyze over time. Today, more permanent<br />

coat<strong>in</strong>g layers are used – either a different polyurethane (PU) layer or a polyethylene (PE) layer. A future<br />

area <strong>of</strong> research could be the performance <strong>of</strong> the PU/PE layers dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stallation and over the long term.<br />

Variations <strong>of</strong> each method (<strong>in</strong>version or pull-<strong>in</strong>-and-<strong>in</strong>flate) are used, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the circumstances.<br />

For example, a PE tube, or a separate layer <strong>of</strong> coated felt, can first be <strong>in</strong>verted <strong>in</strong>to the host pipe as a<br />

“prel<strong>in</strong>er” and then the actual l<strong>in</strong>er <strong>in</strong>verted <strong>in</strong>side the first tube. This will elim<strong>in</strong>ate concern about res<strong>in</strong><br />

washout if high groundwater <strong>in</strong>flows are present.<br />

2.2.4 Tube Construction. Initially the CIPP tube (also called “bag”) construction was made <strong>of</strong> a<br />

needled polyester felt and served only as a carrier for the res<strong>in</strong>. In this construction, the res<strong>in</strong> is the<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ant contributor to the mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> the system. Other forms <strong>of</strong> tube construction<br />

entered the marketplace <strong>in</strong> the U.S. dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1990s. These may <strong>in</strong>volve the <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>of</strong> re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

materials such as fiberglass, aramid fibers or carbon fibers <strong>in</strong> some configuration. The re<strong>in</strong>forcement may<br />

be positioned at selected po<strong>in</strong>ts with<strong>in</strong> the thickness <strong>of</strong> the tube wall or the wall may consist primarily <strong>of</strong><br />

braided re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g layer(s) (Rahaim, 2009).<br />

Re<strong>in</strong>forced tube construction has been <strong>in</strong> use <strong>in</strong> Europe for longer than <strong>in</strong> the U.S. and allows the<br />

designer/contractor to design a th<strong>in</strong>ner CIPP l<strong>in</strong>er and one with a wider range <strong>of</strong> application. The<br />

re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g layers with<strong>in</strong> the res<strong>in</strong> become a significant contributor to the mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> the<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ished l<strong>in</strong>er. This leads to a more complex mechanical behavior <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>er and the reduced thicknesses<br />

are more susceptible to the effects <strong>of</strong> host pipe and l<strong>in</strong>er imperfections on the structural analysis. Studies<br />

<strong>of</strong> new composite tube materials can be found (e.g., Ak<strong>in</strong>ci et al. [2010]).<br />

L<strong>in</strong>er thicknesses may vary from around 0.12 <strong>in</strong>. (3 mm) <strong>in</strong> small-diameter shallow pipes to over 2 <strong>in</strong>. (50<br />

mm) <strong>in</strong> large-diameter deep pipes. In the construction plann<strong>in</strong>g for the CIPP project, consideration needs<br />

to be given to the forces that will be exerted on the tube dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>stallation process. For the <strong>in</strong>version<br />

process, sufficient pressures must be exerted to allow the l<strong>in</strong>er to “<strong>in</strong>vert”. For the pull-<strong>in</strong> process, the<br />

l<strong>in</strong>er tube construction must provide sufficient tensile strength for the pull-<strong>in</strong> and resistance to damage or<br />

tear<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>sertion. L<strong>in</strong>ers to be <strong>in</strong>stalled on steep-gradient pipes pose particular challenges for<br />

water <strong>in</strong>version and cur<strong>in</strong>g because sufficient pressure must be available at the upper end <strong>of</strong> the pipe to<br />

allow the <strong>in</strong>version to occur, but the pressure at the lower end <strong>of</strong> the pipe must not be so high as to cause<br />

l<strong>in</strong>er tear<strong>in</strong>g or excessive th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g. In design<strong>in</strong>g the tube thickness, consideration needs to be given to the<br />

maximum pressure exerted on the l<strong>in</strong>er as it cures so that the f<strong>in</strong>al thickness <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>er meets the project<br />

specifications. The contractor or supplier calculates these parameters based on the site <strong>in</strong>formation and<br />

planned <strong>in</strong>stallation procedures.<br />

2.2.5 Choice <strong>of</strong> Res<strong>in</strong>s for CIPP. The follow<strong>in</strong>g discussion <strong>of</strong> res<strong>in</strong> chemistries is summarized<br />

from a paper on “Res<strong>in</strong> Choices for <strong>Cured</strong>-<strong>in</strong>-<strong>Place</strong> <strong>Pipe</strong> Applications” by Rose and J<strong>in</strong> (2006).<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Rose and J<strong>in</strong> (2006), there are three ma<strong>in</strong> chemistries <strong>of</strong> thermoset res<strong>in</strong>s that are wellsuited<br />

for use <strong>in</strong> CIPP applications. These are polyester, v<strong>in</strong>yl ester, and epoxy res<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!