09.01.2013 Views

ecology of phasmids - KLUEDO - Universität Kaiserslautern

ecology of phasmids - KLUEDO - Universität Kaiserslautern

ecology of phasmids - KLUEDO - Universität Kaiserslautern

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Community structure & host range 9<br />

2 Community structure and host range <strong>of</strong> <strong>phasmids</strong> on BCI<br />

2.1 Introduction<br />

Biodiversity <strong>of</strong> tropical forests is markedly higher than in their temperate counterparts (e.g., Mac Arthur<br />

1972; Erwin 1982) and herbivorous insects constitute a major fraction <strong>of</strong> species (Erwin 1982; Stork<br />

1993; Ødegard 2000; Novotny et al. 2002a). The origin <strong>of</strong> tropical species diversity is partly<br />

hypothesized to be based on the arms raise between plants and their consumers. Their impact on leaves<br />

is thought to represent an important selective force for the evolution <strong>of</strong> plant defenses (Ehrlich & Raven<br />

1964; Rhoades & Cates 1976; Coley et al. 1985). Also, herbivory on seeds and seedlings has been<br />

attributed to the high diversity <strong>of</strong> tropical plant communities (Janzen 1970; Connell 1971). In return the<br />

greater variety and higher regime <strong>of</strong> plant defenses in tropical forests are discussed to favor narrower<br />

diets <strong>of</strong> tropical insect herbivores thereby leading to a higher arthropod diversity than in temperate<br />

forests (Janzen 1973; Coley & Aide 1991).<br />

Aside from plant defenses, natural enemies can select for narrower diets since they have different<br />

abilities to locate a herbivore on variable plant species (Price et al. 1980, Bernays & Graham 1988).<br />

In contrast, the scarcity <strong>of</strong> most plant species in tropical forests (Hubbell & Foster 1986) may favor the<br />

generalist habit if locating them is difficult and costly for a specialist herbivore, both in terms <strong>of</strong> time<br />

and exposure to predators (Jaenike 1990; Basset 1992; Coley & Barone 1996).<br />

Indeed most tropical insect herbivores seem to be relatively specific. Even though the debate on the<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> host specificity remains controversial (e.g. Erwin & Scott 1980; Erwin 1982; Basset 1999;<br />

Basset et al. 1992, 1996; Barone 1998; Ødegard 2000; Novotny et al. 2002a, 2002b) there is evidence<br />

that 90 percent <strong>of</strong> all phytophagous insects feed on plants in less than three different plant families<br />

(Bernays & Graham 1988; Marquis & Braker 1994; Barone 1998).<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> insect herbivore species in tropical forests is rare (Basset 1996, 1999; Basset et al. 1992,<br />

1996; Barone 1998; Novotny et al. 2002b) and abundances vary temporally and spatially. In seasonal<br />

tropical forests, abundances <strong>of</strong> many insect species are positively correlated to rainfall (Wolda 1978,<br />

1979, 1982, 1992) and leaf production (Murali & Sukumar 1993). Concerning the maintenance <strong>of</strong> low<br />

overall population densities, the relative roles <strong>of</strong> lower or higher trophic levels are subject to ongoing<br />

debate but evidence suggests that top-down effects are more important (Coley & Barone 1996; Pace et<br />

al. 1999; Persson 1999; Polis 1999; Dyer & Coley 2001). On a spatial scale insect herbivore densities<br />

are generally assumed to be higher in light gaps than in the forest understory, but this has mainly been<br />

inferred from leaf damage (e.g., Coley, 1980, 1982, 1983; Coley & Barone 1996 and references therein).<br />

Empirical studies on spatial variation in tropical insect herbivore abundances are scarce (e.g., Elton

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!