07.01.2013 Views

academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library

academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library

academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Project Gutenberg eBook <strong>of</strong> ...<br />

Plin. Nat. Hist. XXXIV. 8. Duodeviginti: 82, I just note that octodecim is not used by Cic. Sol<br />

quantus sit: 91. Omnium rerum ... comprehendendi: not a case <strong>of</strong> a plural noun with a singular<br />

gerund like spe rerum potiendi, etc., but <strong>of</strong> two genitives depending in different ways on the<br />

same word (definitio). M. Em. 197 qu. Plat. Leg. 648 E t?? pa?t?? ??tta? f?ß??µe??? a????p??<br />

t?? p?µat??, Brut. 163 Scaevolae dicendi elegantia, De Or. III. 156. Other exx. in M.D.F. I. 14.<br />

For the turn <strong>of</strong> expression cf. T.D. IV. 62 omnium philosophorum una est ratio medendi, Lael. 78<br />

omnium horum vitiorum una cautio est, also 51 <strong>of</strong> this book.<br />

§§129—141. Summary. What contention is there among philosophers about the<br />

ethical standard! I pass by many abandoned systems like that <strong>of</strong> Herillus but consider<br />

the discrepancies between Xenophanes, Parmenides, Zeno <strong>of</strong> Elea, Euclides,<br />

Menedemus, Aristo, Pyrrho, Aristippus, Epicurus, Callipho, Hieronymus, Diodorus,<br />

Polemo, Antiochus, Carneades (129-131). If I desire to follow the Stoics, Antiochus<br />

will not allow me, while if I follow Polemo, the Stoics are irate (132). I must be<br />

careful not to assent to the unknown, which is a dogma common to both you,<br />

Lucullus, and myself (133). Zeno thinks virtue gives happiness. "Yes," says<br />

Antiochus, "but not the greatest possible." How am I to choose among such<br />

conflicting theories? (134) Nor can I accept those points in which Antiochus and<br />

Zeno agree. For instance, they regard emotion as harmful, which the ancients thought<br />

natural and useful (135). How absurd are the Stoic Paradoxes! (136) Albinus joking<br />

said to Carneades "You do not think me a praetor because I am not a sapiens."<br />

"That," said Carneades, "is Diogenes' view, not mine" (137). Chrysippus thinks only<br />

three ethical systems can with plausibility be defended (138). I gravitate then<br />

towards one <strong>of</strong> them, that <strong>of</strong> pleasure. Virtue calls me back, nor will she even allow<br />

me to join pleasure to herself (139). When I hear the several pleadings <strong>of</strong> pleasure<br />

and virtue, I cannot avoid being moved by both, and so I find it impossible to choose<br />

(141, 142).<br />

§129. Quod coeperam: in 128 at veniamus nunc ad boni maique notionem. Constituendi: n. on<br />

114. Bonorum summa: cf. D.F. V. 21 and Madv. Est igitur: so in De Div. II. 8, igitur comes<br />

fourth word in the clause; this is not uncommon in Cic., as in Lucretius. Omitto: MSS. et omitto,<br />

but cf. Madv. Em. 201 certe contra Ciceronis usum est 'et omitto' pro simplici 'omitto,' in initio<br />

huius modi orationis ubi universae sententiae exempla subiciuntur per figuram omissionis.<br />

Relicta: cf. 130 abiectos. Cic. generally classes Herillus (or Erillus as Madv. on D.F. II. 35 spells<br />

the name), Pyrrho and Aristo together as authors <strong>of</strong> exploded systems, cf. D.F. II. 43, De Off. I. 6,<br />

T.D. V. 85. Ut Herillum. MSS. have either Erillum or et illum, one would expect ut Herilli.<br />

Cognitione et scientia: double translation <strong>of</strong> ep?st?µ?. For the finis <strong>of</strong> Herillus see Madv. on<br />

D.F. II. 43. Megaricorum: Xenophanes. Cic considers the Eleatic and Megarian schools to be so<br />

closely related as to have, like the schools <strong>of</strong> Democritus and Epicurus, a continuous history. The<br />

Megarian system was indeed an ethical development <strong>of</strong> Eleatic doctrine. Zeller, Socrates 211.<br />

Unum et simile: for this see Zell. Socr. 222 sq, with footnotes, R. and P. 174 sq. Simile ought<br />

perhaps to be sui simile as in Tim. c. 7, already quoted on I. 30, see my note there and cf. I. 35.<br />

Menedemo: see Zeller Socr. 238, R. and P. 182. The Erctrian school was closely connected with<br />

the Megarian. Fuit: = natus est, as <strong>of</strong>ten. Herilli: so Madv. for ulli <strong>of</strong> MSS.<br />

§130. Aristonem: this is Aristo <strong>of</strong> Chios, not Aristo <strong>of</strong> Ceos, who was a Peripatetic; for the<br />

difference see R. and P. 332, and for the doctrines <strong>of</strong> Aristo the Chian ib. 358, Zeller 58 sq. In<br />

mediis: cf. I. 36, 37. Momenta = aestimationes, a??a? in 36, where momenti is used in a different<br />

way. Pyrrho autem: one would expect Pyrrhoni as Dav. conj., but in 124 there is just the same<br />

change from Pyrrhoni to Xenocrates. ?pa?e?a: Diog. IX. 108 affirms this as well as p?a??t?? to<br />

be a name for the sceptic te???, but the name scarcely occurs if at all in Sext. who generally uses<br />

ata?a??a, but occasionally µet???pa?e?a; cf. Zeller 496, R. and P. 338. ?pa?e?a was also a<br />

Stoic term. Diu multumque: n. on I. 4.<br />

§131. Nec tamen consentiens: cf. R. and P. 352 where the differences between the two schools<br />

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/14970/14970-h/14970-h.htm[1/5/2010 10:31:57 AM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!