ecology of phasmids - KLUEDO - Universität Kaiserslautern
ecology of phasmids - KLUEDO - Universität Kaiserslautern
ecology of phasmids - KLUEDO - Universität Kaiserslautern
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Community structure & host range 9<br />
2 Community structure and host range <strong>of</strong> <strong>phasmids</strong> on BCI<br />
2.1 Introduction<br />
Biodiversity <strong>of</strong> tropical forests is markedly higher than in their temperate counterparts (e.g., Mac Arthur<br />
1972; Erwin 1982) and herbivorous insects constitute a major fraction <strong>of</strong> species (Erwin 1982; Stork<br />
1993; Ødegard 2000; Novotny et al. 2002a). The origin <strong>of</strong> tropical species diversity is partly<br />
hypothesized to be based on the arms raise between plants and their consumers. Their impact on leaves<br />
is thought to represent an important selective force for the evolution <strong>of</strong> plant defenses (Ehrlich & Raven<br />
1964; Rhoades & Cates 1976; Coley et al. 1985). Also, herbivory on seeds and seedlings has been<br />
attributed to the high diversity <strong>of</strong> tropical plant communities (Janzen 1970; Connell 1971). In return the<br />
greater variety and higher regime <strong>of</strong> plant defenses in tropical forests are discussed to favor narrower<br />
diets <strong>of</strong> tropical insect herbivores thereby leading to a higher arthropod diversity than in temperate<br />
forests (Janzen 1973; Coley & Aide 1991).<br />
Aside from plant defenses, natural enemies can select for narrower diets since they have different<br />
abilities to locate a herbivore on variable plant species (Price et al. 1980, Bernays & Graham 1988).<br />
In contrast, the scarcity <strong>of</strong> most plant species in tropical forests (Hubbell & Foster 1986) may favor the<br />
generalist habit if locating them is difficult and costly for a specialist herbivore, both in terms <strong>of</strong> time<br />
and exposure to predators (Jaenike 1990; Basset 1992; Coley & Barone 1996).<br />
Indeed most tropical insect herbivores seem to be relatively specific. Even though the debate on the<br />
degree <strong>of</strong> host specificity remains controversial (e.g. Erwin & Scott 1980; Erwin 1982; Basset 1999;<br />
Basset et al. 1992, 1996; Barone 1998; Ødegard 2000; Novotny et al. 2002a, 2002b) there is evidence<br />
that 90 percent <strong>of</strong> all phytophagous insects feed on plants in less than three different plant families<br />
(Bernays & Graham 1988; Marquis & Braker 1994; Barone 1998).<br />
The majority <strong>of</strong> insect herbivore species in tropical forests is rare (Basset 1996, 1999; Basset et al. 1992,<br />
1996; Barone 1998; Novotny et al. 2002b) and abundances vary temporally and spatially. In seasonal<br />
tropical forests, abundances <strong>of</strong> many insect species are positively correlated to rainfall (Wolda 1978,<br />
1979, 1982, 1992) and leaf production (Murali & Sukumar 1993). Concerning the maintenance <strong>of</strong> low<br />
overall population densities, the relative roles <strong>of</strong> lower or higher trophic levels are subject to ongoing<br />
debate but evidence suggests that top-down effects are more important (Coley & Barone 1996; Pace et<br />
al. 1999; Persson 1999; Polis 1999; Dyer & Coley 2001). On a spatial scale insect herbivore densities<br />
are generally assumed to be higher in light gaps than in the forest understory, but this has mainly been<br />
inferred from leaf damage (e.g., Coley, 1980, 1982, 1983; Coley & Barone 1996 and references therein).<br />
Empirical studies on spatial variation in tropical insect herbivore abundances are scarce (e.g., Elton