ecology of phasmids - KLUEDO - Universität Kaiserslautern
ecology of phasmids - KLUEDO - Universität Kaiserslautern
ecology of phasmids - KLUEDO - Universität Kaiserslautern
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Adult female feeding preference & nymph performance 44<br />
4 Preference <strong>of</strong> female adults and performance <strong>of</strong> larval<br />
stages <strong>of</strong> M. diocles on single food plant species<br />
4.1 Introduction<br />
In tropical forests, herbivores consume up to 11 % <strong>of</strong> annual leaf production (Coley & Barone 1996).<br />
Yet, despite high availability <strong>of</strong> plant tissue most herbivorous insects in the tropics are rare (Basset<br />
1996, 1999; Basset et al. 1992, 1996; Barone 1998; Novotny et al. 2002b). In the initial debate about the<br />
factors that keep insect herbivores at low densities, Hairston et al. (1960) suggested that natural enemies<br />
were responsible for the state <strong>of</strong> affairs. Alternatively it was suggested that plants themselves keep<br />
herbivores rare because they are poor food (McNeill & Southwood 1978; Janzen 1988), and that<br />
evolution has favored selection <strong>of</strong> plant defenses and high plant biodiversity as response to herbivore<br />
pressure (Ehrlich & Raven 1964; Janzen 1970; Connell 1971; Rhoades & Cates 1976; Coley et al.<br />
1985). In the meantime there is consensus that both, bottom-up and top-down regulation mechanisms<br />
maintain tropical herbivores at low densities and attention has shifted towards their relative roles (Pace<br />
et al. 1999; Persson 1999; Polis 1999; Dyer & Coley 2001).<br />
There is no doubt that most plants are poor food for particular herbivores, either because they are<br />
nutritionally inadequate or because they are poisonous (Southwood 1973; Lawton & McNeill 1979;<br />
Strong et al. 1984; Janzen 1988; White 1993). Low suitability <strong>of</strong> a plant is not necessarily a<br />
consequence <strong>of</strong> herbivore selection, as for example high fiber and lignin contents are inevitable for plant<br />
architecture (Hartley & Jones 1995). Regardless whether the evolution <strong>of</strong> poor quality <strong>of</strong> plant tissue<br />
reflects herbivore pressure or functional traits, nutritional quality has been implicated as a major factor<br />
in the debate about the roles in population regulation <strong>of</strong> herbivorous insects (House 1967; Onuf et al.<br />
1977; Onuf 1978; McClure 1980). Limitations in the value <strong>of</strong> plant tissue as food reflect bottom-up<br />
forces that influence herbivore performance determining larval growth rates, survival, adult size, and<br />
fecundity (e.g., Häggstrom & Larsson 1995; Burghardt & Fiedler 1996; Barker & Maczka 1996;<br />
Awmack & Leather 2002).<br />
Plants are inadequate food because plant tissues contain low amounts <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and protein (McNeill<br />
& Southwood 1978; Mattson 1980), sometimes they have lower water contents than animals (Scriber &<br />
Slansky 1981), and they have tough leaves (Feeny 1976; Lowman & Box 1983; Nichols-Orians &<br />
Schultz 1989). Plants also contain toxins, repellents, growth-inhibitors and digestibility reducing<br />
compounds that can be present all the time, i.e. constitutive secondary metabolites (Rosenthal &<br />
Berenbaum 1992). In addition, secondary metabolites may be induced in response to herbivore attack<br />
including phenols (Niemelä et al. 1979; Rossiter et al. 1988; Haukioja 1990; Kogan & Fischer 1991;