Retrospective Evaluation of Cured-in-Place Pipe - (NEPIS)(EPA ...
Retrospective Evaluation of Cured-in-Place Pipe - (NEPIS)(EPA ...
Retrospective Evaluation of Cured-in-Place Pipe - (NEPIS)(EPA ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
impregnated with res<strong>in</strong> and still handled easily prior to <strong>in</strong>stallation. When the l<strong>in</strong>er is <strong>in</strong>verted, this<br />
seal<strong>in</strong>g layer becomes the <strong>in</strong>ner surface <strong>of</strong> the CIPP l<strong>in</strong>er. The uncured res<strong>in</strong> can then flow <strong>in</strong>to cracks<br />
and open<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the host pipe to lock the l<strong>in</strong>er <strong>in</strong> place. For structural purposes, a small amount <strong>of</strong> excess<br />
res<strong>in</strong> ensures that sufficient res<strong>in</strong> is available to give the required l<strong>in</strong>er thickness. However, too much<br />
res<strong>in</strong> can cause problems such as block<strong>in</strong>g sewer laterals. A second advantage <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>version approach<br />
is that the l<strong>in</strong>er is not dragged, relative to the host pipe, as it is <strong>in</strong>stalled; rather, the l<strong>in</strong>er unfurls itself<br />
along the pipe, seal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>f <strong>in</strong>filtration and displac<strong>in</strong>g stand<strong>in</strong>g water <strong>in</strong> the pipe as it moves along the pipe<br />
as well as reduc<strong>in</strong>g the potential for physical damage to the l<strong>in</strong>er. In early CIPP <strong>in</strong>stallations, the coat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
layer was a sacrificial polyurethane layer expected to hydrolyze over time. Today, more permanent<br />
coat<strong>in</strong>g layers are used – either a different polyurethane (PU) layer or a polyethylene (PE) layer. A future<br />
area <strong>of</strong> research could be the performance <strong>of</strong> the PU/PE layers dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stallation and over the long term.<br />
Variations <strong>of</strong> each method (<strong>in</strong>version or pull-<strong>in</strong>-and-<strong>in</strong>flate) are used, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the circumstances.<br />
For example, a PE tube, or a separate layer <strong>of</strong> coated felt, can first be <strong>in</strong>verted <strong>in</strong>to the host pipe as a<br />
“prel<strong>in</strong>er” and then the actual l<strong>in</strong>er <strong>in</strong>verted <strong>in</strong>side the first tube. This will elim<strong>in</strong>ate concern about res<strong>in</strong><br />
washout if high groundwater <strong>in</strong>flows are present.<br />
2.2.4 Tube Construction. Initially the CIPP tube (also called “bag”) construction was made <strong>of</strong> a<br />
needled polyester felt and served only as a carrier for the res<strong>in</strong>. In this construction, the res<strong>in</strong> is the<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant contributor to the mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> the system. Other forms <strong>of</strong> tube construction<br />
entered the marketplace <strong>in</strong> the U.S. dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1990s. These may <strong>in</strong>volve the <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>of</strong> re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
materials such as fiberglass, aramid fibers or carbon fibers <strong>in</strong> some configuration. The re<strong>in</strong>forcement may<br />
be positioned at selected po<strong>in</strong>ts with<strong>in</strong> the thickness <strong>of</strong> the tube wall or the wall may consist primarily <strong>of</strong><br />
braided re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g layer(s) (Rahaim, 2009).<br />
Re<strong>in</strong>forced tube construction has been <strong>in</strong> use <strong>in</strong> Europe for longer than <strong>in</strong> the U.S. and allows the<br />
designer/contractor to design a th<strong>in</strong>ner CIPP l<strong>in</strong>er and one with a wider range <strong>of</strong> application. The<br />
re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g layers with<strong>in</strong> the res<strong>in</strong> become a significant contributor to the mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> the<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ished l<strong>in</strong>er. This leads to a more complex mechanical behavior <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>er and the reduced thicknesses<br />
are more susceptible to the effects <strong>of</strong> host pipe and l<strong>in</strong>er imperfections on the structural analysis. Studies<br />
<strong>of</strong> new composite tube materials can be found (e.g., Ak<strong>in</strong>ci et al. [2010]).<br />
L<strong>in</strong>er thicknesses may vary from around 0.12 <strong>in</strong>. (3 mm) <strong>in</strong> small-diameter shallow pipes to over 2 <strong>in</strong>. (50<br />
mm) <strong>in</strong> large-diameter deep pipes. In the construction plann<strong>in</strong>g for the CIPP project, consideration needs<br />
to be given to the forces that will be exerted on the tube dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>stallation process. For the <strong>in</strong>version<br />
process, sufficient pressures must be exerted to allow the l<strong>in</strong>er to “<strong>in</strong>vert”. For the pull-<strong>in</strong> process, the<br />
l<strong>in</strong>er tube construction must provide sufficient tensile strength for the pull-<strong>in</strong> and resistance to damage or<br />
tear<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>sertion. L<strong>in</strong>ers to be <strong>in</strong>stalled on steep-gradient pipes pose particular challenges for<br />
water <strong>in</strong>version and cur<strong>in</strong>g because sufficient pressure must be available at the upper end <strong>of</strong> the pipe to<br />
allow the <strong>in</strong>version to occur, but the pressure at the lower end <strong>of</strong> the pipe must not be so high as to cause<br />
l<strong>in</strong>er tear<strong>in</strong>g or excessive th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g. In design<strong>in</strong>g the tube thickness, consideration needs to be given to the<br />
maximum pressure exerted on the l<strong>in</strong>er as it cures so that the f<strong>in</strong>al thickness <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>er meets the project<br />
specifications. The contractor or supplier calculates these parameters based on the site <strong>in</strong>formation and<br />
planned <strong>in</strong>stallation procedures.<br />
2.2.5 Choice <strong>of</strong> Res<strong>in</strong>s for CIPP. The follow<strong>in</strong>g discussion <strong>of</strong> res<strong>in</strong> chemistries is summarized<br />
from a paper on “Res<strong>in</strong> Choices for <strong>Cured</strong>-<strong>in</strong>-<strong>Place</strong> <strong>Pipe</strong> Applications” by Rose and J<strong>in</strong> (2006).<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Rose and J<strong>in</strong> (2006), there are three ma<strong>in</strong> chemistries <strong>of</strong> thermoset res<strong>in</strong>s that are wellsuited<br />
for use <strong>in</strong> CIPP applications. These are polyester, v<strong>in</strong>yl ester, and epoxy res<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
10