07.01.2013 Views

academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library

academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library

academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Project Gutenberg eBook <strong>of</strong> ...<br />

much feel the need <strong>of</strong> any speculative system; while the general decay among the educated<br />

classes <strong>of</strong> a belief in the supernatural, accompanied as it was by an increase <strong>of</strong> superstition<br />

among the masses, prepared the way for the acceptance <strong>of</strong> a purely mechanical explanation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

universe. But <strong>of</strong> this subject, interesting and important as it is in itself, and neglected though it<br />

has been, I can treat no farther.<br />

These Roman Epicureans are continually reproached by Cicero for their uncouth style <strong>of</strong><br />

writing [116] . He indeed confesses that he had not read them, but his estimate <strong>of</strong> them was<br />

probably correct. A curious question arises, which I cannot here discuss, as to the reasons Cicero<br />

had for omitting all mention <strong>of</strong> Lucretius when speaking <strong>of</strong> these Roman Epicureans. The most<br />

probable elucidation is, that he found it impossible to include the great poet in his sweeping<br />

condemnation, and being unwilling to allow that anything good could come from the school <strong>of</strong><br />

Epicurus, preferred to keep silence, which nothing compelled him to break, since Lucretius was<br />

an obscure man and only slowly won his way to favour with the public.<br />

In addition to his desire to undermine Epicureanism in Italy, Cicero had a patriotic wish to<br />

remove from the literature <strong>of</strong> his country the reproach that it was completely destitute where<br />

Greek was richest. He <strong>of</strong>ten tries by the most far-fetched arguments to show that philosophy had<br />

left its mark on the early Italian peoples [117] . To those who objected that philosophy was best left<br />

to the Greek language, he replies with indignation, accusing them <strong>of</strong> being untrue to their<br />

country [118] . It would be a glorious thing, he thinks, if Romans were no longer absolutely<br />

compelled to resort to Greeks [119] . He will not even concede that the Greek is a richer tongue<br />

than the Latin [120] . As for the alleged incapacity <strong>of</strong> the Roman intellect to deal with<br />

philosophical enquiries, he will not hear <strong>of</strong> it. It is only, he says, because the energy <strong>of</strong> the nation<br />

has been diverted into other channels that so little progress has been made. The history <strong>of</strong> Roman<br />

oratory is referred to in support <strong>of</strong> this opinion [121] . If only an impulse were given at Rome to<br />

the pursuit <strong>of</strong> philosophy, already on the wane in Greece, Cicero thought it would flourish and<br />

take the place <strong>of</strong> oratory, which he believed to be expiring amid the din <strong>of</strong> civil war [122] .<br />

There can be no doubt that Cicero was penetrated by the belief that he could thus do his country a<br />

real service. In his enforced political inaction, and amid the disorganisation <strong>of</strong> the law-courts, it<br />

was the one service he could render [123] . He is within his right when he claims praise for not<br />

abandoning himself to idleness or worse, as did so many <strong>of</strong> the most prominent men <strong>of</strong> the<br />

time [124] . For Cicero idleness was misery, and in those evil times he was spurred on to exertion<br />

by the deepest sorrow [125] . Philosophy took the place <strong>of</strong> forensic oratory, public harangues, and<br />

politics [126] . It is strange to find Cicero making such elaborate apologies as he does for devoting<br />

himself to philosophy, and a careless reader might set them down to egotism. But it must never<br />

be forgotten that at Rome such studies were merely the amusement <strong>of</strong> the wealthy; the total<br />

devotion <strong>of</strong> a life to them seemed well enough for Greeks, but for Romans unmanly, unpractical<br />

and unstatesmanlike [127] . There were plenty <strong>of</strong> Romans who were ready to condemn such<br />

pursuits altogether, and to regard any fresh importation from Greece much in the spirit with<br />

which things French were received by English patriots immediately after the great war. Others,<br />

like the Neoptolemus <strong>of</strong> Ennius, thought a little learning in philosophy was good, but a great deal<br />

was a dangerous thing [128] . Some few preferred that Cicero should write on other subjects [129] .<br />

To these he replies by urging the pressing necessity there was for works on philosophy in Latin.<br />

Still, amid much depreciation, sufficient interest and sympathy were roused by his first<br />

philosophical works to encourage Cicero to proceed. The elder generation, for whose approbation<br />

he most cared, praised the books, and many were incited both to read and to write<br />

philosophy [130] . Cicero now extended his design, which seems to have been at first indefinite, so<br />

as to bring within its scope every topic which Greek philosophers were accustomed to treat [131] .<br />

Individual questions in philosophy could not be thoroughly understood till the whole subject had<br />

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/14970/14970-h/14970-h.htm[1/5/2010 10:31:57 AM]<br />

[xxviii]<br />

[xxix]<br />

[xxx]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!