09.01.2013 Views

In 1926: living at the edge of time - Monoskop

In 1926: living at the edge of time - Monoskop

In 1926: living at the edge of time - Monoskop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AUTHENTICITY VS. ARTIFICIALITY 265<br />

ual tendency toward reflexivity: "Let us say, <strong>the</strong>n, th<strong>at</strong> inside us <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

wh<strong>at</strong> we call peace. Don't you think so? And do you know wh<strong>at</strong> it comes<br />

from? From <strong>the</strong> simple fact th<strong>at</strong> we have just left <strong>the</strong> city-th<strong>at</strong> is, left a<br />

constructed world: houses, streets, churches, squares. Yet constructed<br />

not only in this sense, but also in <strong>the</strong> sense th<strong>at</strong> no one lives <strong>the</strong>re<br />

anymore just for <strong>the</strong> sake <strong>of</strong> <strong>living</strong>, like <strong>the</strong>se plants, without knowing<br />

wh<strong>at</strong> <strong>living</strong> is. <strong>In</strong> fact, <strong>the</strong>y live for something th<strong>at</strong> doesn't exist and th<strong>at</strong><br />

we ourselves put into life-for something th<strong>at</strong> gives meaning and value<br />

to life: a meaning, a value, th<strong>at</strong> here, <strong>at</strong> least in part, you manage to lose,<br />

or <strong>at</strong> least whose worrisome vanity you recognize" (Pirandello, 49). <strong>In</strong><br />

contrast, Artificiality-a sphere th<strong>at</strong> no longer counts on an underlying<br />

meaning-makes <strong>the</strong> distinction and <strong>the</strong> complementary rel<strong>at</strong>ion between<br />

surface and depth obsolete. Surface no longer equals <strong>the</strong> m<strong>at</strong>eriality<br />

<strong>of</strong> expression, and depth no longer equals <strong>the</strong> spirituality <strong>of</strong> meaning.<br />

Artificiality opens up <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> perceiving things-and even<br />

persons-as ei<strong>the</strong>r purely spiritual or purely m<strong>at</strong>erial. Thus, <strong>the</strong> hero <strong>of</strong><br />

Marcel Jouhandeau's Monsieur Codeau <strong>In</strong><strong>time</strong> divides his <strong>time</strong> between<br />

Veronique, a woman who is pure intellect and will, and Rose, who "had<br />

<strong>the</strong> freshness, <strong>the</strong> health, and <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> same <strong>time</strong> <strong>the</strong> fragility <strong>of</strong> a wild rose,<br />

<strong>of</strong> eglantine. She was only a delicious body, without a soul perhaps, a<br />

woman <strong>of</strong> Mohammed" (22). <strong>In</strong> <strong>the</strong> end, Veronique's formidable spirituality<br />

succeeds in domin<strong>at</strong>ing m<strong>at</strong>ter, and also Godeau. It is her existential<br />

triumph to assume care <strong>of</strong> Godeau who, stricken by a terrible<br />

disease, indeed decays into sheer-repulsive-m<strong>at</strong>ter: "Veronique saw<br />

M. Godeau crumble away little by little before her eyes, but she did not<br />

turn pale with disgust ... She herself was still dressed in an ivory antiseptic<br />

shield, her hair hidden under a turban. Clean and shining, a<br />

diamond st<strong>at</strong>ue, she touched <strong>the</strong> pus as if it were w<strong>at</strong>er ... Soon, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

was nothing left <strong>of</strong> M. Godeau but his torso, and <strong>the</strong> stumps <strong>of</strong> his legs<br />

and arms. A sort <strong>of</strong> head without eyes, nose, or lips topped this torso,<br />

broken by a wild, toothless mouth which, with its tongue barely <strong>at</strong>tached<br />

by a thread <strong>of</strong> blood, stammered <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> twilight, lying exposed on <strong>the</strong><br />

knees <strong>of</strong> Veronique" (424-425). Such views <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> human body as<br />

pure-and in this case stinking-m<strong>at</strong>ter inspire and legitimize popular<br />

initi<strong>at</strong>ives in favor <strong>of</strong> crem<strong>at</strong>ion. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, since bodies th<strong>at</strong><br />

are only m<strong>at</strong>ter no longer require interpret<strong>at</strong>ion or spiritual penetr<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y can be joined and experienced on a level <strong>of</strong> pure sensual perception.<br />

[see Dancing, Reporters, Revues] But such sensual perception is <strong>of</strong>ten

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!