1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
.l.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
7.<br />
8.<br />
9.<br />
10.<br />
11.<br />
Table 11<br />
<strong>Comments</strong> by Media Representatives<br />
photo coverage has been limited to three serious cases. One<br />
involved felony manslaughter and two involved murder. We do<br />
not photograph the witnesses but do photograph the<br />
attorneys, the judge and the defendant. Photographs are<br />
taken from an area <strong>of</strong> the courtroom which is always screened<br />
from the jury and then the jury is not aware photos have<br />
been taken. The most <strong>of</strong>ten heard comment is that no one is<br />
aware photos are being taken.<br />
It is good for the public to see workings <strong>of</strong> the court.<br />
From what I could tell, everything went very smooth. I<br />
think having a meeting with the media one day prior to the<br />
preliminary was an excellent idea. I want to add that it<br />
should be a requirement that the reporters covering the<br />
story should attend the above-mentioned meeting with the<br />
judge and that a specific area be designated for the media<br />
to work and that it be in an orderly fashion.<br />
With few exceptions, both judges and court personnel have<br />
been extremely understanding regarding television cameras in<br />
the courtroom. For the most part, the news media has<br />
handled their new responsibility well. I believe because <strong>of</strong><br />
the size <strong>of</strong> our population, the cooperation between the<br />
courts and the media and our experience over the past year,<br />
Nevada can have one <strong>of</strong> the best working arrangements between<br />
courts and the media in the nation.<br />
Believe it to be beneficial.<br />
I found the rule to work very well.<br />
Believe it has been <strong>of</strong> service to the public, letting it see<br />
the courts in action, especially controversial cases.<br />
Toward the latter part <strong>of</strong> the experimental period the courts<br />
were allowing two still photographers to operate in the<br />
courtrooms. (One for black and white and one for color) I<br />
would like to encourage this practice. I do not feel that<br />
two photographers cause any extra problems and the problems<br />
<strong>of</strong> pooling photographs are greatly simplified.<br />
Please make it possible to hook microphones into witness<br />
stands or total sound system. Our sound quality was not as<br />
good as it could be. Other than than, all was perfect.<br />
Newspaper representatives need to get their act together.<br />
I believe in most cases media is attempting to present<br />
coverage in as objective a fashion as possible.<br />
Page 17