07.01.2013 Views

academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library

academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library

academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Project Gutenberg eBook <strong>of</strong> ...<br />

44, D.F. II. 18, T.D. III. 76. Numerus: so Bentl. for mens <strong>of</strong> MSS., cf. I. 39, T.D. I. 20, 41. An<br />

explanation <strong>of</strong> this Pythagorean doctrine <strong>of</strong> Xenocrates is given in R. and P. 244. Quod intellegi<br />

etc.: so in T.D. I. 41 quod subtiliter magis quam dilucide dicitur. Momenta n. on I. 45.<br />

§125. Verecundius: cf. 114 subadroganter. Vincam animum: a common phrase in Cic., cf.<br />

Philipp. XII. 21. Queru potissimum? quem?: In repeated questions <strong>of</strong> this kind Cic. usually puts<br />

the corresponding case <strong>of</strong> quisnam, not quis, in the second question, as in Verr. IV. 5. The<br />

mutation <strong>of</strong> Augustine Contra Ac. III. 33 makes it probable that quemnam was the original reading<br />

here. Zumpt on Verr. qu. Quint. IX. 2, 61, Plin. Epist. I. 20, who both mention this trick <strong>of</strong> style,<br />

and laud it for its likeness to impromptu. Nobilitatis: this is to be explained by referring to<br />

73—75 (imitari numquam nisi clarum, nisi nobilem), where Cic. protests against being compared<br />

to a demagogue, and claims to follow the aristocracy <strong>of</strong> philosophy. The attempts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

commentators to show that Democr. was literally an aristocrat have failed. Convicio: cf. 34.<br />

Completa et conferta: n. on I. 27. Quod movebitur ... cedat: this is the theory <strong>of</strong> motion disproved<br />

by Lucr. I. 370 sq., cf. also N.D. II. 83. Halm writes quo quid for quod (with Christ), and inserts<br />

corpus before cedat, Baiter following him. The text is sound. Trans. "whatever body is pushed,<br />

gives way." Tam sit mirabilis: n. on I. 25. Innumerabilis: 55. Supra infra: n. on 92. Ut nos nunc<br />

simus, etc.: n. on fragm. 13 <strong>of</strong> Ac. Post. Disputantis: 55. Animo videre: cf. 22. Imagines: e?d??a,<br />

which Catius translated (Ad Fam. XV. 16) by spectra, Zeller 432. Tu vero: etc. this is all part <strong>of</strong><br />

the personal convicium supposed to be directly addressed to Cic. by the Antiocheans, and<br />

beginning at Tune aut inane above. Commenticiis: a favourite word <strong>of</strong> Cic., cf. De Div. II. 113.<br />

§126. Quae tu: elliptic for ut comprobem quae tu comprobas cf. 125. Impudenter: 115. Atque<br />

haud scio: atque here = ?a?t??, "and yet," n. on 5 ac vereor. Invidiam: cf. 144. Cum his: i.e. aliis<br />

cum his. Summus deus: "the highest form <strong>of</strong> the deity" who was <strong>of</strong> course one in the Stoic<br />

system. Ether is the finest fire, and p?? te?????? is one <strong>of</strong> the definitions <strong>of</strong> the Stoic deity, cf. I.<br />

29, Zeller 161 sq. Solem: as <strong>of</strong> course being the chief seat <strong>of</strong> fire. Solis autem ... nego credere:<br />

Faber first gave ac monet for MSS. admonens, which Halm retains, Manut. then restored to its<br />

place permensi refertis, which MSS. have after nego. Hic, which MSS. have after decempeda,<br />

Madv. turns into hunc, while hoc, which stands immediately after nego, he ejects (Em. 187).<br />

Ergo after vos is <strong>of</strong> course analeptic. Halm departs somewhat from this arrangement. Leniter:<br />

Halm and Hermann leviter; the former reads inverecundior after Morgenstern, for what reason it<br />

is difficult to see.<br />

§127. Pabulum: similar language in D.F. II. 46. Consideratio contemplatioque: Cic. is fond <strong>of</strong><br />

this combination, as De Off. I. 153; cf. Wesenberg on T.D. V. 9, who qu. similar combinations<br />

from D.F. V. 11, 58. Elatiores: MSS. mostly have latiores. Halm with Lamb. reads altiores, in<br />

support <strong>of</strong> which reading Dav. qu. D.F. II. 51, Val. Flaccus Argon. II. 547, add Virg. Aen. VI. 49,<br />

Cic. Orat. 119. Exigua et minima: sµ???a ?a? e?a??sta. Madv. on D.F. V. 78 notes that except<br />

here Cic. always writes exigua et paene minima or something <strong>of</strong> the kind. Occultissimarum: n. on<br />

I. 15. Occurit ... completur: MSS. have occuret mostly, if that is retained complebitur must be<br />

read. Madv. Opusc. II. 282 takes occurit, explaining it as a perfect, and giving numerous exx. <strong>of</strong><br />

this sequence <strong>of</strong> tenses, cf. also Wesenb. on T.D. IV. 35.<br />

§128. Agi secum: cf. nobiscum ageret in 80. Simile veri: cf. 66. Notionem: = cognitionem, ep?st?<br />

µ??. At paulum: MSS. et Halm sed.; cf. at illud ante in 116. Si quae: Halm and many edd. have<br />

se, quae. But the se comes in very awkwardly, and is not needed before the infinitive. Madv.<br />

indeed (Em. 114), after producing many exx. <strong>of</strong> the reflexive pronoun omitted, says that he<br />

doubts about this passage because considero does not belong to the class <strong>of</strong> verbs with which<br />

this usage is found, but he produces many instances with puto, which surely stands on the same<br />

level. Non magis: so in 119 nec magis approbabit nunc lucere, etc. The sunlight was the stock<br />

example <strong>of</strong> a most completely cognisable phenomenon; hence the Academics showed their<br />

hostility to absolute knowledge by refusing t?? ?????? ??µ????e?? e??a? ?ata??pt?? (Galen<br />

De Opt. Gen. Dicendi 497 B qu. P. Valentia 304 ed. Or.). Cornix: for the Stoic belief in<br />

divination see Zeller 349—358. Signum illud: the xystus (9) was adorned with statues; edd. qu.<br />

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/14970/14970-h/14970-h.htm[1/5/2010 10:31:57 AM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!