academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library
academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library
academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The Project Gutenberg eBook <strong>of</strong> ...<br />
in I. 2. Ipsa veritas: MSS. severitas, a frequent error; cf. In Verr. Act. I. 3, III. 162, De Leg. I. 4,<br />
also Madv. on D.F. IV. 55. Obversetur: Halm takes the conj. <strong>of</strong> Lamb., adversetur. The MSS.<br />
reading gives excellent sense; cf. T.D. II. 52 obversentur honestae species viro. Bait. follows<br />
Halm. Tu ... copulabis: this is the feigned expostulation <strong>of</strong> veritas (cf. 34 convicio veritatis), for<br />
which style see 125.<br />
§140. Voluptas cum honestate: this whole expression is in apposition to par, so that cum must<br />
not be taken closely with depugnet; cf. Hor. Sat. I. 7, 19 Rupili et Persi par pugnat uti non<br />
compositum melius (sc. par) cum Bitho Bacchius. Si sequare, ruunt: for constr. cf. I. 7.<br />
Communitas: for Stoic philanthropy see Zeller 297. Nulla potest nisi erit: Madv. D.F. III. 70 "in<br />
hac coniunctione—hoc fieri non potest nisi—fere semper coniunctivus subicitur praesentis—<br />
futuri et perfecti indicativus ponitur." Gratuita: "disinterested." Ne intellegi quidem: n. on I. 7, cf.<br />
also T.D. V. 73, 119. Gloriosum in vulgus: cf. D.F. II. 44 populus cum illis facit (i.e. Epicureis).<br />
Normam ... regulam: n. on Ac. Post. fragm. 8. Praescriptionem: I. 23, n.<br />
§141. Adquiescis: MSS. are confused here, Halm reads adsciscis, comparing 138. Add D.F. I. 23<br />
(sciscat et probet), III. 17 (adsciscendas esse), III. 70 (adscisci et probari) Bait. follows Halm.<br />
Ratum ... fixum: cf. 27 and n. on Ac. Post. fragm. 17. Falso: like incognito in 133. Nullo<br />
discrimine: for this see the explanation <strong>of</strong> nihil interesse in 40, n. Iudicia: ???t???a as usual.<br />
§§142—146. Summary. To pass to Dialectic, note how Protagoras, the Cyrenaics,<br />
Epicurus, and Plato disagree (142). Does Antiochus follow any <strong>of</strong> these? Why, he<br />
never even follows the vetus Academia, and never stirs a step from Chrysippus.<br />
Dialecticians themselves cannot agree about the very elements <strong>of</strong> their art (143).<br />
Why then, Lucullus, do you rouse the mob against me like a seditious tribune by<br />
telling them I do away with the arts altogether? When you have got the crowd<br />
together, I will point out to them that according to Zeno all <strong>of</strong> them are slaves, exiles,<br />
and lunatics, and that you yourself, not being sapiens, know nothing whatever (144).<br />
This last point Zeno used to illustrate by action Yet his whole school cannot point to<br />
any actual sapiens (145). Now as there is no knowledge there can be no art. How<br />
would Zeuxis and Polycletus like this conclusion? They would prefer mine, to which<br />
our ancestors bear testimony.<br />
§142. Venio iam: Dialectic had been already dealt with in 91—98 here it is merely considered<br />
with a view to the choice <strong>of</strong> the supposed sapiens, as was Ethical Science in 129—141 and<br />
Physics in 116—128. With the enumeration <strong>of</strong> conflicting schools here given compare the one<br />
Sextus gives in A.M. VII. 48 sq. Protagorae: R. and P. 132 sq. Qui putet: so MSS., Halm and<br />
Bait. putat after Lamb. Trans. "inasmuch as he thinks". Permotiones intimas: cf. 20 tactus<br />
interior, also 76. Epicuri: nn. on 19, 79, 80. Iudicium: ???t????? as usual. Rerum notitiis: p?????<br />
es?, Zeller 403 sq. Constituit: note the constr. with in, like ponere in. Cogitationis: cf. I. 30.<br />
Several MSS. have cognitionis, the two words are frequently confused. See Wesenberg Fm. to<br />
T.D. III. p. 17, who says, multo tamen saepius "cogitatio" pro "cognitio" substituitur quam<br />
contra, also M.D.F III. 21.<br />
§143. Ne maiorum quidem suorum: sc. aliquid probat. For maiorum cf. 80. Here Plato is almost<br />
excluded from the so-called vetus Academia, cf. I. 33. Libri: titles <strong>of</strong> some are preserved in Diog.<br />
Laert. IV. 11—14. Nihil politius: cf. 119, n. Pedem nusquam: for the ellipse cf. 58, 116, Pro<br />
Deiot. 42 and pedem latum in Plaut. Abutimur: this verb in the rhetorical writers means to use<br />
words in metaphorical or unnatural senses, see Quint. X. 1, 12. This is probably the meaning here;<br />
"do we use the name Academic in a non natural fashion?" Si dies est lucet: a better trans <strong>of</strong> e? f?<br />
? est??, ??µe?a est?? than was given in 96, where see n. Aliter Philoni: not Philo <strong>of</strong> Larissa, but<br />
a noted dialectician, pupil <strong>of</strong> Diodorus the Megarian, mentioned also in 75. The dispute between<br />
Diodorus and Philo is mentioned in Sext. A.M. VIII. 115—117 with the same purpose as here, see<br />
also Zeller 39. Antipater: the Stoic <strong>of</strong> Tarsus, who succeeded Diogenes Babylonius in the<br />
headship <strong>of</strong> the school. Archidemus: several times mentioned with Antipater in Diog., as VII. 68,<br />
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/14970/14970-h/14970-h.htm[1/5/2010 10:31:57 AM]