1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5. The positioning <strong>of</strong> the cameras in this instance was<br />
excellent. It was out <strong>of</strong> the peripheral vision <strong>of</strong> the<br />
witness and not distracting. You were only aware <strong>of</strong> the<br />
camera when initially taking the stand. The only suggestion<br />
I have is that once the rule is invoked, there should be a<br />
remote room for the witnesses, not in the hall where the<br />
portable T.V. equipment is located.<br />
6. In regard to having media coverage <strong>of</strong> the trial, I<br />
personnally feel it is against my constitutional rights, due<br />
to the fact that the defendant, and possibly the entire<br />
nation, may view his accuser while the entire city <strong>of</strong> Las<br />
Vegas may not. Just the fact <strong>of</strong> having the equipment in the<br />
courtroom made me nervous, and I feel that the defense<br />
lawyer, knowing he was on T.V., and the fact that I was<br />
nervous could have gotten me confused in my statements and<br />
made me look bad on local television. This makes me think<br />
that I’m being tried and not the subject (the defendant that<br />
started this mess). The media coverage also takes away most<br />
<strong>of</strong> my concentration to answer the questions prop’erly and I<br />
feel anything that disrupts a testimony is not beneficial to<br />
either the plaintiff or the defendant or for the court<br />
system. Just for your information, I thought the other<br />
witnesses were not allowed to hear each other’s testimony,<br />
but with the media monitoring the courtroom, you could hear<br />
everything that was being said from outside <strong>of</strong> the<br />
courtroom. If I hadn’t said anything to the assistant<br />
district attorney, who moved us from the monitoring area,<br />
and if the defense lawyer had found out about this, he might<br />
have gotten his client <strong>of</strong>f on a technicality.<br />
7. The witness exclusion rule was more or less nulified by<br />
monitors in the hall.<br />
8. I have used the system in court for coroner’s inquest and it<br />
possibly .has limited, if any, effect upon either myself or<br />
the proceedings.<br />
9. I believe the news media should not photograph <strong>of</strong>ficers who<br />
testify.<br />
10. I was already nervous enough. The broadcasting,<br />
photographing, televising or newspaper coverage only added<br />
to my nervousness. I had to watch what I said during the<br />
trial for fear it might go public, I would rather none <strong>of</strong><br />
the media be present to protect myself as a witness.<br />
Page 20