1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Commission Rule 3.<strong>03</strong> provides that a majority <strong>of</strong> the Commission<br />
I'<br />
shall be sufficient to determine those questions which may come before -<br />
:<br />
it. The Findings, Conclusions, Recommendations and Memoranda <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ai<br />
Commission which follow are concurred in by Commissioners Ahmann and<br />
Pillsbury.<br />
Commissioner Kaner dissents from the recommendation <strong>of</strong> the Commissi<br />
and has prepared separate Findings, Recommendations and a Xemorandum<br />
are filed herewith.<br />
Upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, the evidence<br />
received and the briefs submitted and upon due consideration <strong>of</strong> the fore-<br />
going, the Commission makes the following findings:<br />
1. The technology <strong>of</strong> video recording equipment has advanced to<br />
the<br />
extent that the only part <strong>of</strong> the equipment which must be in the courtroo:;L J<br />
is a camera. The camera i E no longer<br />
small, compact, relatively unobtrusive,<br />
_ -<br />
silent and does not, in most courtroom<br />
large - and ungainly<br />
can be stationary,<br />
settings, require<br />
but is now .I'<br />
I<br />
is completelv<br />
d<br />
enhanced lighti:- I<br />
I<br />
I<br />
In<br />
.<br />
courtrooms which have an unusually dark decor (: