09.01.2013 Views

Ng¯ati Tuwharetoa (Bay of Plenty) Claims Settlement Bill

Ng¯ati Tuwharetoa (Bay of Plenty) Claims Settlement Bill

Ng¯ati Tuwharetoa (Bay of Plenty) Claims Settlement Bill

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Preamble<br />

Ngāti <strong>Tuwharetoa</strong> (<strong>Bay</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plenty</strong>)<br />

<strong>Claims</strong> <strong>Settlement</strong><br />

Struck out (unanimous)<br />

Crown troops attacked Te Kupenga. On 20 October 1865 all<br />

those remaining at Te Kupenga surrendered to the Crown<br />

force.<br />

Confiscation under the New Zealand <strong>Settlement</strong>s Act 1863<br />

(13) By an Order in Council on 17 January 1866 the Crown confiscated<br />

approximately 448 000 acres <strong>of</strong> land in the eastern <strong>Bay</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Plenty</strong>, under the New Zealand <strong>Settlement</strong>s Act 1863. The<br />

description <strong>of</strong> the confiscation boundary was amended by a<br />

subsequent Crown proclamation <strong>of</strong> 1 September 1866. The<br />

confiscated area included approximately 87 000 acres <strong>of</strong> the<br />

traditional lands <strong>of</strong> Ngati <strong>Tuwharetoa</strong>.<br />

(14) According to the legislation 2 <strong>of</strong> the purposes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

New Zealand <strong>Settlement</strong>s Act 1863 were to provide permanent<br />

peace and security, and establish and maintain the<br />

Queen’s authority. The Act described the introduction <strong>of</strong> a<br />

sufficient number <strong>of</strong> settlers as ‘‘the best and most effectual<br />

means’’ <strong>of</strong> achieving those purposes.<br />

(15) The Act did not mention punishment, but was punitive in<br />

nature. It was used to effect the confiscation <strong>of</strong> Maori land<br />

whenever the Governor in Council was satisfied that ‘‘any<br />

Native Tribe or Section <strong>of</strong> a Tribe or any considerable number<br />

there<strong>of</strong>’’ had been engaged in ‘‘rebellion’’ against the authority<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Queen since 1 January 1863. The Governor could<br />

proclaim a District, for the purposes <strong>of</strong> the Act, where there<br />

was any land owned in that district by those deemed to have<br />

been in rebellion.<br />

(16) The Crown considered the <strong>Bay</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plenty</strong> tribes to have been<br />

in rebellion because <strong>of</strong> the ‘‘resistance’’ to the forces sent into<br />

the area to arrest those responsible for the deaths <strong>of</strong> Fulloon<br />

and others.<br />

The compensation process<br />

(17) The Compensation Court was established under the provisions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the New Zealand <strong>Settlement</strong>s Act 1863 to hear claims<br />

for the return <strong>of</strong> confiscated land. Prior to the sitting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Compensation Court, Crown Agent John A Wilson was<br />

appointed as a special commissioner in February 1866 to deal<br />

with the allocation <strong>of</strong> confiscated land in the <strong>Bay</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plenty</strong>.<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!