08.01.2013 Views

1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch

1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch

1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Clearly, the number <strong>of</strong> "uneventful" EMC proceedings<br />

far outnumber those having some obvious or perceived<br />

problem. The frequency and nature <strong>of</strong> these problems<br />

have been identified in this evaluation as input to<br />

the forthcoming decision on; continuation <strong>of</strong> EMC. The<br />

evaluation uncovers the rate at which these problems<br />

occur and provides a basis for determining the proba-<br />

bility <strong>of</strong> more serious' problems occurring.<br />

3. Summary <strong>of</strong> Attitudinal Data<br />

.<br />

Attitudinal data, presented in Section V and summarized<br />

below, present a considerably more skeptical though<br />

mixed picture than event specific'data. However, shifts<br />

in attitude due to time and experience are almost always<br />

in a direction more favorable towards EMC.<br />

The following summary statements about the attitudes <strong>of</strong><br />

-* judges, attorneys, and jurors should be viewed in combin-<br />

ation with the comparative perspective <strong>of</strong>fered earlier<br />

by the event-specific data. When considered together,<br />

these data provide a more definitive answer to the eval-<br />

uation questions posed than provided by either data<br />

group viewed in isolation. .<br />

0 As <strong>of</strong> July, 1981 judges (61%), prosecutors (79%),<br />

and defenders (90%), all strongly disagree with .<br />

the removal <strong>of</strong> the party consent requirement as<br />

a condition for EMC <strong>of</strong> criminal proceedings.<br />

0 As <strong>of</strong> July, 1981 judges (69%)and prosecutors (70%)<br />

approve <strong>of</strong> EMC for appellate proceedings. Only<br />

30% <strong>of</strong> defenders approve <strong>of</strong> appellate EMC.<br />

l & <strong>of</strong> July 1981, 58% <strong>of</strong> judges, 43% <strong>of</strong> prosecutors,<br />

and 20% <strong>of</strong> defenders approve <strong>of</strong> EMC for civil<br />

proceedings.<br />

-2<strong>24</strong>0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!