academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library
academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library
academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The Project Gutenberg eBook <strong>of</strong> ...<br />
much feel the need <strong>of</strong> any speculative system; while the general decay among the educated<br />
classes <strong>of</strong> a belief in the supernatural, accompanied as it was by an increase <strong>of</strong> superstition<br />
among the masses, prepared the way for the acceptance <strong>of</strong> a purely mechanical explanation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
universe. But <strong>of</strong> this subject, interesting and important as it is in itself, and neglected though it<br />
has been, I can treat no farther.<br />
These Roman Epicureans are continually reproached by Cicero for their uncouth style <strong>of</strong><br />
writing [116] . He indeed confesses that he had not read them, but his estimate <strong>of</strong> them was<br />
probably correct. A curious question arises, which I cannot here discuss, as to the reasons Cicero<br />
had for omitting all mention <strong>of</strong> Lucretius when speaking <strong>of</strong> these Roman Epicureans. The most<br />
probable elucidation is, that he found it impossible to include the great poet in his sweeping<br />
condemnation, and being unwilling to allow that anything good could come from the school <strong>of</strong><br />
Epicurus, preferred to keep silence, which nothing compelled him to break, since Lucretius was<br />
an obscure man and only slowly won his way to favour with the public.<br />
In addition to his desire to undermine Epicureanism in Italy, Cicero had a patriotic wish to<br />
remove from the literature <strong>of</strong> his country the reproach that it was completely destitute where<br />
Greek was richest. He <strong>of</strong>ten tries by the most far-fetched arguments to show that philosophy had<br />
left its mark on the early Italian peoples [117] . To those who objected that philosophy was best left<br />
to the Greek language, he replies with indignation, accusing them <strong>of</strong> being untrue to their<br />
country [118] . It would be a glorious thing, he thinks, if Romans were no longer absolutely<br />
compelled to resort to Greeks [119] . He will not even concede that the Greek is a richer tongue<br />
than the Latin [120] . As for the alleged incapacity <strong>of</strong> the Roman intellect to deal with<br />
philosophical enquiries, he will not hear <strong>of</strong> it. It is only, he says, because the energy <strong>of</strong> the nation<br />
has been diverted into other channels that so little progress has been made. The history <strong>of</strong> Roman<br />
oratory is referred to in support <strong>of</strong> this opinion [121] . If only an impulse were given at Rome to<br />
the pursuit <strong>of</strong> philosophy, already on the wane in Greece, Cicero thought it would flourish and<br />
take the place <strong>of</strong> oratory, which he believed to be expiring amid the din <strong>of</strong> civil war [122] .<br />
There can be no doubt that Cicero was penetrated by the belief that he could thus do his country a<br />
real service. In his enforced political inaction, and amid the disorganisation <strong>of</strong> the law-courts, it<br />
was the one service he could render [123] . He is within his right when he claims praise for not<br />
abandoning himself to idleness or worse, as did so many <strong>of</strong> the most prominent men <strong>of</strong> the<br />
time [124] . For Cicero idleness was misery, and in those evil times he was spurred on to exertion<br />
by the deepest sorrow [125] . Philosophy took the place <strong>of</strong> forensic oratory, public harangues, and<br />
politics [126] . It is strange to find Cicero making such elaborate apologies as he does for devoting<br />
himself to philosophy, and a careless reader might set them down to egotism. But it must never<br />
be forgotten that at Rome such studies were merely the amusement <strong>of</strong> the wealthy; the total<br />
devotion <strong>of</strong> a life to them seemed well enough for Greeks, but for Romans unmanly, unpractical<br />
and unstatesmanlike [127] . There were plenty <strong>of</strong> Romans who were ready to condemn such<br />
pursuits altogether, and to regard any fresh importation from Greece much in the spirit with<br />
which things French were received by English patriots immediately after the great war. Others,<br />
like the Neoptolemus <strong>of</strong> Ennius, thought a little learning in philosophy was good, but a great deal<br />
was a dangerous thing [128] . Some few preferred that Cicero should write on other subjects [129] .<br />
To these he replies by urging the pressing necessity there was for works on philosophy in Latin.<br />
Still, amid much depreciation, sufficient interest and sympathy were roused by his first<br />
philosophical works to encourage Cicero to proceed. The elder generation, for whose approbation<br />
he most cared, praised the books, and many were incited both to read and to write<br />
philosophy [130] . Cicero now extended his design, which seems to have been at first indefinite, so<br />
as to bring within its scope every topic which Greek philosophers were accustomed to treat [131] .<br />
Individual questions in philosophy could not be thoroughly understood till the whole subject had<br />
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/14970/14970-h/14970-h.htm[1/5/2010 10:31:57 AM]<br />
[xxviii]<br />
[xxix]<br />
[xxx]