07.01.2013 Views

academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library

academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library

academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Project Gutenberg eBook <strong>of</strong> ...<br />

17. I conjecture malleo (a hammer) for the corrupt malcho, and think that in the second ed. some<br />

comparison from building operations to illustrate the fixity <strong>of</strong> knowledge gained through the ?<br />

ata???e?? was added to a passage which would correspond in substance with 27 <strong>of</strong> the Lucullus.<br />

I note in Vitruvius, quoted by Forc. s.v. malleolus, a similar expression (naves malleolis<br />

confixae) and in Pliny Nat. Hist. XXXIV. 14 navis fixa malleo. Adfixa therefore in this passage<br />

must have agreed with some lost noun either in the neut. plur. or fem. sing.<br />

18. This and fragm. 19 evidently hang very closely together. As Krische notes, the Stoic e?a??e?<br />

a had evidently been translated earlier in the book by perspicuitas as in Luc. 17.<br />

19. See on Luc. 57.<br />

BOOK IV.<br />

Further information on all these passages will be found in my notes on the parallel passages <strong>of</strong><br />

the Lucullus.<br />

21. Viam evidently a mistake for the umbram <strong>of</strong> Luc. 70.<br />

23. The best MS. <strong>of</strong> Nonius points to flavum for ravum (Luc. 105). Most likely an alteration was<br />

made in the second edition, as Krische supposes, p. 64.<br />

28. Corpusculis: Luc. 121 has corporibus. Krische's opinion that this latter word was in the<br />

second edition changed into the former may be supported from I. 6, which he does not notice.<br />

The conj. is confirmed by Aug. Contr. Ac. III. 23.<br />

29. Magnis obscurata: in Luc. 122 it is crassis occultata, so that we have another alteration, see<br />

Krische, p. 64.<br />

30. Only slight differences appear in the MSS. <strong>of</strong> the Luc. 123, viz. contraria, for in c., ad<br />

vestigia for contra v.<br />

31. Luc. 137 has dixi for dictus. As Cic. does not <strong>of</strong>ten leave out est with the passive verb,<br />

Nonius has probably quoted wrongly. It will be noted that the fragments <strong>of</strong> Book III. correspond<br />

to the first half <strong>of</strong> the Luc., those <strong>of</strong> Book IV. to the second half. Cic. therefore divided the Luc.<br />

into two portions at or about 63.<br />

UNCERTAIN BOOKS.<br />

32. I have already said that this most likely belonged to the preliminary assault on the senses<br />

made by Cic. in the second book.<br />

33. In the Introd. p. 55 I have given my opinion that the substance <strong>of</strong> Catulus' speech which<br />

unfolded the doctrine <strong>of</strong> the probabile was incorporated with Cicero's speech in the second book<br />

<strong>of</strong> this edition. To that part this fragment must probably be referred.<br />

34. This important fragment clearly belongs to Book II., and is a jocular application <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Carneadean probabile, as may be seen from the words probabiliter posse confici.<br />

35. Krische assigns this to the end <strong>of</strong> Varro's speech in the third Book. With this opinion I find it<br />

quite impossible to agree. A passage in the Lucullus (60) proves to demonstration that in the first<br />

edition this allusion to the esoteric teaching <strong>of</strong> the Academy could only have occurred either in<br />

the speech <strong>of</strong> Catulus or in that <strong>of</strong> Cicero. As no reason whatever appears to account for its<br />

transference to Varro I prefer to regard it as belonging to Cic.'s exposition <strong>of</strong> the positive side <strong>of</strong><br />

Academic doctrine in the second book. Cic. repeatedly insists that the Academic school must not<br />

be supposed to have no truths to maintain, see Luc. 119, also 66 and N.D. I. 12. Also Aug.<br />

Contra. Ac. II. 29.<br />

36. It is difficult to see where this passage could have been included if not in that prooemium to<br />

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/14970/14970-h/14970-h.htm[1/5/2010 10:31:57 AM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!