08.01.2013 Views

1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch

1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch

1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5. The positioning <strong>of</strong> the cameras in this instance was<br />

excellent. It was out <strong>of</strong> the peripheral vision <strong>of</strong> the<br />

witness and not distracting. You were only aware <strong>of</strong> the<br />

camera when initially taking the stand. The only suggestion<br />

I have is that once the rule is invoked, there should be a<br />

remote room for the witnesses, not in the hall where the<br />

portable T.V. equipment is located.<br />

6. In regard to having media coverage <strong>of</strong> the trial, I<br />

personnally feel it is against my constitutional rights, due<br />

to the fact that the defendant, and possibly the entire<br />

nation, may view his accuser while the entire city <strong>of</strong> Las<br />

Vegas may not. Just the fact <strong>of</strong> having the equipment in the<br />

courtroom made me nervous, and I feel that the defense<br />

lawyer, knowing he was on T.V., and the fact that I was<br />

nervous could have gotten me confused in my statements and<br />

made me look bad on local television. This makes me think<br />

that I’m being tried and not the subject (the defendant that<br />

started this mess). The media coverage also takes away most<br />

<strong>of</strong> my concentration to answer the questions prop’erly and I<br />

feel anything that disrupts a testimony is not beneficial to<br />

either the plaintiff or the defendant or for the court<br />

system. Just for your information, I thought the other<br />

witnesses were not allowed to hear each other’s testimony,<br />

but with the media monitoring the courtroom, you could hear<br />

everything that was being said from outside <strong>of</strong> the<br />

courtroom. If I hadn’t said anything to the assistant<br />

district attorney, who moved us from the monitoring area,<br />

and if the defense lawyer had found out about this, he might<br />

have gotten his client <strong>of</strong>f on a technicality.<br />

7. The witness exclusion rule was more or less nulified by<br />

monitors in the hall.<br />

8. I have used the system in court for coroner’s inquest and it<br />

possibly .has limited, if any, effect upon either myself or<br />

the proceedings.<br />

9. I believe the news media should not photograph <strong>of</strong>ficers who<br />

testify.<br />

10. I was already nervous enough. The broadcasting,<br />

photographing, televising or newspaper coverage only added<br />

to my nervousness. I had to watch what I said during the<br />

trial for fear it might go public, I would rather none <strong>of</strong><br />

the media be present to protect myself as a witness.<br />

Page 20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!