Sever, V., G. Boyd, and R. Bakeer. 2005. “Oxidative Chemical Effects on CIPP L<strong>in</strong>ers,” Proc. NASTT No-Dig Conf., Orlando FL, Apr 24-27. Spasojevic, A., R. Mair and J. Gumbel 2004. “Experimental studies <strong>of</strong> soil load transfer to flexible sewer l<strong>in</strong>ers: Latest results and implications for design,” ASCE <strong>Pipe</strong>l<strong>in</strong>e Division Specialty Congress - <strong>Pipe</strong>l<strong>in</strong>es 2004 - What's on the Horizon, pp. 417-427, Am. Soc. Civil Engrs., Reston VA. Spasojevic, A., R. Mair and J. Gumbel. 2007. “Centrifuge Model<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the Effects <strong>of</strong> Soil Load<strong>in</strong>g on Flexible Sewer L<strong>in</strong>ers,” Geotechnique, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 331-34, Thomas Telford Serv., UK. Sterl<strong>in</strong>g, R., J. Simicevic, E. Allouche, W. Condit, and L. Wang, 2010. State <strong>of</strong> Technology for Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> Wastewater Collection Systems. <strong>EPA</strong>/600/R-10/078. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office <strong>of</strong> Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory - Water Supply and Water Resources Division, Edison NJ. July. www.epa.gov/nrmrl/pubs/600r10078/600r10078.pdf Sterl<strong>in</strong>g, R., L. Wang, and R. Morrison. 2009. Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> Wastewater Collection and Water Distribution Systems - State <strong>of</strong> Technology Review Report. <strong>EPA</strong>/600/R-09/048. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office <strong>of</strong> Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory - Water Supply and Water Resources Division, Edison NJ. May. www.epa.gov/nrmrl/pubs/600r09048/600r09048.pdf Straughan, W. T., L.K. Guice, and C., Mal-Duraipandian. 1995. "Long-Term Structural Behavior <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pipe</strong>l<strong>in</strong>e Rehabilitation Systems," ASCE Journal <strong>of</strong> Infrastructure Systems, December. Straughan, W.T., N. Tantirungrojchai, L.K. Guice, and H. L<strong>in</strong>. 1998. “Creep Test <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cured</strong>-<strong>in</strong>-<strong>Place</strong> <strong>Pipe</strong> Material Under Tension, Compression and Bend<strong>in</strong>g, J. Test. and Eval., Vol. 26, No. 6, Nov. Thépot, O. 2003. “The Design <strong>of</strong> Non-Circular L<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gs,” Proc. <strong>Pipe</strong>l<strong>in</strong>e Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and Construction Conf., Jul 13-16, pp. 1059-1068, Am. Soc. Civil Engrs., Reston VA. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (<strong>EPA</strong>). 2002. The Clean Water and Dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Water Infrastructure Gap Analysis, Office <strong>of</strong> Water. <strong>EPA</strong>-816-R-02-020. September. Yoshimura, H., J. Tohda, Y. Inoue and A. Ohsugi. 2006. “Response <strong>of</strong> Sewer Concrete <strong>Pipe</strong>s Rehabilitated by CIPP through Two-Edge Load<strong>in</strong>g Tests,” Proc. 6th Intl. Conf. on Physical Model<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Geotechnics, Vol. 2, pp. 1587-1592. Zhao, Q., R. Nassar, and D.E. Hall. 2001. "Numerical Simulation <strong>of</strong> Creep-Induced Buckl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Th<strong>in</strong> Walled <strong>Pipe</strong> L<strong>in</strong>ers," Journal <strong>of</strong> Pressure Vessel Technology, Vol. 123, August, pp. 373-380. Zhao, W., R. Nassar, R. and D.E. Hall. 2005. "Design and Reliability <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pipe</strong>l<strong>in</strong>e Rehabilitation L<strong>in</strong>ers," Tunnel<strong>in</strong>g and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 20, pp. 203-212. Zhao, W. and G. Whittle. 2008. “L<strong>in</strong>er Long-Term Performance Life Prediction us<strong>in</strong>g Critical Buckl<strong>in</strong>g Stra<strong>in</strong>,” Proc. NASTT No-Dig Conf., Dallas, Apr 27-May 2. Zhu, M. and D.E. Hall. 2001. "Creep Induced Contact and Stress Evolution <strong>in</strong> Th<strong>in</strong>-Walled <strong>Pipe</strong> L<strong>in</strong>ers," Th<strong>in</strong> Walled Structures, Vol. 39, pp. 939-959. 134
APPENDIX A LIST OF TEST STANDARDS REFERENCED
- Page 1 and 2:
EPA/600/R-12/004 | January 2012 | w
- Page 3 and 4:
DISCLAIMER The work reported in thi
- Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report has bee
- Page 7 and 8:
samples had a flexural modulus valu
- Page 9 and 10:
CONTENTS DISCLAIMER ...............
