07.01.2013 Views

academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library

academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library

academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Project Gutenberg eBook <strong>of</strong> ...<br />

in I. 2. Ipsa veritas: MSS. severitas, a frequent error; cf. In Verr. Act. I. 3, III. 162, De Leg. I. 4,<br />

also Madv. on D.F. IV. 55. Obversetur: Halm takes the conj. <strong>of</strong> Lamb., adversetur. The MSS.<br />

reading gives excellent sense; cf. T.D. II. 52 obversentur honestae species viro. Bait. follows<br />

Halm. Tu ... copulabis: this is the feigned expostulation <strong>of</strong> veritas (cf. 34 convicio veritatis), for<br />

which style see 125.<br />

§140. Voluptas cum honestate: this whole expression is in apposition to par, so that cum must<br />

not be taken closely with depugnet; cf. Hor. Sat. I. 7, 19 Rupili et Persi par pugnat uti non<br />

compositum melius (sc. par) cum Bitho Bacchius. Si sequare, ruunt: for constr. cf. I. 7.<br />

Communitas: for Stoic philanthropy see Zeller 297. Nulla potest nisi erit: Madv. D.F. III. 70 "in<br />

hac coniunctione—hoc fieri non potest nisi—fere semper coniunctivus subicitur praesentis—<br />

futuri et perfecti indicativus ponitur." Gratuita: "disinterested." Ne intellegi quidem: n. on I. 7, cf.<br />

also T.D. V. 73, 119. Gloriosum in vulgus: cf. D.F. II. 44 populus cum illis facit (i.e. Epicureis).<br />

Normam ... regulam: n. on Ac. Post. fragm. 8. Praescriptionem: I. 23, n.<br />

§141. Adquiescis: MSS. are confused here, Halm reads adsciscis, comparing 138. Add D.F. I. 23<br />

(sciscat et probet), III. 17 (adsciscendas esse), III. 70 (adscisci et probari) Bait. follows Halm.<br />

Ratum ... fixum: cf. 27 and n. on Ac. Post. fragm. 17. Falso: like incognito in 133. Nullo<br />

discrimine: for this see the explanation <strong>of</strong> nihil interesse in 40, n. Iudicia: ???t???a as usual.<br />

§§142—146. Summary. To pass to Dialectic, note how Protagoras, the Cyrenaics,<br />

Epicurus, and Plato disagree (142). Does Antiochus follow any <strong>of</strong> these? Why, he<br />

never even follows the vetus Academia, and never stirs a step from Chrysippus.<br />

Dialecticians themselves cannot agree about the very elements <strong>of</strong> their art (143).<br />

Why then, Lucullus, do you rouse the mob against me like a seditious tribune by<br />

telling them I do away with the arts altogether? When you have got the crowd<br />

together, I will point out to them that according to Zeno all <strong>of</strong> them are slaves, exiles,<br />

and lunatics, and that you yourself, not being sapiens, know nothing whatever (144).<br />

This last point Zeno used to illustrate by action Yet his whole school cannot point to<br />

any actual sapiens (145). Now as there is no knowledge there can be no art. How<br />

would Zeuxis and Polycletus like this conclusion? They would prefer mine, to which<br />

our ancestors bear testimony.<br />

§142. Venio iam: Dialectic had been already dealt with in 91—98 here it is merely considered<br />

with a view to the choice <strong>of</strong> the supposed sapiens, as was Ethical Science in 129—141 and<br />

Physics in 116—128. With the enumeration <strong>of</strong> conflicting schools here given compare the one<br />

Sextus gives in A.M. VII. 48 sq. Protagorae: R. and P. 132 sq. Qui putet: so MSS., Halm and<br />

Bait. putat after Lamb. Trans. "inasmuch as he thinks". Permotiones intimas: cf. 20 tactus<br />

interior, also 76. Epicuri: nn. on 19, 79, 80. Iudicium: ???t????? as usual. Rerum notitiis: p?????<br />

es?, Zeller 403 sq. Constituit: note the constr. with in, like ponere in. Cogitationis: cf. I. 30.<br />

Several MSS. have cognitionis, the two words are frequently confused. See Wesenberg Fm. to<br />

T.D. III. p. 17, who says, multo tamen saepius "cogitatio" pro "cognitio" substituitur quam<br />

contra, also M.D.F III. 21.<br />

§143. Ne maiorum quidem suorum: sc. aliquid probat. For maiorum cf. 80. Here Plato is almost<br />

excluded from the so-called vetus Academia, cf. I. 33. Libri: titles <strong>of</strong> some are preserved in Diog.<br />

Laert. IV. 11—14. Nihil politius: cf. 119, n. Pedem nusquam: for the ellipse cf. 58, 116, Pro<br />

Deiot. 42 and pedem latum in Plaut. Abutimur: this verb in the rhetorical writers means to use<br />

words in metaphorical or unnatural senses, see Quint. X. 1, 12. This is probably the meaning here;<br />

"do we use the name Academic in a non natural fashion?" Si dies est lucet: a better trans <strong>of</strong> e? f?<br />

? est??, ??µe?a est?? than was given in 96, where see n. Aliter Philoni: not Philo <strong>of</strong> Larissa, but<br />

a noted dialectician, pupil <strong>of</strong> Diodorus the Megarian, mentioned also in 75. The dispute between<br />

Diodorus and Philo is mentioned in Sext. A.M. VIII. 115—117 with the same purpose as here, see<br />

also Zeller 39. Antipater: the Stoic <strong>of</strong> Tarsus, who succeeded Diogenes Babylonius in the<br />

headship <strong>of</strong> the school. Archidemus: several times mentioned with Antipater in Diog., as VII. 68,<br />

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/14970/14970-h/14970-h.htm[1/5/2010 10:31:57 AM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!