1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
During the trial, to<br />
yourself in the media?<br />
Not at all<br />
Slightly<br />
Moderately<br />
Very<br />
Extremely<br />
No Response<br />
Total<br />
B. Judge Only:<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> Case<br />
Table 12<br />
what extent did you want to see or hear<br />
Judges<br />
Witnesses<br />
47% 71%<br />
35% 16%<br />
12% 10%<br />
0 0<br />
0 0<br />
6% 3%<br />
100% 100%<br />
Questions and <strong>Comments</strong><br />
Table 1<br />
Judee<br />
Preliminary Hearing<br />
34%<br />
Criminal<br />
Non-jury<br />
Arraignment<br />
Criminal Murder<br />
21%<br />
Non-jury Criminal Murder Arson<br />
Hearing,<br />
on Writ<br />
Criminal Arguments<br />
<strong>of</strong> Habeas Corpus<br />
and Decision<br />
8%<br />
Motion<br />
Other<br />
for Discovery<br />
Motions<br />
16%<br />
5%<br />
Total 100%<br />
Table 2<br />
Was permission for coverage refused?<br />
-Judge<br />
No 100%<br />
Yes 0<br />
Total 100%<br />
Did any party or witness object?<br />
-.-<br />
Judge<br />
NO 56%<br />
Yes 44%<br />
Total 100%<br />
Table 3<br />
Page 7
Change language