1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Result D: The presence <strong>of</strong> the electronic media appeared to have<br />
minimal<br />
proceedings<br />
effects,<br />
on<br />
positive<br />
trial.<br />
or negative, on the quality <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Twenty-eight percent <strong>of</strong> the judges said the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
operators and equipment slightly increased the dignity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
proceedings.. Fifty-six percent <strong>of</strong> the judges, 76 percent <strong>of</strong><br />
attorneys, 89 percent <strong>of</strong> the media and 77 percent <strong>of</strong> witnesses<br />
reported no effect (IV Results, Section A, Table 2). In<br />
addition,<br />
84 percent<br />
56 percent <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> the media<br />
the judges,<br />
reported that<br />
76 percent<br />
operators<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
and<br />
attorneys<br />
equipment<br />
and<br />
did<br />
not at<br />
judges<br />
all disrupt proceedings.<br />
reported a slight disruption<br />
Twenty-eight<br />
in proceedings<br />
percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
and 85 percent<br />
<strong>of</strong> the<br />
Section<br />
media<br />
A, Table<br />
reported<br />
3).<br />
a moderate disruption (IV Results,<br />
The majority <strong>of</strong> judges, 88 percent, reported that the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> the media did not make the attorneys better prepared<br />
(IV Results,<br />
88 percent,<br />
make them<br />
Table 1).<br />
Section B, Table 3). The majority <strong>of</strong> attorneys<br />
also report that the presence <strong>of</strong> the media did not<br />
prepare their cases better (IV Results, Section C,<br />
Result E: The presence <strong>of</strong> cameras and the media did not make the<br />
majority <strong>of</strong> judges, attorneys or witnesses nervous or<br />
self-conscious.<br />
83 percent<br />
Statistics<br />
<strong>of</strong> attorneys<br />
indicate that<br />
and 81 percent<br />
76 percent<br />
<strong>of</strong> witnesses<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
did<br />
judges,<br />
not feel<br />
only slightly felt self-conscious (IV Results, Section A,<br />
iible 7).<br />
Result F: Judges reported a strong tendency <strong>of</strong> witnesses to<br />
become distracted by operators <strong>of</strong> equipment.<br />
Although 44 percent <strong>of</strong> judges reported that witnesses<br />
were not at all distracted by equipment and operators, 48 percent<br />
<strong>of</strong> judges reported that witnesses were extremely distracted<br />
(IV Results, Section B, Table 9).<br />
Result G: Almost half <strong>of</strong> the judges reported that a party or<br />
witness objected to the media’s presence in the courtroom.<br />
Forty-four percent <strong>of</strong> the judges reported objections<br />
(IV Results, Section B, Table 3).<br />
Result H: Witnesses definitely did not want to see or hear<br />
themselves in the media.<br />
s-<br />
According to the data, 71 percent <strong>of</strong> witnesses did not<br />
want to see or hear themselves in the media (IV Results, Section<br />
A, Table 12).<br />
Page 2