08.01.2013 Views

1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch

1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch

1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

B. Implications <strong>of</strong> Research Findings for Rules Content<br />

. A primary objective <strong>of</strong> the Rules <strong>of</strong> Court 980.2 and 980.3<br />

is to set guidelines for the physical presence <strong>of</strong> electronic<br />

and photographic media such that obtrusiveness is minimized.<br />

By all indications <strong>of</strong> this research, this objective was<br />

accomplished quite satisfactorily. In virtually no instance<br />

did EMC cause a major disruption <strong>of</strong> the proceeding being<br />

covered. Except in the minds <strong>of</strong> the most sensitive and<br />

negatively predisposed individuals, EMC never created a<br />

"circus-like" atmosphere.<br />

Despite the fact that the rules were functional throughout<br />

the experimental year in controlling obtrusiveness, the<br />

year's experience does suggest certain refinements in this<br />

regard as well as other respects. The areas needing refinement<br />

are addressed below by a brief description <strong>of</strong> the problem<br />

.-<br />

or issue<br />

tion.<br />

accompained by alternative approaches to its resolu-<br />

The areas addressed in recommending possible rule changes are:<br />

l still camera shutter noise;<br />

0 juror anonymity:<br />

a notice procedures; and<br />

l equipment and operator criteria.<br />

Additionally, the recommendation is made to'leave the rules<br />

regarding consent requirements as presently configured.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!