1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
DICIAL PROCEED?NGS AUDIO-VISUAL COVERAGE<br />
AN ACT to amend the judiciary law, in relation to audio visual<br />
coverage <strong>of</strong> judicial proceedings.<br />
B 1. Legislative Findings.<br />
The legislature finds that an enhanced public<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> the judicial system is important in maintaining<br />
a high level <strong>of</strong> public confidence in the judiciary. Public<br />
awareness and understanding <strong>of</strong> judicial proceedings have <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
been limited to the role played as a juror, witness, or party in<br />
a small claims proceeding. The average law-abiding citizen is<br />
not afforded numerous opportunities to participate in civil and<br />
criminal court proceedings, or able to attend and observe<br />
firsthand the functioning <strong>of</strong> our legal system. The vast<br />
majority <strong>of</strong> citizens, therefore, rely on reports in the news<br />
media for information about the judicial system and accounts <strong>of</strong><br />
judicial proceedings.<br />
The legislature further finds that, because .<strong>of</strong><br />
inadequate technology, state policy in the past has been to<br />
prohibit representatives <strong>of</strong> the news media from providing<br />
audiovisual coverage <strong>of</strong> court proceedings. It was the<br />
experience <strong>of</strong> an earlier generation that bright lights, large<br />
cameras and other noisy equipment intruded upon the dignity and<br />
decorum <strong>of</strong> the courtroom and tended to create an atmosphere<br />
unsuited to calm deliberation and impartial decisionmaking.