Ng¯ati Tuwharetoa (Bay of Plenty) Claims Settlement Bill
Ng¯ati Tuwharetoa (Bay of Plenty) Claims Settlement Bill
Ng¯ati Tuwharetoa (Bay of Plenty) Claims Settlement Bill
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Preamble<br />
Ngāti <strong>Tuwharetoa</strong> (<strong>Bay</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plenty</strong>)<br />
<strong>Claims</strong> <strong>Settlement</strong><br />
Struck out (unanimous)<br />
Crown troops attacked Te Kupenga. On 20 October 1865 all<br />
those remaining at Te Kupenga surrendered to the Crown<br />
force.<br />
Confiscation under the New Zealand <strong>Settlement</strong>s Act 1863<br />
(13) By an Order in Council on 17 January 1866 the Crown confiscated<br />
approximately 448 000 acres <strong>of</strong> land in the eastern <strong>Bay</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Plenty</strong>, under the New Zealand <strong>Settlement</strong>s Act 1863. The<br />
description <strong>of</strong> the confiscation boundary was amended by a<br />
subsequent Crown proclamation <strong>of</strong> 1 September 1866. The<br />
confiscated area included approximately 87 000 acres <strong>of</strong> the<br />
traditional lands <strong>of</strong> Ngati <strong>Tuwharetoa</strong>.<br />
(14) According to the legislation 2 <strong>of</strong> the purposes <strong>of</strong> the<br />
New Zealand <strong>Settlement</strong>s Act 1863 were to provide permanent<br />
peace and security, and establish and maintain the<br />
Queen’s authority. The Act described the introduction <strong>of</strong> a<br />
sufficient number <strong>of</strong> settlers as ‘‘the best and most effectual<br />
means’’ <strong>of</strong> achieving those purposes.<br />
(15) The Act did not mention punishment, but was punitive in<br />
nature. It was used to effect the confiscation <strong>of</strong> Maori land<br />
whenever the Governor in Council was satisfied that ‘‘any<br />
Native Tribe or Section <strong>of</strong> a Tribe or any considerable number<br />
there<strong>of</strong>’’ had been engaged in ‘‘rebellion’’ against the authority<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Queen since 1 January 1863. The Governor could<br />
proclaim a District, for the purposes <strong>of</strong> the Act, where there<br />
was any land owned in that district by those deemed to have<br />
been in rebellion.<br />
(16) The Crown considered the <strong>Bay</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plenty</strong> tribes to have been<br />
in rebellion because <strong>of</strong> the ‘‘resistance’’ to the forces sent into<br />
the area to arrest those responsible for the deaths <strong>of</strong> Fulloon<br />
and others.<br />
The compensation process<br />
(17) The Compensation Court was established under the provisions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the New Zealand <strong>Settlement</strong>s Act 1863 to hear claims<br />
for the return <strong>of</strong> confiscated land. Prior to the sitting <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Compensation Court, Crown Agent John A Wilson was<br />
appointed as a special commissioner in February 1866 to deal<br />
with the allocation <strong>of</strong> confiscated land in the <strong>Bay</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plenty</strong>.<br />
16