1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The first group is a vocal minority <strong>of</strong> persons, particularly<br />
judges and attorneys, who were skeptical about the media’s<br />
ability Or inclination to Cover the courts fairly and<br />
accurately. These individuals point to the commercial aspect<br />
<strong>of</strong> the media andassert that sensationalism and a desire<br />
to "sell soap" dominates the coverage. In the recent camera<br />
coverage <strong>of</strong> oral arguments at the Supreme Court (an historic<br />
first) one Justice expressed disappointment that the Court<br />
had "bowed to the persistence <strong>of</strong> an entertainment medium.*' *<br />
The second group is a substantial number <strong>of</strong> individuals who<br />
applauded the introduction <strong>of</strong> electronic and photographic<br />
.<br />
media in the courtroom as contributing to public revelation<br />
on how the system works --its failings and its strengths.<br />
These persons viewed the media more as an essential component<br />
in the workings <strong>of</strong> democracy than as a commercial industry.<br />
The largest group <strong>of</strong> interviewees <strong>of</strong>fering an opinion on<br />
this issue had a totally different attitude. They recognized<br />
that the time constraints for a news story are such that<br />
only small portions <strong>of</strong> the courtroom proceeding can be used.<br />
Therefore, say these persons, little-opportunity exists<br />
either to educate or bias the public. Generally, these<br />
individuals felt that on balance the TV news reporters<br />
"did a good job" in covering the story accurately and fairly.<br />
What stands out to many <strong>of</strong> these persons (and to the evaluators<br />
is how little in-court material actually is used in the story.<br />
Much <strong>of</strong> the in-court footage that is used is."dubbed over" by<br />
a reporter's summary <strong>of</strong> events, relegating the camera coverage<br />
to visual background. Sound and visual images combined<br />
constitute a small portion <strong>of</strong> the story and the story is at<br />
best gnly a few minutes long. 37 R<br />
37 As documented in Section III, the overwhelming number <strong>of</strong> E?lC I<br />
applications are for news stories. Very few "gavel to gavel"<br />
broadcasts <strong>of</strong> trials occurred.<br />
1<br />
I<br />
-