09.01.2013 Views

ecology of phasmids - KLUEDO - Universität Kaiserslautern

ecology of phasmids - KLUEDO - Universität Kaiserslautern

ecology of phasmids - KLUEDO - Universität Kaiserslautern

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction 1<br />

1 Introduction<br />

1.1 General aspects<br />

Tropical rainforests are renowned for their vast biodiversity and high productivity. For understanding <strong>of</strong><br />

the factors that structure these communities and maintain ecosystem stability, the relationships among<br />

trophic levels are <strong>of</strong> particular interest. Increasing attention has been paid to plant-animal interactions,<br />

and herbivory is discussed as a key agent in maintaining forest dynamics and ecosystem stability<br />

(Lowman 1984; Brokaw 1985; Schowalter et al. 1985; Brown et al. 1987). In tropical forests,<br />

herbivores consume up to 11 percent <strong>of</strong> annual leaf production (Coley & Barone 1996). Such strong<br />

pressure is thought to select for the evolution <strong>of</strong> plant defenses and high plant biodiversity (Ehrlich &<br />

Raven 1964; Janzen 1970; Connell 1971; Rhoades & Cates 1976; Coley et al. 1985). In return, high<br />

variety and high regimes <strong>of</strong> plant defenses are thought to favor high diversity <strong>of</strong> herbivores in the<br />

tropics (Janzen 1973; Coley & Aide 1991). Alternatively, natural enemies may account for selection<br />

towards narrow niches <strong>of</strong> their prey and thereby promote high diversity <strong>of</strong> tropical faunas (Pianka 1966;<br />

Price et al. 1980; Bernays & Graham 1988). Whether populations at different trophic levels are limited<br />

by resources (bottom-up, sensu Murdoch 1966; White 1978; McNeill & Southwood 1978) or due to<br />

consumption by higher trophic levels (top-down, sensu Hairston et al. 1960) is subject to ongoing<br />

debate.<br />

Given the high biodiversity and productivity <strong>of</strong> tropical rainforests, it is most likely that processes that<br />

structure tropical communities may be fundamentally different than processes in temperate ecosystems.<br />

As a consequence, ecological paradigms developed in temperate systems may not be useful for<br />

understanding tropical systems (Dyer & Coley 2001). In fact, relationships among trophic levels seem to<br />

be converse depending on latitude. Tropical plants compared to temperate species seem to be richer in<br />

plant defenses both in variability and amounts (e.g., Coley & Kursar 1996). But the impact <strong>of</strong> plant<br />

defenses appears to be greater in temperate regions (Coley & Barone 1996). The opposite pattern<br />

emerged for predators. There is evidence that the impact <strong>of</strong> predators on herbivores is stronger in the<br />

tropics than in the temperate zone (reviewed in Dyer & Coley 2001). However, there is consensus that<br />

tropical herbivores are kept at bay by both bottom-up and top-down regulation mechanisms (Pace et al.<br />

1999; Persson 1999; Polis 1999). In other words: herbivores are between the devil (natural enemies) and<br />

the deep blue sea (poor food) (Lawton & McNeill 1979). In the debate about the relative roles <strong>of</strong><br />

resource limitation and predators in controlling tropical herbivore populations, evidence suggests that<br />

natural enemies may be the major control factor (Dyer & Coley 2001).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!