Iv - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Iv - University of Salford Institutional Repository Iv - University of Salford Institutional Repository

usir.salford.ac.uk
from usir.salford.ac.uk More from this publisher
07.01.2013 Views

which is understood in terms of the non-verbal and paraverbal features it involves. Rather than the mode of talking, discourse is the act of talking. It materializes at the speech level As such, discourse is determined by an array of generic considerations. A genre is a specific.prO of language use which fulfils the pragmatic requirements of sociocultural interaction in a communicative event. However, a genre has its own discoursal possibilities, phrasal idiosyncracies and meaning limitations. Like genres ) registers are described as varieties of language associated with specific functions of language in specific contexts. The Zwickys ('Sublanguage' edited by R Kittredge and J Lehrberger, 1902, pp213-215) distinguish between dialects and registers. Dialects are varieties of language associated with "broadly defined biological, social and psychological states of speakers with such variables as age, sex, ethnic group, social class, regional origin, occupation, personality, beliefs, and attitudes." Registers, on the other hand, are language varieties associated with "specific contexts or situations and the specific functions of language in these contexts." In 'Investigating English Style' (1969, p16) Crystal and Davy attack the term 'register' on the basis of its being inconsistently and indiscriminately used. A fundamental notion in neo-Firthian stylistics, register is also criticized on the basis of its non- restrictive applicability to social situations. They claim that: "There are very great differences in the nature of situational variables involved in these uses of English, and ... it is inconsistent 60

and confusing to obscure these differences by grouping everything under the same heading." However, they do not specify the subtle differences in the nature of situational variables involved in registers. In an article by Stephen Ullman, included in 'Literary Style: A Symposium' edited by Semour Chatman, 1971, pp140-142, a more generalized definition of 'register' is introduced. Ullmann refers to register as "a variety of language distinguished according to use". Then he discusses the three fundamental criteria according to which registers are classified, namely, field, mode, and tenor of discourse. Echoing Halliday, Ullmann writes: "Field of discourse refers to 'the area of operation' of linguistic activity, and this criterion yields such registers as personal relations, politics, or the various techaical. languages. 'Mode' denotes the medium of linguistic activity, with spoken versus written language as the fundamental distinction. The 'tenor' of discourse is determined by relations between the participants." (ibid, p141) Fundamentally a co-switching process translation according to Nida, (1964, p30) involves "a thorough acquaintance with the manner in which meaning is expressed through language as a communicative code- first in terms of the parts which constitute such a code (semiotic component); secondly, the manner in which the code operates (philosophical component); and thirdly, how such a code as language is related to other codes (communicative component)." (brackets mine) 61

which is understood in terms <strong>of</strong> the non-verbal and paraverbal features<br />

it involves. Rather than the mode <strong>of</strong> talking, discourse is the act <strong>of</strong><br />

talking. It materializes at the speech level As such, discourse is<br />

determined by an array <strong>of</strong> generic considerations. A genre is a<br />

specific.prO <strong>of</strong> language use which fulfils the pragmatic requirements<br />

<strong>of</strong> sociocultural interaction in a communicative event. However, a<br />

genre has its own discoursal possibilities, phrasal idiosyncracies and<br />

meaning limitations.<br />

Like genres ) registers are described as varieties <strong>of</strong> language<br />

associated with specific functions <strong>of</strong> language in specific contexts.<br />

The Zwickys ('Sublanguage' edited by R Kittredge and J Lehrberger,<br />

1902, pp213-215) distinguish between dialects and registers. Dialects<br />

are varieties <strong>of</strong> language associated with "broadly defined biological,<br />

social and psychological states <strong>of</strong> speakers with such variables as age,<br />

sex, ethnic group, social class, regional origin, occupation,<br />

personality, beliefs, and attitudes." Registers, on the other hand,<br />

are language varieties associated with "specific contexts or situations<br />

and the specific functions <strong>of</strong> language in these contexts."<br />

In 'Investigating English Style' (1969, p16) Crystal and Davy<br />

attack the term 'register' on the basis <strong>of</strong> its being inconsistently and<br />

indiscriminately used. A fundamental notion in neo-Firthian<br />

stylistics, register is also criticized on the basis <strong>of</strong> its non-<br />

restrictive applicability to social situations. They claim that:<br />

"There are very great differences in the nature <strong>of</strong> situational<br />

variables involved in these uses <strong>of</strong> English, and ... it is inconsistent<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!