09.01.2013 Views

ecology of phasmids - KLUEDO - Universität Kaiserslautern

ecology of phasmids - KLUEDO - Universität Kaiserslautern

ecology of phasmids - KLUEDO - Universität Kaiserslautern

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Community structure & host range 19<br />

Absolute abundance [ind.]<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Nymphs Adults<br />

May-00<br />

Jun-00<br />

Jul-00<br />

Aug-00<br />

Sep-00<br />

Oct-00<br />

Nov-00<br />

Dec-00<br />

Jan-01<br />

Feb-01<br />

Mar-01<br />

Apr-01<br />

May-01<br />

Jun-01<br />

Jul-01<br />

Figure 2-3: Temporal fluctuations <strong>of</strong> absolute phasmid abundances along forest edges on BCI for phasmid<br />

nymphs (black bars) and phasmid adults (white bars). Each bar represents the cumulative catch per month along<br />

three line-transects (N = 286). Please note that Oct. 2000 and Jul. 201 were excluded from GOF tests.<br />

2.3.3 Food niche<br />

Single phasmid species showed a highly aggregated distribution on particular host plant families<br />

resulting in narrow resource niches with values for Levin’s standardized niche breadth BA ranging from<br />

0 (Otocrania sp.) to 0.40 (Bacteria ploiaria) (Table 2-2). For example, the low niche breadth <strong>of</strong> 0.10 for<br />

I. dentipes (the second most abundant species in forest edge habitats; cf. Figure 2-1) resulted from 68<br />

specimens recorded on two plant families, and 91 % <strong>of</strong> these specimens were found on two individuals<br />

<strong>of</strong> Vismia baccifera (Clusiaceae). All three individuals <strong>of</strong> Otocrania sp. were found on Sapindaceae.<br />

Niche breadth was larger in the other three species because they were recorded on more plant families<br />

and individuals were less aggregated (major proportion <strong>of</strong> individuals per plant family: O. martini, 55 %<br />

on Clusiaceae, 18 % on Euphorbiaceae; B. ploiaria, 34 % on Rhamnaceae; M. diocles, 49 % on<br />

Piperaceae,and one third <strong>of</strong> these on P. marginatum, 25 % on Araceae).<br />

Generally, resource niches <strong>of</strong> phasmid species were separated as demonstrated by Pianka’s index <strong>of</strong><br />

niche overlap Ojk, usually ranging from 0 to 0.19. In contrast, niche overlap between O. martini and<br />

I. dentipes was high (Ojk = 0.91) because 55 % <strong>of</strong> the O. martini and 91 % <strong>of</strong> the I. dentipes individuals<br />

shared 2 individuals <strong>of</strong> Vismia baccifera as food resource (cf. Table 2-2).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!