- Page 11 and 12:
4.3.10.2 Upstream Sample ..........
- Page 13 and 14:
9.2.2 Recommendations for Developme
- Page 15 and 16:
Figure 5-27. Raman Spectra for the
- Page 17 and 18:
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AMP Asse
- Page 19 and 20:
1.0: INTRODUCTION This report forms
- Page 21 and 22:
1.2 Organization of the Report Foll
- Page 23 and 24:
Some sections of a sewer system may
- Page 25 and 26:
• The depth of the pipe below the
- Page 27 and 28:
Figure 2-3 highlights the main diff
- Page 29 and 30:
The most commonly used resins are i
- Page 31 and 32:
the glass fiber. The tube, which is
- Page 33 and 34:
3.0: DEVELOPMENT OF CIPP EVALUATION
- Page 35 and 36:
• The municipality would be willi
- Page 37 and 38:
• Measurements and/or physical sa
- Page 39 and 40:
Table 3-3. Laboratory Evaluation an
- Page 41 and 42:
4.1 Introduction 4.0: CITY OF DENVE
- Page 43 and 44:
Figure 4-1. Images of the Recovered
- Page 45 and 46:
Sample ID Figure 4-4. Soil Grain Si
- Page 47 and 48:
Location Table 4-5. Denver 8-in. Li
- Page 49 and 50:
Profile Plot Red - Steel tube Green
- Page 51 and 52:
Table 4-7. Results from Flexural Te
- Page 53 and 54:
35 Table 4-9. Comparison of Test Da
- Page 55 and 56:
4.2.12 Buckling Test. A steel mecha
- Page 57 and 58:
Figure 4-18. Pressure Gage and Pres
- Page 59 and 60:
4.2.13 Shore D Hardness. Durometer
- Page 61 and 62:
Figure 4-24. Barcol Hardness Readin
- Page 63 and 64:
increases and the heat of cure decr
- Page 65 and 66:
In summary, CCTV inspection of thre
- Page 67 and 68:
Figure 4-28. Thickness for Denver 4
- Page 69 and 70:
4.3.6.2 Downstream Sample. Seven sp
- Page 71 and 72:
Figure 4-34. Flexural Stress-Strain
- Page 73 and 74:
Table 4-18. Flexural Test Results f
- Page 75 and 76:
4.3.8.2 Upstream Sample. Specimens
- Page 77 and 78:
4.3.10 Barcol Hardness 4.3.10.1 Dow
- Page 79 and 80:
4.3.11.2 Downstream Sample. The Ram
- Page 81 and 82:
5.1 Introduction 5.0: CITY OF COLUM
- Page 83 and 84:
April 16, 2010 The specimen was rec
- Page 85 and 86:
The resulting gradation curves are
- Page 87 and 88:
Table 5-4. Soil pH at Designated Lo
- Page 89 and 90:
Figure 5-8. Average Thickness at Di
- Page 91 and 92:
5.2.12 Flexural Testing. Specimens
- Page 93 and 94:
Figure 5-14. Flexural Stress-Strain
- Page 95 and 96:
Figure 5-16. Tensile Stress-Strain
- Page 97 and 98:
5.2.15 Buckling Test. A mechanical
- Page 99 and 100:
Figure 5-24. Localized Leak on the
- Page 101 and 102: Figure 5-26. Barcol Hardness Readin
- Page 103 and 104: 5.3.3 Visual Inspection of Liner. I
- Page 105 and 106: Figure 5-32. Ultrasonic Testing for
- Page 107 and 108: Table 5-13. Geometric Data for Flex
