09.01.2013 Views

ecology of phasmids - KLUEDO - Universität Kaiserslautern

ecology of phasmids - KLUEDO - Universität Kaiserslautern

ecology of phasmids - KLUEDO - Universität Kaiserslautern

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Adult female feeding preference & nymph performance 65<br />

Survival and growth <strong>of</strong> nymphs as key demographic traits in insect herbivores were expected to<br />

decrease with increasing defensive leaf characters. Correlation analysis <strong>of</strong> performance with leaf<br />

toughness, specific leaf weight, water and total phenol content showed no relationship to nymph growth<br />

(Figure 4-10) and survival (Figure 4-11). Considering tannin contents <strong>of</strong> leaves their effects on nymph<br />

performance remained unclear. (Leaf tannin content could not be correlated to nymph performance due<br />

to rare presence <strong>of</strong> tannins.) If tannins influenced survival plant species containing tannins should have<br />

ranged on the upper end considering nymph mortality. In contrast to this prediction 47.5 % <strong>of</strong> nymphs<br />

survived on P. marginatum (1.58 % TAE) only exceeded by survival on two other tannin-free plant<br />

species (P. dilatatum, Phil. inaequilaterum; cf. Table 4-2 and Table 4-3). Similarly survival <strong>of</strong> nymphs<br />

feeding on tannin containing leaves <strong>of</strong> P. cordulatum and P. hispidum ranged on mid levels. While<br />

tannins seemed not to be related to nymph survival there is a clear pattern in terms <strong>of</strong> growth rates <strong>of</strong><br />

nymphs. Growth rates on all three Piper species containing tannins and fed to nymphs (P. cordulatum,<br />

P. hispidum, P. marginatum; cf. Figure 4-9 and Table 4-2) were only exceeded by nymph growth on<br />

P. peltatum (tannin-free).<br />

relative growth rate <strong>of</strong> nymphs<br />

0.20<br />

0.15<br />

0.10<br />

0.05<br />

0.00<br />

f<br />

g<br />

Dlong<br />

Mean<br />

±StDev.<br />

±1.96*StDev.<br />

c<br />

d<br />

e<br />

f<br />

Paequ<br />

a<br />

b<br />

Pcord<br />

b<br />

c<br />

Pcule<br />

e<br />

f<br />

Pdari<br />

c<br />

d<br />

e<br />

Pdil<br />

g<br />

Pgran<br />

b<br />

c<br />

d<br />

Philinae<br />

d<br />

e<br />

f<br />

g<br />

Philsp<br />

a<br />

b<br />

Phisp<br />

a a<br />

Figure 4-9: Relative growth rates <strong>of</strong> M. diocles nymphs on single food plant species (measurements after two<br />

weeks, one week later too many nymphs had died). Growth rates differed significantly depending on food source<br />

(ANOVA, F = 34.2, df = 12, P < 0.01). Identical letters indicate no significant difference (Tukeys HSD unequal N,<br />

P > 0.05).<br />

Pmarg<br />

Ppelt<br />

c<br />

d<br />

e<br />

f<br />

Preti

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!