INDO-EUROPEAN COLLECTIONS Firth, Raymond ... - Kinship Studies

Pailler, Jean-Marie.
1990. Les Bacchanales: Une affaires de famille. In Parenté et Stratégies Familiales dans
l’Antiquité Romaine, edited by Jean Andreau and Hinnerk Bruhns. Pp. 77-83. Roma:
Ecole Française de Rome.
Pearce, T. E. V.
1974. The Role of the Wife as CUSTOS in Ancient Rome. Eranos 72: 16-33.
Peile, John.
1887. Strītauos (Fest). Trītauos. Classical Review 1 (7): 205.
Persson, P.
1909. Zur lateinischen Grammatik und Wortkunde. Indogermanische Forschungen
26 (2): 60-68. [P. 63: socer as exemplifying the rule u > e before r in unaccented open
syllables.]
Persson, P.
1915. Latina. I. Zur behandlung von u in unbetonter offener Silbe. Glotta 6: 87-92. [Pp.
87-88: on Lat socer ‘father-in-law’.] HAVE
Petr, V. J.
1899. Über den Wechsel der Laute d und l im Lateinischen. Beiträge zur Kunde der
Indogermansichen Sprachen 25: 127-158. [P. 137: on lēvir.] HAVE
Phillips, Jane E.
1978. Roman Mothers and the Lives of Their Adult Daughters. Helios 6 (1): 69-80.
Pisani, Vittore. HAVE
1948. Nepos “scialacquatore” e l’allungamento nel nom. sing. dei monosillabi.
Atti del Sodalizio Glottologico Milanese 1 (1): 30-32.
Pisani, Vittore. HAVE
1951. UXOR. Ricerche dui morphologia indeuropea. In Miscellanea Giovanni Galbiati.
Vol. 3. Pp. 1-38. Milano: U. Hoepli.
Pomata, G.
1994. Legami di sangue, legami di seme. Consanguineita e agnazione del diritto romano.
Quaderni Storici 86 (2).
Pomeroy, Sarah B.
1976. The Relationship of the Married Woman to Her Blood Relatives in Rome. Ancient
Society 7: 215-227.
Puigvert i Planagumà, Gemma. HAVE
1998. Rendimientos morfológicos del sufijo ie. *-yH 2: Un exemplo evidente de cohesion
interna del sistema morfológico latino. Faventia 20 (2): 79-92. [Pp. 91-92: on vocative
filie ‘son’ in the context of Latin morphology.]
Raditsa, L. F.
1980. Augustus’ Legislation Concerning Marriage, Procreation, Love Affаirs and
Adultery. Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt 2 (13): 278-339.
Raepsaet-Charlier, M. T.