1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
1989-03-24 Comments of Star Tribune.pdf - Minnesota Judicial Branch
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
inding 010 a verdict and 'he passage <strong>of</strong> the verdict sheet to the<br />
udge and then to the clerk and the reading <strong>of</strong> the verdict. AS<br />
OOn as this was done the film was rushed to the TV station and<br />
ut on the air. The television station had previously infozned<br />
ts listeners that the verdict was to be recorded by the TV<br />
amera and any program underway would be interrupted for the<br />
howing <strong>of</strong> the rendition <strong>of</strong> the verdict.<br />
After the jury had rendered its verdict the Court asked the<br />
urors if they were in anywise a ffected by *de camera or the fact<br />
hat they knew before their deliberation, that they were going<br />
o render their verdict on TV cppera and they all replied in the<br />
egative. Each juror was polled and stated that they had no<br />
eeling cne way or the other about the cameras and electronic<br />
quipment. The attorneys were asked if they felt any distraction<br />
r disruption or were anyway a,& erected by the presence <strong>of</strong> the cameo<br />
nd the electronic equipment and they all replied in 'de negative.<br />
he Judge had no feeling one way or the other about the presence<br />
If the cameras and the electronic equipment. Once the cows came<br />
lack into session, after its recess during the jury deliberation,<br />
be presence <strong>of</strong> +tie.cMlera-just-:slipped ~ne?s.mind~..'Therewas.~o<br />
y)re awareness <strong>of</strong> the TV camera -than there yas <strong>of</strong> TcCple:in the-'<br />
:ourtroom.<br />
This experiment indicated to the writer that many, many Of<br />
&e fears expressed in the gast about the presence <strong>of</strong> cameras and<br />
clectronie equipment in the courtroom were totally unfounded.<br />
rhis will be developed further ti the report.<br />
The only other success in obtain?ing camera aad electronic<br />
:overage took place in Rapides Parish in the Criminal trial <strong>of</strong><br />
State v. Jazzes Williams. There was present in the COUrtrOOm One<br />
rV camera, a news photoqraphex with a still camera, a news<br />
reporter with a small cassette tape recorder and tic=ophones<br />
from the radio station. The cameras and operators and newsmen<br />
were spotted in the courtroom at tie direction <strong>of</strong> the trial judge<br />
and acre they remained until the trial w2s over.<br />
.