09.01.2013 Views

In 1926: living at the edge of time - Monoskop

In 1926: living at the edge of time - Monoskop

In 1926: living at the edge of time - Monoskop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

444 FRAMES<br />

Epistemological Losses and Ontological Compens<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

Heidegger's main concern in writing Sein und Zeit was, I believe, to<br />

preserve those functions which <strong>the</strong> classic subject-object distinction had<br />

fulfilled in Western philosophy-and to achieve this in full awareness <strong>of</strong><br />

an epistemological environment th<strong>at</strong> excluded <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> seriously<br />

opting for <strong>the</strong> subject-object paradigm. [see Uncertainty vs. Reality] The<br />

key element <strong>of</strong> this paradigm, an element th<strong>at</strong> we normally take for<br />

granted in our everyday behavior, is <strong>the</strong> conviction th<strong>at</strong> if a subject<br />

occupies an external, distanced, "eccentric" position, this will enhance<br />

<strong>the</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> subject's observ<strong>at</strong>ions and judgments concerning<br />

<strong>the</strong> world <strong>of</strong> objects. It used to be <strong>the</strong> function <strong>of</strong> this presupposition<br />

(and hence <strong>the</strong> function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> subject-object paradigm) to dignify certain<br />

observ<strong>at</strong>ions as "definitive," "substantive," or "objective" so th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>y<br />

could become unquestionable ground for decisions, actions, and <strong>at</strong>tributions<br />

<strong>of</strong> value.<br />

As one <strong>of</strong> several departures from <strong>the</strong> subject-object paradigm th<strong>at</strong><br />

have occurred in European philosophy since <strong>the</strong> l<strong>at</strong>e nineteenth century,<br />

Husserl's phenomenology began by problem<strong>at</strong>izing <strong>the</strong> "n<strong>at</strong>ural <strong>at</strong>titude<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mind" (n<strong>at</strong>urliche Geisteshaltung) inherent in <strong>the</strong> subject-object<br />

paradigm-by which Husserl meant <strong>the</strong> mutually eccentric position <strong>at</strong>tributed<br />

in <strong>the</strong> epistemological tradition to "outside objects" and to<br />

"human consciousness" as <strong>the</strong>y interrel<strong>at</strong>e.32 Having engaged, from<br />

1918 on, in an intense exchange <strong>of</strong> ideas with Husserl and having even<br />

taught introductory courses in phenomenological philosophy on a regular<br />

basis,33 Heidegger had played, both intellectually and institutionally,<br />

an active (though limited) role in <strong>the</strong> breaking away from <strong>the</strong> subjectobject<br />

paradigm. At least until <strong>the</strong> public<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Sein und Zeit, it was<br />

mainly this role which determined his identity as a philosopher in <strong>the</strong><br />

academic world.34 But <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> an eccentric-or transcendental-position<br />

guaranteeing <strong>the</strong> "objectivity" <strong>of</strong> any observ<strong>at</strong>ion was not limited<br />

to philosophy. The plot structures <strong>of</strong> successful novels such as Ag<strong>at</strong>ha<br />

Christie's Murder <strong>of</strong> Roger Ackroyd or Arthur Schnitzler's Traumnovelle<br />

(Dream Story), and <strong>of</strong> Alfred Hitchcock's film The Lodger, were all based<br />

on <strong>the</strong> impression th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>re no longer existed any outside position from<br />

which reality could be objectively observed, judged, and mastered. [see<br />

Uncertainty vs. Reality] This change triggered a series <strong>of</strong> conceptual and<br />

epistemological substitutions; fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, it intensified a collective de-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!