Iv - University of Salford Institutional Repository

STATEMENT OF QUALITY
As I have said earlier, 'equivalence' will be the main criterion
for judging the quality of translation. Equivalence will not be
confined to lexical equivalence, it will subsume structural, semantic,
and contextual equivalence. Such is the basic characteristic of
adequate translation.
The comparison of ST and TT along the lines suggested by the model
has shown some mismatches on the lexical and structural levels which
could prove detrimental to the meaning of the text. They are listed in
the following:
(a) Johnson-Davies's use of 'savage' (line 20) to replace Salih's
s mutamarris' (line 15) is a lexical mismatch. The adjective
'expert' would be a better replacement. On the other hand, 'buzz
and whirr' (line 21) match the sound symbolism (onomatopoeia) of
the Arabic onomatopoeic verbs 'yatinn' 'vazinn' Air ( 1 ine
16). The phrase "God curse all sand-flies" (line 23) does not
structurally or semantically correspond to the Arabic original.
(line 17) A better and more tellingly, equivalent phrase would be
'I wish all sand-flies were killed'.
(b) The translator's expression "not enamoured of walking" (line 31) is
both irksome and unfamiliar. Besides, it does not convey the
meaning of the original. (line 24) A more meaningful replacement
175