09.01.2013 Views

In 1926: living at the edge of time - Monoskop

In 1926: living at the edge of time - Monoskop

In 1926: living at the edge of time - Monoskop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

354 CODES COLLAPSED<br />

It must be <strong>the</strong> ubiquitous use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> word "Tragedy" th<strong>at</strong> encourages<br />

proto-philosophical efforts to redefine it. The larger discursive field in<br />

which <strong>the</strong>se definitions take place associ<strong>at</strong>es <strong>the</strong> goal-orientedness <strong>of</strong><br />

Action with <strong>the</strong> spiritual side <strong>of</strong> human life, whereas <strong>the</strong> m<strong>at</strong>eriality <strong>of</strong><br />

life (th<strong>at</strong> is, its biological basis) is supposed to explain <strong>the</strong> limit<strong>at</strong>ions and<br />

possible failures <strong>of</strong> Action. <strong>In</strong> his poetico-scientific tre<strong>at</strong>ise on termites,<br />

Maurice Maeterlinck transforms this conceptual configur<strong>at</strong>ion into a<br />

picture <strong>of</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> he calls <strong>the</strong> "tragic situ<strong>at</strong>ion" <strong>of</strong> human existence: "The<br />

situ<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> man is tragic. His principal and perhaps his only enemy (all<br />

religions realize this and here are in agreement, for <strong>the</strong>y have always<br />

dealt with it, under <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> "evil" or "sin") is m<strong>at</strong>ter. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

hand, in himself all is m<strong>at</strong>ter, beginning with <strong>the</strong> part <strong>of</strong> himself th<strong>at</strong><br />

disdains, condemns, and would like <strong>at</strong> all costs to evade m<strong>at</strong>ter"<br />

(Maeterlinck, 209-210). For thirteen years, <strong>the</strong> countless readers <strong>of</strong><br />

Miguel de Unamuno's philosophical bestseller Del sentimiento tragico de<br />

la vida (The Tragic Sense <strong>of</strong> Life) have been impressed with a similar<br />

contrast between spiritual and physical life. Referring to <strong>the</strong> recently<br />

published German transl<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Unamuno's book, Ernst Robert Curtius<br />

presents this very polarity as its decisive component: "Unamuno's most<br />

important philosophical work is his book about <strong>the</strong> tragic sense <strong>of</strong> life.<br />

But it is somewh<strong>at</strong> problem<strong>at</strong>ic to call <strong>the</strong> book philosophical. For by<br />

"philosophy" Unamuno means not working with concepts but, r<strong>at</strong>her,<br />

developing a world view out <strong>of</strong> a feeling <strong>of</strong> life. Life and reason are<br />

opposites for him. Wh<strong>at</strong>ever is vital is antir<strong>at</strong>ional; wh<strong>at</strong>ever is r<strong>at</strong>ional<br />

is antivital" (Curtius, 236). No o<strong>the</strong>r n<strong>at</strong>ion becomes as closely associ<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

as Spain with <strong>the</strong> tragic side <strong>of</strong> human life th<strong>at</strong> has to do with its<br />

biological basis [see Bullfighting, Au<strong>the</strong>nticity vs. Artificiality]-a fact<br />

th<strong>at</strong> may, <strong>at</strong> least among intellectuals, be partly due to Unamuno's intern<strong>at</strong>ional<br />

popularity. <strong>In</strong> Kasimir Edschmid's analysis <strong>of</strong> Spanish culture,<br />

this associ<strong>at</strong>ion is emblem<strong>at</strong>ized by cockfights because <strong>the</strong>y stage a ferocious<br />

ritual <strong>of</strong> killing which is free from any abstract idea: "These<br />

movements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> b<strong>at</strong>tle between animals whose only feeling is th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

annihil<strong>at</strong>ion make <strong>the</strong> most horrible impression which any b<strong>at</strong>tle under<br />

<strong>the</strong> shadow <strong>of</strong> de<strong>at</strong>h can make. These gestures remind us <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tragedy<br />

<strong>of</strong> Oedipus, who, blindfolded, turns toward <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gods. But <strong>the</strong><br />

tragedy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se birds is even more intense because it does not imply any<br />

ideas. It just shows how monstrous killing is in its most maddening<br />

form" (Edschmid, 12). [see Immanence = Transcendence (De<strong>at</strong>h)] Once

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!