08.01.2013 Views

1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch

1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch

1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Result D: The presence <strong>of</strong> the electronic media appeared to have<br />

minimal<br />

proceedings<br />

effects,<br />

on<br />

positive<br />

trial.<br />

or negative, on the quality <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Twenty-eight percent <strong>of</strong> the judges said the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

operators and equipment slightly increased the dignity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proceedings.. Fifty-six percent <strong>of</strong> the judges, 76 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

attorneys, 89 percent <strong>of</strong> the media and 77 percent <strong>of</strong> witnesses<br />

reported no effect (IV Results, Section A, Table 2). In<br />

addition,<br />

84 percent<br />

56 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> the media<br />

the judges,<br />

reported that<br />

76 percent<br />

operators<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

and<br />

attorneys<br />

equipment<br />

and<br />

did<br />

not at<br />

judges<br />

all disrupt proceedings.<br />

reported a slight disruption<br />

Twenty-eight<br />

in proceedings<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

and 85 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

Section<br />

media<br />

A, Table<br />

reported<br />

3).<br />

a moderate disruption (IV Results,<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> judges, 88 percent, reported that the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> the media did not make the attorneys better prepared<br />

(IV Results,<br />

88 percent,<br />

make them<br />

Table 1).<br />

Section B, Table 3). The majority <strong>of</strong> attorneys<br />

also report that the presence <strong>of</strong> the media did not<br />

prepare their cases better (IV Results, Section C,<br />

Result E: The presence <strong>of</strong> cameras and the media did not make the<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> judges, attorneys or witnesses nervous or<br />

self-conscious.<br />

83 percent<br />

Statistics<br />

<strong>of</strong> attorneys<br />

indicate that<br />

and 81 percent<br />

76 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> witnesses<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

did<br />

judges,<br />

not feel<br />

only slightly felt self-conscious (IV Results, Section A,<br />

iible 7).<br />

Result F: Judges reported a strong tendency <strong>of</strong> witnesses to<br />

become distracted by operators <strong>of</strong> equipment.<br />

Although 44 percent <strong>of</strong> judges reported that witnesses<br />

were not at all distracted by equipment and operators, 48 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> judges reported that witnesses were extremely distracted<br />

(IV Results, Section B, Table 9).<br />

Result G: Almost half <strong>of</strong> the judges reported that a party or<br />

witness objected to the media’s presence in the courtroom.<br />

Forty-four percent <strong>of</strong> the judges reported objections<br />

(IV Results, Section B, Table 3).<br />

Result H: Witnesses definitely did not want to see or hear<br />

themselves in the media.<br />

s-<br />

According to the data, 71 percent <strong>of</strong> witnesses did not<br />

want to see or hear themselves in the media (IV Results, Section<br />

A, Table 12).<br />

Page 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!