- Page 109 and 110: Figure 5-38. Shore D Hardness of Co
- Page 111 and 112: 6.1 Introduction 6.0: REVIEW AND CO
- Page 113 and 114: Overall, the liners appear to be ho
- Page 115 and 116: age difference between the liners i
- Page 117 and 118: Looking for correlations to the low
- Page 119 and 120: A significantly lower range of Shor
- Page 121 and 122: 7.0: RECOMMENDED TEST PROTOCOL FOR
- Page 123 and 124: combining this broadly available in
- Page 125 and 126: Table 7-3. Overall Structure for a
- Page 127 and 128: Table 8-2. CIPP and Other Rehabilit
- Page 129 and 130: Table 8-5. Rehabilitation Specifica
- Page 131 and 132: 113 Table 8-9. Process Verification
- Page 133 and 134: Göttingen Stadtentwässerung: Göt
- Page 135 and 136: experience and quality, and do not
- Page 137 and 138: km of pipe and 50-year-old pipes ar
- Page 139 and 140: methods are detailed in the Guide t
- Page 141 and 142: The business of pipeline rehabilita
- Page 143 and 144: • Destructive testing (but will n
- Page 145 and 146: In Denver, in CCTV inspections of n
- Page 147 and 148: 9.2 Recommendations for Future Work
- Page 149 and 150: Falter, B. 1996. “Structural Anal
- Page 151: Lehmann, M.A, J.P. Schroeder and C.
- Page 155 and 156: The following table lists the non-A
- Page 157 and 158: B.1 Introduction This study was con
- Page 159 and 160: Mean thickness values for each cont
- Page 161 and 162: APPENDIX C INTERNATIONAL STUDY INTE
- Page 163 and 164: The original Insituform liner insta
- Page 165 and 166: However, the figures published by O
- Page 167 and 168: exfiltration and infiltration. Any
- Page 169 and 170: STW uses CIPP for virtually all of
- Page 171 and 172: method. Top hat repairs to junction
- Page 173 and 174: All design and construction supervi
- Page 175 and 176: Process verification test samples a
- Page 177 and 178: consultant born out of the corporat
- Page 179 and 180: BW continues to use CIPP, mainly in
- Page 181 and 182: East, but has not yet had marked su
- Page 183 and 184: D-1
- Page 185 and 186: D-3
- Page 187 and 188: D-5
- Page 189 and 190: D-7
- Page 191 and 192: D-9
- Page 193 and 194: D-11
- Page 195 and 196: D-13
- Page 197 and 198: D-15
- Page 199 and 200: D-17
- Page 201 and 202: D-19
- Page 203 and 204:
D-21
- Page 205 and 206:
D-23
- Page 207 and 208:
D-25
- Page 209 and 210:
D-27
- Page 211 and 212:
D-29
- Page 213 and 214:
D-31
- Page 215 and 216:
D-33
- Page 217 and 218:
D-35
- Page 219 and 220:
D-37
- Page 221 and 222:
D-39
- Page 223 and 224:
D-41
- Page 225 and 226:
D-43
- Page 227 and 228:
D-45
- Page 229 and 230:
D-47
- Page 231 and 232:
D-49