07.01.2013 Views

academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library

academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library

academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Project Gutenberg eBook <strong>of</strong> ...<br />

§112. Campis ... exsultare ... oratio: expressions like this are common in Cic., e.g. D.F. I. 54, De<br />

Off. I. 61, Orat. 26; cf. also Aug. Cont. Ac. III. 5 ne in quaestionis campis tua eqitaret oratio.<br />

Cum Peripatetico: nothing that Cic. states here is at discord with what is known <strong>of</strong> the tenets <strong>of</strong><br />

the later Peripatetics; cf. esp. Sext. A.M. VII. 216—226. All that Cic. says is that he could accept<br />

the Peripatetic formula, putting upon it his own meaning <strong>of</strong> course. Doubtless a Peripatetic would<br />

have wondered how a sceptic could accept his formulae; but the spectacle <strong>of</strong> men <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

irreconcilable opinions clinging on to the same formulae is common enough to prevent us from<br />

being surprised at Cicero's acceptance. I have already suggested (n. on 18) that we have here a<br />

trace <strong>of</strong> Philo's teaching, as distinct from that <strong>of</strong> Carneades. I see absolutely no reason for the<br />

very severe remarks <strong>of</strong> Madvig on D.F. V. 76, a passage which very closely resembles ours.<br />

Dumeta: same use in N.D. I. 68, Aug. Cont. Ac. II. 6; the spinae <strong>of</strong> the Stoics are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

mentioned, e.g. D.F. IV. 6. E vero ... a falso: note the change <strong>of</strong> prep. Adhiberet: the MSS. are<br />

confused here, and go Halm reads adderet, and Bait. follows, while Kayser proposes adhaereret,<br />

which is indeed nearer the MSS.; cf. however I. 39 adhiberet. Accessionem: for this cf. 18 and<br />

77. Simpliciter: the opposite <strong>of</strong> subtiliter; cf. simpliciter—subtilitas in I. 6. Ne Carneade quidem:<br />

cf. 59, 67, 78, 148.<br />

§113. Sed qui his minor est: given by Halm as the em. <strong>of</strong> Io. Clericus for MSS. sed mihi minores.<br />

Guietus gave sed his minores, Durand sed minutior, while Halm suggests sed minutiores. I conj.<br />

nimio minares, which would be much nearer the MSS.; cf. Lucr. I. 734 inferiores partibus<br />

egregie multis multoque minores. Tale verum: visum omitted as in D.F. V. 76. Incognito: cf. 133.<br />

Amavi hominem: cf. Introd. p. 6. Ita iudico, politissimum; it is a mistake to suppose this sentence<br />

incomplete, like Halm, who wishes to add eum esse, or like Bait., who with Kayser prints esse<br />

after politissimum. Cf. 108 ita scribenti, exanclatum, and the examples given from Cic. by Madv.<br />

on D.F. II. 13. Horum neutrum: cf. 77 nemo. Utrumque verum: Cic. <strong>of</strong> course only accepts the<br />

propositions as Arcesilas did; see 77.<br />

§114. Illud ferre: cf. 136. Constituas: this verb is <strong>of</strong>ten used in connection with the ethical finis;<br />

cf. 129 and I. 19. Idemque etiam: Krebs and Allgayer (Antibarbarus, ed. 4) deny that the<br />

expression idem etiam is Latin. One good MS. here has atque etiam, which Dav. reads; cf.<br />

however Orat. 117. Artificium: = ars, as in 30. Nusquam labar: cf. 138 ne labar. Subadroganter:<br />

cf. 126.<br />

§115. Qui sibi cum oratoribus ... rexisse: so Cic. vary <strong>of</strong>ten speaks <strong>of</strong> the Peripatetics, as in D.F.<br />

IV. 5, V. 7. Sustinuero: cf. 70. Tam bonos: Cic. <strong>of</strong>ten speaks <strong>of</strong> them and <strong>of</strong> Epicurus in this<br />

patronising way; see e.g. T.D. II. 44, III. 50, D.F. I. 25, II. 81. For the Epicurean friendships cf.<br />

esp. D.F. I. 65. Diodoto: cf. Introd. p. 2. Nolumus: Halm and Bait., give nolimus; so fine a line<br />

divides the subjunctive from the indicative in clauses like these that the choice <strong>of</strong>ten depends on<br />

mere individual taste. De sapiente loquamur: n. on 66.<br />

§§116—128. Summary. Of the three parts <strong>of</strong> philosophy take Physics first. Would<br />

your sapiens swear to the truth <strong>of</strong> any geometrical result whatever? (116) Let us see<br />

which one <strong>of</strong> actual physical systems the sapiens we are seeking will select (117).<br />

He must choose one teacher from among the conflicting schools <strong>of</strong> Thales,<br />

Anaximander, Anaximenos, Anaxagoras, Xenophanes, Leucippus, Democritus,<br />

Empedocles, Heraclitus, Melissus, Plato and Pythagoras. The remaining teachers,<br />

great men though they be, he must reject (118). Whatever system he selects he must<br />

know absolutely; if the Stoic, he must believe as strongly in the Stoic theology as he<br />

does in the sunlight. If he holds this, Aristotle will pronounce him mad; you,<br />

however, Lucullus, must defend the Stoics and spurn Aristotle from you, while you<br />

will not allow me even to doubt (119). How much better to be free, as I am and not<br />

compelled to find an answer to all the riddles <strong>of</strong> the universe! (120) Nothing can<br />

exist, say you, apart from the deity. Strato, however, says he does not need the deity<br />

to construct the universe. His mode <strong>of</strong> construction again differs from that <strong>of</strong><br />

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/14970/14970-h/14970-h.htm[1/5/2010 10:31:57 AM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!