08.01.2013 Views

1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch

1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch

1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

.l.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

7.<br />

8.<br />

9.<br />

10.<br />

11.<br />

Table 11<br />

<strong>Comments</strong> by Media Representatives<br />

photo coverage has been limited to three serious cases. One<br />

involved felony manslaughter and two involved murder. We do<br />

not photograph the witnesses but do photograph the<br />

attorneys, the judge and the defendant. Photographs are<br />

taken from an area <strong>of</strong> the courtroom which is always screened<br />

from the jury and then the jury is not aware photos have<br />

been taken. The most <strong>of</strong>ten heard comment is that no one is<br />

aware photos are being taken.<br />

It is good for the public to see workings <strong>of</strong> the court.<br />

From what I could tell, everything went very smooth. I<br />

think having a meeting with the media one day prior to the<br />

preliminary was an excellent idea. I want to add that it<br />

should be a requirement that the reporters covering the<br />

story should attend the above-mentioned meeting with the<br />

judge and that a specific area be designated for the media<br />

to work and that it be in an orderly fashion.<br />

With few exceptions, both judges and court personnel have<br />

been extremely understanding regarding television cameras in<br />

the courtroom. For the most part, the news media has<br />

handled their new responsibility well. I believe because <strong>of</strong><br />

the size <strong>of</strong> our population, the cooperation between the<br />

courts and the media and our experience over the past year,<br />

Nevada can have one <strong>of</strong> the best working arrangements between<br />

courts and the media in the nation.<br />

Believe it to be beneficial.<br />

I found the rule to work very well.<br />

Believe it has been <strong>of</strong> service to the public, letting it see<br />

the courts in action, especially controversial cases.<br />

Toward the latter part <strong>of</strong> the experimental period the courts<br />

were allowing two still photographers to operate in the<br />

courtrooms. (One for black and white and one for color) I<br />

would like to encourage this practice. I do not feel that<br />

two photographers cause any extra problems and the problems<br />

<strong>of</strong> pooling photographs are greatly simplified.<br />

Please make it possible to hook microphones into witness<br />

stands or total sound system. Our sound quality was not as<br />

good as it could be. Other than than, all was perfect.<br />

Newspaper representatives need to get their act together.<br />

I believe in most cases media is attempting to present<br />

coverage in as objective a fashion as possible.<br />

Page 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!