09.01.2013 Views

In 1926: living at the edge of time - Monoskop

In 1926: living at the edge of time - Monoskop

In 1926: living at the edge of time - Monoskop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IMMANENCE = TRANSCENDENCE (DEATH) 373<br />

scendence, De<strong>at</strong>h also marks <strong>the</strong> one moment in which it is impossible<br />

to distinguish <strong>the</strong> world from wh<strong>at</strong> may lie beyond it. Thus, De<strong>at</strong>h stands<br />

for a paradoxical simultaneity th<strong>at</strong> may exist between Immanence and<br />

Transcendence; and <strong>the</strong> less Immanence is separ<strong>at</strong>ed from Transcendence,<br />

<strong>the</strong> more people think and talk about De<strong>at</strong>h. This intrinsically<br />

paradoxical concept <strong>of</strong> De<strong>at</strong>h is frequently linked to a concept <strong>of</strong> life th<strong>at</strong><br />

itself represents <strong>the</strong> paradoxical unity <strong>of</strong> (and <strong>the</strong> impossibility <strong>of</strong> distinguishing<br />

between) Au<strong>the</strong>nticity and Artificiality. Being a potential paradox<br />

itself, <strong>the</strong> formula "De<strong>at</strong>h and Life" is thus a point <strong>of</strong> convergence<br />

for two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most popular and most burning concerns <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> moment.<br />

[ see Transcendence vs. Immanence, Au<strong>the</strong>nticity vs. Artificiality (Life)]<br />

Wh<strong>at</strong> remains difficult to explain is <strong>the</strong> particularly strong associ<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

between De<strong>at</strong>h and life. <strong>In</strong> La tent<strong>at</strong>ion de ['Occident (The Tempt<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> West), Andre Malraux <strong>at</strong>tempts to solve this problem: "<strong>In</strong> order<br />

to destroy God, and after destroying him, <strong>the</strong> European spirit wiped out<br />

everything th<strong>at</strong> could oppose itself to man. Having reached <strong>the</strong> culmin<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> its efforts, ... it finds nothing but de<strong>at</strong>h" (Malraux, 203). The<br />

absorption <strong>of</strong> Transcendence into Immanence would be a side effect <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> obsessive anthropocentrism th<strong>at</strong> characterizes Western modernity.<br />

The only thing left to provide a contrast by which human existence can<br />

be defined-and given form-is De<strong>at</strong>h. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> necessity <strong>of</strong> defining<br />

human existence seems only to grow in a world where <strong>the</strong>ir meanings<br />

are no longer guaranteed by a transcendentally grounded cosmology.<br />

Such a need to experience <strong>the</strong> limits, and through <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong> meaning, <strong>of</strong><br />

human existence could well be <strong>the</strong> motive for <strong>the</strong> numerous rituals and<br />

competitions th<strong>at</strong> enable people to w<strong>at</strong>ch o<strong>the</strong>rs confronting De<strong>at</strong>h-activities<br />

such as boxing, airplane flight, long-distance running, Channel<br />

swimming, bullfighting, and mountain climbing. [see Airplanes, Boxing,<br />

Bullfighting, Endurance, Mountaineering] Since efforts to scale <strong>the</strong><br />

world's highest peak have already claimed <strong>the</strong> lives <strong>of</strong> thirteen peoplewithout<br />

yielding definitive success-a rhetorical question by Sir Francis<br />

Younghusband, <strong>the</strong> first chairman <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mount Everest Committee <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Royal Geographical Society and Alpine Club, is assuming a seriousness<br />

th<strong>at</strong> he probably never intended: "Why not leave it <strong>at</strong> th<strong>at</strong>? With<br />

<strong>the</strong> knowl<strong>edge</strong> now obtained, <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> science are s<strong>at</strong>isfied. Should<br />

not fur<strong>the</strong>r efforts be abandoned?" (Younghusband, 309). By way <strong>of</strong> an<br />

answer, he suggests th<strong>at</strong> mountain climbing <strong>of</strong>fers <strong>the</strong> opportunity to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!