academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library
academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library
academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The Project Gutenberg eBook <strong>of</strong> ...<br />
Plin. Nat. Hist. XXXIV. 8. Duodeviginti: 82, I just note that octodecim is not used by Cic. Sol<br />
quantus sit: 91. Omnium rerum ... comprehendendi: not a case <strong>of</strong> a plural noun with a singular<br />
gerund like spe rerum potiendi, etc., but <strong>of</strong> two genitives depending in different ways on the<br />
same word (definitio). M. Em. 197 qu. Plat. Leg. 648 E t?? pa?t?? ??tta? f?ß??µe??? a????p??<br />
t?? p?µat??, Brut. 163 Scaevolae dicendi elegantia, De Or. III. 156. Other exx. in M.D.F. I. 14.<br />
For the turn <strong>of</strong> expression cf. T.D. IV. 62 omnium philosophorum una est ratio medendi, Lael. 78<br />
omnium horum vitiorum una cautio est, also 51 <strong>of</strong> this book.<br />
§§129—141. Summary. What contention is there among philosophers about the<br />
ethical standard! I pass by many abandoned systems like that <strong>of</strong> Herillus but consider<br />
the discrepancies between Xenophanes, Parmenides, Zeno <strong>of</strong> Elea, Euclides,<br />
Menedemus, Aristo, Pyrrho, Aristippus, Epicurus, Callipho, Hieronymus, Diodorus,<br />
Polemo, Antiochus, Carneades (129-131). If I desire to follow the Stoics, Antiochus<br />
will not allow me, while if I follow Polemo, the Stoics are irate (132). I must be<br />
careful not to assent to the unknown, which is a dogma common to both you,<br />
Lucullus, and myself (133). Zeno thinks virtue gives happiness. "Yes," says<br />
Antiochus, "but not the greatest possible." How am I to choose among such<br />
conflicting theories? (134) Nor can I accept those points in which Antiochus and<br />
Zeno agree. For instance, they regard emotion as harmful, which the ancients thought<br />
natural and useful (135). How absurd are the Stoic Paradoxes! (136) Albinus joking<br />
said to Carneades "You do not think me a praetor because I am not a sapiens."<br />
"That," said Carneades, "is Diogenes' view, not mine" (137). Chrysippus thinks only<br />
three ethical systems can with plausibility be defended (138). I gravitate then<br />
towards one <strong>of</strong> them, that <strong>of</strong> pleasure. Virtue calls me back, nor will she even allow<br />
me to join pleasure to herself (139). When I hear the several pleadings <strong>of</strong> pleasure<br />
and virtue, I cannot avoid being moved by both, and so I find it impossible to choose<br />
(141, 142).<br />
§129. Quod coeperam: in 128 at veniamus nunc ad boni maique notionem. Constituendi: n. on<br />
114. Bonorum summa: cf. D.F. V. 21 and Madv. Est igitur: so in De Div. II. 8, igitur comes<br />
fourth word in the clause; this is not uncommon in Cic., as in Lucretius. Omitto: MSS. et omitto,<br />
but cf. Madv. Em. 201 certe contra Ciceronis usum est 'et omitto' pro simplici 'omitto,' in initio<br />
huius modi orationis ubi universae sententiae exempla subiciuntur per figuram omissionis.<br />
Relicta: cf. 130 abiectos. Cic. generally classes Herillus (or Erillus as Madv. on D.F. II. 35 spells<br />
the name), Pyrrho and Aristo together as authors <strong>of</strong> exploded systems, cf. D.F. II. 43, De Off. I. 6,<br />
T.D. V. 85. Ut Herillum. MSS. have either Erillum or et illum, one would expect ut Herilli.<br />
Cognitione et scientia: double translation <strong>of</strong> ep?st?µ?. For the finis <strong>of</strong> Herillus see Madv. on<br />
D.F. II. 43. Megaricorum: Xenophanes. Cic considers the Eleatic and Megarian schools to be so<br />
closely related as to have, like the schools <strong>of</strong> Democritus and Epicurus, a continuous history. The<br />
Megarian system was indeed an ethical development <strong>of</strong> Eleatic doctrine. Zeller, Socrates 211.<br />
Unum et simile: for this see Zell. Socr. 222 sq, with footnotes, R. and P. 174 sq. Simile ought<br />
perhaps to be sui simile as in Tim. c. 7, already quoted on I. 30, see my note there and cf. I. 35.<br />
Menedemo: see Zeller Socr. 238, R. and P. 182. The Erctrian school was closely connected with<br />
the Megarian. Fuit: = natus est, as <strong>of</strong>ten. Herilli: so Madv. for ulli <strong>of</strong> MSS.<br />
§130. Aristonem: this is Aristo <strong>of</strong> Chios, not Aristo <strong>of</strong> Ceos, who was a Peripatetic; for the<br />
difference see R. and P. 332, and for the doctrines <strong>of</strong> Aristo the Chian ib. 358, Zeller 58 sq. In<br />
mediis: cf. I. 36, 37. Momenta = aestimationes, a??a? in 36, where momenti is used in a different<br />
way. Pyrrho autem: one would expect Pyrrhoni as Dav. conj., but in 124 there is just the same<br />
change from Pyrrhoni to Xenocrates. ?pa?e?a: Diog. IX. 108 affirms this as well as p?a??t?? to<br />
be a name for the sceptic te???, but the name scarcely occurs if at all in Sext. who generally uses<br />
ata?a??a, but occasionally µet???pa?e?a; cf. Zeller 496, R. and P. 338. ?pa?e?a was also a<br />
Stoic term. Diu multumque: n. on I. 4.<br />
§131. Nec tamen consentiens: cf. R. and P. 352 where the differences between the two schools<br />
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/14970/14970-h/14970-h.htm[1/5/2010 10:31:57 AM]